logo
Is the making-of ‘Apocalypse Now' doc the greatest ever? Plus the week's best movies

Is the making-of ‘Apocalypse Now' doc the greatest ever? Plus the week's best movies

Hello! I'm Mark Olsen. Welcome to another edition of your regular field guide to a world of Only Good Movies.
Writer-director Ari Aster has refashioned himself from a maker of art-house horror films like 'Hereditary' and 'Midsommar' into a more overt social satirist with 'Beau Is Afraid' and his latest film, 'Eddington,' which opens this week.
Pointedly set in the spring of 2020 in a small town in New Mexico — a moment when uncertainty, paranoia and division over the response to COVID were maximally disorienting — the film's story concerns a sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix) who tosses his hat in the ring to run against an incumbent mayor (Pedro Pascal). Each spouts their own complicated, spiraling rhetoric as the race between them becomes more intense, and they seem swept away by circumstances much larger than they can understand or control.
In her review of the film Amy Nicholson wrote, 'Aster's feistiest move is that he refuses to reveal the truth. When you step back at the end to take in the full landscape, you can put most of the story together. (Watch 'Eddington' once, talk it out over margaritas and then watch it again.) Aster makes the viewer say their theories out loud afterwards, and when you do, you sound just as unhinged as everyone else in the movie. I dig that kind of culpability: a film that doesn't point sanctimonious fingers but insists we're all to blame.
'But there are winners and losers and winners who feel like losers and schemers who get away with their misdeeds scot-free. Five years after the events of this movie, we're still standing in the ashes of the aggrieved. But at least if we're cackling at ourselves together in the theater, we're less alone.'
Carlos Aguilar spoke to acclaimed cinematographer Darius Khondji, a former collaborator of David Fincher, James Gray and the Safdies, about working with Aster for the first time on 'Eddington.'
'Ari and I have a common language,' Khondji said. 'We discovered quite early on working together that we have a very similar taste for dark films, not dark in lighting but in storytelling.'
The 1991 film 'Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker's Apocalypse' is widely thought of as among the greatest behind-the-scenes documentaries ever made. Directed by Fax Bahr with George Hickenlooper from documentary footage directed by Eleanor Coppola, the film explores the epically complicated production of Francis Ford Coppola's 'Apocalypse Now.' A new 4K restoration of 'Hearts of Darkness' will have a limited run at the American Cinematheque beginning Sunday, with Bahr in-person for multiple Q&As.
When Eleanor Coppola went to the Philippines in 1976 with her husband and their three children for the production of his hallucinatory Vietnam War saga 'Apocalypse Now,' he enlisted her to shoot doc footage in part to save on additional crew and also to give her something to do.
Drawing from Eleanor's remarkable footage, surreptitious audio recordings she made and her written memoir of the experience, 'Notes: On the Making of 'Apocalypse Now,'' 'Hearts of Darkness' becomes a portrait of the struggle to maintain creativity, composure and sanity amid chaos as everything that could possibly go wrong seemingly does. Military helicopters are redeployed during takes, star Martin Sheen suffers a heart attack, monsoons destroy sets, Marlon Brando is immovable on scheduling and the ending of what all this is leading toward remains elusive.
'I think it's really held up and survived,' said Bahr of the documentary in an interview this week. 'It works as a complement to this extraordinary film that Francis produced. Of course, ['Apocalypse Now'] would be what it is without this, but I do think for people who really want to go deeper into the 'Apocalypse' experience, this is really a necessary journey to take.'
When 'Apocalypse Now' first premiered at the 1979 Cannes Film Festival, Francis Ford Coppola infamously said, 'The way we made it was very much like the way the Americans were in Vietnam. We were in the jungle, there were too many of us, we had access to too much money, too much equipment and little by little we went insane.'
