logo
When it comes to Social Security and Medicare, this is what the nation's top experts on aging worry about

When it comes to Social Security and Medicare, this is what the nation's top experts on aging worry about

Yahoo03-05-2025
At the most recent annual conference of the American Society on Aging, the topic on the minds of the nation's leading experts on aging was the future of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in the current political environment.
Their insights, which are vitally important to anyone in or near retirement, mostly ranged from dour to downright bleak.
'We are the most privileged': My husband and I are tired of paying for our friends. How do we get them to pay their way?
Stock market's rapid rebound from tariff-inspired rout stuns Wall Street. But there were signs this would happen.
Warren Buffett proves, once again, why he's the best
If you read April's jobs report, you won't be surprised by the No. 1 'best job' in America
My eldest son refused to share his father's $500K inheritance with his siblings. Should I cut him off?
'This is nothing like anyone's ever seen before,' said Amy Gotwals, chief of public policy and external affairs at USAging (formerly the National Association of Area Agencies on Aging). 'There's an incredible amount of disruption.'
The anxiety-filled On Aging conference came near the end of President Donald Trump's first 100 days back in the White House, a period that has featured dramatic changes, proposals and staffing cutbacks for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — programs that provide benefits primarily to older Americans. Many of those actions have been decided on and carried out by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.
'For the first time in a long time, Congress is looking to cut some of those mandatory programs,' said Gotwals.
Read: How bad have 10 weeks of stock-market volatility been for your retirement fund? Maybe not as bad as you think.
There was a sliver of good news about Social Security, which turns 90 in August: None of the experts I heard from believe benefits will be cut any time soon for current beneficiaries or people close to claiming Social Security. Nor did they think the president and Congress will raise the full retirement age from the current 67.
But they agreed that changes to Social Security will be needed at some point before 2033, when the program's trust fund is projected to be depleted.
Read: Opinion: A flat $1,660 monthly Social Security benefit for everyone? It's one proposed CBO remedy.
Although Trump has vowed to protect Social Security, the conference analysts were outraged by the efforts of DOGE to cut the Social Security workforce by roughly 12% and to close or merge offices.
About 40 field offices have lost at least 25% of their staff, and others have seen even larger workforce reductions, according to NPR.
'If this is protecting the program, what does it look like when they're not protecting a program?' asked National Council on Aging Chief Executive Ramsey Alwin.
These and likely future cutbacks to customer service, the experts said, will pose worsening problems for people who need assistance from the Social Security Administration or who are just looking to receive benefits they're due.
'Now some people have to drive five or six hours to go to a Social Security office, and you need an appointment,' said Ryann Hill, founder and CEO of Indigo Hill Strategies, a government affairs, public policy and lobbying firm.
'There has already been a longstanding customer-service crisis at Social Security, following decades of underfunding of its operating budget,' said Rebecca Vallas, CEO of the National Academy of Social Insurance, an organization made up of experts on social insurance.
Average call wait times at the Social Security Administration have more than doubled since August. That's happening as the number of calls has soared — from 6.5 million in November 2024 to 10.4 million in March.
Before Trump began his second term, the average Social Security wait time for callers was an hour. Now it's an hour and 39 minutes.
My check of the Social Security Administration's website on the morning of April 29 found there were 4,349 people on hold and 12,919 waiting for callbacks. Only 39% of callers are now able to reach a representative, down from 71% in May 2024.
Wait times are typically shorter in the morning, later in the week and later in the month, the site advises.
In mid-April, the Social Security Administration launched restrictions on what kind of help people can receive from the agency over the phone. The reason, officials say, is to crack down on fraud by people calling to apply for benefits.
There's now a new phone verification system, although the administration hasn't offered many details. 'There's a lot of confusion about the antifraud verification,' Vallas said.
And if the DOGE team winds up incorrectly putting your name into Social Security's 'death master file,' prepare for trouble.
Landing on that list could harm your ability to get credit, Vallas said, because the Social Security Administration sends the names on its deceased list to consumer credit-reporting agencies.
Another Trump administration change that's roiling advocates for older people is its rollback of President Joe Biden's clawback rules for people who received overpayments of their monthly Social Security benefits.
Biden capped the clawbacks at 10% of benefits per month. The Trump administration initially said it would withhold 100% of benefits until the amount is repaid, but it then backed off and switched to 50% withholding, effective April 25.
