logo
What the laws say about Vice-President's sudden resignation and vacancy

What the laws say about Vice-President's sudden resignation and vacancy

India Today4 days ago
The resignation of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar came as a surprise to the country in the midst of the crucial ongoing Monsoon Session of the Parliament.The Constitution of India, read with other legislation like the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952 and the Rules framed under the Act deal extensively with what the procedure is to be followed when a Vice-President tenders his resignation.advertisementWHAT DOES CONSTITUTION SAY?Several provisions of the Constitution deal with the resignation or removal of the Vice-President, their powers, their tenure and the election process to select the new Vice President.
Articles 63, 64 and 65 lay down the foundational basis for the constitutional post of the Vice-President of India — designating him as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha and empowering him to discharge the duties of the President of India during casual vacancies or the absence of the President.Article 66 of the Constitution deals with the criteria laid down for the election of the Vice-President. The provision says that the Vice-President is to be elected by members of an electoral college consisting of members of both Houses of the Parliament in accordance with the system of proportional representation. This election is done by way of a single transferable vote and the voting is done through a secret ballot.To be eligible, a person must be an Indian citizen, at least thirty-five years old, and qualified for membership in the Rajya Sabha, and cannot hold any office of profit other than the aforementioned constitutional posts.Article 67 lays down that the Vice-President is entitled to hold office for a term of five years. The provision also allows the Vice President to resign from office by way of a signed letter addressed to the President of India. In case the Vice-President is to be removed, it must be done via a resolution of the Rajya Sabha passed by a majority of all the present members and agreed to by the Lok Sabha. However, such a resolution can be moved only after at least fourteen-days' notice has been given to the Vice-President communicating the intent to move a resolution for his removal.Importantly, Article 67 says that a Vice-President, even after his resignation or the expiry of his term, will continue to hold office until his successor enters his office.Article 68 is particularly pivotal in cases such as a Vice-President's resignation. It specifies that an election to fill a vacancy caused by the expiration of the term must be completed before the term ends. More importantly, when a vacancy occurs due to resignation, death, removal, or otherwise, an election must be held as soon as possible after the vacancy arises.advertisementThe new Vice-President is entitled to a fresh full term of five years from the date of assumption, thereby ensuring the continuity and legitimacy of the office.Article 71 of the Constitution empowers the Supreme Court of India to deal with and decide any and all issues arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice President of India.WHAT DO OTHER LAWS SAY?Turning to the statutory framework, the Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections Act, 1952, and the related Rules of 1974, expand on these provisions.The Act mandates that the Election Commission of India (ECI) is responsible for setting dates for nominations, scrutiny, withdrawal, and polling. In the case of a vacancy due to resignation or removal, the ECI is duty-bound to notify and conduct the elections as soon as reasonably possible after the occurrence of the vacancy, echoing the constitutional direction.The procedure for nominations, scrutiny, withdrawals, and counting of votes relies on the single transferable vote system and is meticulously detailed in the 1974 Rules. The polling for the Vice-President's election always takes place in Parliament House in New Delhi and under the watchful eye of ECI-appointed officers and with the participation of only MPs as electors.advertisementNotably, both the Constitution and the Act vest the ECI with the 'superintendence, direction, and control' of these elections — rooted in Article 324 of the Constitution and echoed in the Act and Rules — giving the ECI comprehensive and essentially plenary powers to plan, execute, and supervise all aspects of these elections.This includes not only following prescribed procedures but also resolving unforeseen situations, always with the imperative that elections are fair, transparent, and completed without undue delay.A key procedural element that the ECI is entrusted with is the notification of the election. Upon the need to fill the Vice-President's office, the ECI sets and publishes a schedule for the process. This public notice must specify important dates such as the last date for making nominations, the date for scrutiny of nominations, the last date for withdrawal of candidates, and the date on which a poll, if necessary, will be taken.The nomination process itself is detailed, requiring each candidate to be nominated by at least twenty electors as proposers and another twenty as seconders, all of whom must be members of the designated electoral college. Every nomination paper must be accompanied by a security deposit as prescribed by the Act and Rules. The Returning Officer is responsible for scrutinising the nomination papers on the date specified in the notification, ensuring eligibility as per constitutional and statutory requirements. If a nomination is rejected, the officer must provide written reasons.advertisementWithdrawal of candidates is permitted, provided it is done before the notified deadline, after which the final list of validly nominated candidates is published. In the event that only one candidate remains validly nominated at the end of this process, that candidate is declared elected unopposed.Where more than one valid nomination subsists, a poll is conducted. Voting is by secret ballot and follows the system of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. The polling venue for a Vice-President's election is invariably the Parliament House in New Delhi, with the precise location and timings fixed and notified by the Election Commission. Every MP who is an elector may cast only one vote and may indicate as many preferences as there are candidates. The Rules mandate strict maintenance of secrecy in the voting process.advertisementAfter voting, the ballots are counted following the single transferable vote method. If any candidate secures the required quota of votes in the first round, they are declared elected; if not, the counting proceeds in rounds, eliminating the candidate with the fewest votes in each round and transferring their votes according to second or subsequent preferences until a candidate attains the quota.The Returning Officer then declares the result and communicates it to the Central Government, which is required to publish the result in the Official Gazette.WHO DECIDES ISSUES ARISING OUT OF ELECTION OF A VICE-PRESIDENT?Judicial oversight, as stated above, exists solely in the Supreme Court, whose jurisdiction is invoked only if the validity of the election is challenged, ensuring that the autonomy and authority of the ECI in conducting the process remains robust and undisturbed during regular functioning.The Act stipulates the form and period for filing such petitions, the reliefs that may be claimed, and grounds upon which an election may be declared void, including corrupt practices, disqualification, improper acceptance or rejection of nominations, and material non-compliance with constitutional or statutory requirements. Notably, if the returned candidate is found not duly elected but another candidate is, the Court may declare the latter as elected.The Rules made under the Act prescribe detailed forms to be used, the procedures for notice, nomination, withdrawal and the various other technicalities of managing the election process. They give the Election Commission flexibility to adapt procedures to unforeseen circumstances while maintaining the secrecy, efficiency, and fairness of the election. The Act also bars the jurisdiction of all courts except the Supreme Court, ensuring expedited and specialised handling of election disputes.- EndsTune InMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Supreme Court
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Malawi President recalls Parliament to amend voting law
Malawi President recalls Parliament to amend voting law