The years between the lengthy production of 'Apocalypse Now,' its turbulent release and the subsequent years before the 'Hearts of Darkness' project came to be likely eased the Coppolas into participating with such candor and full-fledged access.
'I think having almost 10 years after 'Apocalypse Now' was helpful,' said James T. Mockoski, who oversaw the restoration for Coppola's company American Zoetrope. 'It would've been a much different documentary when it was supposed to come out. It was supposed to support the publicity and the marketing of the film at that time. 'Apocalypse' was very difficult, as we have seen, obviously. I don't know how much they would've had the hunger to revisit the film and go right into a documentary. It was a rather difficult, challenging time for them. And I think 10 years gave them a perspective that was needed.'
'He gambled it all and he won,' said Bahr. 'And what I hope we really achieved with 'Hearts' was showing the despair that really all artists go through in the creative process. And even though you go there, if you keep at it and your goal is true then you achieve artistic greatness.'
According to Mockoski, Francis Ford Coppola has seen his own relationship to the documentary change over the years. While at times unflattering, and certainly showing the filmmaker racked by doubt and in deep creative crisis, 'Hearts' also shows him as someone, improbably, finding his way.
'It's a very hard relationship with the documentary, but he has grown over the years to be more accepting of it,' said Mockoski. 'He doesn't like the films to ever be shown together. If anyone wants to book it, they shouldn't be on the same day. There should be some distance. And he doesn't really want people to watch the documentary and then just figure out, where's Francis and what is his state of mind at this point? They're two separate things for him. And he would rather people watch 'Apocalypse' just for the experience of that, not to be clouded by 'Hearts.''
In his original review of 'Hearts of Darkness,' Michael Wilmington wrote, 'In the first two 'Godfather' movies, Coppola seemed to achieve the impossible: combining major artistic achievement with spectacular box-office success, mastering art and business. In 'Apocalypse Now,' he wanted to score another double coup: create a huge, adrenaline-churning Irwin Allenish spectacle and something deeper, more private, filled with the times' terror. Amazingly, he almost did. And the horror behind that 'almost' — Kurtz's Horror, the horror of Vietnam, of ambition itself — is what 'Hearts of Darkness' gives us so wrenchingly well.'
'What 'Hearts' is great about is that it shows you a period of filmmaking that's just not seen today,' said Mockoski. 'You look at this and you look at ['Apocalypse'] and there's just no way we could make this film. Would we ever allow an actor to go to that extreme situation with Martin Sheen? Would we be allowed to set that much gasoline on fire in the jungle? Hollywood was sort of slow to evolve, they were making films like that up from the silent era, these epic films, going to extremes to just do art. It just captured a moment in time that I don't think we'll ever see again.'
Having premiered at the 2006 Cannes Film Festival and screened only a few times since, Quentin Tarantino's 'Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair' will play twice daily at the Vista Theater from July 18-28.
Clocking in at over 4 hours and screening from Tarantino's personal 35mm print (complete with French subtitles), it combines the films known as 'Kill Bill Vol. 1' and 'Kill Bill Vol. 2' into a single experience with a few small changes. The main difference is simply taking it all in as 'The Whole Bloody Affair,' an epic tale of revenge as a woman mostly known as 'The Bride' (Uma Thurman in a career-defining performance) seeks to find those who tried to kill her on her wedding day. (I'll be seeing the combined cut for the first time myself during this run at the Vista.)
Manohla Dargis' Los Angeles Times reviews of the two films when they were first released in October 2003 and April 2004 still make for some of the most incisive writing on Tarantino as a filmmaker.