The experts at the OnAging conference were generally less concerned about big potential changes to Medicare than to Medicaid.
'Medicare is much more sacrosanct than Medicaid in many ways,' said David Lipschutz, co-director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy.
Lipschutz shared the comforting news that the Congressional Budget Office now says Medicare's Hospital Insurance Trust Fund won't be depleted until 2052 — 17 years later than it predicted a year ago.
When it comes to Medicare, the chief immediate worry among experts concerns the nation's State Health Insurance Assistance Program, known as SHIP.
SHIP provides free, nonpartisan assistance to state residents, explaining how Medicare works, the differences between traditional Medicare and private insurers' Medicare Advantage plans, Part D prescription-drug plans, Medigap policies, how to appeal Medicare denials and who qualifies for Medicare subsidy programs.
SHIP isn't an expensive government program, relatively speaking: It has an annual budget of $55 million. But it was part of the Administration on Community Living, a federal agency the Trump administration is eliminating.
Pieces of ACL are moving to three other agencies, but the administration hasn't yet said what the future holds for the SHIP program.
'We need people to help explain how Medicare works and to find the best programs for people,' said Gotwals. Unlike SHIP staffers, agents and brokers get paid by Medicare Advantage insurers and can sell plans that are in their own interest rather than the best interests of beneficiaries.
Gotwals said a leaked draft budget from DOGE calls for eliminating federal funds for SHIP. If that happens, SHIP would only continue through contributions from states and community-based organizations.
As of now, experts think SHIP will keep running through the upcoming Medicare enrollment period from Oct. 15 to Dec. 7, 2025. Beyond that, however, is anyone's guess.
The Medicare experts also said the Trump administration is very supportive of Medicare Advantage plans, which now have more members than traditional Medicare.
In early April, the administration announced a higher-than-expected payment increase of 5.03% to Medicare Advantage plans for 2026.
Trump, they noted, also halted Biden administration restrictions on the marketing of Medicare Advantage plans.
'We expect less emphasis on consumer protection in this administration,' Lipschutz said.
He also told On Aging attendees that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may be working on proposals to make Medicare Advantage the default enrollment choice. Currently, traditional Medicare is the default.
Medicaid, the federal-state health program for low-income Americans, which accounts for 12% of federal spending, is most likely to see quick and possibly devastating changes, the conference speakers said.
'We are in a critical moment now for the future of the Medicaid program,' said Lipschutz. 'This is crunch time.'
If Medicaid funding is reduced significantly — we're likely to know how much by Memorial Day — people in long-term care and their family members could face serious financial challenges. That's because Medicaid, unlike Medicare, covers some expenses for nursing homes, assisted-living care and home care.
Roughly half the money spent on long-term services and support is provided by Medicaid.
The budget resolution passed recently by Republicans in Congress instructs the House Energy and Commerce Committee to cut spending by $880 billion over 10 years, and Medicaid looks like a target to achieve that goal.
'The Congressional Budget Office says it's impossible for the Trump administration and Congress to reach its spending targets without deep cuts to Medicaid,' said Lipschutz. He believes home- and community-based long-term-care services paid for by Medicaid are especially at risk.
Read: $880 billion in Medicaid cuts would be 'devastating' for nursing homes and their residents
Rural health clinics could also close, because they receive significant funds from Medicaid. Congress might cut funding to states that expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act, too.
Dental care will also likely take a hit, since it is often cut when money is tight.
Reflecting the mood of the conference, American Society on Aging President and CEO Leanne Clark-Shirley told the audience: 'What felt safe and secure before now feels under threat. The landscape of public funding for aging services, research and health initiatives is changing by the day — sometimes by the hour.'
'In their last days, our parents changed their will': They left me $250,000, but gave my sister $1 million. What should I do?
The S&P 500 is headed for its longest winning streak in more than 20 years. That doesn't mean the worst is over for stocks.
'Retirement is within my grasp': I'm 57, my 401(k) is dropping and I'm feeling anxious about a recession. What can I do?
'She's kept him afloat': I'm 78 and leaving my daughter, 41, my life savings, but her partner is a mooch. How can I protect her?
'Money means nothing to my wealthy clients': My coworkers step on each other to get ahead. How do I create a nontoxic culture at work?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump stuns Wall Street, Washington with controversial BLS nominee
Trump stuns Wall Street, Washington with controversial BLS nominee

The Hill

time6 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump stuns Wall Street, Washington with controversial BLS nominee

