logo
Target's DEI rollback raises questions about the retail giant's philanthropic commitments

Target's DEI rollback raises questions about the retail giant's philanthropic commitments

CBS News28-01-2025
Target's rollback on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives is raising questions about the retail giant's philanthropic commitment to fighting racial disparities and promoting progressive values in liberal Minneapolis, where it is based, and beyond.
Target and the Target Foundation have made six-figure donations in recent years to groups working on Black economic empowerment and LGBTQ+ acceptance. "Racial equity" is still listed as a cornerstone of the foundation's local grantmaking. But some fundraisers now wonder whether those types of gifts remain a primary concern for the brand, as Target joins other major American companies in curtailing internal DEI efforts attacked most prominently by President Donald Trump's administration.
"Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict," The White House said in a statement accompanying Trump's executive orders.
Corporations — including Walmart, Amazon and Meta — are retreating from policies intended to counter discrimination, many of which were implemented after the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd, a Black man, in 2020. Philanthropic advisors say the conservative backlash is also chilling support from some funders who fear that backing race-based nonprofit work could bring legal challenges like the one that successfully shuttered the Fearless Fund's grant contest for Black women business owners.
Target announced Jan. 24 that it would conclude the DEI goals previously set to increase Black employees' representation and advancement, improve Black shoppers' experiences and promote Black-owned businesses. The company plans to stop submitting reports to external diversity surveys and named Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index as an example. It is also "further evaluating our corporate partnerships to ensure they are directly connected to our roadmap for growth," according to a memo posted on its website.
Target did not share publicly what those changes meant for its philanthropy — which totaled $384 million last year in cash and products from the corporation and its foundation, according to the company. In response to an Associated Press inquiry, the company described philanthropy as "a key way Target engages with communities, whether in our hometown of Minneapolis-St. Paul, in the communities surrounding our stores, or in the countries where our supply chain exists."
A company spokesperson told AP that the "recent update does not impact Target Foundation giving" but added that, "as always, the foundation will continue to evaluate how it best supports organizations, coalitions and networks." Also unchanged is the Target Circle community giving program that allows loyalty members to decide which nonprofits the company supports. Target did not say what impact the internal changes might have on its corporate giving.
"Whenever you see corporate leadership making shifts in priorities, it worries folks in the foundation space about what impacts that might have on both existing giving and future initiatives," said OutFront Minnesota Executive Director Kat Rohn, who said their LGBTQ+ advocacy group is not a Target partner.
The changes have already influenced how one longtime partner sees their relationship. Twin Cities Pride Executive Director Andi Otto said he learned about the changes when he contacted Target about re-upping its sponsorship of his nonprofit's programming celebrating the LGBTQ community. Target had consistently contributed around $50,000, Otto said.
As he pitched Target on recommitting this year, Otto said he was asked to set up a meeting with company leaders. On the call, according to Otto, executives explained that they still wanted to sponsor Twin Cities Pride but let him know they would be removing internal DEI policies.
Otto said he appreciated the "heads up" but chose to reject Target's sponsorship after his board discussed the impact of the company's moves on the community they serve.
Inclusion falls by the wayside when there aren't checks to ensure it, he added.
"It isn't always just about the money that they give to us as a nonprofit, but it's about what they are doing for the community in getting small, BIPOC- or LGBTQ-owned businesses into their stores and giving them a platform to do so," Otto said.
Twin Cities Pride had seen this coming. Otto recalled that Target didn't carry Pride Month merchandise at its stores last June after the collection received backlash in 2023 and said the nonprofit feared things would "just continue down that slope."
Progressive activists are now calling for a boycott of Target. Nina Turner's working-class advocacy group We Are Somebody is asking customers to instead purchase directly from minority-owned brands. At least one Black-owned brand, Oh Happy Dani, has begun "the process of removing our remaining products from Target shelves," according to a LinkedIn update from founder Danielle Cook Balfour.
Corporate philanthropy can be a reliable source of significant nonprofit funding. Target has long had a very significant presence in the Twin Cities and is notable for its support of education, arts and other diversity efforts. Target and the Target Foundation together were the fifth-largest corporate giver in the state in 2022, according to the Minnesota Council on Foundations.
But Rohn, the LGBTQ advocate and fundraiser, said corporate philanthropy can sometimes put nonprofits in a "tough spot" by pitting their values against the need to sustain their programs. She expects that more nonprofits will step back from corporate relationships — as Twin Cities Pride did — when their missions no longer align with their sponsors.
To that point, Twin Cities Pride shared Monday that more than $50,000 had been raised since the nonprofit cut Target as a sponsor. Individuals donated more than half the total, according to Otto. The Minneapolis Foundation also contributed.
"Right now, all of us in the LGBTQ nonprofit sector are afraid because we don't know what companies will choose to do and what the outcome is going to be," Otto said. "I think everybody right now agrees that it was the best decision to make, and that (if) we stick together, we'll see things on the other side."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President
Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President

Wall Street Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Don't Bomb Mexico, Mr. President

The State Department designated eight organized-crime syndicates based in Latin America as 'foreign terrorist organizations,' or FTOs, in February. In July it added a ninth. Last week the New York Times reported that President Trump has signed a secret 'directive' to the Pentagon to 'begin using military force against certain Latin American drug cartels.' The White House declined to tell me if the Times story is true. But on Thursday Reuters reported that the U.S. deployment of air and naval resources to the Caribbean to combat cartels had begun. Whether their mission is interdiction or something more invasive remains unclear.

