logo
'High risk': The Star's $167m credit to money launderer

'High risk': The Star's $167m credit to money launderer

Yahoo05-06-2025
The Star was willing to offer millions in gambling credit to a known money launderer and wrote falsified letters to enable overseas bank transfers from unknown individuals.
These details and many more have been exposed as financial watchdog AUSTRAC pursues the embattled casino giant in the Federal Court.
The Star made "innumerable contraventions" of Australian anti-money laundering laws through its conduct, including a willingness to do business with 117 high-risk customers, barrister Daniel Tynan told a Federal Court hearing on Thursday.
The casino has admitted that 70 of these customers - who were junket funders, operators or players - each posed a high money laundering risk.
"They would have the opportunity to gamble that money, get the returns, wash it, do it again," Mr Tynan told Justice Cameron Moore.
One of these customers, Suncity junket operator Alvin Chau, was provided with credit of up to $266.67 million.
Chau funded at least 3690 junket programs at The Star's Sydney casino, bringing in a turnover of about $12.6 billion.
Despite media reports linking him to overseas crime syndicates, The Star continued to engage with the Suncity head, Mr Tynan said.
It was only after Chau was arrested by Macau police and hit with a number of charges - including money laundering - that the casino stopped dealing with him, the court has heard.
Another customer was given almost $167 million in credit despite The Star knowing from at least 2014 that he had been involved in alleged money laundering, Mr Tynan said.
The casino also facilitated high-risk transactions from 1221 customers who transferred money in and out through channels that obscured their identity, the court was told.
Staff at EEIS, a Macau-based subsidiary of The Star, wrote up falsified letters for local customers wanting to send funds through the Bank of China directly to the casino, Mr Tynan continued.
These letters contained false claims about the source of the funds being deposited, the barrister said.
Almost $990 million in deposits were made through The Star's hotel debit cards, allowing gamblers to transfer money directly to the casino without going through an Australian bank.
The cards also allowed gamblers in countries like China with restrictions on gambling to disguise their transactions by claiming they were for other purposes like hotel accommodation, Justice Moore was told.
The Star advanced money to customers who complained about the 24 to 48-hour waiting period before funds hit their accounts.
Individuals could also withdraw cash directly, Mr Tynan said.
"This is coming in anonymously, taken out in cash - it can be used for anything."
AUSTRAC is seeking $400 million in penalties over the breaches while the casino has argued it can only pay $100 million without being pushed into administration.
In April, the failing casino business received a $300 million rescue package from US gaming giant Bally's Corporation.
The hearing continues on Friday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indiana mom sues school district after it banned her for recording a meeting
Indiana mom sues school district after it banned her for recording a meeting

Indianapolis Star

time7 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Indiana mom sues school district after it banned her for recording a meeting