President Trump's pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is breaking the mold of his predecessors and causing alarm among economists of all stripes Commissioners of the BLS are usually academics or career civil servants with decades of experience in statistics and economics. But EJ Antoni, who Trump nominated to lead the agency after firing former BLS chief Erika McEntarfer on the heels of a disappointing jobs report earlier this month, has more bona fides as a pundit and conservative advocate than he does as a statistician. The choice of Antoni to lead a statistical division whose data is scrutinized by businesses and governments all over the world is getting major backlash from the economics profession and sparking concerns about the politicization of bedrock-level economic data. 'E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner,' Harvard University economist Jason Furman, who worked for the Obama administration, wrote on social media. 'He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant experience.' Stan Veuger, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, echoed Furman's words. 'He's utterly unqualified and as partisan as it gets,' he told the Washington Post. Who is EJ Antoni? Antoni has been the chief economist of the Heritage Foundation's center on the federal budget for the past four months. The Heritage Foundation is a right-wing think tank that produced the wide-ranging Project 2025 policy agenda. Project 2025 took aim at the 'permanent political class' in Washington, and many of its budget-cutting recommendations have been carried out by the Trump administration. He held two research fellowships at Heritage prior to his current position and two other fellowships at the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, a conservative advocacy group led by billionaire Steve Forbes. Antoni submitted his doctoral dissertation in 2020, in which he defends positions associated with 'supply-side economics,' a conservative policy doctrine that became popular in the 1980s. Besides stints as an adjunct at a community college and as an instructor at his alma mater of Northern Illinois University, he's held no other academic posts. By comparison, McEntarfer worked for 20 years as an economist with the Census Bureau. Her predecessor William Beach was the chief economist for the Senate Budget Committee, and his predecessor Erica Groshen spent 20 years as an economist at the New York Federal Reserve and referees for about a dozen academic journals. Antoni is a frequent guest on a number of conservative media outlets. While BLS makes it a point to produce — rather than interpret — economic data, Antoni has been hitting talking points on recent BLS releases in media appearances, a stark contrast with the agency's typical cut-and-dry communications. Discussing the dismal July jobs report, he emphasized job growth among native-born Americans on former Trump adviser Steven Bannon's internet podcast. 'There was some good news in the report, too, that we should definitely highlight,' he said. 'All of the net job growth over the last 12 months has gone to native-born Americans.' The Heritage Foundation did not respond to a request for an interview with Antoni. Backlash from economists Economists aren't mincing their words about Antoni's credentials. One economist at the University of Wisconsin refuted one of Antoni's recent papers, showing it contained basic statistical mistakes and finding that it wasn't possible to replicate its results — an academic kiss of death. Alan Cole, an economist with the conservative Tax Foundation think tank, described the errors in the paper as 'stunning.' 'Stunning errors in a tweet are bad, but worse to do it in long form, where there's more time and effort involved,' he wrote on social media. Conservative economists have also been blasting the firing of McEntarfer after the July jobs report showed that a meager 106,000 jobs have been added to the economy since May. Trump accused the agency — without any evidence — of producing 'rigged' data, which many economists have said is poppycock. 'The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer … sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau,' William Beach, a Trump appointee who preceded McEntarfer as head of the BLS, wrote online. Warnings to senators Antoni is expected to be easily confirmed by the GOP-controlled Senate after he appears before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, which will also need to approve his nomination. Antoni's critics are waging a long-shot effort to turn GOP members of the committee against the nominee ahead of his likely confirmation. Friends of the BLS, a group that advocates for the agency and that's chaired by Beach and his predecessor Erica Groshen, called out Antoni in a statement Wednesday, describing the debate about his nomination as 'contentious.' 'BLS now … faces the additional challenge of a contentious debate over the nominee for the next Commissioner, Dr. EJ Antoni,' they said. Groshen told The Hill they hope the nomination process will be 'very thorough.' 'The responsibility of the Senate HELP committee … is particularly important at this time,' she added. The Hill reached out to all Republican members of the committee about Antoni's qualifications, most of whom didn't respond. A representative for Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she wouldn't be commenting on the nomination prior to the hearing. What would politicized labor data look like? Antoni has already floated some massive changes to BLS data releases, including canceling regular monthly reports in favor of quarterly releases — a change that would alter the entire cadence of economic data output and affect nearly every private and public sector model of the U.S. economy. He told Fox News before his nomination that 'the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly jobs reports, but keep publishing more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' since BLS data is often subject to revision. Former BLS chiefs told The Hill they're keeping an eye on a regulatory standard known as OMB Directive No. 3, which governs the rules of BLS releases, for any sign that agency data could become politicized. 'Violations of that would be very unusual, and therefore indicative of something unusual underneath it,' Groshen said. Antoni has delivered some conflicting remarks on BLS data revisions, attributing them to 'incompetent' leadership under McEntarfer during his appearance on Bannon's podcast and then noting later that the problems pre-dated her time as agency commissioner. 'I think that's part of the reason why we continue to have all of these different data problems,' he said before adding that 'this is not a problem unique to the Trump administration.' Real problems with BLS data In fact, the downward revisions in the July jobs report that prompted Trump's firing of McEntarfer were due to the late reporting of educational employment figures by state and local governments, along with the more pronounced seasonal effects in that sector since teachers don't work in the summer. That's fairly typical for the agency, current and former employees of the BLS told The Hill. Political narratives aside, the BLS has seen a substantial drop in survey response rates in the aftermath of the pandemic, a decline that has made the data less reliable, but that has affected statistical agencies in a number of countries beyond the U.S. 'This is not a failure of the BLS … This is a phenomenon that is worldwide,' Erica Groshen told The Hill. 'This is a slow-moving train wreck,' she added, exhorting CEOs across the economy to make a priority of the surveys. 'There is no silver bullet. Believe me – people have been looking for it for a long time.' Economists have been lamenting the survey response rates for years. 'Like Orwellian newspeak, [the U.S. employment report] can often mean the reverse of what it says it means. The household and establishment surveys portray contrasting pictures of employment (and both have shocking response rates),' UBS economist Paul Donovan wrote earlier this month, having noted declines since 2023.

