Judicial system needs ‘shake-up' after trader convictions, says Sir David Davis
The former UBS trader and the ex-vice president of euro rates at Barclays bank were said to have manipulated the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) and the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor).
Speaking at a press conference following the Supreme Court judgment, Sir David described the two men as 'scapegoats for the sins that led to the financial crisis'.
He said: 'The implications are far-reaching and of course have been devastating for those caught up in it.
'There were several other people convicted of rate rigging, dozens of others who were either prosecuted, acquitted or not prosecuted. Their lives were upended too.
'This scapegoating exercise happened as a result of collusion between the banks and government agencies, including the SFO (Serious Fraud Office) and FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) and we're not done with that.
'This scandal also highlights the need for urgent reform within our justice system on a range of issues – the handling of expert witnesses right through to the rigidity of the appeals system.'
In an 82-page judgment, with which Supreme Court president Lord Reed, Lords Hodge and Lloyd-Jones and Lady Simler agreed, Lord Leggatt said judges' misdirection to the juries had led to the men's wrongful convictions.
He said: 'The history of these two cases raises concerns about the effectiveness of the criminal appeal system in England and Wales in confronting legal error.'
Sir David said the Supreme Court justices 'did not unpack' why the appeal system fell into error in these cases.
He said: 'I think the judicial system needs a shake-up, and this is the latest demonstrator of it, and we will be returning to it in the future.'
Mr Hayes said he believes the trials of the two men became caught up in the politics of the financial crisis, adding that there was a 'big desire from institutions and politicians, acting in their own interest largely', for traders to go to prison.
Asked about his thoughts on what role juries play in cases like his and Mr Palombo's, he said it was a 'dangerous idea' for complicated fraud and financial cases to be heard only by a judge.
The former trader added: 'The jury is the last defensive barrier that every citizen in this country has between them and a wrongful conviction.
'And are juries perfect? No, they're not. Do they make mistakes? Yes, they do. And you know, it's the best of a whole load of options, none of which is perfect.'
Ben Rose, part of Mr Palombo's legal team, said Wednesday's Supreme Court judgment is 'likely to offer a route' by which others who have been convicted in similar circumstances 'can right the wrong that has been done to them'.
He also said there was a 'fundamental error' in the way the case was prosecuted and that the role of the jury was 'overridden and usurped' by the judges.
The lawyer added: 'That should not happen in a country that abides by the rule of law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up
The Air Force 's top uniformed officer is set to retire early in the most recent shake-up of military leadership during President Donald Trump's second term. Gen. David Allvin will continue serving as the service's chief of staff until a replacement is confirmed by the Senate, the Air Force announced Monday. He expects to retire around Nov. 1, two years into his four-year term, it said in a statement. Allvin joins other top military officials who have stepped down or been fired by Trump 's Republican administration during a broader leadership upheaval, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 's plans to slash the number of senior military positions in what he calls an efficiency effort and a purge of top officers who were believed to endorse diversity, equity and inclusion programs. For example, Trump fired Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr. as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in February. Brown was the second Black general to serve as chairman, and Air Force Gen. Dan Caine later took over the role. Allvin, a command pilot with more than 4,600 flying hours, was appointed Air Force chief of staff by President Joe Biden, a Democrat, serving since November 2023. Before that, he was vice chief of staff during Trump's first term. 'I'm grateful for the opportunity to serve as the 23rd Air Force Chief of Staff and I'm thankful for Secretary Meink, Secretary Hegseth and President Trump's faith in me to lead our service,' Allvin said in the Air Force's statement. When asked for more details on Allvin's departure, the Air Force directed The Associated Press to its statement. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Air Force at
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Lisa Nandy's ‘protect the dolls' T-shirt left a sour taste in my mouth
As Pride season draws to a close, I've been reflecting on who has spoken up for the LGBTQ+ community during this difficult time. It's been heartening to see people like Kate Nash, Mariah Carey, Nicola Coughlan and others affirm their support for trans rights, even as attacks on us continue. But seeing Labour's Lisa Nandy at Wigan Pride, wearing a T-shirt reading 'protect the dolls' – a slogan seen as being supportive of trans rights – left me with very mixed feelings. Not least because of Labour's horrendous approach to trans rights since taking power just over 12 months ago. Nandy, as a cabinet minister, is being justifiably accused of hypocrisy because of her choice of T-shirt, and how it squares with her party's stance on LGBTQ+ issues. When Keir Starmer entered government last July, many trans and non-binary people hoped things might finally improve for us – or at least not get worse after 14 years of the Tories. But that hope was quickly snuffed out. Not only have they abandoned previous commitments to LGBTQ+ people, like self-ID for trans people, but in my view, they've taken some of the harshest, most exclusionary stances possible – whether on puberty blockers, sport, or the Supreme Court ruling on 'sex' in the Equality Act. With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications! And at no point did we see Lisa Nandy publicly speaking out, challenging her government, or even resigning on principle. Wes Streeting's decision to push through a ban on puberty blockers is a prime example. The Cass Report, which has been widely criticised since its publication, said that the case for the medication was 'incredibly weak'. This was a huge disappointment for the trans community, who have now seen hope taken away from younger generations that they can truly be themselves. Myself and my allies spoke out against the ban, and the Supreme Court's recent decision on sex as it relates to the Equality Act. I didn't see