Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says
Some 2.2 million Afghans have crossed the border from Iran and Pakistan since the start of the year, according to the latest figures from the U.N. refugee agency. They arrive in a country struggling with climate change, a stagnant economy and a humanitarian crisis. Some 60% of those returning to Afghanistan are under 18.
Stephanie Loose, a country program manager at U.N. Habitat, said reintegrating these millions was critical for a peaceful future in Afghanistan.
'If you come back to a country where resources are already scarce, there's a lot of competition already for jobs, land, housing, any sort of services, it's clear that if you don't foster dialogue between the local population and those arriving, this feeling of competition will grow and reduce social cohesion, which is like creating another root cause for war and conflicts,' Loose told a media briefing in Geneva. 'And the country has seen enough of that.'
It is important for people to understand that those returning are not a burden, she added. They come with skills and are part of a solution for social and economic stability.
People bring what they can carry from Iran and Pakistan, leaving behind their homes and the majority of their belongings. Afghan authorities offer support at the border with cash, food, shelter, health care and onward transport to settlements across the country.
The Taliban have urged their neighbors to avoid forcibly returning Afghans and to treat them with dignity. Iran and Pakistan deny targeting Afghans, saying they are expelling foreigners living in their countries illegally.
Women and girls are particularly hard hit once they return to Afghanistan, where education is banned for females beyond grade six and the Taliban restrict access to many jobs and public spaces.
Loose said Afghan women and girls lacked social, educational and economic development opportunities. Requirements to have a male guardian when leaving the home created further barriers for women-headed households.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Over 4 years since the Taliban took Kabul, millions of Afghans have been sent back to a country in crisis
Over the course of the past four years since the Taliban took control of Kabul, plunging Afghanistan into a humanitarian crisis and stripping away women's rights, millions of Afghans who initially fled have now been expelled from Iran and Pakistan, according to the United Nations. Over 1.5 million Afghans have returned to Afghanistan so far this year, according to the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM). 700,000 Afghan migrants have returned to Afghanistan from Iran this year as of June 2025, according to the UN. Some have never set foot in Afghanistan, while others haven't been in the country since fleeing it decades ago, said Arafat Jamal, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) representative in Afghanistan. Russia became the first country to recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's official government, but other countries have not done so. Many of the returnees arrived at the Afghan border in buses 'bewildered, disoriented, and tired and hungry,' according to Jamal. Earlier this year, Iran ordered all of the estimated 2 million undocumented Afghans -- out of the estimated 6 million total Afghans in Iran -- to leave the country. Since the 12-day war between Israel and Iran in June, UN agencies have seen a large increase in the number of Afghans crossing the border from Iran back into Afghanistan, Jamal said. This increase of Afghans leaving Iran came as the government of Iran intensified their campaign against Afghans, accusing many of them of espionage, according to the Center for Human Rights in Iran. Pakistan has also accelerated the expulsion of Afghan refugees within its borders since April. More Afghans are expected to leave Pakistan after the government of Pakistan confirmed it won't renew Proof of Registration cards for Afghans, according to the IOM. Some experts warn that these actions constitute a violation of the principle of non-refoulement – meaning not forcing refugees or asylum seekers to return to a country where they may be subject to persecution – in possible violation of international law. In previous years, UNHCR could provide $2,000 in cash assistance to returnee Afghan families, enabling them to build autonomy and get back on their feet once they returned to their home country. In the past few months, cuts in foreign aid funding have decreased that budget to just $156 per family, 'simply enabling a person to survive for a week or two on the basic necessities,' Jamal said. Once inside Afghanistan, returnees' face difficult conditions back at home. In addition to the Taliban restricting women's rights by banning their movements outside of the home without a male guardian and by restricting their access to education past age 12, Afghanistan is also facing climate change and environmental challenges -- around a third of Afghans don't have access to basic drinking water, according to Unicef. The World Food Program reported that 3.1 million Afghans are on the brink of starvation. Zahra, a journalist living in Afghanistan who asked ABC News to use only her first name due to fear of persecution by the Taliban, said that Afghans have done their best to support returnees, despite having very few resources themselves. "Even if I have one extra pillow, I should give it to others," she told ABC News. 'It's enough if we eat lunch and skip dinner to give this meal to another.' In the last several months, international humanitarian aid funding has been slashed by previously committed allies. In April 2025, the U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction announced that it was cutting nearly all assistance programs to Afghanistan. Since the Taliban takeover in 2021, the U.S. had been Afghanistan's largest donor, according to SIGAR. Soon after the U.S.'s April announcement, the U.K. -- another major donor to humanitarian initiatives in the country -- reduced its aid to Afghanistan by 19%. More than 400 health facilities, 400 acute malnutrition centers, and 300 clinics for survivors of gender based violence have shut down as a result, according to the UN. Zahra said she has witnessed the devastating consequences of these facilities' closures. She said there was a pregnant woman who needed medical help but couldn't go to her local clinic, which had shuttered due to aid cuts. The expecting mother could not immediately secure a male chaperone to travel to the nearest open clinic, as mandated by the Taliban, Zahra said. As a result, according to Zahra, both the woman and her baby lost their lives. 'You just cut the aid to kill people slowly,' she told ABC News. 'It is like you're firing and shooting at humans.' Now, as millions of additional Afghans return to a country already facing multiple humanitarian crises, many international NGOs are operating with inadequate funding to address the many issues in the country. UNHCR, for example, said it has less than a quarter of the funding it needs to address the emergency situation in Afghanistan and neighboring countries. Additionally, the International Rescue Committee has had to suspend some of their education services in Afghanistan. These international bodies are calling for an increase in funding and support. "More humanitarian aid is urgently needed to protect and assist Afghans forced to flee," the UNHCR wrote on its website. 'What's happening in Afghanistan are crimes against humanity – crimes against the whole of humanity – which should shock our conscience and provoke action by all,' said Richard Bennett, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Afghanistan. "It is not time to give up."
