Columnist In Palestinian Authority Daily: Gazans Must Rise Up Against Hamas, Demand The Release Of The Israeli Hostages, And That Hamas Withdraw From The Political Scene To End The War
Bassem Barhoum (Image: shfanews.net)
The following are translated excerpts from his column:[2]
"On the night between Thursday and Friday [August 7-8, 2025], the Israeli war cabinet decided to occupy the entire Gaza Strip. This large-scale military operation could last several months and perhaps even more than a year. However, if it ends with an Israeli occupation of the Strip, we will have to understand that Gaza has been completely destroyed… and that the Gaza Strip may lose its Palestinian national identity for many decades to come. This scenario inevitably compels us to question the fate of the Strip, as well as the fate of the long and bitter Palestinian struggle for an independent state and of the Palestinian cause as a whole.
"There are many additional questions, but the important of them at the moment is: How can we avoid all this and avoid the elimination of our national cause? What makes this a difficult task in the present Palestinian reality is that Hamas does not think or act based on national Palestinian premises. [It thinks and acts] based on the premises of the Muslim Brotherhood and its own interests and those of its regional allies. The Palestinian people is trapped between the two jaws of a predator that is crushing our bones and our future. One jaw is the extremist Zionist right-wing stream [in Israel]… and the other is the global [Muslim] Brotherhood organization…
"We must find some way or some action that will preempt the Israeli war machine, and in this context I believe that [UN] conferences and useless Security Council meetings are unable to stop the great slaughter…
"After Hamas led the Palestinian people into a deep crisis following the 2006 elections [and its military coup against the PA in 2007] – a crisis that has now led us to a nakba more serious than the first nakba [of 1948] – we find that we were wrong to allow two parallel paths to remain, paths that do not meet and can never meet because the disagreement between them is essential, namely the national Palestinian path and the Islamist path of the [Muslim] Brotherhood…[3]
"There may be one and only one hope [for Gaza]: the Palestinian public in Gaza – all of it or at least most of it – must rise up, take to the streets en masse and demand that Hamas release the [Israeli] hostages without delay and withdraw from the entire political scene. This may be difficult and may involve some risk, but it is the only chance to avoid total devastation, killing and expulsion. If anyone has a different solution, let him share it with all of us… In my opinion, today this is the [only] feasible solution that may put a stop to the war."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
'Voluntary' or Forced? Inside the renewed push to relocate Palestinians
Shafaq News Once confined to fringe discussion, the relocation of Palestinians—whether framed as 'voluntary migration' or outright forced transfer—has become part of mainstream policy discourse. The shift has been driven by statements from senior officials, leaked strategic documents, and modeling by influential think tanks, blending ideological motivations with complex legal and humanitarian challenges. In July 2025, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz proposed establishing a 'humanitarian city' in Rafah, under full military control, as a holding zone for displaced Gazans. Israeli well-known human rights lawyer Michael Sfard described the plan as 'a blueprint for crimes against humanity,' warning that it amounted to 'population transfer to the southern tip of Gaza in preparation for deportation outside the strip.' The Wall Street Journal reported that feasibility studies had been tied to the plan, though the consulting firm named later denied involvement. This follows an October 2023 leaked 'concept paper' from Israel's Intelligence Ministry that examined scenarios for Gaza's future, including relocating its 2.3 million residents to Egypt's Sinai Peninsula via tent camps evolving into permanent settlements. While the government dismissed the paper as hypothetical, the prospect of systemic displacement sparked alarm domestically and internationally. In March 2025, the Boston Consulting Group modeled a relocation scheme to Somalia, Somaliland, Egypt, Jordan, and the UAE, estimating that 25 percent of Gazans might accept relocation 'voluntarily,' with projected economic benefits of $4.7 billion for host states. UN officials and Arab governments condemned the idea as a modern form of ethnic cleansing. US President Donald Trump has gone further, publicly suggesting resettlement in Egypt, Jordan, Albania, Indonesia, or Libya. In a January 2025 interview, he described his vision as part of rebuilding Gaza into 'the Riviera of the Middle East' under temporary US administration. Arab leaders rejected the proposal outright, while rights groups and legal experts argued it violated core Palestinian rights and international law. Israeli demographer Yoram Ettinger, known for his work with the America–Israel Demographic Research Group, has long highlighted demographic imbalances between Arabs and Jews in historic Palestine. While not explicitly calling for relocation, his work has influenced strategic thinking. On the far-right fringe, former Knesset member Moshe Feiglin has openly called for financial incentives for Palestinian emigration, paired with temporary 'tent encampments,' arguing Palestinians 'should emigrate to other countries.