logo
One More Worry For College Students: Medicaid Work Requirements

One More Worry For College Students: Medicaid Work Requirements

Forbes28-07-2025
Millions of undergraduate and graduate students are on Medicaid. getty
'The uncertainty is really scary,' says Garth Bittner, a 28-year-old studying aerospace engineering at College of the Canyons, a community college in Santa Clarita, California. So scary, that he actually read through parts of the 800-plus-page tax and budget bill President Trump signed into law on July 4th.
Surprisingly, Bittner wasn't looking for answers about the new law's $307 billion in cuts to the student loan program over the next decade, which (among other things), will make repaying loans on income-based payment plans more burdensome. Instead, he was focused on the law's $911 billion in Medicaid cuts, specifically a new 'work requirement' slated to take effect at the start of 2027 and projected to save $326 billion over the next decade, largely by kicking people off the program.
Millions of undergraduate and graduate students now rely on Medicaid for health coverage. Students who attend school more than half time, should, in theory, meet the new work requirement. But yet-to-be issued rules and procedures, along with paperwork problems and administrative snafus, could put many of them at risk.
The new work requirement is contained in what Republicans have dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and applies to the more than 20 million adults who receive coverage as part of the Medicaid expansion that was part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (popularly known as Obamacare). The Supreme Court ruled the expansion was voluntary for the states, which administer Medicaid. Nevertheless, 40 states and the District of Columbia have adopted Medicaid expansion, which allows adults with income up to 138% of the poverty line ($21,597 for a single individual in 2025) to qualify for Medicaid.
According to a recent report from Congress' Government Accountability Office, between 2010 and 2022, the share of undergraduate and graduate students who were uninsured shrank from 19% to 9%. Some of those coverage gains came from a provision in ACA that allows young adults without their own health coverage to stay on their parents' employer-provided health insurance until they are 26.
But even more came from Medicaid expansion. In 2022, the GAO found, 13% of all college students, up from 7% in 2010, were covered by Medicaid. Equally telling, according to the GAO, 12% of college students in states that didn't expand Medicaid lacked coverage in 2022, twice as high as the percentage who went uninsured in the expansion states. (Some colleges offer their own health plan and require all students to be insured, while others don't.)
Under the newly-passed work regime, technically called 'community engagement compliance,' Americans aged 19 through 64 will have to prove at least twice a year that they're working, volunteering or in a work training program for at least 80 hours a month, or enrolled in an educational program at least half-time. Those who are caring for a child below 14 or have a medical condition that makes work impossible can qualify for an exception.
Republicans tout the new requirement as a way to get able-bodied people to join the workforce and ultimately become self-sufficient. But Democrats and many health policy experts warn that millions of otherwise eligible recipients (including those who are working or going to school) will lose coverage because of bureaucratic gotchas.
'The bottom line of what everyone expects is there's going to be massive paperwork and massive confusion,' says Leighton Ku, the director of the Center for Health Policy Research at George Washington University.
The OBBA provides that students who can prove they're enrolled in a higher education program at least half-time will meet the community engagement requirement. But it doesn't define what constitutes half-time enrollment. In fact, that's just one of many issues specific to college students that will need to be clarified by either federal regulations, or in federal guidance to the states (which they then would interpret), before the work requirement takes effect at the start of 2027.
Besides the short time frame, experts see another problem: States may not have (or be ready to spend) the money needed to set up efficient verification systems that don't cut eligible people off. The new law provides just $200 million in federal funds to help states build the infrastructure for tracking Medicaid work requirements in fiscal year 2026. But they'll likely need to spend a lot more to develop adequate systems. For example, Georgia, which implemented a Medicaid work requirement in July 2023, has spent nearly $100 million setting up the program, including an estimated $55 million to develop a digital system for verifying eligibility.
Andrea Ducas, the Center for American Progress' vice president of health policy, ticks off a series of still unanswered questions that will affect college students on Medicaid. 'What constitutes half-time enrollment? Does that enrollment also extend to times that you're not in the school, like if you're on a summer break, or if you're a student that isn't continuously enrolled in a program, but goes during different semesters.'
It's still unclear, she notes, what will happen to students who are enrolled in an educational program when they apply or submit paperwork to requalify for Medicaid, but weren't enrolled the month before. That's because the legislation states that when eligibility is redetermined every six months (or more frequently if states choose), states are required to 'look back' for at least one month to determine if the applicant met the work requirement or qualified for an exemption in the previous month. Just as they can choose to redetermine eligibility more than twice a year, states can choose to look back for multiple consecutive months. Those lookbacks could hurt college students whose schedules change over the course of the year, worries Carolyn Fast, The Century Foundation's director of higher education policy.
