People are struggling to separate Google's new video AI from real life
AI generated clips made by the new cutting-edge tool Veo 3 can include dialogue for the first time to create realistic videos from street interviews that never happened, to fake stand-up comedy shows.
The tech has even been used to 'resurrect' Greek mathematician Pythagoras to explain his famous theorem in front of a fake Parthenon.
But while seasoned experts can tell the video is faked, the majority of the fast-scrolling public may notice little difference between a deepfaked clip and a genuine one.
Californian creator Ari Kuschnir experimented with the Veo 3, which uses Google's filmmaking tool Flow.
He wrote on Instagram : 'AI can Talk! I spent 2 hours playing with Veo 3 @googledeepmind and it blew my mind now that it can do sound! This is all Generative AI text to video out of the box… it comes with dialogue, sound design and music.'
In another example of how the software could be used in minutes, one creator uploaded a video of a news broadcaster appearing to read out a story about how Buckingham Palace had been taken over by an army of cats.
The faked clip shows an English-accented newsreader as he informs his audience: 'Breaking news: A Scottish bald cat named Big White has led an army of felines to seize Buckingham Palace, declaring itself the new King of Britain.'
Another generated video showed a female newsreader appearing to announce that bestselling author J K Rowling had sunk on a yacht attacked by orcas.
The clipped female presenter is shown saying: 'In shocking news, JK Rowling's yacht sank with her onboard after being attacked by orcas off the coast of Turkey.'
The cutting-edge AI technology has also been used to create musical performances.
One uploaded to YouTube by AI creative Jerrod Lew showed Google's tool used to create a series of musicians, from an opera soprano in front of an orchestra to a rock band appearing to perform live on stage in front of a wild crowd.
One user commented: 'The internet is going to be even bigger wasteland than it is now. The fact that it takes just a few seconds to create these clips with a few words is insane.
'We already lived through the era of TikTok brain rot, the doom scrolling, and this will advance it even more. Can't imagine where the internet space will be in 5 years or less.'
But YouTubers are concerned that the new tech is allowing copycats to effortlessly plagiarise their work.
Mark Brown is behind the channel Game Maker's Toolkit and produces clips on video game design for his 1.65 million subscribers.
This week, his voice was stolen using AI and reused to narrate a clip on another anonymous channel.
He explained that while YouTube has systems to detect traditional plagiarism, AI has made it easier to lift content without the author even knowing.
Instead, the platform relies on viewers realising content has been stolen and reporting copycats, which Mark says have become a 'tedious burden' for creators.
He told the Metro: 'In this case the only way to know that someone had trained an AI on my voice and then used that to narrate a video, was for someone to find and watch it, realise it sounded suspiciously like me, and then send the link to me so I could report it to YouTube.
'Right now it's effortless to impersonate someone but almost impossible to detect it.'
AI or Artificial Intelligence involves computer systems performing tasks usually done by a human, such as decision-making and reasoning.
AI is trained using machine learning, which enables it to understand complex concepts such as multiple outcomes and probabilities.
Natural language processing allows computers to also understand and then manipulate human language.
The technology is increasingly being rolled out to replace many administrative functions and jobs normally carried out by human workers.
Source: NASA
'But beyond that, it's just a very strange, invasive and quite creepy thing to have happened. My voice is a very fundamental part of who I am – and not something I was expecting another person to steal!'
While cheap use of AI to imitate work is concerning, Mark believes there will still be a market for human-produced content.
He added: 'This video received over 60,000 views, some amount of advertising income, and was high in search results for the topic. So it's pretty concerning that this easily generated slop content is pushing out stuff made by humans.
'However, I do believe that there will always be an audience for human-made content, made with effort and heart. And I think YouTube is showing that it doesn't want this sort of content on its site.
'So hopefully real content will win out in the end. But right now there is a serious technical imbalance between making this stuff and detecting it.'
It comes as the Government has come under fire after unveiling plans to exempt tech firms from copyright laws.