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has framed such debates within his vision of 'Greater Israel,' which in some interpretations extends into parts of Jordan, Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon. His public endorsement of 'voluntary migration' from Gaza has been met with skepticism, given the coercive conditions under siege and bombardment. Reports of Israeli discussions with South Sudan about potential resettlement were denied by Juba's foreign ministry as 'baseless.' Egypt has repeatedly refused to host displaced Gazans, with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi warning that such moves would undermine regional stability and justice. Jordan, Lebanon, and other Arab states have rejected permanent resettlement, citing the destabilizing impact of previous refugee influxes. Former Israeli diplomat Alon Pinkas called Katz's Rafah plan 'unviable, impractical, and morally depraved,' adding that it should still be taken seriously as evidence of a shift in Israeli operational thinking. A November 2024 Human Rights Watch report concluded that Israeli military actions—including large-scale destruction, starvation tactics, and mass evacuation orders—had displaced 1.9 million people, roughly 90 percent of Gaza's population. The report described these as 'widespread and systematic' violations that may constitute crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute. Analysts from Chatham House, Al-Shabaka, and the Baker Institute stress that no displacement can be considered voluntary under siege and bombardment. As one noted, 'Voluntariness is impossible when people flee under bombardment with homes destroyed.' Relocation proposals have named Egypt, Jordan, Somalia, Somaliland, South Sudan, Libya, Albania, and Indonesia—alongside more unlikely destinations such as Canada, Greece, and Spain. None have agreed to host large-scale resettlement; most have issued explicit refusals. Egypt and Jordan remain geographically feasible but politically opposed. Other destinations face instability or lack capacity. Indonesia's offer to treat 2,000 wounded Palestinians on Galang Island was humanitarian and temporary, not a precursor to resettlement. Given these realities, prolonged internal displacement within Gaza and the West Bank appears far more likely than large-scale emigration abroad. Within Israel, Netanyahu's ideological framing and military strategy have drawn resistance from senior security officials who reportedly oppose expansive displacement plans. For Palestinians, the stakes are existential: the struggle is not only for survival under siege but for the preservation of their presence, identity, and claim to their land.
Shafaq News
4 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Lebanon's Hezbollah rejects disarmament, warns against dragging army into conflict
Shafaq News – Beirut Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem said on Friday the group will not give up its weapons, insisting there can be 'no Lebanese sovereignty without the resistance.' In a televised speech, Qassem condemned an August 5 government decision that, he said, would 'strip the resistance of its weapons' and pave the way for fighters to be expelled from their homes. He accused the cabinet of executing ' American and Israeli orders' to end the resistance, even if it meant civil war, and serving 'the Israeli project' — a stance he said explained the 'joy' expressed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Qassem argued that the decision targeted the resistance's legitimacy instead of focusing on ending Israel's occupation of Lebanese territory, urging the government to plan for confronting the ongoing assault, not 'handing over the country to the Israeli enemy.' Warning against drawing the military into internal disputes, Qassem said the army's leadership rejects such a role. He also pointed to Netanyahu's recent talk of a 'Greater Israel' — which he said refers to control over all of Palestine and parts of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon — as evidence of the threat facing the country. 'We have said repeatedly: stop the aggression, remove Israel from Lebanon, and you will have from us every possible facilitation when discussing national and strategic security,' Qassem concluded.
Shafaq News
12 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iranian FM defends Hezbollah's arms as vital to peace
Shafaq News – Beirut Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi affirmed on Thursday that Tehran's position on Lebanon and the resistance does not mean interference in the country's internal affairs. In statements carried by Iranian media outlets, Araghchi described Hezbollah as a 'fully independent group,' adding, 'However, this position does not prevent us from expressing our views on peace in the region.' He argued that stability in the Middle East cannot be sustained 'without the weapons of the resistance,' warning that no other force could contain what he described as Israel's expansionist and hegemonic ambitions if those arms were removed. Earlier today, Iran's Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani, during his trip to Lebanon, underlined that his country does not impose decisions on resistance groups or sovereign states. He explained that Tehran shares its perspectives openly and offers counsel when invited—without coercion or imposition. The remarks coincide with growing international calls for Hezbollah to disarm. Tehran rejects the disarmament campaign as a US- and Israeli-backed initiative aimed at weakening the movement, while critics of Iran view its stance as interference in Lebanon's internal affairs.
