Ignoring scandals at elite schools does not serve students
Don't miss out on the headlines from Kylie Lang. Followed categories will be added to My News.
If you've allowed your school to define you – and cause you to ignore or dismiss issues that might taint its public image – try stopping. Immovable pride – in any institution just because you're part of it – is a dangerous thing.
All too often, 'old boys' and 'old girls' of private schools, most notably, will feel aggrieved and personally attacked when an alarming issue makes headlines.
It's as if their own identity has been targeted and found wanting – and it can explain why they close ranks and, like a scene out of the film A Few Good Men, 'can't handle the truth'.
For some people in these tight-knit fan clubs, such as alumni associations, the first instinct is to ask who blabbed.
I've written countless articles over many years about schools – independent, religious and state – and that those with strong leadership do best, taking swift and meaningful action.
Shouldn't the objective be constant improvement through learning from mistakes and unfortunate incidents – and not pretending they didn't exist?
Ridiculous, really, for anyone to have their sense of self enmeshed in a school – because like first names, they are chosen by someone else, specifically parents.
If I had been able to name myself, I wouldn't have been Kylie. I rather like Valentina. Had I been in charge of deciding on my schooling, I wouldn't have left my first one to attend another.
I am grateful my parents sacrificed, including holding down several jobs, to give me a private education from years 1 to 12 – but it was their decision, not mine.
Nudgee College in Brisbane. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Tertius Pickard
So I do have to call out this obsession with old school ties. How is it logical to attend an institution for a few years of your life then allow it to define the rest of your life?
And why do people, particularly in Brisbane, persist in asking where you went to school, and decades after you left, as if your answer determines if you're an acceptable individual to know? Snobbery or insecurity, perhaps, but it's a bit silly, not to mention limiting.
This week I interviewed an alumnus of Brisbane Boys' College who told other old boys to 'stop closing ranks and grow a backbone'.
This followed two examples of poor behaviour – BBC boys sharing allegedly serious and potentially illegal nude content on social media, and trashing an Airbnb house during an out-of-control party. Both sparked police investigations.
Some old boys shrugged off the incidents as 'boys will be boys' and maintained that BBC always would be a great school.
Last week a parent alerted me to a 'disgusting' video made and shared on social media by St Joseph's Nudgee College boys about St Rita's girls.
Nudgee said 'the behaviour did not meet the standards expected at this college' and was investigating. An appropriate response.
Yet some parents like to vent. A Nudgee mum emailed, asking if we 'stop to consider the broader impact these stories have'.
'My son loves his school and wears his uniform with pride,' she continued.
'How unfair it is for his pride to be undermined by criticism based on the actions of a few.'
Hmmm. Pride, in any school, is to be earned and not automatically present because of its perceived pedigree – or the significant financial price parents pay for their kids to belong.
The broader impact is why it matters.
I like how a parent in a general Brisbane schools chat group put it when another questioned why the story was newsworthy: 'Because silence protects the wrong people.
'Parents, schools and the public need to be informed so we can guide our children, hold institutions accountable and create a culture of respect – not secrecy.
'If girls from St Rita's or any other school are affected, their experiences matter.
'Brushing it aside minimises the harm and perpetuates a dangerous silence.
'We must talk about it – loudly, honestly and without shame.'
Principals and teachers have to deal with problems that didn't exist when I was a kid – with social media enemy number one.
But it's time past students and current parents wearing rose-coloured glasses ditch them in favour of perspective.
Schools are complex entities and will never be perfect.
They may shape a person, but they should not define them.
Kylie Lang is associate editor of The Courier-Mail
kylie.lang@news.com.au
LOVE
Women who drink coffee (in moderation) are more likely to age well, maintaining physical, mental and cognitive health into their 70s and beyond. Can't see this study translating into cheaper prices though.
