Axelrod: Harris ‘setting herself up' for 2028 presidential run
Harris released a statement on Wednesday saying she had 'given serious thought to asking the people of California for the privilege to serve as their Governor,' but ultimately decided against it.
Axelrod, appearing on CNN's 'The Source with Kaitlan Collins,' said 'it's clear that you read her statement, that she is setting herself up to run.'
'She will begin as the polling leader in any race for president just by dint of having been the nominee the last time,' he added.
'But a lot of Democrats want to turn the page on all of that and look forward, and so it's not going to be easy for her,' he added.
Harris, in her statement about staying out of the governor's race, said she'd remain involved in efforts to elect Democrats to office.
'I have extraordinary admiration and respect for those who dedicate their lives to public service—service to their communities and to our nation. At the same time, we must recognize that our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people, culminating in this moment of crisis,' Harris said.
'As we look ahead, we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking—committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook,' she added.
Axelrod, who served as a top adviser to former President Obama, said Harris 'wouldn't have been a slam dunk in a governor's race either.'
She would have faced Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who also served as former President Biden's secretary of Health and Human Services, for the Democratic nomination. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is term limited.
Axelrod told host Kaitlan Collins that for Harris, 'losing a governor's race would have been the end of her political career.'
On an optimistic note, he added the former vice president had come within a 'point and a half of the presidency' last November.
Harris is expected to appear on CBS's 'The Late Show' on Thursday in her first postelection interview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
"Forgive Me Nebraska, I Wasn't Familiar With Y'alls Game": Over 2 Million People Have Watched This Video Of A Republican Lawmaker Being Passionately Booed And Heckled At A Town Hall
Republican lawmaker Mike Flood was recently booed and heckled at a town hall in Nebraska, and the video is GLORIOUS. Over two million people have watched this TikTok that began with Mike asking, "Do you think people who are 28 years old, who can work and refuse to work, should get free healthcare?" As the crowd screamed a resounding "YESSSS," Mike looked like he was thinking, "Oh no." Related: The face of someone who did not receive the answer they expected: "I don't think that the majority of Nebraskans agree with you," he finally said. When he asked for the next slide of the presentation, people began chanting, "Tax the rich!" Related: Visibly frustrated, Mike tried again: "If you choose not to work. You. Do. Not. Get. Free. Healthcare." But the crowd wasn't having it and screamed, "BOOOOOO!" Mike continued, "Money does not fall out of the sky. It does not grow on trees. It comes from all of you. I wish there was a world we could live in where everything came from the government, and it was free. But that will never, ever, ever happen." Notably, he did not offer the obvious solution of, IDK, making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share??? Throughout the town hall, people also shouted things like "vote him out!" and "liar!" The only time in the video that Mike received applause was when he supported the release of the Epstein files. Naturally, folks in the comments had a lot to say. This person pointed out, "even if you work healthcare isn't free!!!!" Related: Many people said what we're all thinking: "Healthcare should be a basic human right." "i love that you can hear the whole crowd say 'YES' it restored my faith in American society." "'Should people in the richest society in history have access to life saving care' isn't the gotcha he thinks it is." "Forgive me Nebraska, I wasn't familiar with yalls game DAMN." Related: "*the majority screams yes* 'the majority doesn't agree with you.'" And finally, "'it comes from all of you' SIR YOU FORGOT TO TAX THE BILLIONAIRES." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
NYC Mayor Eric Adams' bid for reelection suffers big blow as Campaign Finance Board denies matching funds