Dargis' review of 'Vol. 2' inadvertently helps sell the idea of the totalizing 'The Whole Bloody Affair' experience by saying, 'An adrenaline shot to the movie heart, soul and mind, Quentin Tarantino's 'Kill Bill Vol. 2' is a blast of pure pop pleasure. The second half of Tarantino's long-gestating epic, 'Vol. 2' firmly lays to rest the doubts raised by 'Vol. 1' as to whether the filmmaker had retained his chops after years of silence and, as important, had anything to offer beyond pyrotechnics and bloodshed. Tarantino does have something to say, although most of what he does have to say can be boiled down to two words: Movies rock.
'In a world of commodity filmmaking in which marketing suits offer notes on scripts, this is no small thing. Personal vision is as rare in Hollywood as humility, but personal vision — old, new, borrowed and true blue to the filmmaker's inspirations — shapes 'Vol. 2,' giving it texture and density. Personal vision makes Tarantino special, but it isn't what makes him Quentin Tarantino. What does distinguish him, beyond a noggin full of film references, a candy-coated visual style and a deep-tissue understanding of how pop music has shaped contemporary life, affecting our very rhythms, is his old-time faith in the movies. Few filmmakers love movies as intensely; fewer still have the ability to remind us why we fell for movies in the first place.'
'2046' in 35mm
Showing at Vidiots on Friday night in 35mm will be Wong Kar-wai's '2046,' the 2004 follow-up to his cherished 'In the Mood for Love.' Loosely connected to both 'In the Mood for Love' and Wong's earlier 'Days of Being Wild,' '2046' stars Tony Leung as a writer in late 1960s Hong Kong who has encounters with a series of women, played by the likes of Maggie Cheung, Faye Wong, Gong Li, Carina Lau and Zhang Ziyi. (He may be imagining them.) Fans of Wong's stylish, smoky romanticism will not be disappointed.
In her original review of the film, Carina Chocano called it 'a gorgeous, fevered dream of a movie that blends recollection, imagination and temporal dislocation to create an emotional portrait of chaos in the aftermath of heartbreak.'
'Lost in America' + 'Modern Romance'
On Tuesday and Wednesday, the New Beverly will screen a 35mm double bill of Albert Brooks' 1985 'Lost in America' and 1981's 'Modern Romance.' Directed by, co-written by (with Monica Johnson) and starring Brooks, both films are fine showcases for his lacerating comedic sensibilities.
A satire of the lost values of the 1960s generation in the face of the materialism of 1980s, 'Lost in America' has Brooks as an advertising executive who convinces his wife (Julie Hagerty) to join him in quitting their jobs, selling everything they own and setting out in a deluxe RV to explore the country, 'Easy Rider'-style.
In a review of 'Lost in America,' Patrick Goldstein wrote, 'Appearing in his usual disguise, that of the deliriously self-absorbed maniac, Brooks turns his comic energies on his favorite target — himself — painting an agonizingly accurate portrait of a man imprisoned in his own fantasies. … You get the feeling that Brooks has fashioned an unerring parody of someone who's somehow lost his way in our lush, consumer paradise. Here's a man who can't tell where the desert ends and the oasis begins.'
'Modern Romance,' features Brooks as a lovelorn film editor in Los Angeles desperate to win back his ex-girlfriend (Kathryn Harrold).
In his original review of 'Modern Romance,' Kevin Thomas wrote, 'You have to hand it to Albert Brooks. To put it mildly he's not afraid to present himself unsympathetically.'
In a 1981 interview with Goldstein, Brooks said, 'As a comedian it's really my job to be the monster. People either love me or hate me. If I wanted to be a nice guy, I'd make a movie about someone who saves animals.'
(Brooks would, of course, go on to appear as a voice actor in 'Finding Nemo' and 'Finding Dory.')
'The Little Mermaid'
For the next installment of the Los Angeles Film Critics Assn.'s ongoing series at the Egyptian, there will be a screening on Thursday, July 24, of 1989's 'The Little Mermaid' with directors Ron Clements and John Musker present for a Q&A moderated by Carlos Aguilar.
'The Little Mermaid' received LAFCA's inaugural award for animation, the first of its kind among critics groups.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Superman' flexes its might in second weekend with $57.3 million
‘Superman' flexes its might in second weekend with $57.3 million

