More than 100 civil servants set to be cut from security vetting and Cobra teams
Further cuts have also been proposed for the teams supporting the Government's emergency Cobra committee, including the number of staff working on chemical, biological and radiological threats.
PCS union chief Fran Heathcote warned that the cuts would 'compromise key Government functions, including those critical to national security and emergency preparedness'.
The process is understood to be still ongoing and no final decisions on job cuts have been made.
The proposed cuts are part of wider plans to reduce the number of civil servants working for the Cabinet Office by 2,100 as part of efforts to cut the overall cost of government by 15%.
Most of the cuts are expected to come through voluntary redundancy or by not replacing people who leave, while other civil servants will be redeployed elsewhere.
A source familiar with the proposals told PA that the Cabinet Office had proposed cutting around 110 jobs from UKSV, which vets people for sensitive roles including in the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign Office, as well as conducting security checks on staff applying for parliamentary passes.
UKSV was heavily criticised by the National Audit Office in 2023 over delays carrying out checks that, the watchdog said, risked hampering work on national security.
Writing in Civil Service World last year, UKSV's chief executive Trish Deghorn said the organisation had managed to turn itself around since then, in part due to increased staffing levels.
A source told PA that the Cabinet Office had argued that back-office staff working on UKSV's recovery were no longer required and the organisation's headcount could now be cut.
The source also told PA that around 30 jobs were proposed to be cut from the teams supporting Cobra after a merger of Cabinet Office directorates working on crisis response and resilience.
These include cutting three of the 10 staff working on chemical, biological and radiological threats, although the team will continue to exist.
Fran Heathcote, general secretary of the PCS union, said: 'We warned from the outset that plans for job cuts at the Cabinet Office failed to distinguish between back-office and frontline roles.
'It is now evident that these cuts will undermine the delivery of essential public services and compromise key government functions, including those critical to national security and emergency preparedness.
'PCS will continue to stand firmly with our members in opposing these damaging cuts. We will defend their job security and the vital work they do to keep the country running safely and effectively.'
Alex Burghart, the Conservative shadow chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, said: 'While Labour let the welfare state balloon to £100 billion per year, handing out billion-pound bungs to their union paymasters whilst funnelling money into diversity jobs, it beggars belief they are cutting back on our national security and emergency infrastructure.
'As always for Labour, it's party first, country second.'
A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We don't routinely comment on national security staffing.
'More broadly, we are making the department more strategic, specialist and smaller, helping existing teams better serve the public and deliver the plan for change.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Who's on JD Vance's Cotswolds guest list?
Well, well, well. The US Vice President has taken a family trip to the UK this summer, to enjoy a stay at an 18th-century Georgian manor in the Cotswolds. But although this getaway was supposed to provide some leisure time for JD Vance, the VP has made space to meet with a stream of British politicians and, er, at least one wannabe politico. So who is on Vance's guest list? First up was Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who took a fishing trip with Donald Trump's second in command at the weekend to discuss the war in Gaza and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick – and onetime Tory leadership contender – met with the Vice President on Tuesday, for a tête-à-tête before a drinks event. Jenrick wasn't the only shadow cabinet member to get the call up, however, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp also invited to see Vance on Tuesday. His boss, Kemi Badenoch has not been so fortunate – although a Conservative spokesperson insisted that the VP and Tory leader 'just couldn't make it work with schedules'. Vance's press secretary, Taylor Van Kirk, added: The Vice-President met with a number of people during his trip to the United Kingdom. He specifically tried to see Kemi Badenoch, a friend of his, but a meeting was not possible due to their conflicting schedules. Any suggestion otherwise is false. That's that then! Reform leader Nigel Farage didn't manage to meet President Trump during his visit to Scotland last month, but he has been luckier this time. The Clacton MP secured an eleventh-hour meet with the VP, and is seeing Vance this morning for breakfast in the Cotswolds. And there's more: Vance met with his friend (and Spectator writer) James Orr on Monday for a barbecue, alongside Tory MP Danny Kruger and, er, even one Thomas Skinner – who befriended Vance online. It's certainly not the first time the Apprentice and MAGA have crossed paths, eh? Bosh.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Britain needs Peter Mannion MP
