logo
What is Gers and how is it calculated

What is Gers and how is it calculated

BBC News2 days ago
The Scottish government's latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) report has been published.The annual report estimates the difference between what Scotland raises in taxation and what is spent on its public services.This is known as the net fiscal balance, or some call it the "notional deficit". It found the difference in 2024-25 was £26.5bn, which was up from £21.4bn in the previous financial year.
How did Gers come about and how has it been used?
The Gers figures were first published in 1992 under UK Prime Minister John Major.Conservative ministers in the UK government's Scottish Office thought it would help inform the debate on devolution - or would at least help them make the case against the establishment of a Scottish Parliament.Oil prices were low at the time and they thought the numbers would show how much more Scotland gained from the UK Treasury than it sent south in tax revenues.Since devolution in 1999, the figures have been compiled by the Scottish government but there is still an annual battle to interpret the numbers from either side in the independence debate.At the time of the independence referendum in 2014, the Scottish government's White Paper described Gers as "the authoritative publication on Scotland's public finances".The SNP's Growth Commission blueprint for the finances of an independent Scotland also accepted the Gers figures as its starting point.Meanwhile, opponents of independence have used the figures to point to a "Union dividend" - arguing that Scotland can only afford its relatively high levels of public spending because it is part of the UK.
Does Gers tell us what an independent Scotland would look like?
No. The Gers figures are not meant to be anything other than a way of showing the current position under the present arrangements.Economists at the respected Fraser of Allander Institute say that Gers "presents a useful starting point for a discussion regarding the challenges and opportunities that Scotland would face".And BBC Scotland's economics editor Douglas Fraser says: "One way of looking at them is to measure how big Scotland's deficit would be, if the country were to have been both independent and if its public finances were performing exactly as they did within the UK."It would probably perform rather differently if Holyrood pulled the tax, spending and borrowing levers in different ways to the Treasury in London."It could have pulled those levers in a smarter way, or left a bigger deficit."Everything around this is contested. But what can be said is that this helps illustrate the health or weakness of Scottish public finances."
How is Gers calculated?
The Fraser of Allander Institute has tried to explain how Gers is compiled by Scottish government statisticians.It points out that data on the spending side of the equation is not estimated, but some UK spending is allocated to Scotland on a proportional basis.The total spend is made up of Scottish and local government services and welfare spending, as well as UK welfare spending and pensions in Scotland.It also includes UK government spending in non-devolved areas in Scotland such as defence, and allocates a proportion of the UK's debt interest payments to Scotland.For revenues, there have been complaints that the data used is not collected for Scotland and has to be estimated from UK figures.This can be tricky for North Sea oil and gas revenues, where the projects and the companies behind them are operating across both Scottish and English coastal waters. A version without North Sea oil and gas revenue is also produced as this is often volatile, distorting the overall picture, and is expected to decline over time. In recent years, the inclusion of Scottish income tax, council tax, business rates, the profits made by Scottish Water, landfill tax, land and building transactions tax and local authority user charges and fees have made this less of a problem. There are other revenues - particularly those collected by HMRC - where estimation is needed.The Fraser of Allander Institute says "estimates are not unusual in economic statistics".And the Scottish government says that Gers is "produced independently of Scottish ministers and has been assessed by the UK Statistics Authority as being produced in line with the Code of Practice for Official Statistics."This means the statistics have been found to meet user needs, to be methodologically sound, explained well and produced free of political interference."The Scottish government has published answers to a list of frequently asked questions about its Gers figures.
How does Scotland compare to the rest of the UK?
There are figures from the Office for National Statistics which provide a UK version of Gers, covering the regions of England as well as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, though with a lot less detail. The most recent cover 2022-23, and show Scotland is not the outlier.In spending per head, Scotland is second top to London. It can be expensive to get things done in the capital.In revenue raising, when Scotland was allocated its geographic share of oil and gas tax, it was third behind London and south-east England. It was ahead of England and the UK as a whole.The difference between revenue and expenditure, known as the net fiscal balance, suggests Scotland's notional deficit is bigger than most parts of the UK, but not as big as Wales, Yorkshire and Humberside, the West Midlands and, biggest of all, north-west England.Only London and south-east England raise more in tax than is spent there by government. Every year, there is redistribution of government funds out of the south-east and into the rest of the UK. The question then arises of whether it's sufficient.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five key points on how a long-respected US human rights report became a ‘cudgel' under Trump
Five key points on how a long-respected US human rights report became a ‘cudgel' under Trump

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Five key points on how a long-respected US human rights report became a ‘cudgel' under Trump

