How Xiaomi succeeded where Apple failed
Lei
Jun, founder and chairman of
Xiaomi
Corp., the only tech company to have successfully diversified into carmaking, couldn't resist.
Speaking at a triumphant launch event in Beijing late last month for Xiaomi's second electric vehicle, a long-anticipated SUV, Lei pointedly mentioned
Apple
Inc., which spent a decade and $10 billion trying to make a car before giving up last year.
'Since Apple stopped developing its car, we've given special care to Apple users,' he said, noting that owners of the American giant's iPhones would be able to seamlessly sync their devices to Xiaomi's vehicles.
The not-so-subtle dig was followed by a flex: Xiaomi then said it had received more than 289,000 orders for its new sport utility vehicle within an hour of its announcement, more than its first EV, a sedan launched in March 2024.
Xiaomi succeeding where Apple failed has burnished Lei's reputation, made his company one of the most valuable in China and shaken up both the tech and automobile industries.
The collapse of Apple's moonshot car program has only underscored the effectiveness of Xiaomi's grounded approach, which took inspiration from proven designs from
Tesla
Inc. and
Porsche
Automobil Holding SE while staying true to the affordable ethos that's made it a cult brand for Gen Z consumers.
Crucially, it also launched into the most fertile EV ecosystem in the world — China. With state subsidies, existing charging infrastructure and a ready-made supply chain, Xiaomi had a structural tailwind Apple lacked.
Xiaomi declined to comment for this story.
Lei and Xiaomi's 'charisma, brand recognition and ecosystem cannot be underestimated,' Yale Zhang, the managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight, said. 'It's a big influence on young consumers who have filled their homes with Xiaomi products. When it comes time to buy an EV, they naturally think of Xiaomi.'
But building cars is a far more complex, capital-intensive challenge than making phones or rice cookers. It requires mastering safety regulations, global logistics and production at scale, all while competing against legacy automakers with long histories and large model lineups. Any international expansion will also require navigating complex geopolitical landscapes. As one of the first tech giants to actually manufacture a car, Xiaomi is in uncharted territory.
Apple's failings
Apple's car project, internally dubbed
Project Titan
, failed in large part because it wasn't just an EV — it was at one point an attempt to leapfrog the auto industry with a fully autonomous, Level 5 self-driving machine. Its goals were lofty and the direction constantly shifting, the result being over a decade of effort with nothing to show.
Lei, 55, was comparatively stingy with time and resources and staked his personal reputation on the endeavour, claiming that making cars would be his 'last entrepreneurial project.'
Xiaomi's public narrative is that Lei and his team learned by visiting multiple Chinese automakers, including Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. and Great Wall Motor Co., and talked to more than 200 industry experts in some 80 meetings.
The reality is also that he used Xiaomi's reputation as an innovative consumer behemoth to get close to China's large carmakers and pick off their top talent. Geely and its billionaire founder Li Shufu welcomed Lei to the automaker's research institute in Ningbo in the months leading up to Xiaomi's announcement that it would enter the car business to discuss topics, including potential collaboration.
It's Geely lore that Lei added the WeChat contacts of many staff at the institute, including then-director Hu Zhengnan. Hu later joined Shunwei Capital Partners, the investment firm co-founded by Lei.
Recruitment tactics
Xiaomi headhunters also courted Geely staff intensely, according to people familiar with the matter. While it's common for talent to move between companies in the same industry, it was unusual to see this level of aggressiveness around recruitment, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing information that's private. Geely didn't respond to a request for comment.
Hu, known for his love of the German luxury marque Porsche, was one of the team members credited as being instrumental to developing Xiaomi's EV business, Lei said at the SU7 launch in 2024. Lei added that Hu left his previous employer after his contract ended.
Other executives who joined Xiaomi came from companies including BAIC Motor Corp., BMW AG, SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co. — the General Motors Co. joint venture with SAIC Motor Corp. and Wuling Motors Holdings Ltd. — and auto supplier Magna Steyr LLC.
