logo
Exclusive: Nvidia kept some China customers in the dark about new US chip clampdown, sources say

Exclusive: Nvidia kept some China customers in the dark about new US chip clampdown, sources say

Reuters16-04-2025
SINGAPORE, April 16 (Reuters) - Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab did not warn at least some major customers in advance about new U.S. export rules it was told about a week ago requiring it to obtain licenses to sell its China-focused artificial intelligence chip, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
The U.S. chipmaker disclosed on Tuesday that American officials had informed the company on April 9 that its H20 chip would require an export license for sales to China.
The move to restrict H20 shipments marks Washington's latest effort to limit China's access to advanced semiconductors, as the United States seeks to maintain its edge in AI technology.
Major Chinese cloud companies were still anticipating H20 deliveries by year-end, unaware of the impending restrictions, according to the two sources, who said Nvidia's China sales team also did not appear to be informed ahead of the public announcement. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
Nvidia declined to comment.
The export controls threaten Nvidia's business in China, one of its largest markets. Nvidia had secured $18 billion of H20 orders since the start of the year, according to one of the two sources and a third source.
China generated $17 billion in revenue, or 13% of Nvidia's total sales, in its last fiscal year that ended on January 26.
Nvidia shares fell 6% in after-hours trading on Tuesday after it said it would take up to $5.5 billion of charges in the first quarter ending April 27 due to the licensing requirement, which the U.S. government told it on Monday would be indefinite.
The charges are associated with inventory, purchase commitments, and related reserves for H20 products, the company said.
Chinese tech giants including Tencent (0700.HK), opens new tab, Alibaba (9988.HK), opens new tab and ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, had increased orders for H20 chips amid surging demand for affordable AI models from companies like startup DeepSeek, Reuters reported in February.
Alibaba, ByteDance and Tencent did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The H20 is the primary chip Nvidia is legally permitted to sell in China and was launched after the latest round of U.S. export restrictions took effect in October 2023.
Washington has banned exports of Nvidia's most advanced chips to China since 2022, concerned that advanced technologies could be used by China to build up its military capabilities.
The restrictions on H20 could benefit Chinese AI chipmakers, particularly Huawei, which offers competing products to Nvidia's lineup, analysts said.
"By restricting the H20 system, U.S. regulators are effectively pushing Nvidia's Chinese customers toward Huawei's AI chips," said Nori Chiou, investment director at Singapore-based White Oak Capital Partners.
"Huawei's chip design and software capabilities are likely to advance quickly as it gains more customers and development experience," Chiou added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China rushes to build out solar, and emissions edge downward
China rushes to build out solar, and emissions edge downward

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

China rushes to build out solar, and emissions edge downward

High on the Tibetan plateau, Chinese government officials last month showed off what they say will be the world's largest solar farm when completed — 610 square kilometers (235 square miles), the size of the American city of Chicago. China has been installing solar panels at a blistering pace, far faster than anywhere else in the world, and the investment is starting to pay off. A study released Thursday found that the country's carbon emissions edged down 1% in the first six months of the year compared to a year earlier, extending a trend that began in March 2024. The good news is China's carbon emissions may have peaked well ahead of a government target of doing so before 2030. But China, the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, will need to bring them down much more sharply to play its part in slowing global climate change. For China to reach its declared goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, emissions would need to fall 3% on average over the next 35 years, said Lauri Myllyvirta, the Finland-based author of the study and lead analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. 'China needs to get to that 3% territory as soon as possible,' he said. China's emissions have fallen even as it uses more electricity China's emissions have fallen before during economic slowdowns. What's different this time is electricity demand is growing — up 3.7% in the first half of this year — but the increase in power from solar, wind and nuclear has easily outpaced that, according to Myllyvirta, who analyzes the most recent data in a study published on the U.K.-based Carbon Brief website. 'We're talking really for the first time about a structural declining trend in China's emissions,' he said. China installed 212 gigawatts of solar capacity in the first six months of the year, more than America's entire capacity of 178 gigawatts as of the end of 2024, the study said. Electricity from solar has overtaken hydropower in China and is poised to surpass wind this year to become the country's largest source of clean energy. Some 51 gigawatts of wind power was added from January to June. Li Shuo, the director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute in Washington, described the plateauing of China's carbon emissions as a turning point in the effort to combat climate change. 'This is a moment of global significance, offering a rare glimmer of hope in an otherwise bleak climate landscape,' he wrote in an email response. It also shows that a country can cut emissions while still growing economically, he said. But Li cautioned that China's heavy reliance on coal remains a serious threat to progress on climate and said the economy needs to shift to less resource-intensive sectors. 'There's still a long road ahead,' he said. One solar farm can power 5 million households A seemingly endless expanse of solar panels stretches toward the horizon on the Tibetan plateau. White two-story buildings rise above them at regular intervals. Sheep graze on the scrubby vegetation that grows under them. Solar panels have been installed on about two-thirds of the land. When completed, it will have more than 7 million panels and be capable of generating enough power for 5 million households. Like many of China's solar and wind farms, it was built in the relatively sparsely populated west. A major challenge is getting electricity to the population centers and factories in China's east. 'The distribution of green energy resources is perfectly misaligned with the current industrial distribution of our country,' Zhang Jinming, the vice governor of Qinghai province, told journalists on a government-organized tour. Part of the solution is building transmission lines traversing the country. One connects Qinghai to Henan province. Two more are planned, including one to Guangdong province in the southeast, almost at the opposite corner of the country. Making full use of the power is hindered by the relatively inflexible way that China's electricity grid is managed, tailored to the steady output of coal plants rather than more variable and less predictable wind and solar, Myllyvirta said. 'This is an issue that the policymakers have recognized and are trying to manage, but it does require big changes to the way coal-fired power plants operate and big changes to the way the transmission network operates,' he said. 'So it's no small task.' ___ Moritsugu reported from Beijing. Associated Press video producer Wayne Zhang contributed. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Huge Scottish forest sold for £145m to Gresham House investors in 'astronomical' sale
Huge Scottish forest sold for £145m to Gresham House investors in 'astronomical' sale

