logo
Elders' legal bid to save homes, culture coming to end

Elders' legal bid to save homes, culture coming to end

The Advertiser13-07-2025
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands.
Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change.
The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees.
The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities.
This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science.
The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets.
On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people.
Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021.
They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm.
During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been.
"We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP.
Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community.
But that has all changed, he says.
The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves.
Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding.
"Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments.
"We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents.
"Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks.
"In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors."
Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai.
It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight.
Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors.
"I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says.
"If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world."
As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind.
"My main focus is on the new generation," he says.
"This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren."
No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference.
"We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says.
"The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change."
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands.
Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change.
The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees.
The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities.
This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science.
The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets.
On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people.
Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021.
They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm.
During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been.
"We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP.
Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community.
But that has all changed, he says.
The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves.
Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding.
"Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments.
"We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents.
"Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks.
"In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors."
Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai.
It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight.
Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors.
"I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says.
"If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world."
As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind.
"My main focus is on the new generation," he says.
"This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren."
No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference.
"We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says.
"The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change."
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands.
Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change.
The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees.
The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities.
This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science.
The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets.
On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people.
Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021.
They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm.
During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been.
"We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP.
Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community.
But that has all changed, he says.
The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves.
Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding.
"Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments.
"We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents.
"Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks.
"In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors."
Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai.
It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight.
Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors.
"I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says.
"If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world."
As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind.
"My main focus is on the new generation," he says.
"This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren."
No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference.
"We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says.
"The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change."
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands.
Their Country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10 kilometres off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of climate change.
The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees.
The Uncles have taken the federal government to court in the Australian Climate Case, seeking orders which would require the Commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities.
This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science.
The Commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets.
On Tuesday, the Federal Court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people.
Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai launched the action against the federal government in 2021.
They are arguing that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm.
During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been.
"We don't want to be climate refugees," Pabai Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, tells AAP.
Paul Kabai remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community.
But that has all changed, he says.
The beaches on his island - Saibai - have receded, turning to mud and mangroves.
Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been impacted by flooding.
"Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas," he laments.
"We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents.
"Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?" he asks.
"In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors."
Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai.
It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters but as the Uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight.
Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark High Court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius' asserted by the British at colonisation, Mr Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors.
"I'm standing firm on his shoulders," he says.
"If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world."
As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Mr Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come, in the Torres Strait and further afield, are front of mind.
"My main focus is on the new generation," he says.
"This is why I'm doing it - for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren."
No matter the legal outcome, Mr Kabai says he believes the action he and Mr Pabai have taken will make a difference.
"We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose," he says.
"The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two-thirds of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles
Two-thirds of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles

Perth Now

time6 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Two-thirds of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles

Some 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, according to YouGov. (AP PHOTO) Some 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, according to YouGov. (AP PHOTO) Credit: AAP Two thirds of Britons believe the Duke of York should be stripped of his remaining royal titles, according to a new poll. Research by YouGov found that 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie in August delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex-obsessed, a "useful idiot" and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Some 13 per cent opposed the removal of his titles and 21 per cent were unsure, the survey suggested. Three years ago, 62 per cent believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67 per cent in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just five per cent have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex who has a 20 per cent positive rating and the Duke of Sussex at 28 per cent. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The duke stopped using his style of his royal highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.

'Abusive obsession': Latham targeted over sex act tweet
'Abusive obsession': Latham targeted over sex act tweet

