Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course unlikely to host The Open due to 'logistical' issues say R&A
US President Donald Trump's Turnberry course won't be hosting The Open any time soon with R&A officials saying logistical challenges remain.
The Ayrshire venue's iconic course last hosted the event 16 years ago - five years prior to Trump purchasing the famous resort.
While 120,000 spectators attened the 2009 Open, that figure swelled to 250,000 for Royal Troon last year with a further increase expected at Portrush with this year's championship getting underway today.
R&A chief executive Mark Darbon insists the infrastructure in and around Turnberry simply isn't up to the required standard to mee the demands of hosting the prestigious event.
He said: "We love the golf course - we've not taken it out of our pool of venues - but we have some big logistical issues there.
"You've seen the scale of the set-up here (Royal Portrush) and there's some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Senate Democrats brawl over Trump: ‘A lot of us...want to f***ing fight'
Senator Cory Booker insisted many in his party 'want to f***ing fight' as he savaged Democratic colleagues for accommodating Donald Trump, despite the president's threats to target blue states and districts in funding fights. The New Jersey Democrat on Tuesday accused senior members of the party of valuing bipartisanship over efforts to push back against Trump 's perceived overreaches. He and two other senators, both Democrats, attacked each other in dueling floor speeches as the chamber debated passage of two bills involving benefits for law enforcement. Booker's objection came after he said the Office of Justice Programs, which administers grants through the Justice Department, was withholding funds for programs in so-called 'sanctuary cities', like Booker's hometown of Newark. Booker clashed with Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Amy Klobuchar over an amendment that would have prevented the DOJ from blocking those funds. It also would have likely endangered the unanimous consent process, which senators were relying upon to pass the bill, given that it would likely trigger GOP opposition. Then, in comments to reporters, he slammed his fellow Democrats as 'complicit' in the Trump administration's attempts to bully blue states and districts into line. 'Literally, they were about to be complicit in the very things they say out of the other side of their mouth that they object to. Democrats need to learn to fight and fight him and stop him from hurting people,' he said. He added to The Independent: 'Today, I saw people being complicit with something that is truly undermining the Constitution, the separation of powers and the kind of things that we should be standing up [against].' Booker didn't explain why he didn't object to the bills' final passage when his amendment failed. Cortez Masto, meanwhile, maintained her anti-Trump bona fides in a separate conversation with The Independent after the vote, pointing to her work at the DSCC to flip the Senate into Democratic hands in 2020, when her party secured a narrow 50-50 majority, with ties broken by Vice President Kamala Harris. Mastro said that she was 'proven' in 'the fight against Donald Trump.' And she added: ' I chaired the DSCC. We flipped the Senate [to] control of the Democrats and pushed back on Donald Trump. 'I am not opposed to taking on the challenges of Donald Trump and bad policies. I do it all the time. The question is, why aren't most Democrats supporting law enforcement?' the senator asked. Klobuchar, in her floor speech, took aim at her New Jersey colleague for not bringing up his concerns in committee. But Booker contended to reporters later that the threats were only leveled after the legislation advanced, making Klobuchar's criticism a moot point. Booker gained notoriety on the left with a marathon floor speech earlier this year denouncing the Trump administration's second-term agenda, a speech that broke Senate records. At the same time, he, like other Democrats in the chamber, has faced derision from some in their party for the persisting air of bipartisanship that still permeates part of the chamber, particularly involving the nominations of former senator Marco Rubio to be Trump's Secretary of State. His notion that the party is sick and tired of leadership and the strategy of appeasement some Senate Democrats like Chuck Schumer have exhibited when dealing with the new Republican majority is accurate, however. A national NBC News poll in March found that just 7 percent of Democrats have a very favorable view of their party, with just a quarter having positive views overall. A second poll in May from The Center Square, conducted by Noble Predictive Insights, found that three-quarters of Democrats want the party to push back against the president 'more often'.
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Harvard to comply with Trump officials' demand to turn over employment forms
Harvard University said on Tuesday that it will comply with the demands of Donald Trump's administration to turn over employment forms for thousands of university staff, but for the time being was not sharing records for those employed in roles only available to students. In an email to university employees sent on Tuesday, Harvard said that earlier this month it received a notice of inspection and a related subpoena from the Department of Homeland Security, seeking to inspect the I-9, or Employment Eligibility Verification, forms and supporting documentation for university employees. The I-9 forms, from US Citizenship and Immigration Services, are used to verify the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for work in the US, according to the agency's website. Harvard said federal regulations entitle the government to access a US employer's paperwork, including information on employment eligibility. Harvard has been embroiled in a legal fight with the Trump administration to have its billions of dollars of frozen federal funds restored. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. The president has threatened universities with federal funding cuts over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rights advocates have raised concerns over free speech, due process and academic freedom. Harvard said that, for now, it was not sharing records with the government for people employed in roles only available to students as it was determining if such a request complied with privacy protection requirements. The New York Times reported on Monday that Harvard was open to spending up to $500m to end its dispute with the government. That amount was more than twice what Columbia University agreed to pay last week to resolve federal inquiries. The newspaper said negotiators were still discussing the financial details of the Harvard deal and that Harvard opposed allowing an outside monitor to oversee the deal. On Monday, the government initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal to determine if the journal's selection of its editors gave preferences to candidates from minority communities. On Tuesday, the government said it notified Duke of a freeze of $109m in federal funds. Separately it alleged that the University of California, Los Angeles violated federal civil rights law. Both Duke and UCLA had no immediate comment.
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Mondelez beats second-quarter estimates on strong international demand
July 29 (Reuters) - Cadbury-parent Mondelez International (MDLZ.O), opens new tab beat Wall Street estimates for second-quarter revenue and profit on Tuesday, supported by steady consumer demand for its higher-priced chocolates and biscuits, particularly in international markets including Europe. To offset rising input costs such as cocoa, the Milka and Toblerone chocolate maker has raised prices over successive quarters, boosting profits. Resilient demand despite the hikes supported revenue growth in key segments such as Europe. Volumes in Europe, a major revenue contributor, were down 1.3 percentage points (pp), compared to a 3.1 pp dip a year ago, while revenue in the segment surged 18.7%, driven by a 13.8 pp rise in pricing. North America volumes declined 2.4 percentage points, widening from a 1.2 pp decline in the same quarter last year. Macroeconomic uncertainty from U.S. trade tariffs under President Donald Trump has pressured consumer spending in the United States, pushing budget-conscious shoppers toward cheaper private-label alternatives. Mondelez, which flagged the trend last quarter, said it plans to counter it through value-focused price packs in its American market. "U.S. consumers are showing more resistance to higher prices compared to consumers in Europe. Looking ahead, having the right pack sizes at the right price points, channels, and locations will be even more critical," said Arun Sundaram, an analyst with CFRA Research. The company reported net revenue of $8.98 billion for the quarter ended June 30, topping analysts' average estimate of $8.84 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. On an adjusted basis, Mondelez earned 73 cents per share for the quarter, compared with analysts' average estimate of 68 cents per share. Shares of the Chicago-based snack maker fell about 3% in after-hours trading after it maintained its annual forecast despite the quarterly results beat. The company reaffirmed its outlook for 2025 organic net revenue growth of about 5%, but continues to expect adjusted profit to decline 10%.
