As Markets Churned, Bitcoin Surged. Here's What Could Happen Next.
Macroeconomic data and the current tariff situation will heavily influence investor sentiment about Bitcoin over the short run.
Historically, Bitcoin has followed four-year cycles that are punctuated by periods of extreme boom and bust.
Something completely unexpected happened with Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) in April. After falling precipitously in February and March, the cryptocurrency suddenly began surging and is now up 15% over the past 30 days.
For Bitcoin investors, the big question is whether this mini-rally is going to last through 2025 or whether it will dissipate once the new tariffs really begin to kick in. With that in mind, here's a look at possible scenarios for Bitcoin this year.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Let's start with the bull-case scenario for Bitcoin. This scenario assumes that the worst of the tariff situation is behind us. If you buy into the messaging coming out of the White House, then trade deals with India, Japan, and South Korea could be coming soon. That would set the stage for some kind of grand rapprochement with China and a flurry of other trade deals around the world.
Once that happens, it could be off to the races for Bitcoin. Ever since February, Bitcoin has struggled to regain the $100,000 level. However, with greater optimism about U.S. economic growth this year, risk-averse investors might start to pile back into crypto, and that could lead to Bitcoin soaring to another all-time high.
The two primary variables here are spot Bitcoin ETF inflows and overall investor sentiment, as measured by the Crypto Fear & Greed Index. Generally speaking, we need to see Bitcoin ETF inflows surging and the Crypto Fear & Greed Index (which is measured on a scale of 0-100) moving to 80 or higher, as it was after the election.
Thus far, that hasn't happened. For example, the Fear & Greed Index currently sits at 51, which is just about as neutral as you can possibly get.
In a bear-case scenario, all the talk about new trade deals turns out to be a mirage. Consumer confidence weakens, economic growth slows, empty store shelves start to appear, prices soar, and people start talking about the "R" word (recession).
Against this backdrop, Bitcoin still has the potential to rally. But this is only if investors begin to lose confidence in the U.S. dollar and start to move their money into Bitcoin as a potential safe-haven asset. Already, investors have started to talk about Bitcoin as "digital gold."
If the economic situation deteriorates significantly, then the Federal Reserve might need to step in and lower interest rates in order to provide a much-needed stimulus. Historically, the lowering of interest rates has been beneficial for crypto, and this could also help to push Bitcoin higher.
So, even in a bear-case scenario, Bitcoin might still rally. The primary variable to watch here is Bitcoin's performance compared to gold. This will be the best possible indicator of whether or not investors are really beginning to view Bitcoin as "digital gold." In theory, the performance gap between gold and Bitcoin in 2025 should begin to narrow. If gold continues to hit new all-time highs, then Bitcoin should start hitting new all-time highs as well.
Thus far, I've primarily focused on macroeconomic factors and how they influence investor sentiment about Bitcoin. But it's also important to take into account the historical performance of Bitcoin, which tends to follow fairly predictable four-year cycles that are punctuated by periods of boom and bust.
While it can be more of an art than a science to figure out where we are in any Bitcoin cycle, the conventional wisdom is that the starting point of any "boom" period is the most recent Bitcoin halving date. In this case, the most recent halving took place in April 2024. Depending on whom you talk to, the "boom" period following any halving lasts anywhere from 12 to 18 months.
So, let's do a few back-of-the-napkin calculations. If we use April 2024 as the starting date of the "boom" period and then assume a particularly robust 18-month boom, that takes us to October. For the sake of argument, let's assume an extra "Trump pump" for Bitcoin. That takes us to November.
So far, so good. But remember what happened four years ago, in November 2021? Yes, Bitcoin hit an all-time high of $69,000 and seemed to be headed to the moon. Nobody thought the crypto party would ever end. But it did. The price of Bitcoin collapsed by 65% in 2022, and the term "crypto winter" entered the popular vernacular.
Of course, there will be those who say, "It's different this time." After all, the spot Bitcoin ETFs didn't exist back in 2021. There was no Strategic Bitcoin Reserve back in 2021. Big institutional investors weren't piling into Bitcoin as they are now. I get it. It does feel different, especially with the Trump administration's support of crypto.
But ignore history at your own peril. If history is any guide, the four-year Bitcoin cycle is coming to a close soon, and it won't matter how many trade deals the White House signs or how much the Fed cuts interest rates. If you're buying Bitcoin now, make sure you're prepared for future volatility and are willing to hold for at least four years.
Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $623,685!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $701,781!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 906% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 164% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 28, 2025
Dominic Basulto has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
As Markets Churned, Bitcoin Surged. Here's What Could Happen Next. was originally published by The Motley Fool

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Federal Reserve's ‘Interest On Reserves' Doesn't Contain Inflation
The difference between what economists believe and what's true is Pacific Ocean vast. Think the popular view that the Federal Reserve, by paying banks to park reserves at the central bank, is containing inflation. Where to begin? First, inflation is one thing and one thing only: a shrinkage of the exchange medium circulating such that it exchanges for fewer and fewer market goods. In our case, inflation is a shrinkage of the dollar. Except that the dollar's exchange value isn't, nor has it ever been, part of the Fed's policy portfolio. What about interest on reserves? What about it? If we ignore that lending has nothing to do with inflation to begin with, what wasted thought. That's because credit is produced, not decreed or managed by central banks. Individuals, banks, and governments borrow money not to stare lovingly at it, but for what it can be exchanged for. Which is just a comment that credit is an effect of production, nothing else. Economists ascribe an inflationary quality to borrowing which implies impressive market stupidity. Really, what individual, business or government would take on debt just to take it on? Tick tock, tick tock. The answer to the above is what is once again true: credit is produced, which means lending grows alongside production. Looking ahead, and in consideration of the extraordinary production surge that awaits as AI and other labor-saving advances render humans superhuman in terms of their ability to generate endless plenty, credit availability today will be but a tiny fraction of what it is tomorrow. Stop and think about what this means. As credit availability surges, the effect will be a 'cheap revolution' (Rich Karlgaard of Forbes long ago created, popularized the term, or both) that's going to make today appear austere by comparison. Translated, the surest sign of economic growth is falling prices, not rising. Which is important to remember when considering the once again popular (and baseless) view of economists that the Fed is containing prices by paying banks for the right to theoretically sideline the monies entrusted to them. Implied in such a view is the opposite of what's true, that lending is inflationary because lending associates with economic growth that allegedly pushes up prices as prospering individuals buy, and buy, and buy. Let's refer to the latter as fallacy on top of fallacy on top of fallacy. Demand is an effect of production, nothing else. Translated, the more people are producing the more they're demanding. To imagine that demand can outpace supply is to misunderstand how people demand in the first place. Second, what we don't spend as our production grows exists as capital for innovators to be matched with, on the way to even more production of myriad goods and services at prices that continue to decline. At present, hundreds of billions are finding their way to AI and other labor-saving advances that will yet again push down the cost of everything while simultaneously leading buyers to all new wants and needs they never knew they had. Despite this, fallacy-stalked economists just dying to be distracted are focused on the Fed paying interest to banks so that they'll lend less? Forget that the latter has nothing to do with inflation, forget that banks are but a shrinking portion of soaring amounts of global credit, and just remember that a bank lending to the Fed doesn't nor will it have any impact on the growth aspects of the U.S. economy, growth that by its very name will associate with rapidly declining prices. Economists are most effective at being irrelevant. Their focus on interest on reserves helps explain why.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stock market pullbacks will be 'short-lived': Wall Street sees AI, rate-cut optimism fueling rally
President Trump's tariffs weren't enough to derail the stock market rally last week as the S&P 500 (^GSPC) and Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) continued to hover near record highs. Wall Street strategists point to other factors fueling the major averages higher: optimism over the AI trade and expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut rates in September. "August could very well be a little bit of a volatile month," Gargi Chaudhuri, BlackRock chief investment and portfolio strategist for the Americas region, told Yahoo Finance on Thursday morning. "I don't know that any pullbacks we see in the market will be long-lived. I think they'll be short-lived in nature," she added, highlighting that investors may want to add short-term, fixed-income investments to their portfolios as a way to diversify. Even as Trump's tariff deadline landed on Thursday, with imports from nearly 200 countries now facing duties ranging from 10% to 50%, strategists downplayed longer-term risks to equities. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs "Our base case remains that the US effective tariff rate will settle at around 15% — enough to weigh on growth and lift inflation, but not enough to derail the US economy or the equity rally," said Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, global head of equities at UBS Global Wealth Management. Strategists also point to companies' ability to navigate the tariff front, with heavyweights like Apple (AAPL) and TSMC (TSM) receiving exemptions due to their US investment commitments. "On a margin and short term, sure, the tariffs will affect earnings," Rockland Trust vice president and portfolio manager Michael Sayers told Yahoo Finance. "But once the tariffs rates are finally set, then it will be a one-time adjustment to company earnings, and then I think long-term fundamentals will take over." Overall earnings have come in strong this season, with roughly 82% of the companies that reported beating estimates, according to Bloomberg data. Wall Street has its eyes set on the AI trade, which has led the market. Data analytics firm Palantir (PLTR) saw its market cap balloon past $420 billion this week after posting a boom in revenue and contracts. Bullishness around AI followed strong quarterly results from software and cloud leader Microsoft (MSFT), social media giant Meta (META), and cloud and search engine provider Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG), all among the biggest data center spenders. "I think the big story that's driving the market, as it very well should, is how the large-cap, quality tech and friends — if we can call it that name — continue to have absolutely stellar earnings growth," said Chaudhuri. Wall Street strategists also anticipate that if an inflation print coming out next week shows cooling price increases, the Federal Reserve will increasingly lean toward cutting interest rates in September against a backdrop of a slowing job market. "The Fed is likely to be able to resume their rate-cutting cycle. I think the market takes a lot of relief from that," added Chaudhuri. Ines is a senior business reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