Besides assembling top Chinese automaking talent, Lei made a prescient bet on investing in a self-controlled supply chain — insulating Xiaomi's operation from manufacturing vagaries. This came from painful lessons learned in Xiaomi's early smartphone-producing days, when external suppliers would cut off components unpredictably.
In 2016, some members of Xiaomi's supply chain team displeased Samsung Electronics Co. representatives and the South Korean firm threatened to halt supply of its industry-leading AMOLED screens.
To mend the fractured relationship, Lei flew to Shenzhen to meet with Samsung's China head at the time. The pair drank five bottles of red wine during their dinner meeting, according to a Xiaomi company biography, and Lei also made multiple trips to Samsung's headquarters in South Korea to apologise and negotiate the resumption of supply. Representatives from Samsung declined to comment.
After Xiaomi went into the carmaking business, it invested into almost all parts of the EV supply chain, from batteries and chips to air suspension and sensors. It pumped more than $1.6 billion via Shunwei or other Xiaomi-led funds into over 100 supply chain companies between 2021 and 2024, according to data compiled by Chinese analytics firm
Zhangtongshe
and Bloomberg.
The components from some of the companies that Xiaomi invested in have ended up in its cars, such as lidars from Hesai Technology Co. and onboard chargers and voltage converters from Zhejiang EV-Tech Co.
With the 10 billion yuan ($1.4 billion) it committed to the first phase of its EV venture, Xiaomi also built its own factory, rather than going down the contract manufacturing route that some Chinese makers, including Nio Inc. and Xpeng Inc., did when they started out.
'Among tech companies that now build electric vehicles, those who previously had hardware products seem to be more successful than those who only had software products or information services,' said Paul Gong, UBS Group AG's head of China autos research.
Copycat allegations
Despite its early success, there are many who argue Xiaomi's one-hit car is copied from elsewhere — and that a sole successful vehicle does not a successful auto producer make. Lei's aggressive approach has also raised hackles in China's car industry.
Yu Jingmin, vice president of SAIC's passenger car division, reportedly described Xiaomi's approach as 'shameless' in a critique of the SU7 resembling Porsche. The SU7 has been colloquially dubbed 'Porsche Mi' by netizens. SAIC didn't respond to questions about Yu's remarks.
Xiaomi's design team, led by former BMW designer Li Tianyuan, has defended the SU7's aesthetics, emphasising that the choices were driven by aerodynamic efficiency and performance benchmarks.
In late March, there was another setback after a fatal accident involving the SU7. The car had its advanced driver assistance technology turned on before the crash, which afterwards led to authorities reining in the promotion and deployment of the technology.
The usually vocal Lei kept a low profile on social media for more than a month post the March accident. He returned to more active engagement in May with a missive that said this period of time was the most difficult in his career.
Fortunately for Xiaomi, its consumer base is sticky. Known as 'Mi Fans,' the loyal customers have played a pivotal role in the company's rise. Xiaomi cultivated this fandom early on by prioritising user feedback, and the grassroots allegiance has helped it build strong brand equity, especially in China. The SU7 has remained a top-selling model even after the accident in March.
Indeed, dealers have reported that nearly 50% of customers plump for the SU7 without comparing it to other brands. 'A significant number of older consumers are buying the SU7 for their children, indicating that the model has built trust among more conservative buyers thanks to its safety and quality,' said Rosalie Chen, a senior analyst from investment research firm Third Bridge.
Small scale
Xiaomi has set a delivery target of 350,000 units in 2025, up from its previous goal of 300,000, buoyed by demand for the newly launched YU7 and a ramp-up in production. The starting prices for the SU7 sedan, at 215,900 yuan ($30,100), and its SUV, at 253,500 yuan, make them competitive alternatives to models like Tesla's Model 3 and Model Y.
The EVs are also showing financial promise. Xiaomi posted record revenue for the first quarter this year, driven by car and smartphone sales. Its EV division is expected to turn profitable in the second half of 2025, Lei said in an investor meeting in June.