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Suddenly Shifts With Gen Z
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has rebounded with Gen Z voters, according to a new poll. Trump's approval rating among the youngest voters remains underwater, but the latest YouGov/Economist poll, conducted between August 9-11, shows Trump's net approval rating at -28 (33 percent approve, 61 percent disapprove), a 10-point jump from last month when it was -38 (18 percent approved and 66 percent disapproved). But his net approval rating remains far lower than it was in January, when it stood at +5 points. Why It Matters In the 2024 election, Trump made inroads with young voters, narrowing the Democrats' traditional lead among Gen Z—a group that has typically leaned left in recent cycles. According to AP VoteCast, voters ages 18 to 29 supported then Vice President Kamala Harris over Trump by just 51 percent to 47 percent. In 2020, Joe Biden carried the same age group by a much wider margin, winning 61 percent to Trump's 36 percent. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in Washington. Alex Brandon/AP What To Know Trump's standing with Gen Z voters has improved over the past month, with notable gains on the economy, immigration, and inflation, alongside modest increases in trust and confidence in his leadership, according to the polling. The August YouGov/Economist poll surveyed 1,635 adults and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percent. The July poll surveyed 1,680 adults and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percent. On the economy, approval rose from 30 percent in July to 36 percent in August, while disapproval fell from 64 percent to 54 percent. Meanwhile, approval of his handling of inflation jumped from 23 percent to 31 percent, with disapproval dropping from 72 percent to 60 percent. Inflation rose to 2.7 percent year-on-year in June, the highest reading since February, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Gen Z's view of economic trends also improved. In July, 12 percent said the economy was getting better, 27 percent said it was the same, and 58 percent saw it getting worse. By August, "better" climbed to 18 percent, "same" dipped slightly to 25 percent, and "worse" fell to 51 percent. But Trump's approval rating on the economy is still substantially lower than it was in January, when his net approval among Gen Z stood at +18 points. Job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added, far lower than expected. After last month's jobs report was published, Trump fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. In a post, Trump accused McEntarfer—without offering evidence—of rigging the numbers to harm his administration. But that move by Trump was not popular among Gen Z voters, with only 13 percent saying the decision was justified—50 percent said they were not sure. Despite that, the latest poll shows small but measurable gains in perceptions of Trump's character and leadership. In August, 22 percent described him as honest, up from 20 percent in July, while the share saying he is not honest fell from 67 percent to 57 percent. But overall, Trump's honesty rating has fallen to its lowest point since he reentered the White House, with just 31 percent of Americans viewing Trump as trustworthy as he has recently faced mounting criticism for his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Billionaire Elon Musk has urged Trump to "just release the files as promised," while author Michael Wolff has speculated that Trump may be seeking major distractions to shift attention away from the Epstein fallout. Victims and advocacy groups remain adamant that all records be made public, arguing that the current handling of the case "smacks of a cover-up." Public discontent is also reflected in the polls. On the Jeffrey Epstein case, only 13 percent of Gen Z voters approve of Trump's handling, while 69 percent disapprove. And 44 percent believe he knew "a lot" of Epstein's crimes before investigations began—and 32 percent think he knew "some." Trump has said that he had no knowledge of, or involvement, in Epstein's crimes. What Happens Next The Republican-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the DOJ for its files on Epstein, with a deadline of August 19 to hand them over, suggesting the issue isn't going away for the president anytime soon. And Trump's new nominee to run the BLS hinted at suspending the monthly release of jobs data. August's numbers are due to be published in the first week of September.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump speaks to Ukrainian and NATO leaders after Putin summit reaches no deal to end war
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy after his summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska and also was talking with NATO leaders early Saturday, the White House said. Trump secured no agreement to end Russia's war in Ukraine even after rolling out the red carpet for Putin. Trump said that 'there's no deal until there's a deal,' after Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' During an interview with Fox News Channel before leaving Alaska, Trump insisted that the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy 'to get it done,' but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. Trump did not speak to reporters on his flight back to Washington. When his plane landed, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump was on the phone with NATO leaders after a lengthy call with Zelenskyy.
