logo
Top Trump health official slams Democrats for 'misleading' claims about Medicaid reform

Top Trump health official slams Democrats for 'misleading' claims about Medicaid reform

Fox News5 hours ago

FIRST ON FOX: A top Trump White House official is looking to undercut Senate Democrats' talking points on Medicaid, arguing that the GOP's plan to reform the healthcare program would benefit rural hospitals, not harm them.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz told Fox News Digital that "special interests are pushing misleading talking points to try and stop the most ambitious healthcare reforms ever."
Oz's sentiment comes as Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Senate Republicans sprint to finish their work on President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" ahead of a self-imposed July 4 deadline.
Part of the bill from the Senate Finance Committee aims to make good on the GOP's promise to root out waste, fraud and abuse within the widely used healthcare program by including work requirements and booting illegal immigrants from benefit rolls, among other measures.
Tweaks to the Medicaid provider tax rate have ruffled feathers on both sides of the aisle. Indeed, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. and Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., sent a letter to Trump and the top congressional Republicans last week warning that changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate would harm over 300 rural hospitals.
And a cohort of Senate Republicans were furious with the change after the bill dropped last week.
But Oz contended that "only 5%" of inpatient Medicaid spending happens in rural communities, and that the mammoth bill "instead targets abuses overwhelmingly utilized by large hospitals with well-connected lobbyists."
"We are committed to preserving and improving access to care in rural communities with a transformative approach that bolsters advanced technology, invests in infrastructure, and supports workforce — rather than propping up a system that mostly benefits wealthier urban areas," Oz said.
Schumer's letter included data from a study recently conducted by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina at his behest. He warned that if the bill is passed as is, millions of people would be kicked off of their healthcare coverage, and "rural hospitals will not get paid for the services they are required by law to provide to patients."
Fox News Digital reached out to Schumer, Wyden and Merkley for comment.
However, another report from the Trump-aligned Paragon Health Institute argued similarly to Oz that special interest groups and healthcare lobbyists were "flooding the airwaves with claims" that Republicans' changes to Medicaid would shutter rural hospitals.
For example, they argued that a recent report from the Center for American Progress warned that over 200 rural hospitals would be at risk of closure, but that the findings were based on changes to the federal medical assistance percentage, or the amount of Medicaid costs paid for by the federal government.
Changes to that percentage were mulled by congressional Republicans but were not included in the "big, beautiful bill."
Still, the changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate, which were a stark departure from the House GOP's version of the bill, angered the Republicans who have warned not to make revisions to the healthcare program that could shut down rural hospitals and boot working Americans from their benefits.
The Senate Finance Committee went further than the House's freeze of the provider tax rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to healthcare providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, for non-Affordable Care Act expansion states, and included a provision that lowers the rate in expansion states annually until it hits 3.5%.
However, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is working on a possible change to the bill that would create a provider relief fund that could sate her and other Republicans' concerns about the change to the provider tax rate.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Charlamagne says Dems 'sound like hypocrites' for demanding congressional approval for strikes
Charlamagne says Dems 'sound like hypocrites' for demanding congressional approval for strikes

Fox News

time35 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Charlamagne says Dems 'sound like hypocrites' for demanding congressional approval for strikes

Radio host Charlamagne tha God called out Democrats on Monday for their outrage about President Donald Trump launching strikes on Iran without congressional authority, saying they turned a blind eye when Democrats recently did the same. The U.S. launched a surprise strike using B-2 stealth bombers on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities on Saturday. "All three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Joint Chiefs Chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine said during a briefing at the Pentagon on Sunday morning. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., called out Trump for the strikes during a Sunday appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," arguing the head of state should have begun the process by first "coming to Congress and asking for authorization to do this." He continued, "That's the constitutional approach to this. He could have talked to us about what the goal is and what the plan is ahead of time. And we could have had a discussion about it." Charlamagne agreed, but argued Democrats like Kelly should look in the mirror. "Morgyn, this is one of those times when politicians sound like hypocrites, because Mark Kelly is right, the president should get congressional approval," he said about the national war powers debate. "But there have been a bunch of presidents who have ordered strikes without congressional approval." "Barack Obama did it against Libya. Joe Biden ordered strikes in Iraq and Syria without congressional approval. Bill Clinton did it with - 'Kosovo' I think you pronounce it?" he recalled. "So presidents ordering military action without congressional approval has become pretty routine." Co-host Morgyn V. Wood noted that this issue is now being cited for possible impeachment. "So why didn't it lead to an impeachment for everybody else? Like, when Barack Obama did it, when Biden did it, when Clinton did it?" Charlamagne asked. Wood said that there have been calls for impeachment over presidents' military actions without congressional approval before, but Charlamagne was not persuaded. "I don't even remember hearing about it during the Joe Biden administration," Charlamagne said. "I guess that's just because of the way Trump has been moving," co-host DJ Envy said. "But we didn't hear about it when Obama did it. We didn't hear about it when Biden did it." "I do remember when Obama did it," Charlamagne said. "When Obama did it, I do remember, you know, people in Congress saying he needed congressional approval, and they were making it a thing. I don't remember the Biden thing at all. I don't remember that even making a headline." After Wood recalled the widespread outrage over Biden's botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, Charlamagne said he recalled Biden's lack of accountability for military missteps after an NBC News piece headlined, "Presidents' ordering military action without Congress' approval has become routine."