Hans India

time19 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Malawi President recalls Parliament to amend voting law

Malawian President Lazarus Chakwera has ordered the country's recently dissolved Parliament to reconvene on August 5 to amend the voting law to ensure that all eligible citizens, including those assigned to duty on election day, can cast their votes. Malawi's 2019-2025 Parliament was dissolved on Wednesday by National Assembly Speaker Catherine Gotani Hara, in line with constitutional provisions for an election year. However, the Constitution empowers the president to recall Parliament before a general election if a constitutional crisis is deemed to have arisen, Xinhua News Agency reported. A supplement to the government Gazette dated Friday and signed by Chakwera confirmed the decision to reconvene Parliament to consider amending the Presidential, Parliamentary, and Local Government Elections Act. A follow-up statement from the State House on Saturday provided further clarification. "President Chakwera... has ordered that Parliament be reconvened for an emergency session on Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025, to amend the Presidential, Parliamentary, and Local Government Elections Act in order to allow Malawians who will be posted on duty for various electoral services in various parts of the country on election day to cast their vote where they are posted, instead of where they registered," the statement read. It added that the proposed amendment seeks to safeguard every Malawian's constitutional right to vote. Malawi is scheduled to hold its general election on September 16 to elect the president, members of Parliament, and local government councillors. More than 20 presidential aspirants, including incumbent President Chakwera and two former presidents, Peter Mutharika and Joyce Banda, have declared their intention to contest the presidency. Malawi's President Lazarus McCarthy Chakwera was sworn into office on June 28, 2020. Before joining frontline politics, Chakwera was President of the Malawi Assemblies of God from 1989 until he resigned on May 14, 2013 to contest in the 2014 General Elections as a presidential candidate for the Malawi Congress Party.