'You could see a situation where a student who wasn't enrolled [in school] over the summer or wasn't enrolled for one semester is going to have trouble either getting enrolled [in Medicaid] or staying enrolled,' she says.
Bittner takes a full course load at College of the Canyons. But he shares the experts' concerns about getting caught by the frequent recertifications and look backs. 'Do you have to time it so that you're enrolling (in Medicaid) when you're in school and potentially going summer without health insurance? Nobody knows,' he says. 'You're going to have to submit more paperwork to show that you go to school more often and if anything goes wrong, and things always go wrong with these programs, you could lose it and then it takes forever to get somebody to correct it.'
As a resident of California, Bittner might have less to worry about than students in some other states. GW's Ku says a lot could depend on how states chose to implement the verification process, including the frequency of checks, number of months they look back and types of data used. 'They could say 'Gee, for July and August you weren't in school half-time, so therefore you didn't meet the requirement,' he observes. But a state could also opt to check only twice a year with a one-month look back or accept a student's two-semester course schedule as adequate, despite the summer break.
Adrianna McIntyre, an assistant professor of health policy and politics at Harvard University, offers additional unknowns: What types of educational programs will count towards the requirement? And how difficult will it be for those who work part time and attend school part time to meet the 80 hour requirement?
The legislation permits people to combine qualifying activities to reach the requirement, but she fears some students who are enrolled in one or two classes and work part-time could struggle to compile the necessary paperwork to prove their eligibility every six months. 'These requirements create more homework for students. The government is giving them homework on top of their schoolwork,'' McIntryre observes. 'A lot of people just aren't going to successfully navigate that.'
Allie Gardner, a senior policy analyst on the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' health policy team, points to another requirement that could trip up students on Medicaid. In addition to proving they meet the work/school requirement at least twice a year, Medicaid expansion recipients will also need to prove at least twice a year (up from once a year) that their income still qualifies them for Medicaid with separate documents. So even if states set up systems that automatically verify education status, they may not automatically verify students' income.
'Basically everyone, including college students, may be hit with this double paperwork burden of having to prove compliance with the work requirement while also completing a full redetermination of eligibility,' Gardner says. (This more frequent income recertification is expected to save another $63 billion, on top of the savings from the work requirement.)
Some states already have online portals for Medicaid enrollment, but Gardner says some folks seeking coverage report difficulties using these websites and opt for mail. That presents yet another gotcha for college students: They could miss notices if they use their home address while at school, but also risk losing coverage from their home state if their school address is out of state.
'Let's say because they want to make sure they get their mail for their renewal to meet the paperwork burden, [a student] submits their college address in another state. That could trigger the state thinking that someone is now enrolled in a Medicaid program out of state and they could lose Medicaid coverage,' Gardner says.
That means, she adds, that it will be crucial for states and universities to communicate state-specific policies, but they can't even formulate these policies until they get federal guidance. That 'makes the timeline to implement work requirements in the next year and a half very difficult,' she adds.
The correlation between heightened paperwork and qualified people never getting –or losing– Medicaid coverage is strong, as demonstrated in Georgia, the only state that currently has a work requirement through its Pathways to Coverage program (which it adopted instead of a standard ACA expansion for poor, able-bodied adults). As of May, only about 7,500 of the nearly 250,000 theoretically eligible people in Georgia were enrolled, with critics largely attributing low enrollment numbers to heightened paperwork.
'I think that the overall story of Georgia is proof of how somebody could leave home, go to college, not be able to afford the student insurance, and not be able to get Medicaid coverage they are otherwise eligible for because of all of the paperwork burdens,' Gardner says.
Leah Chan, Georgia Budget and Policy Institute's director of health justice, says students in Georgia have a comparatively easier time than others when it comes to the new systems. That's because if they submit an official course enrollment schedule at the start of a semester, it exempts them from reporting hours monthly. Plus, as students, they likely have an easier time navigating an online system than older or less educated folks.
But students aren't immune from problems. In June, the Georgia group spotlighted the case of a graduate student and former social worker who lost coverage after having problems with the website and then struggling to get help through to the state call center. 'There's glitchy technology, there's overburdened caseworkers who aren't able to answer your questions,' Chan says. 'So people are still falling through the cracks because of the added paperwork and the bureaucratic red tape.'
Chan says states will need to establish not only tech systems for tracking eligibility, but also high quality phone-based and in-person support for Medicaid users and outreach programs to make sure people know what forms they need to submit.
'People call them startup costs, but really what we're seeing is that making modifications to the eligibility enrollment system is an ongoing cost, and so that is something that I think states are going to need to be mindful of,' Chan says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