Key Mike Lee proposal stripped from Trump budget bill
Key Mike Lee proposal stripped from Trump budget bill

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Key Mike Lee proposal stripped from Trump budget bill

WASHINGTON — A proposal to expand congressional control over federal policy decisions was stripped from President Donald Trump's massive tax bill over the weekend despite a push from GOP leaders to include the language. The provision, a slimmed-down version of Sen. Mike Lee's REINS Act, sought to implement new requirements for federal agencies, subjecting proposed agency actions to be approved by Congress before they can take effect. The statute primarily targeted policies that increase revenue and would allow for review of past rules already approved by agencies. However, that measure was removed from the bill's language on Sunday by the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan adviser who must evaluate each provision in the tax bill to ensure it adheres to the strict rules of reconciliation. Through the budget reconciliation process, Republicans can circumvent Democratic opposition and prevent a filibuster to expedite the passage of certain legislation and go around the minority party by enacting key pieces of their agenda with a simple majority vote. There are certain rules that dictate how often reconciliation can be used, and the procedure can only be utilized to advance budget-related legislation such as taxes, spending and the debt limit. Once a budget reconciliation blueprint is finalized, it then only requires a simple majority in the House and Senate to pass. However, the parliamentarian ruled that the current language related to Lee's REINS Act did not adhere to those guidelines, making it ineligible for simple-majority passage. However, Lee could still adjust the language before the package reaches the Senate floor, which GOP leaders hope to accomplish by the end of this week. Lee has pushed for years to pass the REINS Act, which would require regulations with an economic impact of $100 million or more to be approved by Congress, giving lawmakers more control over how agencies operate. Under current law, Congress has the authority to pass resolutions that nullify certain agency regulations if those rules are considered to be harmful. However, the REINS Act would seek to ensure that most proposed regulations must first be cleared by Congress before it takes effect, giving lawmakers the ability to halt certain regulations if they disapprove. Some version of the REINS Act has been introduced in every Congress since 2009. The House has managed to pass several iterations of the bill but the proposal has never managed to pass the Senate, where it would typically need 60 votes to be approved. And to get enough votes to support it, Lee is suggesting to somehow attach the bill to the reconciliation package, which would only require 50 votes in the Senate. Lee has not yet publicly responded to the parliamentarian's ruling, and his office did not respond to a request for comment by the Deseret News.

How to stay cool in Pittsburgh during the extreme heat
How to stay cool in Pittsburgh during the extreme heat

CBS News

time37 minutes ago

  • CBS News

How to stay cool in Pittsburgh during the extreme heat

What to do if your home does not have air conditioning? What to do if your home does not have air conditioning? What to do if your home does not have air conditioning? An expert has tips on how to stay cool during the extreme heat in Pittsburgh. Heat is the leading weather-related cause of death nationwide, surpassing the fatalities caused by floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and lightning. What to do if your home does not have air conditioning? If you live in a multilevel home without AC, go downstairs because heat rises. But if you do not have a lower level to escape to, there is something you can do to keep yourself cool. People are advised to close any doors to rooms they are not occupying. Whatever cold air you have, you don't want it going somewhere you are not going to be. Also, be sure to close all windows and blinds, and beware of what lights you keep on. If you have a fan, turn it on, but make sure it's going counterclockwise. That way, whatever cold air is in the room will stay down where you are. But what about your body? Dr. Brian Lamb of Allegheny Health Network Internal Medicine has some suggestions. "You need to make sure you are consistently drinking," Lamb said. "Not a glass of water in the morning and a glass of water at night. You can actually help increase evaporation for your skin. ... If you get towels, soak them in cold water, put them around your neck, put them across your forehead. You lose a lot of heat through your head." And hold off on vacuuming or using the dryer, and do not use the oven. "Eat some fruit," Lamb said. "You don't want a hot, heavy meal. That puts more demands on your body." "When you're body is hot, it doesn't work as well," he added. If all else fails, find someone who has air conditioning or go to a cooling center. Pittsburghers go to the pool to stay cool Settlers Cabin Wave Pool was busy on Monday, as people were trying to escape the heat. "We have a pool at home, but we come out here," said Sean/Giavanna Weir. Already this week, so many wanted to come to the wave pool that it reached capacity and closed admissions. Same at other pools in the county, including Boyce Park. So, what can you do to make sure you don't get in line only to be turned away? Check out the county's Facebook page before you head out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store