The current Labour government grows ever more farcical. Despite its promise to 'tread lightly' on people's lives, we've seen war declared on farmers, private schools, pubs, humour at work and even allotment owners. This week came the news that drivers over the age of 70 must take compulsory driving tests, with a mandatory ban if they fail – presumably so that, when younger relatives start ushering them towards the 'assisted dying' clinic, they won't be able to make a quick getaway. Starmer, on winning the election, promised the 'sunlight of hope', yet things have rarely felt gloomier. Rachel Reeves may have wept for the nation in parliament last month, but its miseries are so often of her devising. You can't help wondering what The Thick of It would make of it all. In Armando Iannucci's satire on 21st-century politics, which ran from 2005–2012, ludicrous policies like the above, some of them apparently dreamt up on the hoof, might have been all in a day's work for characters like Labour MP Nicola Murray (Rebecca Front) – whose greatest policy idea is wooden toys – or Lib Dem Fergus Williams (who buys a bank 'out of social embarrassment'). But how would Peter Mannion MP, the series' urbane, likeable Tory, react to them? Mannion (as played by RSC stalwart Roger Allam) is an old-school Conservative from the Major or late-Thatcher era. He studied classics at university, still smokes and, though married, has the mandatory lovechild with a parliamentary colleague. Increasingly adrift in the 21st century, Mannion is an analogue politician in a digital world. Dressed stubbornly in suit and tie, he winces at phrases like 'silicone playground' and can't even grapple with the functions on his Nokia dumbphone ('Is this 'settings'? I think I've just taken a photo of my feet'). Called a 'digitard' by one character, he's described by another as being 'tuned 24/7 to the Yesterday Channel watching Cash in the Attic and wondering why it's taking place inside his head'. Much of the comedy in Mannion's scenes comes from seeing this relatively dignified politician (apparently based on David Davis, but with an obvious smattering of Ken Clarke as well) wrestle with the new touchy-feely, hug-a-hoodie inanities of David Cameron's Conservative rebranding. 'I'm modern!' he protests at one point. 'I say 'black' instead of 'coloured'. I think women are a good thing. I have no problems with gays – many of them are very well turned out, especially the men. Why is it this last year I'm being made to feel as if I'm always two steps behind, like I can't programme a video or convert everything back to old money?' 'You've still got a video?' his aide asks incredulously. Mannion is a Victor Meldrew before his time, a man tormented to a state of anguish by the sheer silliness of modern life. He is endlessly afflicted by spin doctors and spads who feel the most useful thing he can do is take his tie off; by newspapers which catch him smoking or holding (catastrophically) a bottle of champagne; by members of the public who leave toxic comments on his blog ('You always have a pained expression on your face. Do you take it up the chutney?'). Frequently, losing his cool, he starts to spit out strings of expletives (you need to hear Allam, a classical actor with a voice as beautiful as Michael Gambon's, snarling the f-word to realise how it's done or why that word even exists). In calmer moments, he lapses into an ironic lethargy several steps beyond despair as though, realising the futility of his existence, there is little else to do but make drawling, jaded asides about it. In a post-Blair world of 'uniparty' soundbites and 'caring' initiatives, conservatism itself seems to be collapsing. Asked by Tory director of communications Stewart Pearson – the bane of his life, whose mission is to 'detoxify' the Tory brand – if he's 'up to speed' with the 'new line', Mannion lapses into sarcasm: Well, I don't know, am I? Because I get people stopping me in the street and saying 'Are you still for locking up yobbos?' and I say 'Yeah, of course we are!' And then I think, are we? Because maybe I missed a memo from you. Maybe I should understand yobbos now… or not even call them yobbos. Call them young men with issues around stabbing. If Mannion, with his grey suits and black sense of humour, represents an age of lost common sense, Stewart Pearson (Vincent Franklin) is the man who has no intention of finding it. A kind of walking rainbow flag, always dressed in brightly coloured shirts (untucked and open two buttons), Pearson is the coming era made flesh. He's the kind of man (we all know them) who drinks ginseng tea, wears a high-visibility tabard to ride a bike, and whose dementing natural habitat is the whiteboard brainstorming session: 'Let's architecturalise this… Let's graphicise and three-dimensionalise our response… Time is a leash on the dog of ideas.' 'What was that word I used this morning?' he demands of Mannion at one point. 'You used a lot of words,' says Mannion wearily. 'It was like a fucking Will Self lecture.' The Thick of It ended in 2012 – a year or two before 'woke' came in to land – but now and then you find it deliciously ahead of the curve. In an episode of series 4, Mannion is summoned by Stewart to attend an out-of-town 'thought bubble' group seminar – the kind of life-sapping, compulsory, organised infantilisation we're now accustomed to from our betters. At one point, the characters take part in a 20-questions bonding game where they must guess the political concept written on their foreheads. Mannion, with the word 'inclusivity' flapping above his eyes on a Post-It note, asks a series of increasingly exasperated questions. 'Am I a sensible, solid concept?' ('No'). 'Would I be comfortable talking to Andrew Marr about this concept on television?' ('No'). 'Am I 'diversity'?' 'Oh for fuck's sake,' he snaps when he rips off the label. 'Inclusivity's practically the same as diversity.' Did the writers know then that in the coming decade these two abstract nouns would batter us over the head until we were gurgling in prone stupefaction? Or that the age of Stewart Pearson – that era of bullying power-play shrouded in bright primary colours – had barely begun? Most of us these days have become some form of Peter Mannion – looking at the wreckage of things we once believed in (Radio 4, the sanctity of certain prizes, Oxbridge, the National Trust, you name it) and, like him, asking in bewilderment: 'How the sow's tits did this happen? Nothing matters any more. Politics, faith, values, whatever your thing is. Nothing.' How would Mannion have survived an era of take-the-knee, pronoun badges and rainbow lanyards, or reacted to a government bent on destroying all that he and his supporters hold most dear? It's certainly kinder to him – though a loss to the viewer – that we were never allowed to find out.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