Scotsman

time23 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Huge Scottish forest sold for £145m to Gresham House investors in 'astronomical' sale

The sale illuminates the demand for Scotland's asset-rich landscapes. Sign up to our Scotsman Rural News - A weekly of the Hay's Way tour of Scotland emailed direct to you. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A forest estate in Scotland has been sold to asset managers for £145 million in one of the biggest deals of its kind. Griffin Forestry Estate, near Aberfeldy in Perthshire, which spans some 5,560 hectares, has been bought by a subsidiary of Gresham House Ltd, a London-based asset management company now owned by a private equity firm headquartered in New York. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Griffin Forestry Estate near Aberfeldy in Perthshire. PIC: Savills. | Savills Griffin Forestry Estate is made up of three separate woodlands and a windfarm. The land was marketed by Savills in 2023 for offers over £130m given its 'exceptional sustainability and income credentials'. The sale of Griffin illuminates the demand for Scotland's asset-rich landscapes and the 'astronomical sums' paid by 'anonymous corporate investors' for the land, Community Land Scotland said. Meanwhile, Andy Wightman, Scotland's land ownership expert, said he believed that Gresham House and its subsidiaries could now be 'on track' to become Scotland's second-largest landowner following the Griffin deal, with his latest research into the company due. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Wightman said: 'It is a unique property as it is so huge and has such valuable assets. This is a straightforward commercial transaction where £145m is deemed to be the price worth paying for that future stream of revenue from windpower and timber.' Griffin Forestry Estate was originally part of the Grandtully Estate and was earlier owned by Guy Hands, an investment manager and former chairman of record company EMI. The new owner is Gresham House FF VI LLP, a limited liability partnership between Gresham House Initial Partner Ltd and Gresham House Forest Fund VI LP, a Scottish Limited Partnership that includes City of Cardiff Pension Fund, Swansea Council Pension Fund and Gresham House Ltd among its limited partners. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Josh Doble, director of policy and advocacy at Community Land Scotland , said the sale was another 'concerning example of landownership concentrating in Scotland into the hands of anonymous corporate investors'. He said: 'This sale also sets the remarkable and quite unbelievable precedent that an average sized Highland estate can sell for astronomical sums, which seem completely removed from the reality of many Highland communities who are in dire need of investment in local housing, travel infrastructure and local services. READ MORE: Owner of Scottish castle heads to court amid Net Zero tree planting row 'This disparity raises the serious question of who is benefiting from Scotland's natural resources and how a remote corporate entity such as Gresham House can justify an apparent investment of £145 million in a Highland estate, and how much of that investment will be benefiting the local area.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Doble said he hoped the new owners would 'closely and meaningfully engage' with the local community about their plans for the estate and what benefits would be shared with the local community. In February last year, Olly Hughes, managing director of Gresham House, appeared before the net zero, energy and transport committee at Holyrood and told MSPs the company did 'not own any land directly under the name of Gresham House'. However, it is understood the firm and its subsidiaries are namd as General Partner in a number of Scottish Limited Partnerships (SLP) - legal entities which can own land.