A mom and a national public policy organization are taking her northeast Indiana school district to court to challenge a school policy they say violates her First and 14th Amendment rights. The Goldwater Institute, a conservative-leaning Arizona-based think tank, filed a complaint Aug. 12 in the Northern District of Indiana that, if successful, could overturn the school district's meeting recording policy and clarify a gray area of First Amendment law. Whitley County Consolidated Schools' policy says a building administrator must first give permission before parents and others can record private school meetings such as parent-teacher conferences. Goldwater argues that the policy is unconstitutional, saying there is "no compelling, substantial, important, or even rational reason" to prohibit parents from recording. "We think there's a clear idea that the First Amendment protects more than just verbal speech. It protects conduct, and especially conduct that's inherently expressive," Goldwater attorney Adam Shelton said. "We think that presents a very good and important First Amendment question." In a previous statement to IndyStar, district Superintendent Laura McDermott said Nicole Graves was restricted from campus for "a pattern of aggressive interactions with school staff and public commentary involving children other than her own," not for expressing concerns. IndyStar has reached out to McDermott regarding the newly filed litigation. Last year, Graves recorded a meeting with her school principal about an incident on her daughter's school bus concerning the driver's behavior. She decided to record the meeting so she could accurately recount what was said, according to Goldwater. Discontent with the principal's answers, she posted part of the recording on social media. The district then notified Graves in a letter, which IndyStar obtained, that she broke policy and was given a school grounds ban and restrictions on staff communications. The punishment has since expired. As she brings her fight to court, Graves said she is surprised it has come to this but not that the school won't back down. She said she is continuing to fight to establish better policies for parents and protect children. "This is not fun for me. This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for," she said. "But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district." With her four children still attending school in the district, Graves is concerned about retaliation. She said she is keeping a close eye on her children's schooling and is "terrified" the school will ban her again. The right to record public officials engaged their official duties in a public place has been solidified through previous case law. Goldwater, through its complaint, is attempting to deepen those rights by arguing that some private conversations are protected as well. In its complaint, Goldwater argues that people have the right to record meetings with government officials as long as the recording doesn't violate the rights of other private individuals and the person is lawfully present. "When it's just a conversation between a parent and a school official about their child and doesn't implicate any privacy rights of other students, we think a parent has the right to record that meeting," Shelton said. If the school restricted Graves from talking about the meeting or drafting a transcript, Shelton previously said, it would undoubtedly violate the First Amendment. He questions why a recording would be any different. The complaint also says the policy violates Graves' 14th Amendment rights to control her child's education in several instances, overlapping with their First Amendment argument. Goldwater is seeking an injunction halting the recording policy and a judgment finding the school district violated Graves' First and 14th Amendment rights. This is Goldwater's second crack in two years at clarifying First Amendment case law on recording conversations with school officials. The institute petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2024 to take up the case of a Massachusetts dad denied the ability to video-record his son's special education accommodation conferences. The high court did not take up the appeal after a district court ruled the act of recording was not protected by the First Amendment. Shelton said the institute is hopeful the courts will take a full look at their arguments in Graves' case. "We think we have a very good argument here that the recording of this meeting is protected both by the First Amendment and the 14th Amendment," he said. "We look forward to expressing those ideas in court." The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.

Livingstone gets another $10 million, claims premier private HBCU in NC
Livingstone gets another $10 million, claims premier private HBCU in NC

Miami Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Livingstone gets another $10 million, claims premier private HBCU in NC

SALISBURY, NC - Livingstone College has made waves in the HBCU world and by big contributions from an anonymous donor. Add another one to the total. For the third time in just over a year, Livingstone College has received a $10 million donation from a sole anonymous benefactor-further fueling its push to be recognized as the premier private HBCU in North Carolina. The Salisbury-based HBCU has now secured more than $60 million from the same donor, a level of philanthropic support unmatched by any other private HBCU in the state. President Dr. Anthony J. Davis calls the series of gifts part of the "Miracle on Monroe Street," a multi-phase campus transformation that has already modernized key facilities and is poised to expand even further. "Everyone can look and see that we've invested every dollar, every dime into renovating this campus," Davis said. "Now we are the premier private HBCU in North Carolina, creating an experience that is second to none for our students." Philanthropy Driving Growth The latest gift will help advance the next stages of campus revitalization, including planned upgrades to Goler Hall and Honors Hall. Combined with more than $40 million in private fundraising over the past two fiscal years, these investments have positioned Livingstone to grow faster than any other private HBCU in the state. Enrollment has surged from 221 freshmen just two years ago to an expected 500 this fall, with overall growth creating new housing and facilities needs. "We're one of the fastest-growing HBCUs in the country," Davis said. "It's a good problem to have, but it means we have to think creatively about how to house our students." Retention Through Student Experience Among the most visible recent upgrades is Aggrey Cafeteria, now transformed into the Luxe Life Café and operated by Thompson Hospitality. Davis frames the dining overhaul as a central piece of the college's retention strategy, alongside residential improvements. "It's part of our retention model-creating a student experience that is second to none," he said. "While we're enhancing the student experience, we take care of where they sleep and where they eat. They want to be here at Livingstone College." That approach is producing results. Livingstone boasts a 92 percent return rate for upperclassmen and a 78 percent freshman retention rate. Those figures compare favorably with top-tier institutions, public or private. Defining the Premier Private HBCU Making the claim to be the premier private HBCU in North Carolina is no small feat. That landscape that includes Johnson C. Smith, Bennett College, Shaw University and Saint Augustine's University. Livingstone's mix of bold fundraising, rapid enrollment growth, and student-focused upgrades is setting a new standard. As the "Miracle on Monroe Street" continues, Davis and his team are aiming to ensure the college's place at the forefront of North Carolina's private HBCUs for years to come. The post Livingstone gets another $10 million, claims premier private HBCU in NC appeared first on HBCU Gameday. Copyright HBCU Gameday 2012-2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store