Boston Globe

time7 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

‘Superman' flexes its might in second weekend with $57.3 million

Strong audience scores and good reviews should help propel the $225 million-budgeted 'Superman' toward profitability in the coming weeks. For Warner Bros. and DC Studios, 'Superman' is key to kicking off a 10-year plan for the comic book adaptation studio. Co-heads Gunn and Peter Safra were tasked with rehabilitating the flagging operation. Next on tap are the films 'Supergirl' and 'Clayface' in 2026. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But 'Superman' is far from flying solo in theaters right now. Universal Pictures' 'Jurassic World: Rebirth' came in second this weekend, with $23.4 million in its third week of release. The seventh 'Jurassic' movie, this one starring Scarlett Johansson, held its own despite the competition from 'Superman.' In three weeks, it accrued $648 million worldwide. Advertisement Apple Studios and Warner Bros.' 'F1: The Movie' has also shown legs, especially internationally. In its fourth weekend, the Brad Pitt racing drama dipped just 26% domestically, bringing in $9.6 million in North America, and another $29.5 million overseas. Its global total stands at $460.8 million. Advertisement But both of the biggest new releases — Sony Pictures' 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' and Paramount Pictures' 'Smurfs' — fell flat. 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' opened with $13 million, a fair result for a movie budgeted at a modest $18 million, but a disappointing opening for a well-known horror franchise. The film, directed by Jennifer Kaytin Robinson, is set 27 years after the 1997 original. Teenagers played by Madelyn Cline and Chase Sui Wonders are again haunted for covering up a car accident. The movie's reviews (38% 'fresh' on Rotten Tomatoes) were poor for 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' and audiences graded it similarly. The film notched a 'C+' on CinemaScore. The original collected $72.6 million in its domestic run in 1997. Paramount Pictures' 'Smurfs' debuted in fourth place this weekend with $11 million. The latest big-screen reboot for the woodland blue creatures prominently features Rihanna as the voice of Smurfette. But reviews (21% 'fresh' on Rotten Tomatoes) were terrible. Audiences were kinder, giving it a 'B+' on CinemaScore, but the $58 million-budgeted release will depend largely on its international sales. In 56 overseas markets, 'Smurfs' earned $22.6 million. Ari Aster's 'Eddington' opened with $4.2 million on 2,111 screens for A24. Since its premiere at the Cannes Film Festival, 'Eddington' has been particularly divisive. The pandemic-set Western features Joaquin Phoenix as the right-wing sheriff of a small New Mexico town who faces off with its liberal mayor (Pedro Pascal). While Aster's first film, 2018's 'Hereditary' ($82.8 million worldwide against a $10 million budget) helped establish A24 as an indie powerhouse, but the less-than-stellar launch of 'Eddington' marks the second box-office disappointment for Aster. His 2023 film 'Beau Is Afraid' cost $35 million to make but collected just $12.4 million worldwide. 'Eddington' cost about $25 million to produce. Audiences gave it a 'C+' on CinemaScore. None of Aster's previous films have been graded higher. Advertisement Yet collectively, Hollywood is enjoying a very good summer. According to data firm Comscore, the 2025 summer box office is up 15.9% over the same period last year, with the year-to-date sales running 15% ahead of 2025. Summer ticket sales have amassed about $2.6 billion domestically, according to Comscore. Top 10 movies by domestic box office With final domestic figures being released Monday, this list factors in the estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Comscore: 1. 'Superman,' $57.3 million. 2. 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' $23.4 million. 3. 'I Know What You Did Last Summer,' $13 million. 4. 'Smurfs,' $11 million. 5, 'F1: The Movie,' $9.6 million. 6. 'How to Train Your Dragon,' $5.4 million. 7. 'Eddington,' $4.3 million. 8. 'Elio,' $2 million. 9. 'Lilo & Stitch,' $1.5 million. 10. '28 Years Later,' $1.3 million.