C1 Fund Inc. Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering
C1 Fund Inc. Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

C1 Fund Inc. Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering

PALO ALTO, Calif., August 07, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--C1 Fund Inc., a new closed-end investment company ("C1 Fund" or the "Fund"), today announced the pricing of its initial public offering of 6,000,000 shares of its common stock (the "Common Shares") at a public offering price of $10.00 per share. C1 Fund has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 900,000 Common Shares to cover over-allotments, if any, at the public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The Common Shares are expected to begin trading on August 7, 2025, on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "CFND." The offering is expected to close on August 8, 2025, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. The net proceeds of this offering are estimated at approximately $55.1 million (or approximately $63.4 million if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional Common Shares in full), after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and the Fund's estimated offering expenses. The Fund intends to complete its investment of the net proceeds within three months, but, in any event, no later than 12 months, after the closing of the offering. The Benchmark Company, LLC is acting as sole book-running manager for the offering. SoFi Securities LLC and China Renaissance Securities (Hong Kong) Limited are acting as co-managers for the offering. A registration statement on Form N-2 (File Nos. 333-283139 and 811-24022) relating to the Common Shares has been filed with and declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on August 6, 2025. The offering is being made only by means of a prospectus. Copies of the final prospectus, when available, may be obtained upon request to: The Benchmark Company, LLC, 150 East 58th Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10155, Attention: Prospectus Department, or by email at prospectus@ This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any offer, solicitation or sale of any securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the laws of such state or jurisdiction. About C1 Fund Inc. C1 Fund Inc. is a Maryland corporation based in Palo Alto, California. C1 Advisors LLC, which is also based in Palo Alto, California, will serve as the Fund's investment adviser. The Fund's investment objective is to maximize the portfolio's total return, principally by seeking capital gains on the Fund's equity and equity-related investments. Under normal market conditions, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in equity and equity-linked securities of companies principally engaged in the digital assets services and technology sector. The Fund intends to achieve its investment objective by investing in a portfolio of what the Fund believes to be 30 of the top digital assets services and technology companies, excluding companies whose business is principally administered in the People's Republic of China, including Hong Kong and Macao. Investors should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The registration statement on Form N-2, which contains the Fund's preliminary prospectus, has been filed with the SEC, contains this information and should be read carefully before investing. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including statements relating to the offering of the Common Shares, our ability to complete the offering on the anticipated timeline or at all and the anticipated use of the net proceeds therefrom, together with other statements that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements that are estimates reflecting management's best judgment based upon currently available information. Words such as, but not limited to, "look forward to," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "confidence," "encouraged," "potential," "plan," "targets," "likely," "may," "will," "would," "should" and "could," and similar expressions or words identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this press release are based on management's current expectations and beliefs which are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and factors that may cause the actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements of the Fund, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. As a result, no assurance can be given as to future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and neither the Fund nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such statements in the future. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements, and we undertake no obligation to revise or update this press release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof. Risk is inherent in all investing. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective, and you could lose some or all of your investment. NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE View source version on Contacts For Media Enquiries contact: media@ Sign in to access your portfolio

