Yoon Suk Yeol's ex-lawyers drop ‘Yoon Again' political party idea amid backlash
Two lawyers who represented former President Yoon Suk Yeol in his impeachment trial abruptly canceled a press conference Thursday, just hours after announcing plans to launch a new political party under the slogan 'Yoon Again,' named after the disgraced ex-president.
Attorneys Kim Gye-ri and Bae Ui-cheol — who had served on Yoon's impeachment defense team — initially notified the press that they would hold a press briefing Friday in Yeouido, Seoul, to introduce the 'Yoon Again' political party.
The plan was announced in a group chatroom on KakaoTalk that Bae had created and used to invite nearly 600 journalists. In his message, Bae wrote, 'The five attorneys from the former president's legal team will hold a press conference related to a new party tomorrow.'
However, the chatroom soon drew criticism from reporters who questioned Bae's acquisition and use of their private contact information.
Following the backlash, Bae apologized and instead opened a new public-access chatroom. That chatroom, however, was closed within four hours, after it was flooded with images and messages from Yoon's supporters, effectively derailing communication.
Before closing the chatroom, Kim and Bae issued a joint statement saying they had decided to postpone the event, citing concerns that the initiative might lead to misunderstandings about the impeached former president's intentions.
'In the ongoing context of a potential early presidential election, officially launching a party may spark speculation that the president is trying to wield influence or pursue political ambitions — which is not what we intended,' they said.
They also noted that Yoon had personally asked them to refrain from holding the press event, reportedly saying, 'Now is the time to unite our strength.'
Explaining the motivation behind the proposed party, the two said it was aimed at representing the voices of young conservatives and pro-freedom voters whom the ruling People Power Party 'can no longer contain.'
Regarding Yoon's involvement, Seok Dong-hyun, another attorney and former member of his legal team, dismissed the claims, stressing that the former president had no role in the initiative.
'He is not in any way participating in or connected to the party's formation,' Seok said, adding that 'legal representation and political activity should be kept entirely separate.'
The People Power Party, meanwhile, distanced itself from the move. Jang Ye-chan, a former senior party official and prominent Yoon loyalist, criticized the effort in a Facebook post.
'Creating a new party is a strategic blunder that harms not only the conservative bloc but also former President Yoon himself,' Jang wrote. 'I hope this is not just a political stunt to sell 'Yoon's intentions' using naive young people for someone else's political gain.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
19 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Main opposition calls for Lee to proceed with election law retrial
The main opposition People Power Party on Tuesday urged President Lee Jae-myung to proceed with his retrial on election law violation charges, which has been postponed indefinitely by a Seoul court. On Monday, the Seoul High Court said that the first hearing in Lee's trial, which was initially scheduled for June 18, was indefinitely postponed as per Article 84 of the Constitution. Article 84 of the Constitution claims that a sitting president shall not be prosecuted for criminal offenses during his tenure in office except in cases of insurrection or treason. 'I request President Lee Jae-myung to declare that he will accept the proceeding of the trial with confidence, if he is not guilty and all indictments are fabricated, just as he claimed during the election run,' People Power Party floor leader Rep. Kweon Seong-dong said during an intra-party strategy meeting in the morning. 'This would be a path towards protecting the reputation of the president and towards earning the trust of the people,' he added. Kweon criticized the ruling Democratic Party of Korea's plans to railroad a contentious bill aimed at revising the Criminal Procedure Act to halt criminal trials for an elected president. 'The Democratic Party of Korea said that it plans to forcefully pass the legislation on halting trails for a president -- this is an act that rattles the judicial system by creating a law for only one man, President Lee Jae-myung, a criminal defendant undergoing five trials, and this this unprecedented in South Korea's history,' said Kweon. Echoing Kweon's sentiment, People Power Party deputy floor leader Rep. Park Hyeung-soo expressed concerns that the passage of the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Act would effectively 'halt' all five of Lee's trials. 'The Democratic Party of Korea has moved beyond threatening the court to halt the trial, but has forcefully pushed to pass the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Act, which would halt all of President Lee's trials,' Park said during the same intra-party meeting. 'If the bill passes, then all cases, including the one involving subornation of perjury under trials at Seoul High Court, Seoul Central District Court and Suwon District Court, would be halted. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party on Tuesday decided to postpone its plan to convene a plenary session of the National Assembly on Thursday to pass several contentious bills, including the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Act. Democratic Party spokesperson Noh Jong-myeon told reporters at the National Assembly that the momentum in pursuing the passage of the bills will be revived after the members of 'the new leadership are decided.' The party is scheduled to elect its new floor leader on Friday. Lee's postponed retrial came after the Supreme Court returned the case to the Seoul High Court in May, overturning the lower court's decision to acquit Lee of a suspended prison term for violating the Public Official Election Act. Lee has been accused of making false statements ahead of the 2022 presidential election, including lying in a 2021 media interview about a land development corruption scandal in Seongnam, Gyeonggi Province, that took place when he was the mayor of the city. Lee's four other trials involve charges of corruption related to the Seongnam land development scandal, embezzlement of provincial funds during his tenure as Gyeonggi governor, the illegal remittance of funds to North Korea, and subornation of perjury.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Prosecution, CIO ramp up investigation into Yoon ahead of special counsel probe