China faces pivotal welfare reform test as court ruling hits jobs, small firms
China faces pivotal welfare reform test as court ruling hits jobs, small firms

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

China faces pivotal welfare reform test as court ruling hits jobs, small firms

BEIJING, Aug 21 (Reuters) - China's top court ruling that makes it illegal for businesses and employees to avoid social insurance payments is stoking fears about jobs and the survival of small firms, forcing Beijing to confront the risks of long-promised welfare reform. The ruling, analysts and one government adviser say, aims to replenish depleted pension coffers in ageing regions and lay the groundwork for more generous welfare, helping China transition to a growth model that relies more on consumer demand and less on debt-driven infrastructure and industrial investment. The Supreme People's Court said this month the levies have always been mandatory, but acknowledged patchy enforcement. In practice, millions of workers informally agree with factories, construction firms, delivery services, restaurants and other small businesses not to pay into the scheme so they can keep the money. Hit by higher U.S. trade tariffs this year, some factories have fired full-time staff and rehired them as day labour to save on pension, unemployment, medical and other insurance payments. Analysts say the court ruling, which is effective September 1, could bring Beijing closer to meeting its long-standing pledge to bolster the safety net in the world's second-largest economy, but it also poses a difficult test to the government's broader reform ambitions as it creates immediate risks to economic growth if businesses and workers have less to spend. Jia Kang, founding president of the China Academy of New Supply-Side Economics, told Reuters the decision could be "a matter of life or death for many small firms." Societe Generale estimates the costs to firms and consumers at about 1% of GDP if the ruling is enforced. "China is confronting the core question of who pays for reform," said Joe Peissel, an analyst at research firm Trivium. As things stand, workers and businesses bear the burden, which undermines employment and consumption and may not be sustainable, he said. This calls for new policies to make more state resources available to the welfare system. "The long-term success of these reforms will hinge on whether the government is willing to shoulder more of the cost," said Peissel. The human resources ministry, and the State Council Information Office, which answers media queries for the government, did not immediately respond to a comment request. Social insurance contributions differ by city but typically equal about a tenth of gross income for employees and roughly a quarter for employers. That's high by global standards and incentivises informal workarounds, economists say. A complex system of paybands also makes social insurance payments highly regressive, with low-income workers bearing a heavier burden than top earners, discouraging them from paying, a 2024 report by China's top legislature found. A survey of more than 6,000 firms by human resources firm Zhonghe Group last year found only 28.4% of them were fully compliant with social insurance rules. Official data shows 387 million employees contribute to China's urban pension scheme, roughly half of the workforce. Mary Dai, 23, a waitress in the eastern city of Jinhua, said her boss asked her to accept a salary cut to 2,500 yuan from 4,000 yuan per month if they both had to pay contributions. "It's like one sweeping blow killing everyone" said Dai, adding such income would not cover her basic needs and she would return to her village to live with her parents. Qin Sinian, a restaurant owner in the southwestern city of Mianyang, said he fired six of his 12 workers to be able to afford paying social insurance from next month. His restaurant makes 700,000 yuan annually, of which 500,000 goes on rent, labour and ingredients. Social insurance will add 120,000 yuan, leaving just 80,000 yuan ($11,140) before taxes. "It feels like being crushed beneath a mountain," Qin said. Social media users have also expressed a lack of trust in how their contributions are managed. A 2024 cabinet report found 13 provinces had diverted 40.6 billion yuan from pension funds to other expenditures. Xiao Qiang, founder of U.S.-based censorship tracker China Digital Times, said some posts on this topic have been taken down, including views that the ruling disproportionately hurts the most vulnerable. A construction worker from the central Hubei province, giving only her surname Li for privacy, said neither she nor her employer can afford social insurance on her 3,500 yuan wage. "When they roll out these policies, do they even consider the struggles of people at the bottom?" Li said. Waiving social insurance payments has fed China's economic imbalances at home and abroad. It lowers factory labour costs and improves China's export competitiveness. It makes public infrastructure works cheaper, which in turn lowers logistics costs for manufacturers and brings supply chains closer together. But as China ages, missed payments pose risks to the pension system - predicted to run out of money by 2035. It also worsens industrial overcapacity by freeing resources for factory expansion. And it forces workers to save for rainy days on their own, a key drag on consumer spending. "A core flaw in China's overall economic development has been relying on suppressed labour costs to compete, generating large trade surpluses, especially with the United States and Europe," said a policy adviser, requesting anonymity due to the topic's sensitivity. "This is not a viable long-term path," the adviser said, citing trade tensions. "If you can't afford to pay wages, what kind of business are you running?" The adviser suggested Beijing should increase unemployment benefits before tightening enforcement to cushion the blow of business closures. Societe Generale analysts expect the government will either delay implementation or roll out more stimulus to offset the impact. "Another shock to the labour market is the last thing policymakers would like to see," they wrote in a note. ($1 = 7.1813 Chinese yuan)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store