What is Gers and how is it calculated
The Scottish government's latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) report has been annual report estimates the difference between what Scotland raises in taxation and what is spent on its public is known as the net fiscal balance, or some call it the "notional deficit". It found the difference in 2024-25 was £26.5bn, which was up from £21.4bn in the previous financial year. How did Gers come about and how has it been used? The Gers figures were first published in 1992 under UK Prime Minister John ministers in the UK government's Scottish Office thought it would help inform the debate on devolution - or would at least help them make the case against the establishment of a Scottish prices were low at the time and they thought the numbers would show how much more Scotland gained from the UK Treasury than it sent south in tax devolution in 1999, the figures have been compiled by the Scottish government but there is still an annual battle to interpret the numbers from either side in the independence the time of the independence referendum in 2014, the Scottish government's White Paper described Gers as "the authoritative publication on Scotland's public finances".The SNP's Growth Commission blueprint for the finances of an independent Scotland also accepted the Gers figures as its starting opponents of independence have used the figures to point to a "Union dividend" - arguing that Scotland can only afford its relatively high levels of public spending because it is part of the UK. Does Gers tell us what an independent Scotland would look like? No. The Gers figures are not meant to be anything other than a way of showing the current position under the present at the respected Fraser of Allander Institute say that Gers "presents a useful starting point for a discussion regarding the challenges and opportunities that Scotland would face".And BBC Scotland's economics editor Douglas Fraser says: "One way of looking at them is to measure how big Scotland's deficit would be, if the country were to have been both independent and if its public finances were performing exactly as they did within the UK."It would probably perform rather differently if Holyrood pulled the tax, spending and borrowing levers in different ways to the Treasury in London."It could have pulled those levers in a smarter way, or left a bigger deficit."Everything around this is contested. But what can be said is that this helps illustrate the health or weakness of Scottish public finances." How is Gers calculated? The Fraser of Allander Institute has tried to explain how Gers is compiled by Scottish government points out that data on the spending side of the equation is not estimated, but some UK spending is allocated to Scotland on a proportional total spend is made up of Scottish and local government services and welfare spending, as well as UK welfare spending and pensions in also includes UK government spending in non-devolved areas in Scotland such as defence, and allocates a proportion of the UK's debt interest payments to revenues, there have been complaints that the data used is not collected for Scotland and has to be estimated from UK can be tricky for North Sea oil and gas revenues, where the projects and the companies behind them are operating across both Scottish and English coastal waters. A version without North Sea oil and gas revenue is also produced as this is often volatile, distorting the overall picture, and is expected to decline over time. In recent years, the inclusion of Scottish income tax, council tax, business rates, the profits made by Scottish Water, landfill tax, land and building transactions tax and local authority user charges and fees have made this less of a problem. There are other revenues - particularly those collected by HMRC - where estimation is Fraser of Allander Institute says "estimates are not unusual in economic statistics".And the Scottish government says that Gers is "produced independently of Scottish ministers and has been assessed by the UK Statistics Authority as being produced in line with the Code of Practice for Official Statistics."This means the statistics have been found to meet user needs, to be methodologically sound, explained well and produced free of political interference."The Scottish government has published answers to a list of frequently asked questions about its Gers figures. How does Scotland compare to the rest of the UK? There are figures from the Office for National Statistics which provide a UK version of Gers, covering the regions of England as well as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, though with a lot less detail. The most recent cover 2022-23, and show Scotland is not the spending per head, Scotland is second top to London. It can be expensive to get things done in the revenue raising, when Scotland was allocated its geographic share of oil and gas tax, it was third behind London and south-east England. It was ahead of England and the UK as a difference between revenue and expenditure, known as the net fiscal balance, suggests Scotland's notional deficit is bigger than most parts of the UK, but not as big as Wales, Yorkshire and Humberside, the West Midlands and, biggest of all, north-west London and south-east England raise more in tax than is spent there by government. Every year, there is redistribution of government funds out of the south-east and into the rest of the UK. The question then arises of whether it's sufficient.