Eddington review: An ambitious but overstuffed satire
Eddington review: An ambitious but overstuffed satire

Digital Trends

time12 hours ago

  • Digital Trends

Eddington review: An ambitious but overstuffed satire

Eddington Score Details 'Writer-director Ari Aster's Eddington struggles to distill all the chaos unleashed during the 2020 pandemic in a two-and-a-half-hour nightmare comedy.' Pros Stellar performances from Joaquin Phoenix, Emma Stone, and Austin Butler Outstanding cinematography and editing Ari Aster's insightful social satire Cons The film loses focus and speed with so many plotlines Some jarring character development 'Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.' Hereditary and Midsommar writer-director Ari Aster and A24 unleashed another modern nightmare with the new black comedy film, Eddington. Taking place during the COVID-19 pandemic, Eddington follows small-town sheriff Joe Cross (Joaquin Phoenix) as he runs for mayor against incumbent Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal), getting swept up in several timely political and social conflicts that send him and his community into a downward spiral. Recommended Videos Since breaking out into the indie film scene with Hereditary, Aster's movies have grown more ambitious over time. Eddington reaches the height of this zeal as its story tries to tackle all the issues that plagued America when COVID-19 put the world on lockdown. It's a bold undertaking that is sure to be divisive, especially since people are still reeling from the pandemic's effects five years after it began. Despite its good intentions and many artistic merits, Eddington collapses under the weight of its So many subplots, so little time Eddington squeezes everything that was on people's minds during the pandemic and distills all the rage and anxiety into a two-and-a-half-hour satirical extravaganza. This includes bitter politicians clashing in an election, angry in-laws regurgitating online conspiracy theories, and Black Lives Matter advocates marching in the streets and demanding justice after the death of George Floyd. However, the film acts less like a time capsule and more like a time bomb that explodes later on as Joe faces off against an Antifa assassin and sprays the streets with a Gatling gun. Through Joe's weird and wild adventure, the movie says a lot about how America and its people seemed to have lost their way during the pandemic. At the same time, Eddington seems to lose its way as it attempts to tackle numerous social issues with multiple subplots, leaving the story feeling unfocused. Stories involving an upcoming data center, Louise's (Emma Stone) experience with sexual assault, and the mysterious cult that she joins seem to get pushed aside until the last few minutes of the film, making for a swift resolution with very little payoff. Like with his previous films, Aster proves that he is meticulous with his writing in Eddington. The story establishes many small details that tie the film's plotlines together later on as Joe's plans unravel. This adds an extra layer of suspense to the story as everyone investigates Joe's wrongdoings, making the film's second half especially thrilling. However, Eddington takes so long to build up all that excitement in its slow first half that the story seems to run out of steam by the time it crosses this threshold. One man frees his heart (of darkness) Like in Aster's previous film, Beau Is Afraid, Joaquin Phoenix takes center stage in a deep character study best encapsulated when Joe asks, 'How did we get here, and even worse, is it worth it?' Joe starts off as a good-hearted man who is understandably sick of the pressures that come with living through a pandemic that has brought out the worst in his community. Though he seemed a little self-centered at times, he stood up to aggressive public shaming directed toward those who don't follow mask mandates due to breathing problems. Joe's heart may start off in the right place as he tries to bring positive change to his community as mayor. However, he grows more impulsive and selfish in pursuit of political power, exploiting his wife's past trauma without her consent to attack his opponent online. As Joe's actions isolate him from his family, he succumbs to his anger and ambition and starts killing his 'enemies' in some shocking moments. He even tries to pin his crimes on a social justice advocate and a Black police officer, showcasing police corruption and how politicians use social discord for personal gain. Phoenix really sells his performance as Joe, realistically portraying an earnest man who slowly nears his breaking point and quickly loses himself when things get out of hand. Likewise, Emma Stone presents herself as a sensitive person whose repressed anger boils to the surface. Her character's transformation into a zealous conspiracy theorist does seem rushed, especially when her paranoid mother (Deidre O'Connell) suddenly acts more sensible. On the other hand, Austin Butler stands out in his brief role as cult leader Vernon Jefferson Peak, projecting an odd yet hypnotic aura that draws audiences toward him. A stunning and immersive Western in present-day America Eddington presents itself as a modern Western, and the film joins the ranks of classic Westerns with a variety of majestic visuals from cinematographer Darius Khondji. With gorgeous wide shots of vast desert landscapes, Eddington appears to be a town that's cut off from the rest of the world, adding to the sense of isolation felt in this pandemic-era community. The film immerses its audience even more with several long takes that incorporate a variety of camera shots, with sounds like Katy Perry's 'Roar' and Joe's asthmatic breathing adding tension that pulls the audience in even more. Lucian Johnston stitches all the film's vibrant and unsettling images together with spectacular editing, leading to some very clever transitions that have become a mainstay of Aster's movie. In particular, the dynamic match cuts of Joe disposing of a body and the jump from him spray-painting a wall to a car rolling across the screen give the film a distinctive visual and auditory style. Is Eddington worth a watch? Ari Aster's films have proven to be an acquired taste, and the writer-director has repeatedly proven to be a calculating and intentional storyteller with his movies. While Eddington isn't Aster's best picture, it still deserves a massive audience for its visual splendor, gripping character study, and outrageous satire of 2020's America. It's a slow start for its first act, and there is more than enough going on in this film that needs to be digested. It all culminates in a gonzo fever dream filled with action, suspense, and dark humor that hits close to home and blows the roof off of it. Eddington is now playing in theaters.