Sir Elton John said he felt 'betrayed' by ministers, who are on track to 'rob young people of their legacy and their income', who he said wouldn't have the resources to fight tech giants.
He told BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that ministers were being 'absolute losers and I'm very angry about it'.
Google unveiled its latest wave of updates on Tuesday, including 'AI Mode', which rolled out across the US this week, and new additions to its Gemini virtual assistant.
At its developer conference in California, the tech giant also unleashed its new real-time translation software.
Google's latest AI features include: AI Mode for searches- available only in the US
A 'try it on' feature for online shopping
Google Veo 3 – creates realistic videos with fake characters and dialogue
Gemini Live – point your phone at an item and talk to an AI assistant about it
New smart replies on Gmail
It showed how AI could now be used, for example, to help a tourist book accommodation in Mexico by translating their sentences into Spanish and even imitating their accent to match. More Trending
Online shoppers will also be able to make use of a new 'try it on' feature. By uploading a picture of themselves, consumers will be able to see how they look in a range of clothes.
The technology is so intuitive that it understands how a range of fabrics and materials fold, stretch and drape on different bodies.
And, in another huge innovation, once they've found the perfect garment, shoppers can use a new price-tracking feature that will purchase the product once it is reduced.
Customers can enter their budget, and the AI wizardry will buy the item for them once it reaches the desired price.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: WWE Saturday Night's Main Event 2025 UK start time for free YouTube live stream
MORE: Warning to 1,800,000,000 Gmail users over sophisticated scam
MORE: Is the Europa League final 2025 on YouTube? How to watch for free in the UK
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
29 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Google Pixel Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 8 Classic: The Ultimate Showdown
The smartwatch market continues to evolve, offering users a variety of choices that cater to different preferences and lifestyles. Samsung has already released its new Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, and the most anticipated release of 2025 is the Google Pixel Watch 4. These two devices represent distinct approaches to design, functionality, and user experience. Samsung leans into its heritage of blending traditional aesthetics with innovative technology, while Google emphasizes a sleek, minimalist design paired with modern performance. By examining their design, size options, display, hardware, battery life, and features, you can determine which watch aligns best with your needs. Watch this video on YouTube. Design: Classic Heritage vs. Modern Minimalism The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is a testament to timeless design. Its iconic rotating bezel not only adds a tactile element to navigation but also reinforces its classic watch aesthetic. The 'squirkle' case—a fusion of square and circular shapes—encases a fully circular display, striking a balance between vintage charm and modern functionality. This design appeals to users who appreciate a traditional look with a touch of innovation. In contrast, the Google Pixel Watch 4 adopts a 'water drop' design, where the glass seamlessly curves into the case. This creates a clean, minimalist appearance that exudes modernity. The slim bezels and smooth contours make it an attractive choice for those who prioritize contemporary elegance. Whether you prefer the tactile familiarity of Samsung's rotating bezel or the sleek simplicity of Google's design, both watches offer distinct visual identities. Size Options: Flexibility for Different Wrists Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is available exclusively in a bold 46 mm size, making it a statement piece on the wrist. This size is ideal for users who prefer a larger, more prominent smartwatch. However, it may not be as comfortable for individuals with smaller wrists. Google, on the other hand, provides more flexibility with two size options for the Pixel Watch 4: a smaller 41 mm model and a larger 45 mm version. This range accommodates a wider audience, making sure that users with smaller wrists or those who prefer a more compact wearable can find a suitable option. The availability of multiple sizes highlights Google's commitment to inclusivity and user comfort. Display: Brightness vs. Smoothness The display is a critical component of any smartwatch, and both models excel in this area, albeit with different priorities. Samsung equips the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic with a 1.34-inch Super AMOLED display that delivers an impressive 3,000 nits of brightness. This ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, making it a practical choice for outdoor enthusiasts. Google's Pixel Watch 4, while slightly smaller in its smaller variant (1.27 inches) and slightly larger in its bigger model (1.43 inches), features AMOLED displays with at least 2,000 nits of brightness. Additionally, the Pixel Watch 4 features a 60 Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals for an immersive user experience. While Samsung prioritizes outdoor visibility, Google focuses on balancing display size options with smooth performance, catering to users who value both aesthetics and functionality. Hardware: Power and Storage Under the hood, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is powered by the Exynos W1000 chip, paired with 2 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage. This combination provides ample space for apps, media, and other data, making it a versatile device for everyday use. Google's Pixel Watch 4, on the other hand, features the Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 chip, which is designed to deliver improved performance and energy efficiency. It also includes 2 GB of RAM but offers 32 GB of storage. While Samsung provides more storage capacity, Google's newer chip may offer better overall performance and battery optimization. This makes the Pixel Watch 4 a compelling choice for users who prioritize innovative hardware. Battery Life: Longevity vs. Efficiency Battery life is a crucial factor for any smartwatch user. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic features a 445 mAh battery, which provides 1-2 days of usage depending on activity levels and settings. This longevity makes it a reliable option for users who need a watch that can keep up with their busy schedules. Google's Pixel Watch 4, by comparison, includes a smaller 306 mAh battery in its 41 mm model and a 420 mAh battery in the 45 mm version. However, the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 chip and Wear OS 6 optimizations may help offset the smaller battery capacity, potentially extending usage times. This highlights Google's focus on efficiency and software integration to enhance the user experience. Software and Features: Ecosystem and Health Tracking Both watches run on Wear OS 6, but their ecosystems and features differ significantly. Samsung integrates its Galaxy Eye and Gemini Assistant, offering advanced bioactive sensors for heart rate, ECG, temperature, and antioxidant tracking. Additional features such as a running coach and Samsung Health further enhance its fitness capabilities, making it a strong choice for health-conscious users. Google, meanwhile, emphasizes a streamlined user experience with its Material You redesign and Gemini 2 assistant. The Pixel Watch 4 also includes enhanced fitness tracking, workout building, and expanded activity monitoring. These features cater to users who value simplicity and functionality in their daily routines. While both watches offer robust health and productivity tools, their distinct approaches ensure that users can find a device that aligns with their specific needs. Key Differentiators: What Makes Each Unique The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic's standout feature is its rotating bezel, which provides intuitive tactile navigation. Combined with its comprehensive health tracking suite, including unique metrics like antioxidant monitoring, it appeals to fitness enthusiasts and traditional watch lovers alike. Google's Pixel Watch 4, on the other hand, focuses on innovative design with slimmer bezels and a modern aesthetic. The inclusion of the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 chip underscores its commitment to performance and efficiency, making it an attractive option for users who prioritize innovation and style. Making the Right Choice Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and Google Pixel Watch 4 ultimately depends on your personal preferences and priorities. If you value a polished, traditional design with reliable features and comprehensive health tracking, Samsung's offering is a strong contender. However, if you're drawn to sleek aesthetics, modern performance, and the promise of technological advancements, Google's Pixel Watch 4 may be the better fit. Both watches cater to distinct audiences, making sure there's a smartwatch for every preference and lifestyle. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in AMOLED Display. Source & Image Credit: Demon's Tech Filed Under: Android News, Gadgets News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mirror
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Tech companies know when ‘you're looking at pictures of your ex'
Social media developers have worked tirelessly to track your every move, and the designers behind these apps have confirmed they can even see when you're stalking an ex's profile Tech experts who helped to create the apps we use day in day out have since opened up about just how much of your online behaviour they track – and it turns out it's just about everything. The Social Dilemma is a groundbreaking documentary that dropped on Netflix, revealing to audiences the inner workings of their most used apps. From Google to Facebook and Instagram, the creators behind some of these big hitters opened up about just how much of what you get up to on your devices is monitored and used to keep you online. "If you are not paying for the product. You are the product". These were powerful words used by former Google design ethicist and leading voice throughout the film, Tristan Harris. He explained in simple terms the ethics behind sites - that while they may seem like a simple way to see