LOATHE
A tone-deaf decision by Queensland's Court of Appeal that juvenile criminals who invade homes and attack residents with knives in heinous acts should not have convictions recorded against them. It apparently aids their rehabilitation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
17 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The Sydneysiders hoping death won't part them from their pets
Her father was 'totally devoted' to Rex and the duo became 'local identities' thanks to their long walks together, she said. Rex's death in 2010 was devastating and marked the first time she had the courage to sit with a pet as they were put to sleep. Annie the beagle loved to snuggle on the sofa watching 'endless amounts of BBC crime shows' with Terceiro's mother. Oscar, the Jack Russell fox terrier cross, became Annie's best friend. Oscar had a 'big ego' and was known to 'attack the lawn mower front on', but was also a sweetheart. 'I'd get that oxytocin upload in the morning just gazing into each other's eyes,' Teceiro said. Terceiro's latest adoptee, Milo, 8, is from Jack Russell Rescue. Loading 'Some people may think, 'they're just animals, why is there all this fuss?' But I think that ... dogs and cats, [and] all pets, have a very important role and place in many Australians' minds and lives,' she said. 'There's an evolving awareness that animals and pets are much more than property.' Under the changes, a person who already has their late pet's ashes can be interred with them when they die. Where a companion animal outlives human family members, their remains can also be placed or buried with their family when they die. Animal Justice Party MP Emma Hurst, a member of the NSW upper house, spearheaded the amendments, passed on June 4. She said her Victorian counterpart Georgie Purcell brought the lacuna in the law to her attention. 'It became clear to us that this was a problem in Victoria because the law was silent on the issue. A lot of cemeteries [believed] ... they would be breaking the law to allow people to be buried with their beloved companion animals.' NSW law was also silent on the issue, Hurst said. 'We wanted to make sure it was absolutely clear.' Veterinarian Dr Sam Kovac, founder of Southern Cross Veterinary Clinic, said that 'for decades we've known about people resorting to secretive measures', such as sneaking pets' ashes into caskets. 'We do a lot of work in the homeless [community] … with Project HoPe, our charity, and that's something that comes up with those clients all the time. Their pet really is like a soulmate,' Kovac said. Elderly clients who lost a spouse might also turn their mind to their pets' last resting place. Kovac said two of his vets had put a request in their will to have their ashes mixed with their pets' ashes so that their remains could be scattered together. One vet had a clause requesting that if one of her pets outlived her, a portion of her ashes should not be scattered until their ashes could be mixed. Kovac himself has three corgis: his 15-year-old 'soul dog' Clara-Belle, with whom he says he has a 'special connection', Bonnie, 13, and Maddie, 7. He's had many animals over the years and had not contemplated being buried with his furry companions, but he welcomed the change to the law. 'I encourage other state parliaments to debate this topic and follow suit. I really think this law will help people to have that idea of a continuing bond with their pet,' he said. 'Even though their best friend has passed away, one day when they also pass away, they can be together forever. I think that's just a really beautiful thought.'
The Age
17 hours ago
- The Age
The Sydneysiders hoping death won't part them from their pets
Her father was 'totally devoted' to Rex and the duo became 'local identities' thanks to their long walks together, she said. Rex's death in 2010 was devastating and marked the first time she had the courage to sit with a pet as they were put to sleep. Annie the beagle loved to snuggle on the sofa watching 'endless amounts of BBC crime shows' with Terceiro's mother. Oscar, the Jack Russell fox terrier cross, became Annie's best friend. Oscar had a 'big ego' and was known to 'attack the lawn mower front on', but was also a sweetheart. 'I'd get that oxytocin upload in the morning just gazing into each other's eyes,' Teceiro said. Terceiro's latest adoptee, Milo, 8, is from Jack Russell Rescue. Loading 'Some people may think, 'they're just animals, why is there all this fuss?' But I think that ... dogs and cats, [and] all pets, have a very important role and place in many Australians' minds and lives,' she said. 'There's an evolving awareness that animals and pets are much more than property.' Under the changes, a person who already has their late pet's ashes can be interred with them when they die. Where a companion animal outlives human family members, their remains can also be placed or buried with their family when they die. Animal Justice Party MP Emma Hurst, a member of the NSW upper house, spearheaded the amendments, passed on June 4. She said her Victorian counterpart Georgie Purcell brought the lacuna in the law to her attention. 'It became clear to us that this was a problem in Victoria because the law was silent on the issue. A lot of cemeteries [believed] ... they would be breaking the law to allow people to be buried with their beloved companion animals.' NSW law was also silent on the issue, Hurst said. 'We wanted to make sure it was absolutely clear.' Veterinarian Dr Sam Kovac, founder of Southern Cross Veterinary Clinic, said that 'for decades we've known about people resorting to secretive measures', such as sneaking pets' ashes into caskets. 'We do a lot of work in the homeless [community] … with Project HoPe, our charity, and that's something that comes up with those clients all the time. Their pet really is like a soulmate,' Kovac said. Elderly clients who lost a spouse might also turn their mind to their pets' last resting place. Kovac said two of his vets had put a request in their will to have their ashes mixed with their pets' ashes so that their remains could be scattered together. One vet had a clause requesting that if one of her pets outlived her, a portion of her ashes should not be scattered until their ashes could be mixed. Kovac himself has three corgis: his 15-year-old 'soul dog' Clara-Belle, with whom he says he has a 'special connection', Bonnie, 13, and Maddie, 7. He's had many animals over the years and had not contemplated being buried with his furry companions, but he welcomed the change to the law. 'I encourage other state parliaments to debate this topic and follow suit. I really think this law will help people to have that idea of a continuing bond with their pet,' he said. 'Even though their best friend has passed away, one day when they also pass away, they can be together forever. I think that's just a really beautiful thought.'
Courier-Mail
a day ago
- Courier-Mail
Ignoring scandals at elite schools does not serve students
Don't miss out on the headlines from Kylie Lang. Followed categories will be added to My News. If you've allowed your school to define you – and cause you to ignore or dismiss issues that might taint its public image – try stopping. Immovable pride – in any institution just because you're part of it – is a dangerous thing. All too often, 'old boys' and 'old girls' of private schools, most notably, will feel aggrieved and personally attacked when an alarming issue makes headlines. It's as if their own identity has been targeted and found wanting – and it can explain why they close ranks and, like a scene out of the film A Few Good Men, 'can't handle the truth'. For some people in these tight-knit fan clubs, such as alumni associations, the first instinct is to ask who blabbed. I've written countless articles over many years about schools – independent, religious and state – and that those with strong leadership do best, taking swift and meaningful action. Shouldn't the objective be constant improvement through learning from mistakes and unfortunate incidents – and not pretending they didn't exist? Ridiculous, really, for anyone to have their sense of self enmeshed in a school – because like first names, they are chosen by someone else, specifically parents. If I had been able to name myself, I wouldn't have been Kylie. I rather like Valentina. Had I been in charge of deciding on my schooling, I wouldn't have left my first one to attend another. I am grateful my parents sacrificed, including holding down several jobs, to give me a private education from years 1 to 12 – but it was their decision, not mine. Nudgee College in Brisbane. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Tertius Pickard So I do have to call out this obsession with old school ties. How is it logical to attend an institution for a few years of your life then allow it to define the rest of your life? And why do people, particularly in Brisbane, persist in asking where you went to school, and decades after you left, as if your answer determines if you're an acceptable individual to know? Snobbery or insecurity, perhaps, but it's a bit silly, not to mention limiting. This week I interviewed an alumnus of Brisbane Boys' College who told other old boys to 'stop closing ranks and grow a backbone'. This followed two examples of poor behaviour – BBC boys sharing allegedly serious and potentially illegal nude content on social media, and trashing an Airbnb house during an out-of-control party. Both sparked police investigations. Some old boys shrugged off the incidents as 'boys will be boys' and maintained that BBC always would be a great school. Last week a parent alerted me to a 'disgusting' video made and shared on social media by St Joseph's Nudgee College boys about St Rita's girls. Nudgee said 'the behaviour did not meet the standards expected at this college' and was investigating. An appropriate response. Yet some parents like to vent. A Nudgee mum emailed, asking if we 'stop to consider the broader impact these stories have'. 'My son loves his school and wears his uniform with pride,' she continued. 'How unfair it is for his pride to be undermined by criticism based on the actions of a few.' Hmmm. Pride, in any school, is to be earned and not automatically present because of its perceived pedigree – or the significant financial price parents pay for their kids to belong. The broader impact is why it matters. I like how a parent in a general Brisbane schools chat group put it when another questioned why the story was newsworthy: 'Because silence protects the wrong people. 'Parents, schools and the public need to be informed so we can guide our children, hold institutions accountable and create a culture of respect – not secrecy. 'If girls from St Rita's or any other school are affected, their experiences matter. 'Brushing it aside minimises the harm and perpetuates a dangerous silence. 'We must talk about it – loudly, honestly and without shame.' Principals and teachers have to deal with problems that didn't exist when I was a kid – with social media enemy number one. But it's time past students and current parents wearing rose-coloured glasses ditch them in favour of perspective. Schools are complex entities and will never be perfect. They may shape a person, but they should not define them. Kylie Lang is associate editor of The Courier-Mail LOVE Women who drink coffee (in moderation) are more likely to age well, maintaining physical, mental and cognitive health into their 70s and beyond. Can't see this study translating into cheaper prices though. LOATHE A tone-deaf decision by Queensland's Court of Appeal that juvenile criminals who invade homes and attack residents with knives in heinous acts should not have convictions recorded against them. It apparently aids their rehabilitation.