MHA refuses to share data on CAA beneficiaries
MHA refuses to share data on CAA beneficiaries

The Hindu

time19 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

MHA refuses to share data on CAA beneficiaries

More than a year after the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 became effective, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has refused to share data on the total number of beneficiaries under the Act. A Bharatiya Janata Party MP from West Bengal told The Hindu that fewer than 100 people in his constituency had received citizenship under the CAA even though the number of intended beneficiaries, mostly belonging to the Matua sect, were around 1 lakh. There are around 2.8 crore people from the Matua and Namasudra communities who stand to benefit from the CAA in the State. The CAA Rules were notified on March 11, 2024 to give citizenship to undocumented members of Hindu, Sikh, Parsi, Jain, Buddhist and Christian communities from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh under the Act that was passed in 2019. Ranaghat MP Jagannath Sarkar told The Hindu that the requirement to submit any one document, which will help trace an applicant's roots to Bangladesh, should be dropped and the cut-off date for applying under CAA should be amended too. The existing cut-off date is December 31, 2014. 'Most people do not have any of the documents sought by the MHA to fulfil citizenship criteria. These people came to India to escape persecution, with barely any belongings. How will they provide documents?' Mr. Sarkar said. Following reports from West Bengal, Schedule 1A of the CAA Rules was tweaked on July 8, 2024, and the list of nine documents to prove that the applicant is a national of Afghanistan or Bangladesh or Pakistan was expanded to include any document issued by the State or the Centre or quasi-judicial authority in India identifying or representing the applicant or their parents or grandparents or great-grandparents as a national of these three countries . Anticipating non-cooperation in Opposition-ruled States, the CAA Rules entrusted Central government officials posted in States, including officials of Directorate of Census, Postal Department, Railways, National Informatics Centre (NIC) and Intelligence Bureau, to process the applications. On April 2, Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai said in the Rajya Sabha that 'thousands were granted citizenship', while responding to Trinamool Congress member Sushmita Dev's remarks that merely 350 people were granted citizenship under the CAA. The Minister did not specify the number. The Act was mostly expected to benefit people in West Bengal and Assam as those who had arrived from Pakistan had entered legally and possessed one of the documents required to acquire citizenship. In West Bengal, most intended beneficiaries already have voter cards and other identity documents. One of the criteria to avail citizenship under the CAA is that the applicant has to declare that he or she is a foreigner. The Pakistani applicants from the six non-Muslim communities would have been eligible under the Citizenship Act, 1955 also after living in India continuously for 12 years. According to Hindu Singh, president, Seemant Lok Sangathan, a group that advocates for the rights of Pakistani minority migrants in India, of the around 8,500 people who applied under the CAA in Rajasthan, 7,250 were granted citizenship in the past one year. On March 10, Assam's Parliamentary Affairs Minister Chandra Mohan Patowary informed the Assembly that two applicants in Assam were granted citizenship under CAA. In Gujarat, at least 373 people had got citizenship via the CAA. While discussing the legislation in Rajya Sabha on December 11, 2019, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said that 'lakhs and crores' of people would benefit from the law. However, Director, Intelligence Bureau had deposed before a parliamentary committee in 2018 that around 31,000 people would be the immediate beneficiaries. The MHA has refused to share information on how many people have either applied or had been granted citizenship. The Hindu filed a Right to Information Act (RTI) application in June 2024 and in September 2024, the MHA refused to provide the information. An appeal was also filed with the Central Information Commission (CIC), which hears appeals from applicants who have issues with RTI responses from public authorities of the Union government. The CIC's Chief Commissioner Heeralal Samariya heard The Hindu's case on July 9. The RTI was limited to applications received on the portal, which is run by the Home Ministry as the entire process is online. The Home Ministry's representative, Ram Dayal Meena, did not specifically dispute any of The Hindu's arguments during the hearing, and when asked by the CIC if he wanted to speak, declined to make any oral submissions. A written response reiterated the MHA's earlier refusals, which simply stated that the information was 'not being maintained as desired by you'. 'Upon perusal of records and examining the facts of the case at hand, it is noted that the Appellant's queries had been appropriately answered by the concerned PIO,' Mr. Samariya wrote in his order. 'The reply is self- explanatory and information as permissible under the provisions of the RTI Act has been duly supplied to the Appellant.' The decision was arrived at the same day, and was uploaded at a later date.

