Hollowed out of thinkers, Sussan Ley's party dreams of nothing other than opposition
Menzies led the Liberals to power for the first time in 1949 with an anti-socialist platform that attacked the Curtin Labor government's bank nationalisation plans. Now, 75 years on, the party's policy brain appears to have atrophied sometime between the Russian Revolution and the fall of the Berlin Wall.
When Labor introduced legislation to bring its 'Future Made in Australia' industrial policy to fruition in April 2024, Ley referred to the government as 'radical' while Taylor dismissed the policy as a slush fund for the PM to 'pick winners'.
But industrial policy is one area where government intervention makes sense. Australia sits below Botswana at 105 out of 133 on the Economic Complexity Index, reflecting overreliance on commodities and underinvestment in innovation and manufacturing compared to other advanced economies. A policy to build sovereign manufacturing capacity and high‑skill jobs in strategically important sectors reflects a 21st-century economic consensus that markets are a means to a societal goal, not an end in themselves.
Socialist smears may resonate with rusted-on conservatives, but risk alienating voters the party desperately needs. A 2024 YouGov poll found 53 per cent of Australians aged 18-24 favour a more socialist direction, compared to 22 per cent preferring more capitalism.
According to a June Redbridge Group poll, voters aged 65+ were the only cohort in which the Coalition won more votes than Labor at the May election. A paltry 19 per cent of 18-34 year-olds voted Coalition, less than half of those who voted for Labor – a result dubbed a 'youthquake' by Redbridge director and former Liberal Party official Tony Barry.
Loading
Where to now for a party that defines itself in opposition to a Labor Party that's colonised the political centre? How does the party of 'lower taxes' resonate in a social democracy where overall taxation is already well below the OECD average?
Unfortunately for Ley, she has inherited a party lacking the policy hardheads to write the necessary software update. In the wake of the election result, Institute of Public Affairs Senior Fellow John Roskam bemoaned the loss of the 'serious thinkers' at the heart of the party in the 1970s and 1980s. Roskam says the party is verging on 'anti-intellectual' and is lacking the personnel to think critically about how Liberal principles can be adapted to 21st-century realities.
Meanwhile, the pews of a once broad church have been gradually purged of moderates since Ian McPhee lost preselection for opposing John Howard's hard-line rhetoric on Asian immigration in the late 1980s. Others followed, among them Julia Banks, John Hewson, Fred Chaney, and former PMs Fraser and Turnbull.
Loading
What remains is a party with an uninspiring message about small government that airbrushes over Menzies' nation‑building legacy of universities, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, and delivering the publicly funded Snowy Mountains Scheme – the largest engineering project in our nation's history.
Ley deserves some patience as she tries to rehabilitate the Liberals. She's saying all the right things about 'listening' and addressing issues that concern young people, but uncertain times call for a leader, not populist vessel.
We must judge her on whether she can reignite a contest of ideas anchored in sound values and serious policy work. The outcome from her working group on energy and emissions reduction will be a test she cannot afford to fail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
9 minutes ago
- West Australian
Four-day work week proposal dismissed by PM and Treasurer as pair align ahead of next week's roundtable
A union-led call for Australia to adopt a four-day work week has been shot down by both the Prime Minister and Treasurer before it could even be discussed at next week's productivity roundtable. The Australian Council of Trade Unions claimed its push for shorter working hours would boost productivity and improve Australians' work-life balance but business groups have slammed the idea as 'populist' and 'anti-productivity.' Anthony Albanese laughed off the proposal when asked on Wednesday, joking he'd 'wouldn't mind a six-day-and-23-hour work week, myself, rather than 24/7' before adding 'certainly, the government has no plans'. The proposal faced further rejection from Jim Chalmers who echoed: 'We haven't been working up a policy for a four day week. That hasn't been our focus'. It comes after Dr Chalmers had previously said he didn't want to kill off floated ideas before the three-day talks even begin. Business Council of Australia boss Bran Black slammed the peak body for Australian unions for not taking the roundtable opportunity seriously and proposing ideas based on 'fundamentally-flawed evidence'. Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox had fumed that attendees had been explicitly told industrial relations reforms wouldn't be discussed at all. It was frustration which was shared by Australian Chamber or Commerce and Industry boss Andrew McKellar who said they had also respected the rules but said IR should be on the agenda. The PM and Dr Chalmers' lock-step on the issue marked a notable shift on Wednesday after mixed messaging on Labor's ambition of their upcoming productivity-turned-economic reform roundtable next week. The PM bushed off questioning on Wednesday that he had spoken to his treasurer face-to-face on the need to 'be on the same page' regarding the roundtable, saying they meet every week. 'We meet every week. We met face to face. We meet every single week. We talk every week, almost every day. We talked yesterday. We talk every day, either in person or exchange messages,' the PM told ABC radio, in a morning media appearance blitz. It comes after the PM had previously hosed down the prospect of major tax reform emerging from the productivity round table. 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election,' he had said last week when seeking to adjust expectations. But on Wednesday, the PM changed his tune, declaring: 'I'm up for big reform and we are a big reforming Government '. Mr Albanese also flagged he would act immediately on 'low hanging fruit' which can be agreed on. 'I think there's a range of things that we can do immediately out of the roundtable,' he said. 'That's what I hope. There's agreement. There's some low-hanging fruit out there that we can get done.' Dr Chalmers later added he was also eyeing 'sufficient common ground in areas that aren't especially controversial' to move on immediately. 'It's hard to preempt the suggestions that people might make. There might be sufficient appetites, sufficient common ground in areas that aren't especially controversial to make some progress on tax reform,' he said. 'On tax reform more broadly, the PM and I have said the same thing. We've had a tax reform agenda and our focus is on rolling that out. 'We haven't changed our position on the tax policies that we have.' However, both said not all changes would necessarily be immediate, as measures could come in next year's budget or a future government term. 'There's other measures that will feed into next year's Budget. There's other things that could be for a future term of government,' the PM said. Shadow Finance Minister James Paterson said Coalition would back any proposals from next week's economic roundtable that boost productivity. 'If good ideas are brought forward at the round table, and if the government adopts them and chooses to move forward with them, then we'll offer bipartisan support for them to be legislated and enacted,' he told ABC. 'If there are ideas that reduce red tape and regulation, we're up for that. We're open minded. 'We have reservations if the government tries to do things it doesn't have a mandate for because it didn't earn it at the election, for example, increasing taxes. 'Labor didn't tell anyone before the election that they would raise taxes. 'A hand-picked roundtable of people in Canberra doesn't provide them the mandate.'