The Advertiser

time12 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

'Abusive obsession': Latham targeted over sex act tweet

A controversial politician's "abusive obsession" with a fellow MP has exposed him to ongoing hatred and ridicule, a tribunal has been told. NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich continued his legal fight against controversial former federal Labor leader Mark Latham on Tuesday, having sued him for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. In a passionate address, Mr Greenwich said the tweet had sought to define him as a "disgusting sexual act" and a threat to children. "(He has) an abusive obsession with me, it began with that tweet and it has not stopped," he told the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal on Tuesday. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality." Mr Greenwich added his electorate office had been "inundated" with abuse after Mr Latham's tweet and subsequent interviews. "I have as an openly gay MP ... of course at times received homophobic abuse (but) I have never been defined by someone as a disgusting sex act," he said. Mr Latham repeatedly interjected from the public gallery, drawing a sharp warning from senior tribunal member Mandy Tibbey. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in a Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He sued the former NSW One Nation leader in the Federal Court over the tweet, which was sent days after the state election and described a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters who had set themselves up outside the Belfield church. Mr Greenwich's lawyer Prue Bindon said recent tweets from the former Labor leader had subjected her client to "further hatred and ridicule ... from members of the public". After his lawyer objected to the tweets being formally tendered as evidence, Mr Latham loudly complained about "another whinge-athon from the European prince", a reference to Mr Greenwich's links to Georgian nobility. Mr Latham has been embroiled in several scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. But a recent attempt to have Australia's oldest parliamentary chamber officially censure him failed after the coalition opposition, the Greens and minor party MPs voted to adjourn the motion until October. The independent MP spent the hearing live-tweeting proceedings, including defending his postings as true. "No court or tribunal should be used for restricting the legal, authentic freedom of speech of an elected member of parliament," he wrote. A controversial politician's "abusive obsession" with a fellow MP has exposed him to ongoing hatred and ridicule, a tribunal has been told. NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich continued his legal fight against controversial former federal Labor leader Mark Latham on Tuesday, having sued him for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. In a passionate address, Mr Greenwich said the tweet had sought to define him as a "disgusting sexual act" and a threat to children. "(He has) an abusive obsession with me, it began with that tweet and it has not stopped," he told the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal on Tuesday. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality." Mr Greenwich added his electorate office had been "inundated" with abuse after Mr Latham's tweet and subsequent interviews. "I have as an openly gay MP ... of course at times received homophobic abuse (but) I have never been defined by someone as a disgusting sex act," he said. Mr Latham repeatedly interjected from the public gallery, drawing a sharp warning from senior tribunal member Mandy Tibbey. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in a Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He sued the former NSW One Nation leader in the Federal Court over the tweet, which was sent days after the state election and described a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters who had set themselves up outside the Belfield church. Mr Greenwich's lawyer Prue Bindon said recent tweets from the former Labor leader had subjected her client to "further hatred and ridicule ... from members of the public". After his lawyer objected to the tweets being formally tendered as evidence, Mr Latham loudly complained about "another whinge-athon from the European prince", a reference to Mr Greenwich's links to Georgian nobility. Mr Latham has been embroiled in several scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. But a recent attempt to have Australia's oldest parliamentary chamber officially censure him failed after the coalition opposition, the Greens and minor party MPs voted to adjourn the motion until October. The independent MP spent the hearing live-tweeting proceedings, including defending his postings as true. "No court or tribunal should be used for restricting the legal, authentic freedom of speech of an elected member of parliament," he wrote. A controversial politician's "abusive obsession" with a fellow MP has exposed him to ongoing hatred and ridicule, a tribunal has been told. NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich continued his legal fight against controversial former federal Labor leader Mark Latham on Tuesday, having sued him for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. In a passionate address, Mr Greenwich said the tweet had sought to define him as a "disgusting sexual act" and a threat to children. "(He has) an abusive obsession with me, it began with that tweet and it has not stopped," he told the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal on Tuesday. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality." Mr Greenwich added his electorate office had been "inundated" with abuse after Mr Latham's tweet and subsequent interviews. "I have as an openly gay MP ... of course at times received homophobic abuse (but) I have never been defined by someone as a disgusting sex act," he said. Mr Latham repeatedly interjected from the public gallery, drawing a sharp warning from senior tribunal member Mandy Tibbey. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in a Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He sued the former NSW One Nation leader in the Federal Court over the tweet, which was sent days after the state election and described a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters who had set themselves up outside the Belfield church. Mr Greenwich's lawyer Prue Bindon said recent tweets from the former Labor leader had subjected her client to "further hatred and ridicule ... from members of the public". After his lawyer objected to the tweets being formally tendered as evidence, Mr Latham loudly complained about "another whinge-athon from the European prince", a reference to Mr Greenwich's links to Georgian nobility. Mr Latham has been embroiled in several scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. But a recent attempt to have Australia's oldest parliamentary chamber officially censure him failed after the coalition opposition, the Greens and minor party MPs voted to adjourn the motion until October. The independent MP spent the hearing live-tweeting proceedings, including defending his postings as true. "No court or tribunal should be used for restricting the legal, authentic freedom of speech of an elected member of parliament," he wrote. A controversial politician's "abusive obsession" with a fellow MP has exposed him to ongoing hatred and ridicule, a tribunal has been told. NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich continued his legal fight against controversial former federal Labor leader Mark Latham on Tuesday, having sued him for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. In a passionate address, Mr Greenwich said the tweet had sought to define him as a "disgusting sexual act" and a threat to children. "(He has) an abusive obsession with me, it began with that tweet and it has not stopped," he told the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal on Tuesday. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality." Mr Greenwich added his electorate office had been "inundated" with abuse after Mr Latham's tweet and subsequent interviews. "I have as an openly gay MP ... of course at times received homophobic abuse (but) I have never been defined by someone as a disgusting sex act," he said. Mr Latham repeatedly interjected from the public gallery, drawing a sharp warning from senior tribunal member Mandy Tibbey. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in a Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He sued the former NSW One Nation leader in the Federal Court over the tweet, which was sent days after the state election and described a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters who had set themselves up outside the Belfield church. Mr Greenwich's lawyer Prue Bindon said recent tweets from the former Labor leader had subjected her client to "further hatred and ridicule ... from members of the public". After his lawyer objected to the tweets being formally tendered as evidence, Mr Latham loudly complained about "another whinge-athon from the European prince", a reference to Mr Greenwich's links to Georgian nobility. Mr Latham has been embroiled in several scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. But a recent attempt to have Australia's oldest parliamentary chamber officially censure him failed after the coalition opposition, the Greens and minor party MPs voted to adjourn the motion until October. The independent MP spent the hearing live-tweeting proceedings, including defending his postings as true. "No court or tribunal should be used for restricting the legal, authentic freedom of speech of an elected member of parliament," he wrote.