Monsoon session: Parliament to debate Operation Sindoor; after washout week, top guns to face off
Monsoon session: Parliament to debate Operation Sindoor; after washout week, top guns to face off

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Monsoon session: Parliament to debate Operation Sindoor; after washout week, top guns to face off

Lok Sabha NEW DELHI: After a week of disruptions, Parliament's Monsoon session is poised to shift gears on Monday with an intense debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor , as the ruling BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and the opposition prepare to go head-to-head over national security and foreign policy issues. Top ministers from the government and senior leaders from the opposition are expected to participate in what is being billed as a marathon 16-hour debate in both Houses, starting with the Lok Sabha on Monday, followed by the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. These discussions, sources told the news agency PTI, may extend well beyond the allotted time, given the political stakes involved. Home minister Amit Shah, defence minister Rajnath Singh, and external affairs minister S Jaishankar are expected to lead the government's charge during the debate. Prime Minister Narendra Modi reportedly may intervene to highlight what the government views as its 'robust' record on national security. On the opposition side, Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge are likely to lead the charge, alongside Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav and other senior leaders from the INDIA bloc. Their criticism has focused on alleged intelligence failures preceding the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 civilians, and on US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of mediating between India and Pakistan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Baking Soda Tricks Everyone Should Know About Beach Raider Undo Rahul Gandhi has targeted the government's foreign policy, arguing that India failed to garner international backing during Operation Sindoor. He has also cited Trump's mediation remarks as evidence of the government's diplomatic setbacks. PM Modi, however, has hailed Operation Sindoor, India's cross-border strike on terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, as a resounding success that showcased the effectiveness of the country's indigenous defence capabilities. 'India has drawn a 'new normal' in its response to Pakistan-linked terrorism, and it will not differentiate between terrorists and their sponsors,' PM Modi asserted, defending the government's firm approach in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack. India caused serious damage to several Pakistani air bases in the four-day conflict. Meanwhile, the NDA plans to field a wide range of speakers, including ministers and MPs from the seven multi-party delegations that travelled to over 30 global capitals to explain India's position post-Operation Sindoor. These include Shrikant Shinde (Shiv Sena), Sanjay Jha (JDU), and Harish Balayogi (TDP), among others. A key point of interest remains whether Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who led one of the delegations to the US, will be allowed to speak during the debate. His public praise for the government's handling of the operation has reportedly created friction within his party. However, sources suggest that a way may be found for him to participate, given the significance of his role. While the focus is shifting to national security, one unresolved issue continues to hang over the session -- the opposition's demand for a debate on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The opposition claims the Election Commission's exercise could benefit the BJP in the upcoming Bihar polls, an allegation the EC has denied, stating the revision is aimed solely at ensuring only eligible voters are on the rolls. Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju, speaking on July 25 after the session's first week ended in a washout, confirmed that the opposition had agreed to begin discussions on the twin issues of Pahalgam and Sindoor. However, on the SIR issue, Rijiju reiterated the government's position: 'Every issue cannot be taken up for discussion in Parliament at once,' adding that the government will consider the demand for a separate debate in due course, as per the rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store