
‘It's a huge loss': Trump administration dismisses scientists preparing climate report
The Trump administration this week summarily dismissed more than 400 scientists and other experts who had begun to write the latest National Climate Assessment report, informing them by email that the scope of the report was being reevaluated.
The report, mandated by Congress, is prepared every four years under a 1990 law. It details the latest science on climate change, and also reports on progress in addressing global warming.
Scientists said they fear the Trump administration could seek to shut down the effort or enlist other authors to write a very different report that seeks to attack climate science — a path they say would leave the country ill-prepared for worsening disasters intensified by humanity's warming of the planet, including more intense heat waves, wildfires, droughts, floods and sea-level rise.
'Climate change puts us all at risk, and we all need this vital information to help prepare,' said Katharine Hayhoe, a climate scientist at Texas Tech University who was an author of four previous versions of the report, including three times as a lead author. 'Without it, the future will be much more dangerous.'
She noted that although the assessment is required by law, there aren't specific requirements about who exactly should write the report or the form it should take.
'It could end up being a collection of long-debunked myths and disinformation about climate change,' Hayhoe said. 'It could end up being a document that is just not useful, does not serve the purpose of providing information to the American people on the risks of climate change and the best ways to mitigate or adapt to those risks.'
Trump administration officials didn't respond to requests for comments.
Participants in the latest study, set for release in late 2027 or early 2028, received an email Monday informing them they were being dismissed.
'At this time, the scope of the [report] is currently being reevaluated,' said the email from Heidi Roop, deputy director for services of the U.S. Global Change Research Program. 'We are now releasing all current assessment participants from their roles.'
It thanked them for participating and said that 'as plans develop for the assessment, there may be future opportunities to contribute or engage.'
The report is prepared by scientists and experts who volunteer their time. They were working on what would be the sixth assessment since the first report came out in 2000.
'The National Climate Assessment is a national treasure,' said Costa Samaras, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Carnegie Mellon University who had been working as the lead author of the chapter on climate change mitigation prior to Monday's announcement. 'It is accessible, supported by the highest levels of scientific integrity, and represents the best available science to the American people on how their communities are changing because of climate change, and how they can respond.'
The report's update comes at a critical time, as the burning of fossil fuels and rising greenhouse gases put the Earth on a trajectory for a climate that is warmer and more volatile than humans have experienced. The most recent National Climate Assessment, released in 2023, detailed the latest science on more extreme heat waves, wildfires and other disasters, and said that without deeper cuts in emissions and faster adaptation efforts, 'severe climate risks to the United States will continue to grow.'
Last year, the United States experienced 27 weather and climate-related disasters that each measured at least $1 billion dollars in losses — costing the country $185 billion in total, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Over the last five years, there have been 115 separate events that cost communities more than $750 billion.
'The National Climate Assessment helps communities understand how climate affects their population, their ecosystem, their infrastructure, and helps them prepare and adapt to these changes,' Samaras said.
He said his team had been making good progress on their chapter, which is meant to take stock of how well and in what sectors the United States is reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that drive global warming, as well as what innovation opportunities exist for the country to grow industries that will help produce clean energy. They had already onboarded all of their authors — which included federal government employees and researchers from academia and nonprofits — and submitted a preliminary draft for review.
'It's a huge loss,' Samaras said. 'It's a loss for taxpayers, it's a loss for communities, it's a loss for the environment. Not producing the report saves us basically nothing and costs us maybe everything.'
Ladd Keith, an associate professor of planning and director of the University of Arizona's Heat Resilience Initiative, also received the email. Keith said he and other contributors were carefully selected to ensure a range of scientific expertise and regions were represented.
'If a report is provided to fulfill the Congressional mandate without the expertise of the contributors and a rigorous and transparent peer review process, it will further erode the credibility of this administration's ability to address our nation's most serious and pressing challenges,' Keith said.
'The hottest ten years on record were all in the last decade, and the U.S. is experiencing increases in extreme heat, drought, wildfire and flooding,' Keith said. 'Losing this vital source of information will ultimately harm our nation's ability to address the impacts of climate change.'
Trump and his administration have repeatedly criticized, undermined and defunded science on climate change. While seeking to boost oil and gas drilling and production, the Trump administration has fired thousands of government scientists and canceled many grants that had supported climate research.
Federal scientists recently were ordered not to attend a meeting of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. And in early April, the administration terminated a contract with a consulting firm that had supported technical staff at the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which coordinates federal research and the writing of the National Climate Assessment.
Project 2025, the conservative blueprint written by Trump's allies last year, advised the president to review and possibly reject the program's assessments.
'The next President should critically analyze and, if required, refuse to accept any [U.S. Global Change Research Program] assessment prepared under the Biden Administration,' the document says.
It argues that the National Climate Assessment and other climate change research programs reduce the scope of the president's decision-making powers and that of federal agencies. It also says the process should include more diverse viewpoints. Both are themes that have played out repeatedly in the first 100 days of the second Trump administration, which has focused on rolling back environmental regulations and reducing bureaucratic red tape in the name of cost savings and greater U.S. energy independence.