The prosecution and the state anti-corruption agency are intensifying their investigations into former President Yoon Suk Yeol ahead of the launch of an independent special counsel probe. The ongoing inquiries center on allegations of insurrection, treason and obstruction of a military investigation. According to the prosecution's investigation team, led by Seoul High Prosecutors' Office chief prosecutor Park Se-hyun, the prosecutors have obtained key evidence, including phone server-related data from Yoon's secure phone lines and CCTV records from the Presidential Security Service on Monday. Since January, the investigation team has attempted to secure such records more than once through search warrants, but the PSS denied previous requests, citing the Criminal Procedure Act. The act bans any seizure and search attempts in a place where secret military matters are held, including the presidential residence, without the permission of the authority in charge. The PSS decided to cooperate with the prosecution, which on May 29 initiated another attempt to secure more evidence to substantiate charges against the former president. And the additional digital data stored on the server is reportedly taking time to access, as the PSS is making a voluntary submission while coordinating with the prosecution. The Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials, which is investigating Yoon's alleged interference in a military investigation into the death of Cpl. Chae Su-geun, also requested additional phone records from the presidential office on Monday. Chae is a marine conscript who drowned during a rescue mission in 2023. The Democratic Party of Korea claimed that Yoon tried to hinder an investigation into Lim Seong-geun, the then-commander of the deceased marine's division, and his possible negligence or other wrongdoings in Chae's death. The anti-corruption investigative agency previously secured data related to a specific phone number, which is suspected to be associated with Yoon's private office or workroom. The number was allegedly used to call then-Defense Minister Lee Jong-sup and the marine's case, scheduled for transfer to the police at the time, was suspended shortly thereafter. The CIO suspects Yoon instructed the former minister to delay the transfer of the case via phone. The CIO is reportedly receiving evidence necessary to identify the origin of the phone number. "The agency will transfer the necessary records once the special counsel probe is launched. But, until special prosecutors are appointed, we are committed to investigating the case thoroughly," the CIO official said in a press briefing on Tuesday. Though the National Assembly approved the special counsel probe bills on June 5, both the prosecutors and the state anti-corruption agency pushed ahead with their investigation to ensure there is no investigative gap in the probe. The prosecution, the CIO and the police are required to comply with the special prosecutors' request for investigative records, evidence or the transfer of cases currently under trial. The extent to which the special prosecutors will take over the martial law-related cases is expected to be decided after the special counsel probe is formally activated. Meanwhile, the police are likely to consider an arrest warrant request for Yoon as the former president continued to defy the summons. The police's special investigation unit announced Monday that a second summons was sent to Yoon. 'We requested that he appear for questioning on June 5, but Yoon's legal team rejected the summons. We asked him to comply with the second summons on Thursday,' the police officer said in a press conference held on Monday. Police typically request an arrest warrant if a suspect fails to respond to the third summons The police reportedly claimed that there is nothing more to share in regards to the possible arrest warrant since only the second summons has been issued. But it vowed to take the utmost efforts to conduct all possible investigations. While denying the former president's alleged criminal offenses, Yoon Kab-keun, one of Yoon's legal representatives, insisted Monday that the investigation can be carried out in a written questionnaire, suggesting Yoon is unlikely to comply with the summons.
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Can President Lee stay out of court?
President Lee Jae-myung's term will likely be unaffected by his ongoing criminal trials, with the ruling Democratic Party of Korea set to push for a Criminal Procedure Act amendment that would postpone any criminal trials involving sitting presidents until they leave office. A total of five different criminal trials presented major challenges for Lee during his presidential campaign, allowing other candidates to question whether Lee was truly qualified to lead the country. Some in the legal community expected that the trials would remain hurdles for Lee even after the election as Article 84 of the Constitution -- which stipulates that the president cannot be criminally prosecuted while in office except in cases of insurrection or treason -- does not clarify whether this immunity extends to ongoing trials that began before the president took office. But the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee, led by the Democratic Party, approved a revision to the Criminal Procedure Act in early May to prevent legal ambiguity. The ruling party is reportedly considering proposing the amendment in a National Assembly plenary session on Thursday. 'The Constitution guarantees the president immunity from prosecution in order to ensure stable governance. The Criminal Procedure Act also states that criminal trials fall under the definition of prosecution,' said Democratic Party Rep. Jeon Hyun-heui during the ruling party's Supreme Council meeting on Monday, claiming that the entire case needs to be suspended regardless of when it began. The Democratic Party added that the amendment is a legislative clarification introduced to avoid any conflict between constitutional immunity and the actual judicial process. The main opposition People Power Party condemned the liberal party's legal revision, calling the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Act a 'bulletproof law,' a self-interested measure aimed at granting immunity to the president. 'All are equal before the law. The presidency is not a position to escape trials that began before taking office,' said People Power Party interim leader Kim Yong-tae in a press conference held Sunday, asking whether President Lee is willing to attend a hearing in his trial for alleged election law violations scheduled on June 18. Kim criticized the proposed bills -- the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Act and a proposed expansion of the Supreme Court -- which he said the ruling party is attempting to ram through only for the benefit of the current president. In early May, the Supreme Court's Court Administration Office stated that the judges of each court will have to decide whether to stop or proceed with the trials by applying Article 84 of the Constitution to a criminal defendant who has been elected president. Meanwhile, the Seoul High Court announced Monday that the hearing in Lee's retrial on charges of election law violations, which was set to be held on June 18, will be postponed. 'The court has rescheduled the hearing date and will set a new date later. The decision was made after considering Article 84 of the Constitution,' the Seoul High Court said, without giving a new date for the hearing. At a general meeting of the main opposition party, People Power Party Rep. Kweon Seong-dong said the judges chose to "abandon judicial independence," and the court's decision will be remembered as the judiciary's embarrassing past. "I hope the judges who are tasked to hear Lee's other criminal trials do not make foolish mistakes. I urge the Seoul High Court to withdraw its arbitrary interpretation of Article 84 of the Constitution and appeal to the Supreme Court of Korea for legal clarification," Kweon said. Decisions about Lee's remaining criminal trials, in which the president is accused of subornation of perjury, corruption, illegal money transfers to North Korea and misappropriating public funds, are yet to be announced.