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Our students are our resource. They shouldn't be taxed
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number. No attachments, please include your letter in the body of the email. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. Ross Gittins (' PM cries poor as gas riches go untaxed ', 13/8) highlights the ridiculous situation in which the government takes more money from tertiary education students via HECS than we collect from the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. This is an inherited situation from previous LNP governments. On the eve of the federal government's productivity roundtable, and given the government's huge parliamentary majority, now is the time to rectify these flawed policies and follow the example of Norway, which taxes its oil and gas companies and provides free higher education. What Australia needs is strong leadership and structural change to our tax system, not a tinkering around the edges to avoid upsetting parts of the electorate. David Conolly, Brighton Labor is on notice to act Another insightful piece by Ross Gittins on the failure of the government to collect the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. Critics have been talking about this inequitable failure for some time, but nothing changes. Gittins asks why the federal government is 'giving our gas away to big companies?' He answers his own question and the reason is due to powerful lobbying by those companies. This disparity in power is at the heart of our current lack of productivity and general economic progress. Everyday workers and even students (as Gittins observes) are easy targets from which to extract tax. There is growing disquiet in the community about the stated intention of the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of not tackling the big equality issues in the economic roundtable. If this forum turns out to be just a talkfest, it will demonstrate a lack of courage by Labor and a failure to listen to voters. We will all pay the price. Jan Marshall, Brighton We allow multinationals to pay a pittance The return taxpayers receive from the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax is half of 1 per cent. We are virtually allowing the petroleum companies to have our oil and gas for nothing. A person renting out a property would expect to get 2.5 per cent on the capital value of the property and yet we allow these multinationals to get away with paying a pittance. The treasurer and prime minister need to toughen up for the sake of future generations and impose a flat rate of $40 billion a year for them to have access to oil and gas. Oil and gas is a finite resource – once it's gone it's gone. Paul Chivers, Box Hill North Please, impose some sort of taxation Ross Gittins' article is jaw dropping. It is quite incomprehensible how we arrived at this position, although no doubt there are complex watertight contracts in place that would cost billions to get out of. Even a modest application of taxation would pay for the NDIS, among many other social needs. Fiona White, Alfredton Arguments need to be addressed The federal government needs to address the arguments made by Ross Gittins on the lack of a fair tax on gas exporters. Gittins shows that these tax rates stand in stark contrast to HECS charges paid by students. Mike Lawson, Adelaide We should not be subsidising this situation It is outrageous that our youth pay $50,000 for an arts degree, 56 per cent of our gas exports are given gratis to LNG exporters and the tax office describes the oil and gas companies as 'systematic non-payers' of tax. To make it even worse – currently every single Australian pays $548 a year to subsidise fossil fuels. Talk about room for improvement. Lesley Walker, Northcote THE FORUM Not so lucky The supposedly socially progressive Victorian Labor government is failing badly on at least two key measures of socio-economic wellbeing and fairness. As the Australian Education Union laments (Page 13 advertisement, 13/8), Victorian public schools are the lowest funded in Australia. Victoria ranks last in Australia for availability of social housing, with growing waiting lists. The government is not being brought to account by a divided opposition though incompetence and ideological blindness. The opposition is arguably worse federally. Liberal governments were primarily responsible for overseeing one of the most inequitable and segregated education systems in the developed world. They threaten scare campaigns against some urgent reforms to ease the housing crisis. Recent Labor governments have lacked the communication skills and courage to persevere with necessary change. Donald Horne's description of 'The Lucky Country' remains depressingly apt. Norman Huon, Port Melbourne
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Hamas claims vindication of October 7 attacks due to Albanese recognising Palestine
Sky News host Steve Price discusses reports indicating Hamas claims vindication over the shock October 7 attacks as the Albanese government recognises Palestine. 'As Prime Minister Albanese toured Brisbane today … on the other side of the world Sheikh Hassan Yousef, figuratively lobbed a hand grenade in the prime minister's very own backyard,' Mr Price said. 'The Sheikh, a 70-year-old Hamas veteran, described as an extremist, is there any other kind of Hamas leader, issued a statement that has stunned, not just critics of our pointless politically motivated recognition of Palestine, but I am sure it will unsettle many in Labor from the right rather than the Palestinian-supporting left.'