But even if the popularity of Xiaomi's EVs can spring beyond the company's devoted base, production is still on a much more boutique scale. China's top car brand, BYD Co., sold around 4.3 million EVs and hybrids last year, many overseas, while Tesla moved about 1.78 million vehicles globally. Toyota Motor Corp., the world's No. 1 automaker, sold some 10.8 million vehicles and boasts a lineup of approximately 70 different models.
Lei doesn't seem to be prioritising the mass market of below $20,000 yet, which drives significant volume and is where BYD dominates, Automotive Foresight's Zhang said.
Without a lineup in that segment, Xiaomi cars will remain niche purchases for middle to higher-income consumers and Xiaomi may face the same risks as Tesla, which is seeing its sales slump exacerbated by a narrow consumer base and limited models.
Nonetheless, Lei seems buoyed by Xiaomi's early wins and is now looking at global expansion. Xiaomi will consider selling cars outside China from 2027, he said last week.
Success or otherwise, the European Union, the US and Turkey have all slapped tariffs on Chinese EVs, but Xiaomi wants to set up a R&D centre in Munich and may test sales starting in European markets such as Germany, Spain and France when the time is right, Chinese media 36Kr reported in April.
'Xiaomi is a latecomer to the auto industry,' Lei admitted on
in June. But, he said, in a market driven by technology and innovation and the rising global influence of China's EV culture, 'there are always opportunities for latecomers.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
'She will always be my greatest hero': Bengaluru techie now earns ₹46 lakh per annum, recalls mother's sacrifices
A Reddit post detailing the incredible transformation of a Bengaluru-based web developer has struck a chord with thousands online. The anonymous poster, a 35-year-old tech professional, shared how he went from earning just ₹ 5,000 a month to making ₹ 46 lakh annually - drawing praise for his perseverance and deep gratitude to his family. The man, who hails from a modest background, recounted his early years in a village where he and his elder brother stayed behind while their parents moved to Bengaluru in search of better opportunities. His mother juggled several jobs -working as a domestic help during the day and stitching garments at night. 'Her hands were always full, but her heart was even fuller, with love, grit, and the will to change our future,' he wrote in the now-viral post, calling her his 'real hero.' Screengrab from the viral post. Raised by his grandmother, the boy studied in government schools and later enrolled in a polytechnic institute—not for academics, but because it offered free hostel facilities. That decision proved pivotal. Excelling in studies, he went on to pursue a degree, supported financially by his elder brother, who had by then joined Power Grid Corporation of India. Also Read | total collection might shock you">Bengaluru traffic fines got you down? The total collection might shock you He began his career as a junior web developer, drawing a salary of just ₹ 5,000 per month. Despite the low income, he remained determined. 'I stayed focused, kept learning, and embraced every challenge,' he shared. Today, after more than ten years in the technology sector, he earns ₹ 46 lakh a year. His family now owns five acres of land, has built a house, and even owns a car - things he once thought were beyond reach. The story attracted widespread appreciation on Reddit, with many users lauding his resilience. One person wrote, 'Your gratitude to your family comes across. Salute to you and your family pillars.' Another added, 'Hope you inspire more to not lose hope and keep learning, evolving, adapting. Staying grateful tells me your grandma instilled all the right values.' While some remarked that a ₹ 46 LPA package was not rare in tech, most agreed that the post wasn't about figures but about overcoming hardships and honouring sacrifices. 'Looking back, the journey wasn't easy, but every struggle shaped me into who I am today,' the post concluded. 'My mother's sacrifices are the foundation of everything I've built.'
