You Can Get This 15.6-Inch Lenovo Laptop at $280 Off, but Only for Today
Available in abyss blue, the laptop has an Intel 12th generation core i5 processor, which will do a decent job at multitasking. It also has Intel Iris Xe graphics, which make this computer a budget-friendly option for playing video games. Backing this up is 8GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, and an HD webcam with a microphone that's perfect for making video calls over Zoom or Skype.
Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money.
The ultrathin design (0.7 inches) and lightweight build (3.52 pounds) make this Lenovo model a great budget option for anyone who wants to get the basics done at home or on the road. Just remember, it's down by 46% right now -- but you'll need to act quickly as this deal expires tonight.
Fancy something with a bit more power? Here are the best laptops of 2025, including the new M3 MacBook Air, as well as laptops from the likes of HP, Microsoft and Dell. And for more discounted options, check out our roundup of laptop deals happening now.
This deal knocks $280 off an already well-priced laptop. It has plenty of power and good features, and it's an excellent choice for anyone in school or who travels for work a lot. It's literally only on sale for today though, so act fast if you're interested. Tech prices are expected to rise with upcoming tariffs, so it's a good idea to buy sooner rather than later if it's already a purchase you were planning and it falls within your allotted budget.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel
Intel (INTC) stock is popping following reports that the US government is considering taking a stake in the legacy chipmaker after Trump's meeting with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Slatestone Wealth chief market strategist and host of Yahoo Finance's Trader Talk, Kenny Polcari, and Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Allie Canal join Opening Bid to take a closer look at what the reported government partnership could mean for the US, Intel, and the evolving chip landscape. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. All right, let's fire up, uh, my stock of the day. The Trump administration is reportedly in talks with Intel to have the US government take a stake. Uh, Intel declined to comment specifically on this to me, but they did say this, uh, quote, Intel's deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. Uh, the questions here are many though. One, why would the administration even want to stake in an Intel that is scary behind chief rivals Nvidia and AMD? President Trump has interacted a lot with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and has got a taste as to what it means to be a leader in semiconductors. Two, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government at a time in which CEO Lipu Tang and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company. I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder. There's a lot of stake here, as Intel is and should be a beacon of US chip making, not the punching bag it has become. The company's financials have taken a major hit with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. A lot going on there. Still with me, my round table, Kenny, Paul Kerry, uh, Slate Stone Wealth chief market strategist, David Seif, Nomora chief economist, and Yahoo Finance reporter, senior reporter, Allie Canal. Kenny, I want to go over to you. Um, any interest in going long in Intel on news like this, uh, even in the, uh, keeping the back of your mind, or maybe just putting the front of your mind that this is a fundamentally, uh, just wrong company. I mean, nothing's going right for them. Uh, uh, agree. So Intel's not a name that I've ever owned, uh, and we don't own it here. But look, I it's certainly has a pop because of the news. But is the pop temporary? I'm not even sure. And I agree with you. Why would you want to get, why would the government want to now be partners with Intel? Why would Intel want to be partners with the government? And what does that say about future opportunities? Is the government now going to start this Trump going to start the stick his hand in other companies? Kenny, it's like the auto bailout. I mean, it reminds me of when they took a stake in GM, what, 15, 20 years ago. 100%. And so I'm a little bit I'm a little bit confused about that. But Intel's not a name that I ever owned at all. I think there's other places to put your money in the space. But so this news does nothing in terms of getting me excited about, oh, I got to jump on this Intel bandwagon. I do not. David, does the, does it benefit, um, the US economy to have a healthy Intel? Or at this point, the semiconductor industry led by Nvidia, AMD, and of course, Taiwan semiconductor, they have just passed this company by, and our economy can go chugging along relying on chips from these three companies. Yeah, I mean, you know, I don't have much to say about individual companies, but certainly, um, you know, the US has a multi-century track record of doing well by sort of not sticking its nose into things and allowing, allowing the private market to go where it may. Um, to the extent that Intel has been