Man, 39, accused of housebreaking jumps bail, arrest warrant issued, Singapore News
An arrest warrant has been issued to Long Zhihua, 39, after he failed to turn up for a pre-trial conference on May 23.
In response to AsiaOne's queries, the Singapore Courts said that Long has been uncontactable since April 5, four days after he was granted bail.
Long, a member of a housebreaking syndicate, had broken into a home on Windsor Park Road on June 21, 2024, with his accomplice, Luo Changchang, 44.
They were arrested five days after the heist, before they had planned to fly back to China on June 29.
Several stolen items were found in their hotel room in Geylang, but the victim, a 53-year-old woman, still suffered a loss as more than $390,000 in jewellery remains missing.
According to court documents, Long and Luo initially pleaded guilty last December and were awaiting sentencing, but retracted their plea, prompting the court to schedule a pre-trial conference.
Long, who had been granted bail, failed to show up in court on April 25.
He did turn not turn up to the rescheduled pre-trial conference on May 23, which led to the arrest warrant being issued.
Meanwhile, Luo has remained in remand since his arrest. His case is scheduled to be be heard again on July 25.
Offenders convicted of housebreaking can be jailed up to 10 years, and fined.
[[nid:697687]]
chingshijie@asiaone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Paper
3 hours ago
- New Paper
Woman gets sole custody of son, 14, who rejects 'tiger dad'
A senior consultant doctor has been awarded sole custody of her 14-year-old son, who threatened to commit self-harm if he had to live with his "tiger dad". The boy accused his father of forcing him to finish his Chinese homework while in tears, and compelling him to change co-curricular activities in order to get into a prestigious school. The High Court also ruled that the husband, a 52-year-old Australian who is now a permanent resident, should receive 69 per cent of their marital assets while the wife received 31 per cent. The court calculated the couple's assets at $8,673,727, including private homes in Pasir Panjang and Clementi, as well as stocks, savings, and jewelry. Son refused contact with father Shin Min Daily News reported that the couple got married in Feb 2009. The 50-year-old woman works in a hospital, while the man is an ex-investment analyst who retired in 2013. After moving out of the marital home, the woman filed for divorce in 2021, and the two went to court over their marital assets and son. Although the two initially agreed to share custody of their son, the woman demanded sole care and custody of the boy, claiming that father and son had a bad relationship. In July 2022, the court issued a temporary order granting permission for the boy to stay overnight with his father. Upon learning of this, the boy told his principal that he felt pressured and afraid to communicate with his father, saying he would resort to self-harm if he had to live with him. The woman said that as the man insisted on meeting his son, the boy eventually ran away from home. Sold custody awarded to the mother During a recent appearance before a judge, the boy accused his father of being overly focused on his academic performance. He claimed that as a child, his father ignored him while he was crying on his mother's lap and insisted he complete his Chinese tuition. The boy also accused his father of forbidding him from taking part in his floorball co-curricular activity, instead forcing him to take up tennis to improve his chances of getting into his desired secondary school through the direct admission program. Because the son repeatedly said that he did not want to have any contact with his father, the judge awarded the son's custody, care and supervision to his mother. He also ordered the husband to video chat with his son for half an hour every week under the supervision of a counselor for a period of six months. If the relationship between the two progresses, adjustments will be made afterwards.
AsiaOne
12 hours ago
- AsiaOne
2 Singaporeans arrested for leaving Malaysia illegally via land checkpoints, Singapore News
Two Singaporeans and an Indian national were arrested in separate incidents for attempting to leave Malaysia illegally via a "major land checkpoint" on motorcycles. The men, who are in their 20s and 30s, were detained by the Malaysian Immigration Department and are now under investigation, reported The Star on Friday (Aug 1). In the first incident, a Singaporean man allegedly entered Johor Bahru on motorcycle without having his passport stamped and was caught while trying to exit Malaysia. While he claimed he had taken the wrong route, investigations suggest he had entered the country using an unmanned motorcycle lane at the Bangunan Sultan Iskandar (BSI) Customs, Immigrations and Quarantine Complex in Johor. The second case involved two men, a Singaporean and an Indian National, who were travelling by motorcycle. Both were stopped after it was found that they had no entry records in the system. All three men are being investigated under Section 6(1)(C) of Malaysia's Immigration Act for entering the country without valid documentation. If convicted, the men face up to RM10,000 (S$3,000) in fines, a maximum of five years' jail, and up to six strokes of the cane. A police source confirmed that police reports have been filed in connection with both incidents. The Malaysian Immigration Department has carried out special operations to clamp down on Malaysians and Singaporeans attempting to bypass passport checks at both BSI and the Second Link. An official said foreigners must learn that it is an offence to enter or exit Malaysia without presenting their passports and issued a warning to the thousands of motorcyclists using the land routes between Malaysia and Singapore to not resort to shortcuts. The immigration department also cited previous cases, where Malaysian motorcyclists rushing to work faced stiff penalties for failing to scan their passports. [[nid:720663]] melissateo@
AsiaOne
a day ago
- AsiaOne
Man allegedly spotted vaping on bus wearing military uniform was held in SAF custody, Singapore News
A man was held in Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) custody after allegedly vaping on a public bus. AsiaOne understands that he has since been released. A video shared by SGFollowsAll recently went viral showing the individual, dressed in a No. 4 military uniform, taking several puffs from a pink device, presumably an e-vapouriser. Mindef told AsiaOne in a statement today (Aug 2) that the man had been identified and put in SAF custody to assist with the investigation. The ministry said that SAF takes a "serious view" on the possession and use of vapes by service personnel and called it "both a matter of military discipline and an offence under national law". Offenders could be fined up to $1,000 or detained if the devices are found to be laced with controlled drugs. "Besides enforcement, the SAF also undertakes awareness and education efforts, and provides cessation counselling and support," the ministry added. "Service personnel are encouraged to speak to their commanders or medical officers if they require help." Vape seizures and disposal bins Between January 2024 and March 2025, over 17,900 people were caught for possession and use of e-vapourisers, with the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) seizing over $41 million worth of devices and components in 50 operations. Sixty people aged between 17 and 43 were also prosecuted for selling vapes. Starting July 25, the Ministry of Health (MOH), HSA and People's Association have placed vape disposal bins at 24 locations around the island for people to willingly curb their habit and safely dispose of their vaping paraphernalia. This comes after recent public concerns about vapes laced with etomidate, an anaesthetic agent that can cause seizures and psychosis which has been deemed a Controlled Substance under the Poisons Act. Health Minister Ong Ye Kung revealed that a third of vapes seized in Singapore were such 'Kpods'. The purchase, possession and use of e-vaporisers is illegal under the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act and offenders can be fined up to $2,000. Possessing or supplying pods containing etomidate can result in jail of up to two years and/or a fine of up to $10,000 under the Poisons Act. As an interim measure, etomidate will be listed as a Class C drug and subsequently, persons caught using etomidate-laced vapes will face mandatory supervision and rehabilitation, and penalties under the Misuse of Drugs Act. [[nid:720471]] drimac@