'Everything we've seen in their first 100 days is just cause for alarm when it comes to climate science,' said Rachel Cleetus, an economist and policy director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' climate and energy program. 'The motivations are clearly to privilege fossil fuel interests over the interests of the public. This report is entirely in the public interest, and they're just trying to bury the facts.'
Cleetus had been among the authors of a chapter on how climate change is affecting U.S. coasts.
Edward Carr, senior scientist and director of the Stockholm Environment Institute's center in the U.S., said the report's cancellation is 'another effort to erase the evidence on which serious policy debate can be constructed.'
The Trump administration also recently canceled the writing of a major scientific report called the National Nature Assessment, which began under the Biden administration.
'The pattern that I'm seeing across the federal government is acting as if eliminating all mention of climate change will make climate change go away, which is certainly not correct,' said Chris Field, director of Stanford University's Woods Institute for the Environment.
Field was an author of the nature assessment report before it was shelved, and has also been an author of previous versions of the climate assessment.
He said if the next version of the report is scrapped, the country would lose up-to-date and authoritative information from the federal government, which has been widely used to inform local decisions by cities, states, planning agencies, flood control authorities, coastal commissions, and agriculture agencies, among others.
Without such information, the country will be less prepared for the effects of climate change that are ongoing and increasing, he said.
'It's as if, when you're driving your car, you have half the window blocked out, or your headlights don't work,' Field said. 'The ability to make good decisions about the future really depends a lot on the best available information, and cutting off access to that information, making it more difficult to get, makes life more challenging, uncertain and expensive.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
Republican attorneys general accuse California of excusing 'lawlessness'
FIRST ON FOX: Nearly all Republican attorneys general blasted California's Democratic leaders on Tuesday in a joint statement, accusing them of condoning criminal behavior and saying they left President Donald Trump with no choice but to activate thousands of National Guard soldiers. "In California, we're seeing the results of leadership that excuses lawlessness and undermines law enforcement," 26 attorneys general wrote in the statement, first provided to Fox News Digital. "When local and state officials won't act, the federal government must." The attorneys general said Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard to address anti-immigration enforcement riots and protests that broke out in parts of Los Angeles County over the weekend was the "right response." Their remarks stand in direct contrast to those of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats across the country, who widely condemned Trump's decision to send the military into California as an unnecessary escalation. Newsom sued Trump over the move and accused the president of stripping California of its sovereignty. Presidents federalizing the National Guard, which is a state-based military force that falls under the dual control of governors and presidents, is rarely carried out without the consent of a governor. Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, who led the attorneys general in issuing the statement, told Fox News Digital in a brief interview he felt Newsom was "gaslighting" the public by saying California's local and state law enforcement had the unrest under control and did not need Trump to intervene. "We all saw what was happening," Carr said. "There were federal law enforcement officers that were being attacked by mobs. And in fact, I read articles where local law enforcement were saying they were overwhelmed and they needed help. My question is, why in the world would he not accept the help of the federal government at a time where there was mob rule, where there was arson that was taking place, where assaults were occurring, instead of coddling the criminals that are doing this again?" Carr said those opposed to the Trump administration's immigration raids could "peacefully disagree with what the federal government is doing." Newsom, for his part, alleged that Trump exacerbated the riots, echoing a position some criminal justice advocates take that an immediate show of force in response to intensifying protests is an ineffective approach. In Newsom's lawsuit, attorneys wrote that Trump's decision was not only unwise but also an unlawful and "unprecedented usurpation of state authority and resources." Fox News Digital reached out to the California Attorney General's Office for comment.