The crypto craze sweeping Washington and Wall Street
Earlier this year, more than 35,000 bitcoin enthusiasts descended on Las Vegas for Bitcoin 2025 – the largest-ever gathering of its kind, attracting an eclectic mix of high rollers ... and true believers. "Your goal should be to own at least one bitcoin, because by the time you retire, that can be worth 20, 30 million," said Michael Terpin. Guy Malone said, "You can't change the Bible; it changes you. The same is true of bitcoin." But everyone here seems to agree on one thing: President Donald Trump's re-election has been like hitting the jackpot. As Vice President JD Vance told the crowd, "I'm here today to say loud and clear, with President Trump, crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House." Once dismissed by investors, and still baffling to many Americans, cryptocurrencies like bitcoin have won over supporters from Wall Street to Washington. In July, the president signed the Genius Act, which opens the door for companies like Wal-Mart and Amazon to issue their own digital currencies. And Congress is debating another bill that, for the first time, aims to regulate cryptocurrency trading – this after the industry spent more than $167 million on behalf of crypto-friendly candidates ahead of last year's election. Asked how people should think of cryptocurrencies, Amanda Fischer, who served as a top official in the Securities and Exchange Commission during the Biden administration, replied, "You could think of it as gambling, you could think of it as a collectible, you could think of it as a type of investment. But I think what's important to understand is that crypto is highly volatile. It's highly speculative. "Crypto is often marketed to individuals as an investment opportunity that will yield them the possibility of great returns," she said. "But unlike, say, a stock, which represents a part-ownership of a company, [crypto] is not backed by any sort of business that is producing goods and services." Unlike hard currencies like the dollar or the euro, cryptocurrencies only exist online, and are issued by individuals and companies, not central banks. And yet, billions of dollars' worth of crypto are traded every day. "The number of scams, the types of scams, the sophistication of scams are so rife and plentiful that the capacity to lose your money in a crypto investment is substantially higher than if you're just investing in stocks and bonds," Fischer said. During the Biden administration, the SEC cracked down on the cryptocurrency industry. The Trump administration has changed course, dismissing the largest outstanding cases, which Fischer says leaves consumers more vulnerable. I asked, "We are seeing leaders in crypto say we want to be regulated. And there is legislation currently here in Washington underway to regulate cryptocurrency. They say they want laws passed." "They want laws that they write to be passed," said Fischer. "So, the legislation currently being considered in Washington, D.C., is written by and for the crypto industry." David Bailey, who runs the bitcoin conference and is CEO of a bitcoin holding company called Nakamoto, said, "I wish that was the case, that'd be fantastic. But no, it's not true." Like many crypto entrepreneurs, Bailey now calls Puerto Rico home. "It started because of the taxes," he said. "Now, it's like the place to do business." But the 34-year-old's real claim to fame might be his role in convincing a skeptical President Trump (who in June 2021 told Fox Business Channel that bitcoin "just seems like a scam") to go all-in on bitcoin during the 2024 campaign. Asked what he told Mr. Trump to convince him to support crypto, Bailey replied, "First off, no one convinces the president of anything. He makes up his own mind about things. A lot of people, especially in Washington, have missed how big this has gotten. And so, we made the case to the president about how many people hold this asset. He saw the opportunity that was here by embracing this industry. And I think we had a big part of swinging the election in his direction." The Federal Reserve says only eight percent of Americans have bought or held cryptocurrency in the last year, and only two percent have ever used it to buy anything. But digital assets are increasingly part of the economy. You may now be able to use crypto as collateral for a mortgage, and this past week the president signed an executive order to make it easier to hold cryptocurrencies in your 401(k). All the attention has helped drive the price of bitcoin to an all-time high, recently passing $120,000 each. Bailey says bitcoin was about $10 when he first bought it. Asked how much he bought, he replied, "Well, you know, that's something I'm not going to talk about on camera. Not enough, let's just go like that. Not enough." And as crypto's fortunes have improved, so have the president's; CBS News estimates that crypto ventures controlled by the Trump family have made up to $765 million in revenue from token sales since the fall of 2024. The White House did not respond to questions about the token sales, but in a statement told CBS News, "Neither the President nor his family have ever engaged, or will ever engage, in conflicts of interest." Most experts in government ethics believe the situation is unprecedented. I asked Bailey, "Has it ever occurred to you that maybe the president has changed his position on bitcoin and crypto because he can personally benefit from it, or his family can?" "No, absolutely not," said Bailey. "I don't think he embraced this industry to enrich himself; I think that he just sees the same potential that I see. When you get excited about an idea, you feel compelled to do something about it." And that potential is why investors are betting that crypto will soon become part of everyday life. Vice President Vance told the audience at Bitcoin 2025, "We want our fellow Americans to know that crypto and digital assets, and particularly Bitcoin, are part of the mainstream economy and are here to stay." But for Amanda Fischer, that's a gamble not worth taking. "We heard the same thing about subprime mortgages going into 2008," said Fischer. "We heard the same thing about complex financial derivatives going into the last crisis, too. These products are wonderful and there are ways to extract so much value in wealth, until they're not. And I fear that crypto is going to follow down the same path. Things are going great many times, until they're not." For more info: Story produced by Mark Hudspeth, Madeleine May and Dan Ruetenik. Editor: Jason Schmidt. See also: