US business owners risk being ‘robbed and killed' if they return to Russia
US companies returning to Russia risk having their businesses and staff 'robbed and killed', campaigners have warned, amid calls from the Trump administration to rebuild economic links.
Sir Bill Browder, a financier turned anti-Russian corruption campaigner, said American businesses should be wary of the risks of returning to the country.
Sir Bill, whose fund was once Russia's biggest foreign investor, said: 'American companies will do what's in their self interest, and there's no self interest in going into Russia where you can be robbed and killed. Nobody is going to risk their capital.'
Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer who represented Sir Bill in Russia, was tortured and killed in a Moscow prison in 2009 after he uncovered a web of alleged corruption. Sir Bill has since been on a mission to secure justice for the Magnitsky family. In 2012, the Magnitsky Act was passed in the US to punish those who could have been involved in his death.
His comments come after Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, claimed there were 'incredible opportunities that exist to partner with the Russians, geopolitically on issues of common interest and frankly economically'.
Closer economic ties between the US and Russia were discussed at a meeting between the two countries in Saudi Arabia this week, which principally focused on how to end the war in Ukraine. The summit has provoked panic and outrage in Kyiv and other European capitals for excluding the Ukrainians and European leaders.
Sir Bill said Western investment was unlikely to pour back into Russia despite Moscow's charm offensive of the Trump administration as 'nobody is going to want to get caught in that mess'.
He said: 'The only thing that might happen is that companies which sell products into Russia [could start reselling products there], but nobody is going to invest a penny over there.'
B4Ukraine, a campaign group that has pressured businesses to leave Russia, said it was calling on 'all Western businesses to stay out of Russia until it fully withdraws from Ukraine and justice is served to the Ukrainian people'.
It added: 'Any company choosing to return before then will be complicit in enabling an illegal war and occupation. There is no ethical way to operate in a country waging a genocidal war against its neighbour.'
Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, said after the meeting with Mr Rubio this week that there was 'great interest ... in removing artificial barriers to the development of mutually beneficial economic cooperation'.
Kirill Dmitriev, the head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, claimed US businesses could return to within months. He told Reuters that the Russian Direct Investment Fund 'expects a number of American companies to return to the Russian market in the second quarter of 2025'.
Mr Dmitriev said he believed US oil companies that had 'very successful business in Russia' would 'at some point' return. He added: 'Why would they forego these opportunities that Russia gave them to have access to Russian natural resources?'
At this week's meeting in Saudi Arabia, the sovereign wealth chief handed out a document showing that American companies had walked away from around $324bn (£257bn) of investments by quitting Russia, according to The New York Times.
Nezir Sinani, of B4Ukraine, said the Kremlin's control over the Russian economy meant businesses had no certainty about investments there.
He said: 'Companies rushing back to Russia are playing a reckless game of Russian roulette. No matter what deal the Trump administration strikes with the Kremlin, Russia remains a lawless, high-risk market where foreign businesses are at the mercy of an unpredictable regime.
'The Russian government has a long history of seizing assets, weaponising regulations and using businesses as pawns in its geopolitical games. Any company that returns is gambling with its investments, exposing itself to sudden expropriation, and the whims of an authoritarian state that views Western firms as expendable.'
The Kremlin has been accused of illegally taking control of the assets of some Western businesses such as Carlsberg and Danone, whose Russian subsidiaries were seized in 2023 as they were trying to exit the country. This came after Vladimir Putin signed a presidential decree that gave him powers to commandeer Western businesses. Jacob Aarup-Andersen, Carlsberg's chief executive, accused Russia of having 'stolen' his subsidiary in the country.
Mr Sinani said: 'Beyond financial risk, the reputational damage could be catastrophic. Companies that once took a stand by leaving will be seen as hypocrites, prioritising profit over principle. The message is clear: doing business in Russia isn't just risky – it's a moral and strategic failure.'
Ukraine on Wednesday said it would continue to 'defend our right to exist' after Mr Trump blamed the country for starting the war in 2022 and launched a series of attacks on President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
When Will Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:KC) Turn A Profit?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited () is possibly approaching a major achievement in its business, so we would like to shine some light on the company. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited provides cloud services to businesses and organizations primarily in China. On 31 December 2024, the US$3.3b market-cap company posted a loss of CN¥2.0b for its most recent financial year. As path to profitability is the topic on Kingsoft Cloud Holdings' investors mind, we've decided to gauge market sentiment. In this article, we will touch on the expectations for the company's growth and when analysts expect it to become profitable. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is bordering on breakeven, according to the 11 American IT analysts. They expect the company to post a final loss in 2026, before turning a profit of CN¥352m in 2027. The company is therefore projected to breakeven around 2 years from now. How fast will the company have to grow each year in order to reach the breakeven point by 2027? Working backwards from analyst estimates, it turns out that they expect the company to grow 97% year-on-year, on average, which is extremely buoyant. If this rate turns out to be too aggressive, the company may become profitable much later than analysts predict. We're not going to go through company-specific developments for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings given that this is a high-level summary, however, bear in mind that by and large a high forecast growth rate is not unusual for a company that is currently undergoing an investment period. View our latest analysis for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings One thing we would like to bring into light with Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is its relatively high level of debt. Typically, debt shouldn't exceed 40% of your equity, which in Kingsoft Cloud Holdings' case is 98%. Note that a higher debt obligation increases the risk in investing in the loss-making company. There are too many aspects of Kingsoft Cloud Holdings to cover in one brief article, but the key fundamentals for the company can all be found in one place – Kingsoft Cloud Holdings' company page on Simply Wall St. We've also put together a list of pertinent factors you should further examine: Valuation: What is Kingsoft Cloud Holdings worth today? Has the future growth potential already been factored into the price? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is currently mispriced by the market. Management Team: An experienced management team on the helm increases our confidence in the business – take a look at who sits on Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's board and the CEO's background. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
US appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll
US appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll A divided 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has left intact its Dec. 30 decision upholding a $5 million verdict against Donald Trump Show Caption Hide Caption Judges deliberating on Trump's E. Jean Carroll appeal Judges are deliberating on whether the jury that awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million should have been allowed to hear other allegations. NEW YORK, June 13 (Reuters) - Donald Trump failed to persuade a federal appeals court to reconsider the $5 million verdict won by E. Jean Carroll after a jury found that the U.S. president sexually abused and defamed the former magazine columnist. A divided 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on June 13 left intact its Dec. 30, 2024, decision upholding the jury award. Carroll, now 81, accused Trump of attacking her around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, and defaming her in an October 2022 Truth Social post by denying her claim as a hoax. More: Trump loses appeal of sexual abuse and defamation judgment in E. Jean Carroll case Jurors decided in May 2023 that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll, and defamed her by lying. They did not find that Trump raped Carroll, as she had claimed. More: Did Donald Trump rape E. Jean Carroll? Here's what a jury and judge said. In seeking reconsideration, Trump maintained that the trial judge erred in letting jurors review the 2005 "Access Hollywood" video of him bragging about his sexual prowess, and a "pile-on" of inflammatory evidence that he mistreated two other women. One, businesswoman Jessica Leeds, said Trump groped her on a plane in the late 1970s. The other, former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff, said Trump forcibly kissed her at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005. Trump has denied their claims. More: Jury finds Donald Trump liable in civil sex abuse case of E. Jean Carroll Trump, who turns 79 on June 14, is separately appealing an $83.3 million jury verdict in January 2024 for defaming Carroll and damaging her reputation in June 2019, when he first denied her claim about the Bergdorf encounter. The president is arguing in that appeal that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last July providing him substantial criminal immunity shields him from liability in Carroll's civil case. In his 2019 and 2022 denials of Carroll's accusations, Trump said she was "not my type" and had made up the rape claim to promote her memoir.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man who attacked officers with Molotov cocktail had been referred to Prevent
A man who had an 'extreme anti-government mindset' and attacked police officers armed with an axe and a Molotov cocktail, had been referred to an anti-terror programme a year earlier, police have said. Alexander Dighton, 28, attacked three officers on January 31 at Talbot Green police station in south Wales, stabbing one in the leg and punching another in the head. He attempted to set fire to police cars and used a variety of weapons in the incident, including a knife, a hatchet and a pole with sharpened metal plates fixed to the end. Senior police officers have now revealed that Dighton, who was described as a 'lonely' individual, had been referred to the Prevent programme 12 months before he carried out the attack, following concerns about his views on immigration and Islam. Despite the referral by his sister, it was decided that Dighton, who spent a lot of time online expressing far-right views and playing computer games, 'did not meet the criteria' to be included on the scheme. Detective Superintendent Andrew Williams of counter terrorism policing Wales said: 'Our investigations show that Dighton was motivated by an extreme anti-government mindset. 'He had extreme anti-immigration views, he had anti-Islam views, and he saw the police as a legitimate target, in his words as 'representatives or agents of the state'. 'Dighton was known to us. 'He was referred into the Prevent programme or for assessment by the Prevent programme in January 2024, 12 months before the attack took place. 'The concerns expressed in that referral were around his immigration views, his views around the religion of Islam and some sentiments he had expressed in relation to the involuntary celibate, or 'incel' movement.' The incel movement is made of people who find themselves unsuccessful in relationships, often blaming women, with some harbouring extreme views. Mr Williams said counter terrorism officers undertook a 'detailed assessment' over a three-week period during the referral, including interviewing Dighton, before the case was closed. He said: 'There was nothing in that referral or in the subsequent assessment that would give any indication whatsoever that Dighton would go on to commit an offence of the nature he did.' Mr Williams said the police have received 30,000 referrals in the last few years and 'judgement calls have to be made'. 'Alexander Dighton was a lonely individual who spent a lot of time online, he had a particular fascination with an online game called Warhammer (40K),' he said. 'He was also online, expressing a number of what could be deemed far-right views. 'In his own words, he formed the intention to carry out this attack approximately a month beforehand and his online activity ramped up in that month. 'Without a doubt, I suspect the online world highly contributed to what he did.' Mr Williams added that Dighton never published an account of what he planned to do before the incident, and he did not believe there had been prior contact with him before he was referred to Prevent.