Politico
33 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge
President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that he plans to revert the names of seven major Army bases back to the Confederate generals for which they were originally named. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee,' Trump said. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts, it's no time to change.' Trump's announcement, during a speech to soldiers at Fort Bragg, follows Biden-administration era alterations in 2023 that changed the installation names to honor new, non-Confederate individuals. Those included changing Fort Hood to Fort Cavazos, for the Army's first four-star Hispanic general. The Army previously redesignated Fort Liberty, previously known as Fort Bragg, to its original name, but honoring Private First Class Roland L. Bragg, a World War II hero instead of the Confederate general Braxton Bragg. The service also redesignated Fort Moore, after Gen. Hal Moore and his wife Julia Compton Moore, for Fred G. Benning, who won the Distinguished Service Cross during World War I. The Army is taking the same approach for the bases tapped for renaming on Tuesday, finding award-winning soldiers with the same last names as the Confederate generals to name the bases after, according to a statement released by the service after the president's speech. The president gave no timeline for the name changes and it was not immediately clear whether the Army's bases would be renamed after Confederate generals or soldiers from different eras. One army official, granted anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak, said they were caught off guard by the rapid-fire developments, which could take months to Army did not immediately respond to POLITICO's request for comment. Though the Trump administration insisted the redesignations were in-line with laws that prevent the Pentagon from naming bases after Confederate leaders or battles, Ty Seidule, a retired Army brigadier general who was the vice chair of the Congressional Naming Commission, which is tasked with relabeling bases and U.S. military assets, said that Trump's decision went against the spirit of the new rule enacted after the George Floyd protests. 'The bottom line is he's choosing surname over service,' said Seidule, who's now a visiting professor at Hamilton College. 'It is breaking the spirit of a law that was created by the will of the American people through their elected representatives.' Seidule said that the commission, which was made up of three Republicans, one Democrat and four retired flag officers, spent 20 months seeking input from the public and got 33,000 responses to change the names of Army bases and other installations and assets named after Confederates, including several U.S. Navy ships. But he said the decision still reflected that the Trump administration 'realizes that Confederates chose treason to preserve slavery, and they are unworthy of having bases named for them in America in 2025.' On Tuesday, Trump criticized Biden at several points during his speech, which was full of asides about immigration, transgender Americans and the spending bill currently being debated in Congress. His political comments in front of hundreds of soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division led to a smattering of boos from the mostly uniformed audience when he criticized former President Joe Biden. Audience members also jeered when Trump mentioned California Gov. Gavin Newsom, whom the president clashed with over protests in California that were sparked by the Trump administration's immigration raids. Presidents normally avoid giving political speeches to military personnel. 'Do you think this crowd would have showed up for Biden,' Trump said at one point in his remarks. 'I don't think so.' 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump said, claiming parts of the city are under the control of international criminal gangs. The president has ordered 4,000 California National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, though so far only about 300 guardsmen have entered the city. The Marines are positioned outside Los Angeles, where they're undergoing training on crowd control, said one defense official who was granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. The move to rename Army bases comes just days after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth moved to relabel a Navy vessel named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk as well as other ships named after civil rights leaders and women. Seidule, the retired Army brigadier general who served on the Biden-era naming commission, said that Trump's decision creates the risk that future administrations could take turns renaming the Army's bases. 'What happens if some other administration would name something after someone that one party thinks is just absolutely beyond the pale,' said Seidule. 'I think that this could absolutely be a tennis match.' Sam Skove contributed to this report.


New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
LA anti-ICE looters shatter Apple store and make off with iPhones, Adidas in another night of chaos
Looters tore apart stores across Los Angeles as daytime protests against ICE-immigration raids descended into chaos overnight, yet again — and even a museum dedicated to Japanese-American immigrants was vandalized. Windows were smashed and merchandise was stolen at LA's Broadway Apple store Monday night, while down the block the Adidas store was broken into and robbed of sneakers by frenzied crowds. The windows of a nearby jewelry store were also smashed open and the shop's shelves were completely emptied by looters, while two marijuana dispensaries and a pharmacy were also raided, according to NBC 4. 4 A worker boards up an Adidas store after it was looted following days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS Footage from the chaos showed mobs masked and hooded hooligans pouring into the stores and grabbing armloads of whatever was in sight and then pouring back out onto the street spilling goods as they fled. Some ran right into the ranks of waiting cops, but many were able to muscle themselves free from the overwhelmed officers and escape. 'This is so ridiculous. This doesn't look like they're protesting for ICE or anything. Just looting the stores,' one fed up business owner who watched the overnight chaos unfold told News Nation. Across town in Little Tokyo, a sushi restaurant — Otoro Sushi — even had its doors ripped open by mobs, with troublemakers appearing to make off with a computer monitor and other equipment while onlookers yelled that they were 'Making us look bad.' 4 Products lie scattered in an Apple store after it was looted following days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS 4 People clean graffiti after days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and US Marines, outside the Japanese American National Museum in Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS The Japanese American National Museum was even targeted, with 'F**k ICE' and other graffiti spray-painted across windows, walls, and even over what appeared to be an outdoor exhibit about Japanese-American soldiers who fought in WWII as their families were locked away in internment camps. Volunteers flocked to the museum Tuesday morning with brushes and soap to help scrub away what vandalism they could, photos showed. And back on Broadway workers were seen laboring to sweep up and take stock of the damaged stores, while shattered windows and doors were boarded up. 4 Broken glass lies on the floor of a cannabis stores after it was looted following days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS At least 14 people were arrested for looting, according to police, while another 96 were arrested for failure to disperse. The protests were expected to continue for a fifth day and night Tuesday, as President Trump dispatched another round of National Guard troops — as well as Marines forces — to quell the chaos. Those deployments — which California's and LA's Democrat leaders say have done nothing but fuel the chaos in the city — is expected to cost at least $134 million, the Pentagon revealed Tuesday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said its likely the troops will remain in LA for about 60 days, telling a House budget hearing that the protestors were 'rioters, looters and thugs.' Chaos was sparked in the City of Angels Friday after ICE carried out numerous raids to arrest suspected illegal immigrants. Activists attempted to block the raids and later picketed a downtown detention center where some of the detainees were being held, before the demonstrations snowballed into all-out riots in some areas.