Former Superman Dean Cain Says He's Joining ICE ‘ASAP': America Was ‘Built on Patriots Stepping Up'
Former Superman Dean Cain Says He's Joining ICE ‘ASAP': America Was ‘Built on Patriots Stepping Up'

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Superman Dean Cain Says He's Joining ICE ‘ASAP': America Was ‘Built on Patriots Stepping Up'

Dean Cain says he's joining ICE. During an appearance on Fox News' 'Jesse Watters Primetime' on Wednesday, the former 'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman' star explained that he spoke to the officials over at the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and will be joining their ranks 'ASAP.' More from Variety 'South Park' Mocks a Puppy-Shooting Kristi Noem and JD Vance Offers to Rub Baby Oil on Satan In Wild New Episode U.S. Homeland Security Is Now Using 'South Park' to Promote ICE's Website Amid the Show's Takedown of Donald Trump Spike Lee, Adam McKay and 2,300 More WGA Members Sign Letter Blasting Trump's 'Authoritarian Assault' on Free Speech He told Watters, 'I put out a recruitment video yesterday, I'm actually a sworn deputy sheriff and a reserve police office, I wasn't part of ICE, but once I put that out there and you put a little blurb on your show, it went crazy. So now I've spoken with some officials over at ICE, and I will be sworn in as an ICE agent, ASAP.' When asked what motivated him to join the organization, Cain said that America is a country 'built on patriots stepping up, whether it was popular or not,' and that joining ICE was 'the right thing' to do. 'We have a broken immigration system,' he added. 'Congress needs to fix it, but in the interim, President Trump ran on this. He is delivering on this. This is what people voted for. It's what I voted for, and he's going to see it through, and I'll do my part and help make sure it happens.' In his profile with Variety, Cain was vocal about his conservative values and his support of Donald Trump. 'I love President Trump. I've been friends with him forever,' Cain said. 'Trump is actually one of the most empathetic, wonderful, generous people you'll ever meet.' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025

United Airlines ‘Technology Issue' Resolved, But Some Flights Still Face Delays
United Airlines ‘Technology Issue' Resolved, But Some Flights Still Face Delays

Forbes

time23 minutes ago

  • Forbes

United Airlines ‘Technology Issue' Resolved, But Some Flights Still Face Delays

United Airlines on Wednesday night announced it had resolved a 'technology issue' that had triggered a ground stop for the carrier's flights at major U.S. airports earlier in the evening and triggered hundreds of delays and several dozen cancelations, although the airline was still tackling residual delays triggered by the outage. United Airlines flights were disrupted by technology issues on Wednesday night, causing hundreds of flight delays and cancelations. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved Earlier on Wednesday evening, the airline told several news outlets that it was 'holding United mainline flights at their departure airports,' due to a 'technology issue,' without offering specifics. In a post on X, Transport Secretary Sean Duffy said United CEO Scott Kirby had briefed him on the matter, adding that 'the issue was specific to United's operations, and is unrelated to the broader air traffic control system.' In a notification on its website later on Wednesday night, the company said it has resolved the 'technology issues that had been affecting flights,' but noted it was still experiencing delays as its team works to restore normal operations. The Federal Aviation Administration also issued a statement saying it was aware that United 'experienced a technology issue disrupting their operations,' and noted: 'We've offered full support to help address their flight backlog.' According to FlightAware data, nearly 1100 United Airlines flights faced delays on Wednesday, which is 35% of the carrier's scheduled flights for the day. In addition to this, 157 United flights were canceled. The residual impact of the ground stop was still being felt after midnight, as 70 flights scheduled for Thursday had been canceled, while 79 had been delayed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store