$30,000 EV change from today despite desperate pleas: 'Worst possible time'
It helped shave tens of thousands of dollars off the cost of buying a PHEV, and, despite its success, the government has committed to ending it on Tuesday, April 1. CarExpert.com.au founder Paul Maric told Yahoo Finance that PHEVs had become the perfect middle ground between ICE cars and EVs.
"People are switching away from electric vehicles to plug-in hybrids," he said.
Electric car drivers lose out in Coalition's $6 billion plan to lower petrol prices: 'Save $700 per year'
Rare $1 coin worth up to $3,000: 'Crazy errors'
Centrelink blow for millions on JobSeeker, Age Pension as federal budget denies cash boost
"It's the worst time possible for this kind of thing because the people just don't want to buy electric vehicles and they're going to be removing the only real subsidy that is currently sort of gaining traction."
Research released in October showed that 61 per cent of PHEV owners bought their cars specifically because of the FBT exemption.
Additionally, 90 per cent said the tax break made a "big difference" in their decision.The data from the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association also found PHEVs were the perfect "stepping stone" between an ICE and a battery-powered electric vehicle (BEV).
It's because PHEVs gave drivers the best of both worlds.
They can use petrol on longer journeys where they might have range anxiety or worries about where the next charger might be, and then they can switch to the battery for short trips.
That's why Maric said it was such a shame that the FBT exemption was being dumped today.
"When you do the sums on it, you can actually go down the path of buying a $20,000 to $30,000 more expensive electric vehicle and still have it cost the same as a cheaper vehicle once you take into account the tax benefits that you get out of it," he told Yahoo Finance.
Several peak industry bodies begged for the FBT exemption to be extended well beyond April 1 as the electric car sector continued to find its feet in the market.
They're worried that removing incentives will cause more people to stick with or switch back to an ICE vehicle.
"We know the FBT exemption is an important tool that is helping more Australians afford and access the latest EVs," Electric Vehicle Council policy head Aman Gaur said.
PHEVs have been growing in popularity, according to the Australian Automobile Association, with 7,556 sales in the December quarter, compared to 4,476 a year earlier.
However, BEVs have stagnated.
There were 21,331 sales in the last three months of 2024, compared to 21,474 in 2023's December quarter.
National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association chief executive Rohan Martin said removing the tax cut was a "lost opportunity".
"Once the bulk of people move into a plug-in hybrid, they're on their electrification journey," he said.
Back in October, the government revealed that PHEVs would no longer be considered "a zero or low emissions vehicle" under FBT law and therefore wouldn't be "eligible for the electric cars exemption".
The only people who will be exempt from this change will be those who continue to have a "financially binding commitment" that was in place before the April 1 deadline.
That type of commitment is what's known as a novated lease.
There are a few ways to ensure that the FBT can still apply to you after April 1:
Optional extensions to your agreement, but it has to be for a pre-determined period of time.
Breaks in novation agreements, however, the car cannot be used or available for personal use during that time off
Changes to the financial obligations under the lease, which include alterations to lease payments or the residual value of the car
Changed employer for FBT purposes, as that results in a new commitment to the application or availability of the car by the new employer
Other changes in the pre-existing commitment for your PHEV on or after April 1, then the FBT exemption will no longer apply.
Ending the exemption means car owners will likely have to fork out more for their payments, and their balloon payment at the end could be higher than expected.
Maric said the second-hand PHEV market could soon be flooded with cars as people seek to offload their rides.
He also said the tax change could see a shakeup in the EV industry.
"I think we're going to see a big shift towards regular hybrids," he said.
"People realise that that is the type of vehicle you need to buy if you want to protect your re-sale value, and if you still want the benefits of having a fuel and energy efficient vehicle.
"Stepping up to a plug-in hybrid or even an electric vehicle, you're adding the complexity of having these batteries and then the charging equipment.