lagging behind, uh, it it may be the best thing for the economy to simply allow it to, uh, continue to either wither or sink or swim, so to speak, um, and allow the current leaders to continue to lead and only lose their lead if they actually get out competed. Uh, Allie, uh, we're just about almost two weeks away from that Nvidia earnings report. And it will look starkly different to what Intel put up a few weeks ago. And it's night and day. I mean, these are, these companies both might be making computer chips, but they couldn't be more different. Couldn't be more different. And Intel, I just feel like it's too late for the company to really catch up to AMD, to Nvidia. Of course, for the Trump administration, they're viewing this as an issue of national security, that they really want to make sure that Intel can survive through this volatile time. We did have the that CEO meeting with President Trump, and really we've seen that across the board of big tech, right? Apple CEO, Tim Cook, met with Trump recently. And then out of that meeting was a $100 billion investment in the US. So that is President Trump's goal. He wants to bring manufacturing production, all the things, including all the chip makers back onto the domestic soil. But they also have other types of agreements that they're rolling out that are very unique and really unprecedented. One of those being that revenue share agreement with Nvidia and AMD. They're letting them sell some of their chips to China for a kickback, for some of the revenue to the federal government. So there's just a lot of moving parts and moving pieces to this. It's still an unconfirmed report. Intel did say that they are looking forward to working with the government, but they didn't confirm whether or not this was actually happening. So it feels like the US is just going to continue to be involved in some of these companies, at least throughout the term of Trump's presidency. What ultimately comes from that and the legacy that leads and how it really changes what we view the the chip supply chain as at this current moment, that remains to be seen. Related Videos How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold Apple shares. Should you? Intel Soars as Trump Considers US Stake in Chipmaker 3 AI chip stocks that are best positioned right now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
17 minutes ago
- CNBC
Government Intel intervention is 'essential' for national security, tech analyst says
A government intervention in struggling chipmaker Intel is "essential" for the sake of national security, analyst Gil Luria said Friday, following a report that the Trump administration is weighing taking a stake in the company. "We're all capitalists," Luria, head of technology research at D.A. Davidson, said in an interview with CNBC's "Squawk Box." "We don't want government to intervene and own private enterprise, but this is national security." Bloomberg reported Thursday that the Trump administration is considering having the U.S. government take a stake in Intel. The news sent Intel shares higher, and the stock climbed again Friday. Intel previously declined to comment on the report. Luria said such a deal is needed to revive Intel and reduce the country's reliance on companies like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor to manufacture chips. President Donald Trump has called for more chips and high-end technology to be made in the U.S. How the White House could structure such an intervention is still in question. Bloomberg reported Friday that the administration has discussed using funds from the CHIPS Act. "Intel has had many opportunities over decades to get it right, and it hasn't. So we need to intervene," Luria said. "The government's going to come in and it's going to give Intel unfair advantages, and if it's going to do that, it wants a piece of the business." Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan met with Trump at the White House on Monday after the president called for his resignation based on allegations that he has ties to China. Luria pointed to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's comments that the rise of superintelligent AI could be "the next wave of nuclear proliferation," as evidence that direct intervention by the government is needed. "We can't rely on somebody else making shell casings for our nuclear arsenal," Luria said. "We have to get it right."
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel Soars as Trump Considers US Stake in Chipmaker
The Trump administration is in talks with Intel Corp. to have the US government take a stake in the beleaguered chipmaker, according to people familiar with the plan, in the latest sign of the White House's willingness to blur the lines between state and industry. A deal would help shore up Intel's planned factory hub in Ohio, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the deliberations are private. The company had once promised to turn that site into the world's largest chipmaking facility, though it's been repeatedly delayed. The size of the potential stake isn't clear. Ed Ludlow, co-Host of Bloomberg Tech joins Lizzy Burden and Stephen Carroll on Bloomberg radio to discuss Sign in to access your portfolio