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Hyatt faces India tax blow as Supreme Court confirms ‘Permanent Establishment' status
In a crucial ruling with broad implications on how multinational companies are taxed in India, the Supreme Court on Thursday held that UAE-based Hyatt International Southwest Asia, which provides hotel advisory services in India, has a taxable Permanent Establishment (PE) in the country. A bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan upheld Delhi High Court's earlier decision, which had ruled that Hyatt's Indian PE must be treated as a distinct taxable entity. The judgment is significant as it clarifies that multinational companies can be taxed in India if they exercise substantial operational control here, even without long-term employee presence. The court held that a PE should be treated as a separate taxable entity, meaning India can tax profits attributable to the PE even if the foreign parent company incurs overall global losses. The apex court noted that Hyatt's executives and employees made frequent and regular visits to India to supervise operations and implement business decisions. While no single employee stayed beyond the nine-month threshold under Article 5(2)(i) of the India-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), the assessing officer's findings proved a continuous and coordinated business presence. Hyatt had approached the Supreme Court challenging the September 2024 Delhi High Court Full Bench judgment, which had held that Hyatt's Indian PE was taxable regardless of the company's global profitability. The top court agreed with the High Court's conclusion that Hyatt's role extended beyond high-level decision-making to substantial operational control and implementation in India. Its ability to enforce compliance, oversee hotel operations, and earn profits linked to hotel revenues established a clear and continuous commercial nexus with its Indian operations, satisfying the fixed place PE conditions under the DTAA. Hyatt had argued that under Article 7 of the India-UAE DTAA, India could tax the PE's profits only if the foreign enterprise as a whole was profitable. However, tax authorities maintained that the PE should be assessed as a separate and independent entity, regardless of the parent company's global financial performance. 'The judgment provides a clear conceptual framework for determining PE thresholds—frequent, regular visits by employees, rather than the duration of individual stays, are the key factor. Once continuity of business presence is established, the return or rotation of individuals becomes irrelevant. Operational control, oversight, and income linked to core functions establish the commercial nexus necessary for a PE. This ruling could set a precedent for PE determinations in cases involving frequent employee travel to India,' said Amit Baid, head of tax at BTG Advaya, a disputes and transactional law firm. Under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs), a Permanent Establishment (PE) is a fixed place of business, such as a branch, office, factory, or dependent agent, through which a foreign company operates in another country. Article 5 of the India-UAE DTAA defines what constitutes a PE, including fixed place PE, agency PE, and service PE. Having a PE in India gives Indian tax authorities the right to tax profits attributable to that PE, treating it like a local entity, irrespective of the parent company's global results. Article 7 allows India to tax only the profits linked to the PE's activities, calculated as if it were an independent enterprise. Foreign enterprises without a PE in India are not taxed here on business profits. The Hyatt PE taxation case originated when Indian tax authorities assessed that Hyatt had enough presence in India to be taxed, as its executives frequently visited and controlled hotel operations, despite no single employee staying long-term. These assessments dated back to 2011 onwards. Hyatt challenged the findings in the Delhi High Court in 2020, arguing that under the tax treaty, India could tax the PE only if the global enterprise was profitable. In January 2023, a Division Bench of the High Court referred the matter to a Full Bench for deeper examination. In September 2024, the Full Bench ruled that Hyatt did have a PE in India because of its continuous operational involvement and held that the PE should be taxed as a separate entity. Hyatt then appealed to the Supreme Court, leading to Thursday's ruling.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bihar vs Maharashtra: Which state tops in originating Vande Bharat trains?
Vande Bharat trains: Vande Bharat Express trains have revolutionized the rail transportation in the country. Since its inception in 2019, the Vande Bharat trains have not only reduced the travel time between two distances but also improved the connectivity between cities. Developed by Chennai-based Integral Coach Factory (ICF), these semi-high-speed trains are running with full occupancies. Presently, 144 Vande Bharat Express trains are operating across the country. The national transporter is also set to roll out few more trains in the ongoing financial year. Currently, there are 20 Vande Bharat trains services (on originating/terminating basis) are catering to the needs of various stations located in Bihar. On the other hand, 22 Vande Bharat train services are catering to the needs of various stations in Maharashtra. In a written reply to Lok Sabha on Wednesday (July 23), Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said that introduction of train services including Vande Bharat Express services are on-going processes on Indian Railways, subject to traffic justification, operational feasibility, etc. Vaishnaw also added that the expenditure on infrastructure including that related to Vande Bharat trains is part of expenditure on overall maintenance and upgradation works of Railways and is incurred under both Revenue and Capital Segments.