Social Security Just Received Its First Data Point to Determine the 2026 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA). Here's Where Things Stand Now.
Social Security Just Received Its First Data Point to Determine the 2026 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA). Here's Where Things Stand Now.

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Social Security Just Received Its First Data Point to Determine the 2026 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA). Here's Where Things Stand Now.

Key Points The annual Social Security COLA is based on a specific measure of inflation from July, August, and September. The first data point might have come in lower than expected, but experts still predict a bigger COLA than 2025. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › A growing number of retirees are heavily reliant on Social Security to make ends meet. In the most recent iteration of an annual poll from Gallup, 62% of retirees said Social Security is a major source of income for them. That's up from 60% last year. Another 24% said their monthly benefits represent a minor (although meaningful) source of income in retirement. For any retiree using Social Security payments as a key factor in planning their budgets, few things have a bigger impact on their spending plans than the annual cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA. The COLA is designed to help Social Security payments keep up with the rising cost of goods and services, but many seniors have suffered in recent years as inflation has pushed prices higher on just about everything. While there is still two months until the official COLA for 2026 will be available, retirees just received the first data point necessary to determine how much they will receive next year. Here's where things stand now. How the government calculates the COLA Before diving into the latest data point, it's important to understand exactly how the Social Security Administration (SSA) calculates the COLA each year. Many people know the COLA is tied to inflation, but there's a very specific measure of inflation used to determine the exact number. It's called the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). The index is calculated monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics based on surveys of prices taken throughout the nation. There are over 200 price categories catalogued, and each receives a specified weight in calculating the total index. To determine the COLA, the SSA only looks at CPI-W readings from the third quarter (July through September). The year-over-year increase in the average CPI-W from those three months becomes the COLA for the following year. The BLS published the July CPI numbers on Aug. 12. That's the first data point necessary to determine next year's COLA. The August CPI numbers will come out on Sept. 11, and the September numbers will come out on Oct. 15. At that point, all of the necessary data will be available to calculate the 2026 COLA. Here's where the 2026 COLA stands now The July CPI report came in lower than expected. The commonly reported CPI-U came in 2.7% higher than last year. However, core CPI, which removes volatile food and gas prices, came in above expectations, increasing 3.1% year over year. A higher core CPI number suggests seniors could face significant pressure in keeping up with rising costs next year, as food and fuel prices do eventually move higher. The CPI-W increased 2.5% year over year, reaching 316.349. That's a month-over-month increase of 0.1%. Using the most recent month-over-month increase in inflation to model the next two months of CPI-W numbers, the 2026 COLA will come in around 2.6%. Using the average increase over the last three months, it'll come in around 2.7%. Both numbers are an increase from the 2025 COLA of 2.5%. There are good reasons to expect inflation to come in higher over the next two months. Specifically, the Trump tariffs announced in April have mostly been delayed until August. While businesses have worked to stockpile inventory ahead of the tariffs in order to keep their pricing low, they will eventually have to factor in the increased tax on imports and raise pricing if they want to maintain their profit margins. The Senior Citizens League estimates next year's COLA will be 2.7%, raising it from their 2.6% estimate last month. Independent analyst Mary Johnson also expects a 2.7% COLA for next year in light of the most recent CPI-W data. The Social Security Board of Trustees put its estimate at 2.7% when it released its annual report in June. As those estimates converge, it's likely the best guess. The data and trends support a 2.7% COLA for 2026, and unless there's a massive disruption in pricing over the next eight weeks, that's what retirees should expect to see. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Social Security Just Received Its First Data Point to Determine the 2026 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA). Here's Where Things Stand Now. was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

‘My Kid Will Never Ever Be Smarter Than an AI': OpenAI's Sam Altman Warns Most Kids Won't Know a World Without AI
‘My Kid Will Never Ever Be Smarter Than an AI': OpenAI's Sam Altman Warns Most Kids Won't Know a World Without AI

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘My Kid Will Never Ever Be Smarter Than an AI': OpenAI's Sam Altman Warns Most Kids Won't Know a World Without AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now so advanced that some experts believe no child will ever surpass its intelligence again. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, a central figure in the world of artificial intelligence, recently reflected on the transformative potential of AI advancements, and particularly their impact on the next generation. Speaking on a podcast, he remarked, 'My kid will never ever be smarter than an AI. That will never happen. You know, kid born a few years ago. They had a brief period of time. My kid never will be smarter.' More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Cautions Ill-Informed Investors: 'The Market, Like the Lord, Helps Those Who Help Themselves,' But Markets Are Unforgiving Can Archer Aviation Become the Tesla of the Skies? As Kodak Terminates Its Pension Plans, What Top Companies Still Offer This Retirement Perk? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Altman's statement captures a profound and ongoing shift, both in technology and society. As the current leader of OpenAI, the organization behind breakthroughs like the GPT-language model series and other advanced AI technologies, Altman's insights carry significant weight. His views are shaped by daily interactions with researchers pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve — tasks ranging from language generation and autonomous reasoning to problem-solving at a superhuman scale. When Altman says 'my kid will never be smarter than an AI,' he is not lamenting a loss, but observing a turning point in technology. Historically, each new generation had the chance to exceed the achievements of earlier ones, shaped by new education, tools, and inventions. Now, he says, a rapidly accelerating AI trajectory means that children born today will coexist with machines that learn and develop orders of magnitude faster, with access to vast data and computational resources. Altman's comment reflects both a recognition of what has already changed and a sense of inevitability about the future. The authority behind Altman's remark comes from his central role at OpenAI. Since its founding in 2015, OpenAI has led the development of generative AI with a philosophy that blends technological optimism and public caution. Altman, previously a leading Silicon Valley investor and technologist, has often spoken about the responsibility of the sector and the need for flexible, thoughtful policy as AI becomes increasingly integrated into everyday life and the economy. His assertion that no human — no matter how young or well-educated — could ever outpace AI is rooted in empirical reality. AI models now routinely outperform humans in specialized knowledge domains, can process and generate language with uncanny fluency, and are applied across finance, healthcare, logistics, and creative fields. The 'brief period of time' when a child or their peers could match or exceed machine intelligence may well have effectively vanished, as Altman suggests, replaced by a world where coexistence and collaboration with increasingly capable AI systems is the norm. This perspective is particularly salient as debates about job displacement, educational outcomes, and the essence of human endeavor gain prominence. Altman's comment is not simply an observation about his own family, but a reflection of the collective transition underway: society must adapt to new definitions of intellect, capability, and value in an era dominated by artificial intelligence. Experts suggest this requires a renewed emphasis on skills such as creativity, adaptability, and ethical reasoning — areas where machines may never fully overtake human strengths. For now, Altman's remark encapsulates the magnitude of change artificial intelligence is bringing to global culture, labor, and the imagination of what people can become. As AI evolves, the notion of human uniqueness is being redefined, not diminished — and it's a process that will shape the upbringing and prospects of generations to come. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store