Fatal explosion at U.S. Steel's plant raises questions about its future despite heavy investment
Fatal explosion at U.S. Steel's plant raises questions about its future despite heavy investment

Los Angeles Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Fatal explosion at U.S. Steel's plant raises questions about its future despite heavy investment

HARRISBURG, Pa. — The fatal explosion last week at U.S. Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the United States — along with profits, share prices and steel prices — have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anticompetitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, including Clairton Coke Works, where the blast occurred, and he approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15-billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. 'We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley,' David Burritt, U.S. Steel's chief executive, said at a news conference Tuesday, a day after the explosion. 'You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time.' The explosion killed two workers and hospitalized 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the U.S. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. A spokesperson for the company said in a statement that its 'commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong' and that it sent 'technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support.' Meanwhile, Burritt said that he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that 'this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay.' U.S. Steel officials say that safety is their top priority and that they spend $100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. Repairing Clairton, however, could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get U.S. Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens, and two — where the explosion occurred — were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the blast. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, U.S. Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odor into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organization, said U.S. Steel has been forced to pay $57 million in fines and settlements since Jan. 1, 2020, for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at Clairton in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he 'found no indication that U.S. Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance program for the Clairton plant.' Clairton, he wrote, is 'inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design.' U.S. Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said U.S. Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on paying fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. It's unclear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest $11 billion into U.S. Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the $2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, U.S. Steel had signaled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple of years and whispering that U.S. Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. In many ways, U.S. Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, U.S. steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the U.S. has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favor. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the U.S., there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, because they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. 'I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe,' Briem said. 'If the market does not bode well for U.S. Steel, for American steel, is Nippon Steel really going to keep these things?' Levy writes for the Associated Press.

Russiagate prosecutions a must, DSA ties should disqualify and other commentary
Russiagate prosecutions a must, DSA ties should disqualify and other commentary

New York Post

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Russiagate prosecutions a must, DSA ties should disqualify and other commentary

Conservative: Russiagate Prosecutions a Must 'Damning evidence' now shows 'conclusively' that 'Russiagate was a conspiracy — hatched, implemented and relentlessly promoted by top officials in the CIA, FBI and across the Obama-Biden-Clinton political machine to rig a presidential election and undermine a duly elected president,' fumes Tom Fitton at The Hill. And it corrupted 'institutions essential to protecting American liberty.' Yet 'those responsible' remain unpunished. CIA chief John Brennan and National Intelligence boss James Clapper 'lied to Congress and the American public.' Top 'Justice Department officials, such as Bruce Ohr,' acted as 'a conduit for anti-Trump smears.' James Comey and other 'leaders at the FBI' used 'the intelligence community's credibility to spread what they knew to be their own fiction as if it were truth.' 'America is a republic, not a banana republic. It's time for accountability, reform and a sharp reminder' that 'the people are sovereign, not unelected bureaucrats.' Culture desk: Fitness Test Offers Valuable Lessons For many children, recalls The Free Press's Kat Rosenfeld, the old Presidential Fitness meant confronting 'the humiliation and discomfort of being weak and slow,' hence its 2012 'retirement' as President Barack Obama promoted 'a kinder, gentler, more progressive worldview' that preferred 'inclusivity to merit.' Yet this leveling could 'move the nation toward institutionalized mediocrity' by 'making it taboo to even have standards at all.' Progressives faced with a high bar have sought 'to get rid of the bar'; let's welcome President Trump's return of the Fitness Test, since important 'lessons' come only with 'the bitter taste of failure on your tongue.' That is: Failure is 'one of the greatest motivators to self-betterment there is.' From the right: DSA Ties Should Disqualify Zohran Mamdani, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other prominent progressives' membership in the Democratic Socialists of America membership have 'been treated gingerly,' gripes Commentary's Seth Mandel. Yet 'affiliation with the DSA should finally and rightfully be regarded as disqualifying for an elected official.' After all, the recent DSA national convention included a resolution making 'it an expellable offense to say 'Israel has a right to defend itself' or to 'have knowingly provided material aid to Israel,'' plus one 'censuring Ocasio-Cortez for being too pro-Israel.' Who wants to be associated with a 'hate group?' No way 'any politician's membership in such a group should be acceptable.' Eye on hate: The Left's Obsession With Assassins Praise for Shane Tamura, who killed four people, including the CEO of BlackStone, in a mass shooting in New York City last month, 'points to a growing belief,' especially on the left, that 'violent extremism is the only way to challenge a corrupted system,' warn Max Horder & Olivia Rose at City Journal. Most evidence suggested Tamura was targeting NFL offices, but 'an alternative narrative quickly emerged' on social media that 'claimed that Tamura was following in the footsteps' of Luigi Mangione. 'The prevalence of this chatter on social media reflects the unabated growth of what the Network Contagion Research Institute has termed 'assassination culture,'' which glorifies and cheers on political violence. 'The consequences for American civic life are ominous,' and the 'slow but steady rise' of this mentality 'bodes ill for any democracy.' Campus watch: Vindicated for Resisting DEI 'I was heartened to see my former employer, Duke University Health System, quietly reverse its commitment to woke racism this year,' cheers Kendall Conger at RealClear Investigations. A physician, Conger questioned Duke's insistence, supposedly 'guided by science,' that 'racism is a public health crisis' — and 'was fired because of it.' After a nurse reported him for his views on the subject, Duke forbade him to talk about it. Though counseled to keep quiet, he continued to ask questions, knowing that evil comes from 'good men holding their tongues.' In 2024, he was let go for being disruptive and had trouble finding work nearby. But now Duke has changed — and he feels 'vindicated.' He tells his kids: 'Never shy away from asking questions in the pursuit of truth.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store