In May, Donald Trump took to the stage at a business conference in Saudi Arabia's capital, promising that the US would no longer chastise other governments over human rights issues or lecture them on 'how to live and how to govern your own affairs'. With the release this week of the US government's annual report on human rights worldwide, the president has – in part – followed though on that pledge. The report – compiled by the state department – softens its criticism of nations that have sought closer ties with the US president, while alleging 'significant' human rights breaches among traditional allies across Europe, all while vastly scaling back criticism of discrimination against minority groups. The report's claims of 'no credible' human rights abuses in Hungary and El Salvador sit at odds with the state department's own report from a year earlier, which described the situation in Hungary as 'deteriorating', while highlighting 'arbitrary killings', 'enforced disappearance' and 'torture' in El Salvador. In April, a delegation of EU lawmakers warned that the rule of law in Hungary is 'rapidly going in the wrong direction' under Viktor Orbán's government. They highlighted threats to press freedom and targeting of minorities. In June a law banning content about LGBTQ+ people from schools and TV was found to violate basic human rights and freedom of expression by a scholar at the European court of justice. Meanwhile, activists and opposition leaders in El Salvador have warned the country is on the path towards dictatorship after its congress scrapped presidential term limits, paving the way for President Nayib Bukele to seek indefinite re-election. Bukele's hardline approach to crime has been accompanied by an assault on civil society and democratic institutions. Orbán and Bukele have both positioned themselves as Trump adherents – with El Salvador opening up a notorious mega-prison to detain US deportees. Orbán, who came to power in 2010, was once described as 'Trump before Trump' by the US president's former adviser Steve Bannon. France, Germany and the United Kingdom are among the European countries singled out as having seen a worsening human rights situation. The picture is a far cry from the previous report, which saw no significant changes. Criticism over the handling of free speech – in particular relating to regulations on online hate speech – was directed at the governments of the UK, Germany and France. The criticism comes despite the US itself moving aggressively to deny or strip visas of foreign nationals over their statements and social media postings, especially student activists who have criticised Israel. Since being returning to power, Trump and his administration have stepped up criticism of traditional allies – in February the vice-president, JD Vance, accused European leaders of suppressing free speech, failing to halt illegal migration and running in fear from voters' true beliefs. The report also singles out Brazil, where Trump has decried the prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Brazil, the report says, has 'undermined democratic debate by restricting access to online content deemed to 'undermine democracy.'' The report's section on Israel and the Palestinian territories is much shorter than last year's edition and contains no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza. It acknowledges cases of arbitrary arrests and killings by Israel but says authorities took 'credible steps' to identify those responsible. More than 61,000 people have been killed in Gaza, the Gaza health ministry says, as a result of Israel's military assault after an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023 in which 1,200 people were killed. Sections within the report highlighting discrimination have been vastly pared back. Any criticism focused on LGBTQI rights, gender-based violence or racial and ethnic violence which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appear to have been largely removed. A group of former state department officials called some omissions 'shocking,' particularly highlighting the lack of detail on Uganda, which in 2023 saw the passing of some of the harshest anti-LGBTQ+ laws in the world, including the death penalty for some homosexual acts. For decades, the report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy – but critics have labelled this year's edition politically driven. 'The report demonstrates what happens when political agendas take priority over the facts,' says Josh Paul, a former state department official, adding 'the outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda.' In April, secretary of state Marco Rubio wrote an opinion piece saying the bureau that prepares the report had become a platform for 'left-wing activists,' and vowed that the Trump administration would reorient it to focus on 'western values'. State department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and was no longer an expansive list of 'politically biased demands and assertions'. Democratic party lawmakers, however, have accused Trump and Rubio of treating human rights only as a 'cudgel' against adversaries, in a statement released this week. Rubio's state department has 'shamelessly turned a once-credible tool of US foreign policy mandated by Congress into yet another instrument to advance Maga political grievances and culture war obsessions,' said Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. With Reuters

I lost £97,000 to a scammer. Before you judge me, here's the unexpected - and tragic - reason I fell for it... and how it changed my life forever: SARAH GRACE
I lost £97,000 to a scammer. Before you judge me, here's the unexpected - and tragic - reason I fell for it... and how it changed my life forever: SARAH GRACE

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

I lost £97,000 to a scammer. Before you judge me, here's the unexpected - and tragic - reason I fell for it... and how it changed my life forever: SARAH GRACE

It was the dead of night when I made the devastating discovery. Combing frantically through the flurry of emails I'd received from a financial services company and trying to work out how I had got into such a mess, I suddenly realised the address was slightly different to the one on the website. An email to the legitimate firm that morning confirmed my worst fears; I had lost £97,000 to a gang masquerading as investment brokers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store