Lisa Nandy joining us. In fact, on trans and non-binary issues, the Wigan MP has herself also contributed to the noise. She claimed to feel 'incredibly uncomfortable' watching Imane Khelif box at 2024 Olympics, adding to a circus of misinformation surrounding the Algerian fighter – who online agitators claimed was trans, despite no evidence of that. It was a grim debate fuelled by misinformation and anti-trans panic, and for someone in Nandy's position to amplify it by describing an athlete's participation in the pinnacle of her sport as 'uncomfortable' is wrong. It's just another reason why eyebrows are being raised at Nandy's apparent support for trans people. To her credit, Nandy has at times spoken up in the past – once memorably clashing with Piers Morgan over his own comments about trans women in sport, and, when a leadership candidate, signing a pledge by the Labour Campaign for Trans Rights. But that was years ago, and for Labour, actions speak louder than words. With Keir Starmer declaring he doesn't believe people like me are women, and Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson saying I should use men's toilets, it's hard not to despair and feel completely abandoned by Labour. So when I see Nandy marching in Pride with a 'protect the dolls' shirt, it feels hollow. How can you claim to protect us while the government you serve strips our rights away and undermines our identities and lived reality? That isn't allyship – it's performative politics. I can't feel that someone like Nandy actually supports me, when all recent evidence points to the contrary. Meanwhile, trans people are living with the consequences of anti-trans narratives and a hostile political landscape – while members of the Labour Party show up and march at Pride like nothing has happened. There is a clear disconnect, and it's deeply upsetting. And although I want to believe there was sincerity behind Nandy's choice to wear the shirt and march at Wigan Pride, it means nothing unless it translates into real action. And with a grim predictability, Nandy has received backlash not only from the LGBTQ+ community, but from anti-trans voices for wearing the shirt. More Trending It shows just how toxic and emboldened anti-trans bigotry has become. Any shred of support for our community, whether sincere or otherwise, is met with an array of abuse and toxicity. Maybe that backlash will be a wake-up call for Nandy and her colleagues – a chance to push back against the epidemic of transphobia sweeping this country. But I'm not holding my breath. Labour seems determined to fuel this culture war, tarnishing their legacy by targeting a vulnerable minority who threaten no one. I've given up any expectation that Labour will support us anytime soon. But I hold onto a different hope: that one day they'll look back in shame at what they did, and finally realise it wasn't us who were the problem – it was them. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Love Is Blind's Katisha doesn't deserve your judgement MORE: Princess Andre's ITV docuseries changed my mind about her MORE: I had the gayest night of my life at Sao Paulo Pride – the biggest queer party in the world
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
JK Rowling divides gender critics - but is it permanent?
Ms Rowling has been a vocal critic of the constitutional divide for more than a decade, voting No in the 2014 referendum and donation £1 million to the Better Together campaign. Equally though, she has always maintained friendships with people on both sides of the debate. Ms Rowling and the transgender exclusionary movement share a common dislike for the former first minister, given that she spearheaded the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill that set fire to the debate. It is surprising, then, that Ms Rowling's review of Ms Sturgeon's memoir caused such a schism in the movement. Ms Rowling took particular issue with the former first minister's argument that the independence debate was not "unpleasant and divisive". She wrote in her review that No voters were "being threatened with violence and to f*** off out of Scotland, quizzed on the amount of Scottish blood that ran in their veins, accused of treachery and treason". It immediately caused a divide. Pro-independence blogger Wings Over Scotland stated it had "ripped open an old wound between a bunch of gender-critical people who were getting along just fine". And getting along just fine they were. Arguably, the gender critical movement was at an all-time harmonious high. When the Supreme Court ruling linked the terms "woman" and "man" to biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, the triumph from campaigners was inescapable. And the employment tribunal between Sandie Peggie and NHS Fife reinvigorated the gender critical community with 10 days of non-stop news of their cause. After Ms Rowling's review, social media was awash with conflicting views: those urging pro-independence voters not to conflate the constitutional issue with the campaign for women's rights. Read more: But others felt that it was only right to call out the Harry Potter author. High profile figures joined in to contradict her version of events. Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry said she felt Ms Rowling's take may have exaggerated the bad behaviour during the referendum. The author's review omits "any reference to bad behaviour by Better Together supporters which also occurred," according to the former SNP MP. The KC said she experienced a "determined attempt" to "traduce" her professional reputation after she set up Lawyers for Yes. The author referenced the concerns, writing on X: "Did pro-union people behave badly, as well as nationalists? Yes, without a doubt. In any binary contest you will look around and find a lot of people standing in your camp you don't have a single thing in common with except on a single yes/no question. "There's a reason, though, that far more nationalists than unionists look back fondly on the run up to the referendum time. "Pro-independence politicians were happy to impugn remainers' motives in very ugly ways, and plenty elected MPs and MSPs contributed enthusiastically to online toxicity." Both Scottish independence and the gender debate have become two of the most divisive debates in the country's history. Ms Rowling's self-published review has reignited questions about how movements with shared values can fracture when broader identities and loyalties clash. Much like the debate around self-ID, the constitutional question continues to stir deep emotion and division. The Scottish independence movement has never overcome that division. The challenge now for the gender critical side, is whether it can overcome the deep differences for the benefit of its greater cause - and only time will tell.