"Whereas with a hybrid, we're seeing them hold their value extremely well, and anything electric at the moment is depreciating."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Major EV warning as true battery range for big brands like Tesla and BYD exposed: 'Aussies deserve to know'
Australians considering buying an electric vehicle (EV) have been warned about the real-world battery range on some of the most popular models. Range anxiety has been a thorn in the side of the electric vehicle market for years as Aussie drivers fear they'll run out of juice on a long journey. Major strides have been made to push the maximum battery range for many EV manufacturers; however, these limits have been put to the test on our roads. The Australian Automobile Association grabbed popular models from Tesla, BYD, and Kia to see if they could go as far as they claimed. RELATED Electric vehicle warning as BYD records biggest month of sales in Australia Little-known Centrelink perk offers Australian students free flights ATO warning over $485 billion deadline for thousands just weeks away The AAA's investigation was part of a $14 million Real-World Testing Program to see how cars (including petrol and hybrid models) really performed in the wild. The Program recently discovered 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested consumed more fuel than their lab results, and more than three-quarters failed to meet expectations. The next round of testing saw EVs taken on urban and rural roads, as well as on a motorway, and they had to contend with real-time traffic. They were also driven inside a lab to see how far the battery would last under perfect circumstances. Carmakers happily boast their vehicles can go certain distances on a single tank or full battery, with the latter used as a huge competitive edge in the EV world. Five electric cars were tested in AAA's program: BYD Atto 3 Tesla Model 3 Tesla Model Y Kia EV6 Smart #3How long did popular EV car batteries last? For the two Teslas, the Model 3 was able to go 513km in the lab, but only 441km on real roads, a 14 per cent difference. The Model Y had an 8 per cent difference, with the car driving 533km in the lab and only 490km outside. The BYD Atto 3 had the biggest inconsistency of 23 per cent, with the lab results showing a battery range of 480km, but a real-world result of just 369km. Kia's EV6 notched 528km in the lab and 484km on real roads, and the Smart #3 had the lowest variation of just 5 per cent, with 455km in the lab and 432km real-world battery range. "Australians deserve to know how vehicles perform on roads," the AAA said. "This testing provides accurate and relevant information to enable more informed decisions for consumers, businesses and fleets buying new light vehicles." Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones blamed the difference in battery range on multiple factors, including high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and whether the driver uses air conditioning or heating features during their journey. He said EV makers needed to be more upfront about how far their cars could go so that buyers didn't shy away from them in the future. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Yahoo Finance has approached Tesla, Kia, and BYD for comment. EV subsidies could soon be axed under major overhaul The revelation could serve as a huge blow to the EV industry at a time when subsidies that won over many buyers are on the chopping block. The Productivity Commission is investigating the country's goal of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050 and highlighted the generous handouts given to those who buy an electric car. It has recommended to dump the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemptions and state-based stamp duty discounts for the EV market. 'Now that the Australian Government has implemented the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), it should phase-out the exemption of electric vehicles from the Fringe Benefits Tax,' the interim report said. The NVES was implemented earlier this year and it gives every car manufacturer a CO2 target that they either have to meet or beat each year. That target is lowered each year until 2029, which will put increased pressure on brands to have zero or low-emissions vehicles in their fleet. 'The EV purchase subsidies and the NVES overlap, as they both promote the purchase of low-emissions vehicles," the Productivity Commission said. 'EV tax discounts subsidise car buyers to opt for EVs, while the NVES is a broader-based policy that aims to increase purchases of low-emissions light vehicles, including both EVs and more fuel-efficient fossil fuel cars.' The suggestion sparked outcry from the EV industry, with Electric Vehicle Council (EVC) CEO Julie Delvecchio saying the incentives proposed to be axed were "finally helping everyday Australians afford an electric car". 'Suggesting we end incentives just as Australia finally catches up to the rest of the developed world with an efficiency standard is short-sighted. We need both - they work together, not in isolation," she while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data
Motor Trend
2 hours ago
- Motor Trend
Porsche Said To Be Readying All-New, Gas-Powered Compact SUV
Even as the present U.S. administration is busy rolling back emissions regulations, much of the rest of the world continues to tighten theirs, forcing automakers including Porsche into making tough decisions about whether or not to replace aging gas-powered models with EVs. At present, Porsche is taking a "let's do both" approach with its Macan compact SUV that currently exists as both an ICE and purely electric-powered vehicle. But it's gradually phasing out the gas-fed Macan, which is already gone in Europe and will soon be here in America as well. So, it's EVs only now for Porsche from here on out? Not so fast, as it appears that a new compact crossover Porsche is developing to join the Macan in its lineup will be a gas-fed model, possibly a hybrid of some form. Porsche is developing a new gas-powered compact SUV to join its lineup by 2028, potentially replacing the current gas-only Macan. This model may include a hybrid version and will be distinct from the Macan EV, reflecting Porsche's adaptive strategy to market demands. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article. Read Next According to a recent Car and Driver report, Oliver Blume, CEO of Porsche, stated on an earnings call that there's a gas-powered crossover on track to join the Porsche SUV lineup as soon as 2028, that may come with a new name. While the size will probably be very close to that of the current Macan, this new SUV will be distinct from the Macan EV that will continue with that nameplate. We contacted Porsche to see what we could get confirmed, but it's not terribly much. 'Once the combustion-engine models of the same name have been phased out, the Macan will be sold exclusively as an all-electric model, worldwide,' a Porsche spokesperson told us via email. 'At the same time, Porsche is continuously monitoring market development and customer demand. If necessary, the company looks ahead and adapts its product strategy.' Part of that evolving product strategy for the new compact SUV may be to add a hybrid version of the model to supplement any pure, gas-powered engine option. Porsche also confirmed that this smaller crossover will be entirely unique from the Macan EV but will have similar sporting characteristics that make it a Porsche and that it 'would benefit from synergies.' While Porsche wouldn't confirm the 2028 timeframe that Car and Driver stated from Blume, the spokesperson said it's expected to be launched 'towards the end of the decade.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crypto 401(k)s Are Legal Now—So Why Aren't They in Your Retirement Account?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A heated Reddit discussion about cryptocurrency in 401(k) plans reveals a troubling gap: while the Trump administration relaxed regulatory barriers on May 28 to allow digital assets in retirement accounts, the path from policy to paycheck allocation remains fraught with obstacles that could severely limit crypto's actual penetration into Americans' nest eggs. The $9 Trillion Question As Washington looks to open up Americans' $9 trillion in retirement savings to alternative assets, the potential impact appears staggering on paper. Crypto proponents estimate that even an 'extremely conservative' allocation of 0.5% to 2% of new 401(k) contributions flowing into cryptocurrency could generate billions in additional demand. The math is compelling: with millions of workers potentially directing 1%-10% of their paychecks, plus employer matches, into crypto-enabled retirement plans, the market could see what supporters call a 'monster catalyst.' Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Although crypto is a small part of the 401(k) plan market, it could grow substantially in 2025. The regulatory shift comes at a time when Bitcoin ETFs like the iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ:IBIT) have already demonstrated massive institutional appetite, with the most popular fund ballooning to over $50 billion in total assets. The Employer Bottleneck Reality However, regulatory approval represents just the first hurdle. The real challenge lies with America's risk-averse employers and plan administrators. Many fiduciaries are disinclined to include crypto in plan line-ups on the basis that some of them may have high volatility and risk profiles, creating a significant bottleneck between policy and practice. As of mid-2025, only five employers had adopted private market offerings with crypto allocations, typically ranging between 5% and 20% of portfolios. This glacial adoption rate highlights a critical disconnect between regulatory possibility and workplace reality. Companies remain hesitant to shoulder potential liability for employee losses, particularly given crypto's notorious volatility that can produce 50% swings. Many employer-sponsored plans currently maintain restricted investment menus, often limited to mutual funds or excluding individual ETFs entirely. For plans that don't currently allow spot ETFs, the leap to 'raw crypto' becomes even more unlikely. This structural conservatism could severely limit crypto's penetration, even in a more permissive regulatory environment. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. The Access and Engagement Gap Beyond employer approval lies another sobering reality: employee engagement. Many workers already have theoretical access to crypto through 'BrokerageLink' or self-directed options within their 401(k) plans, yet utilization remains minimal. The majority of participants remain in target-date funds that typically exclude crypto, suggesting that only a tiny percentage might actively modify their allocations. This passive approach to retirement investing could significantly dampen the anticipated crypto influx. Unlike the dramatic flows seen with institutional Bitcoin ETF adoption, 401(k) integration may prove more gradual and limited than bulls anticipate. The Tax-Efficient Trojan Horse Despite adoption hurdles, crypto's 401(k) integration offers a compelling value proposition for those who do participate. Investing through tax-advantaged retirement accounts eliminates capital gains taxes, potentially making crypto more attractive to tax-conscious investors. This benefit extends to HSA and Roth accounts, creating multiple pathways for tax-efficient crypto exposure. The primary vehicle for this access will likely remain crypto ETFs rather than direct holdings, providing some institutional oversight while maintaining the tax advantages that make retirement account crypto allocation particularly Impact: Priced In or Game Changer? The debate over whether 401(k) crypto integration is already 'priced in' to current valuations reflects broader uncertainty about timing and scale. While some argue that anticipation has already influenced crypto prices, others contend that actual inflows cannot be fully discounted in advance—a lesson learned from underestimating ETF impact earlier. For crypto markets seeking sustained institutional demand, 401(k) integration represents a potential steady-state influx rather than a dramatic one-time catalyst. The long investment horizons typical of retirement accounts could provide stabilizing demand, even if adoption proves slower than optimistic projections suggest. The regulatory barriers have fallen, but the practical obstacles remain formidable. Whether crypto's 401(k) revolution proves transformative or merely incremental may depend less on Washington's blessing and more on corporate America's willingness to embrace the risk. Read Next: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Image: Shutterstock This article Crypto 401(k)s Are Legal Now—So Why Aren't They in Your Retirement Account? originally appeared on