'Abusive obsession': Latham targeted over sex act tweet
'Abusive obsession': Latham targeted over sex act tweet

Perth Now

time13 hours ago

  • Perth Now

'Abusive obsession': Latham targeted over sex act tweet

A controversial politician's "abusive obsession" with a fellow MP has exposed him to ongoing hatred and ridicule, a tribunal has been told. NSW independent MP Alex Greenwich continued his legal fight against controversial former federal Labor leader Mark Latham on Tuesday, having sued him for homosexual vilification and workplace harassment. The case relates to a sexually explicit tweet the Federal Court has previously ruled as defamatory and subsequent media appearances made by Mr Latham, who sits as an independent in the state parliament. In a passionate address, Mr Greenwich said the tweet had sought to define him as a "disgusting sexual act" and a threat to children. "(He has) an abusive obsession with me, it began with that tweet and it has not stopped," he told the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal on Tuesday. "I have never been so diminished, demeaned, dehumanised by someone ... this was the first time in my political career I'd been so fundamentally attacked for who I am and my sexuality." Mr Greenwich added his electorate office had been "inundated" with abuse after Mr Latham's tweet and subsequent interviews. "I have as an openly gay MP ... of course at times received homophobic abuse (but) I have never been defined by someone as a disgusting sex act," he said. Mr Latham repeatedly interjected from the public gallery, drawing a sharp warning from senior tribunal member Mandy Tibbey. Mr Greenwich, who is a vocal advocate for the LGBTQI community, received $140,000 in damages in a Federal Court suit against Mr Latham in 2024. He sued the former NSW One Nation leader in the Federal Court over the tweet, which was sent days after the state election and described a sex act in explicit terms. It came in response to a post quoting Mr Greenwich describing him as a "disgusting human being". The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest, where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023. About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters who had set themselves up outside the Belfield church. Mr Greenwich's lawyer Prue Bindon said recent tweets from the former Labor leader had subjected her client to "further hatred and ridicule ... from members of the public". After his lawyer objected to the tweets being formally tendered as evidence, Mr Latham loudly complained about "another whinge-athon from the European prince", a reference to Mr Greenwich's links to Georgian nobility. Mr Latham has been embroiled in several scandals, including taking photos of women MPs without their knowledge, for which he has already apologised. But a recent attempt to have Australia's oldest parliamentary chamber officially censure him failed after the coalition opposition, the Greens and minor party MPs voted to adjourn the motion until October. The independent MP spent the hearing live-tweeting proceedings, including defending his postings as true. "No court or tribunal should be used for restricting the legal, authentic freedom of speech of an elected member of parliament," he wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store