The New York City Campaign Finance Board has once again denied millions of dollars in matching funds to Mayor Eric Adams' struggling efforts to keep his job. It is part of a long standoff between the mayor and the board that relates to his corruption indictment and allegations of improper contributions from straw donors and foreign governments. Even though the indictment against Adams was dropped, the board denied him the funds for the 10th time. "The board determined Mayor Adams' campaign has failed to demonstrate eligibility for public funds payments at this time on two grounds. One, failure to provide requested information and, two, reason to believe the campaign has violated the law," said Frederick Schaffer, chair of the Campaign Finance Board. It was a stunning blow to Adams' attempt to stay in Gracie Mansion. The campaign board's decision to withhold millions in matching funds will make it difficult for Adams to even the playing field in his uphill battle to run as an independent against Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, the winner of the Democratic primary, and a crowded field that also includes former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa. "The board's investigation of the Adams campaign is ongoing. As stewards of taxpayer dollars, we are committed to enforcing the rules fairly and equally to all candidates," Schaffer said. The Adams campaign was livid, saying the ruling "raises serious questions about fairness, timing and selective enforcement" and "We are reviewing all legal options, including formal action to compel the release of public matching funds." Mamdani received nearly $1.7 million, Sliwa got $1.9 million, and independent candidate James Walden got $237,000. Cuomo, who is also running as an independent, did not receive funds because he didn't decide to actively campaign until after the filing deadline. The Campaign Finance Board's actions came as Adams took issue with Mamdani's public safety policies, specifically his insistence of limiting NYPD functions and having social workers respond to domestic violence and other calls. Mamdani told law enforcement officials at a National Night Out event that his plan, "enables officers to focus on serious crimes and creates a Department of Community Safety that focuses on mental health, on homelessness, on so much that we have tasked our officers with which has made it more difficult for them." Adams dismissed Mamdani's plan, using as an example the 2022 killings of NYPD officers Wilbert Mora and Jason Rivera. "It's terrible idea. People tend to believe that responding to domestic violence cases are routine cases. It sounds nice. Just domestic violence. It's one of the most dangerous jobs that a police officer could respond to. Officers Mora and Rivera were assassinated responding to a domestic violence case," Adams said. However, Mamdani's campaign didn't take the mayor's attack lying down. A spokesperson pointed out that Adams slashed $3 million from a program for victims of domestic violence, while Mamdani's Department of Community Safety will allocate $40 million for victim's services. It would also make it easier for police officers to "actually do the essential jobs of stopping crime," the spokesperson said.
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Capital Jewish Museum shooting suspect indicted on murder and hate crime charges and could face death penalty
Gun violenceFacebookTweetLink Follow Federal prosecutors secured an indictment Wednesday detailing nearly 10 charges connected with the killings of Israeli Embassy staff members Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim earlier this year. The indictment against Elias Rodriguez includes counts of premeditated murder and hate crimes resulting in death. It also includes legal findings that authorize the Justice Department to pursue the death penalty. The step sets the stage for the Justice Department to pursue its first death penalty case out of Washington, DC, in years. It also means that the department cleared a key, and difficult hurdle – convincing a grand jury that Rodriguez's motivation for the murder was antisemitism. Rodriguez has not yet entered a formal plea in court and has been in federal custody since the fatal shooting on May 21. According to prosecutors, Rodriguez was caught on surveillance footage approaching the two victims as they prepared to leave an event at the Capital Jewish Museum. Rodriguez allegedly fired at the two Israeli embassy staffers several times, and then after they had fallen to the ground, leaned over them 'with his arm extended, and firing several more times.' As Milgrim tried to crawl away, Rodriguez allegedly 'followed behind her and fired again.' Rodriguez then appeared to reload his firearm as the woman began to sit up, and, once he reloaded, he allegedly shot at her again. Convincing a trial jury that Rodriguez committed hate crimes may still be a difficult task for the prosecutors assigned to the case, as the evidentiary standard for a conviction is far higher than the one required for an indictment. One hurdle in proving that the murder was motivated by religious bigotry and not vitriol against the state of Israel is that Rodriguez repeatedly denounced Israel over the war in Gaza both at the scene of the crime and in alleged statements online — including his comment to police after his arrest that 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza.' And if a trial jury convicts, prosecutors will then have to prove that capital punishment is warranted, a feat that hasn't been accomplished in the district for many years. While they now have the legal authority to do so, DOJ will still have to inform a judge whether it plans to pursue a death sentence. CNN's Holmes Lybrand contributed to this report.