‘Eddington' Cinematographer Darius Khondji on Shooting Ari Aster's Western Dark Comedy: ‘It's So Bright, It's Never Bright Enough'
‘Eddington' Cinematographer Darius Khondji on Shooting Ari Aster's Western Dark Comedy: ‘It's So Bright, It's Never Bright Enough'

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

‘Eddington' Cinematographer Darius Khondji on Shooting Ari Aster's Western Dark Comedy: ‘It's So Bright, It's Never Bright Enough'

In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, 'Eddington' cinematographer Darius Khondji talked about his filmic approach to Ari Aster's pandemic-set film, which follows a standoff between a small town mayor (Pedro Pascal) and the local sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix). While he notes that writer/director Aster called it 'a European psychological thriller on American land,' visually he saw something different — 'a modern western.' This take ended up being not only accurate, but how the feature has been predominantly described in reviews. 'We wanted the exterior to be very bright, like, garishly bright, like the light has almost started to take off the color and the contrast a little bit because it's so bright, never bright enough,' Khondji said. More from IndieWire Jamie Lee Curtis Decries Stephen Colbert Cancellation Jennifer Love Hewitt on How Her Teen Career Mirrors Britney Spears': 'I Realized I Was Crying For Me' Khondji is a legend worldwide, having shot some of the greatest films of all time — 'Seven' and 'Amour' among them. He landed Oscar nominations for his work in 'Evita' and 'Bardo, False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths.' While a longtime fan of Aster's — and a defender of Aster's controversial 'Beau Is Afraid' — the two had never worked together before 'Eddington.' Each said that the collaboration went smoothly. 'Ari and I have a common language,' Khondji said. 'We discovered quite early on working together that we have a very similar taste for dark films, not dark in lighting but in storytelling.' Aster said that Khondji even rewired how he looks at visuals. 'Darius and I hate unmotivated camera movement,' Aster explained to the LA Times. 'But there are certain things that never would've bothered me compositionally that really bothered Darius, and now they're stuck in my head. For instance, Darius hates it when you cut off somebody's leg, even if it's at the ankle. A lot of Darius's prejudices have gone into my system.' Khondji did say that while he has his guidelines, they aren't necessarily set in stone. 'You have a rule, and then you decide this is the moment to break the rule,' he explained. Speaking with IndieWire in 2023, Khondji gave insight into his theories behind how best to shoot a film. 'And it's not just about what's in the frame. The world outside the frame is very important. It's good not to have flags or equipment in the way of the actor's gaze because I want them to feel the scene,' he said. 'The world of cinema is not only technical. It's about feeling the world around the actors, becoming them.'Best of IndieWire Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See 'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store