what your friends are up to or source new information, they are essentially "competing for your attention". The technology ethicist named some of the world's biggest social media apps and how their business models are all set to keep people engaged on their screens. Other experts chimed in to explain that while many of these services we deem to be free, they are in fact not, it's just that they are in fact paid for by advertisers – ultimately, our attention is the product. The documentary explains the way in which these booming tech companies, in order to be successful, need to have accurate predictions. How they do that is with a hell of a lot of data, which they gather through constantly monitoring our online behaviour. Jeff Seibert, Twitter 's former executive and serial tech entrepreneur, explained just how this works. He said: "What I want people to know is that everything they're doing online is being watched, is being tracked, is being measured. Every single action you take is carefully monitored. and recorded." "Many people call this surveillance capitalism," Harris explains. He added: "Capitalism profits off of the infinite tracking of everywhere everyone goes by large technology companies whose business model is to make sure that advertisers are as successful as possible." When explaining just how much tech companies monitor, Seibert said they have the capability to see not only when you look at something but also how long you're looking at it for. This helps them to understand users' emotions on a deeper level when they're feeling lonely or even in depressive states. "They know when people are looking at photos of their ex romantic partners," the tech entrepreneur explained. "They know what you're doing late at night. They know the entire thing." If one thing became clear in The Social Dilemma, it was that technology companies have more unprecedented amounts of information about us than anyone has ever had before. The more we continue to use these apps, the better they get to know their users and the more time they can guarantee we spend using their platforms. To uncover more about the online world and the intelligent minds behind these apps, you can watch The Social Dilemma, exclusively on Netflix. It's full description reads: "This documentary-drama hybrid explores the dangerous human impact of social networking, with tech experts sounding the alarm on their own creations."
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Skibidi' and ‘mouse jiggler' among the oddities added to the dictionary
The words 'skibidi' and 'mouse jiggler' may come across as gibberish or nonsensical but they have now been added to the Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge said it decided to include skibidi after phrases such as 'that wasn't very skibidi rizz of you' entered into the mainstream. Defined in the dictionary as 'a word that can have different meanings such as 'cool' or 'bad', or can be used with no real meaning as a joke'. An example of its use is, 'What the skibidi are you doing?'' Last year, Kim Kardashian also shared a video on social media showing a necklace that had been engraved with 'skibidi toilet', which was a gift from her daughter. Lexicologists for the online dictionary, established in 1999, said they only add words which they think will have 'staying power'. Working from home helped 'mouse jiggler', meaning a device or piece of software used to make it seem as though someone is working when they are not, to gain its place in the dictionary. Gen alpha – referring to people born in the 2010s – and delulu, an abbreviation of delusional, are among the 6,000 new additions. The phrases work wife and work spouse, red flag and green flag, broligarchy and tradwife have also been added after repeated use over the last year. Tradwife is short for traditional wife – a woman who embraces conventional gender roles within a marriage, prioritising home-making, childcare and catering to her husband's needs – while broligarchy refers to a blend of a Silicon Valley-style 'tech bro' and oligarchy. Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg were all classed as members of the broligarchy after they attended Donald Trump's presidential inauguration earlier this year. Lewk was also among the new additions this year, and refers to a style, fashion or outfit which is usually unusual, impressive and might stand out. Work wife and work spouse, referring to relationships between colleagues, were among the new entries alongside inspo, which is short for inspiration. RAAC – an abbreviation for reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete – is an environmental term which has also entered the dictionary after widespread safety concerns over the material widely used in buildings during the second half of the 20th century. Red flag and green flag were both updated entries, and are used to describe if something good is about to happen or something bad is about to happen respectively. Colin McIntosh, lexical programme manager of the Cambridge Dictionary, said: 'It's not every day you get to see words like skibidi and delulu make their way into the dictionary. 'We only add words where we think they'll have staying power. Internet culture is changing the English language and the effect is fascinating to observe and capture in the dictionary.'
