Only 16% of UK firms are recruiting ex-offenders, research suggests
A report has warned that a lack of job opportunities for former prisoners is driving reoffending due to difficulties covering bills after leaving prison.
Research commissioned by DSA Connect indicated that efforts from firms to hire ex-offenders could significantly reduce the costs linked to reoffending.
The figures showed that only 16% of UK business said they have recruitment policies in place to target ex-offenders.
However, around a quarter of employers (26%) said they would feel comfortable employing someone with a criminal record, while 30% said they were indifferent.
More than half of surveyed firms warned that they are experiencing skills shortages.
The research comes amid Government efforts led by former Timpson Group chief executive James Timpson to reduce reoffending.
The findings highlighted concerns that a lack of post-prison employment options leads to reoffending.
The survey found that more than half (52%) of those imprisoned for a second or subsequent offence said they were unable to find a job after their first release.
Of that same group, 61% said they believed the challenge of finding employment contributed to their reoffending.
DSA Connect, an IT asset disposal company which runs programmes to support prisoners in developing work skills, surveyed former prisoners and small and medium-sized UK firms.
Harry Benham, chairman at DSA Connect, said: 'Our survey serves as a stark reminder that finding stable and meaningful employment is one of the most powerful factors in helping people rebuild their lives.
'Sadly, these findings show that without urgent measures being taken, we risk trapping people in a cycle of crime and imprisonment.
'It is a fact that, if a person leaving prison has employment, they are far less likely to reoffend and reoffending (according to government statistics) costs the country around £18 billion per year.
'Our new research highlights that particularly when facing a skills shortage, many UK businesses are missing out on valuable employees by not having a recruitment policy to hire ex-offenders.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who is social media vigilante Cycling Mikey?
A cycling activist has stated that he was unable to prevent his electric bike from swerving into the path of a car that was passing a no-entry sign. A motorist struck Michael van Erp's bike on Sunday while he was pushing it onto a west London road, according to a video he uploaded to his Cycling Mikey YouTube account. Mr van Erp said on social media site X on Tuesday that he 'couldn't… brake a 28kg e-bike once I realised the driver wasn't stopping.' In the YouTube video, the 52-year-old activist first prevents the vehicle from passing under a no-entry sign that was put up at a junction due to road construction. The male driver makes a gesture to Mr van Erp, then shifts into reverse to let cars going in the other direction pass, then resumes driving. Once again, the cyclist tries to block him, but the driver hits his bike and leaves. Although Mr van Erp's possessions were strewn all over the road, it seems he was unharmed and his bike was spared significant harm. According to a Metropolitan Police spokesperson, 'We are aware of footage circulating on social media which appears to show an incident on Paddenswick Road, Hammersmith on Sunday August 10. No arrests have been made at this stage. 'We urge victims of crime to contact the police by calling 101, or 999 in an emergency.' But who exactly is Michael van Erp, better known as Cycling Mikey? Who is Cycling Mikey? Cycling Mikey, whose real name is Michael van Erp, is a Dutch-born road safety campaigner and YouTube content creator based in London. Cycling Mikey, whose Youtube account has over 119,000 followers, frequently records drivers he says are violating traffic laws, such using a mobile phone while driving. He then reports these incidents to the police and shares compelling footage on YouTube. Since 2019, he claims to have reported 2,280 drivers, who have been hit with 2,649 penalty points and fines totalling £165,700. He says that his actions have resulted in the disqualification of 35 individuals from driving. His footage has captured public figures like Guy Ritchie and Chris Eubank committing infractions—but who he is remains unknown to him during filming. His personal drive stems from a tragic past: his father was killed by a drunk driver when he was 19. Often dubbed a 'vigilante cyclist' a label he disputes—he insists he is simply collecting evidence for the justice system. He regularly positions himself at hotspots like 'Gandalf Corner' near Regent's Park to catch offenders. While some hail him as a deterrent to dangerous driving, others criticise his confrontational methods However, even Cycling Mickey makes mistakes. His own camera captured him running a red light in April 2024; he publicly acknowledged the incident and stated that he was prepared to accept any repercussions. Has he really been banned from reporting to the police? According to social media speculations, the Met Police have 'ghosted' or blocked him, which means that his submissions might now be disregarded or denied. However, the Met has neither confirmed nor denied any such action, and the assertion is not supported by any official statement. In fact, Cycling Mikey himself discussed his encounters with the police during an interview on Fubar Radio. According to him, even though he mostly uses the reporting system online and rarely speaks with officers in person, he feels that the police are "on his side, generally" and generally support the need for traffic enforcement.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gatwick passengers warned of severe August delays amid baggage screener strike
Holidaymakers flying from Gatwick Airport could face severe delays as baggage screeners prepare to strike over pay, the UK's largest union has warned. The walkout, set for later this month and covering the August bank holiday, is expected to disrupt travel for thousands of passengers. Baggage screeners will strike from August 22 to August 26 and from August 29 to September 2, Unite the Union has said. All flights out of Gatwick will face disruption during these times, the union said, warning industrial action will intensify if the dispute is not resolved. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said'ICTS has more than enough money to offer these workers a fair pay rise. Not doing so is just corporate greed. 'ICTS' Gatwick workers will receive Unite's complete backing for as long as it takes during their strikes for fair pay.' Unite has said workers, employed by ICTS, are amongst the lowest paid workers at the airport and earn just above the minimum wage. Despite this, ICTS's turnover has grown by 110 per cent since 2020, reaching £170.59 million in 2024, the union said. It made a profit before tax of £6.1 million in 2024, a 46.9 per cent increase compared to the year before. Unite regional officer Ben Davis said: 'ICTS is entirely responsible for the disruption that will be caused to Gatwick passengers during the strike action. It can well afford to put forward an acceptable pay offer and that is what needs to happen. 'Despite performing a critical role, these workers are amongst the lowest paid at the airport. Gatwick should be stepping in and pressuring ICTS to put an improved offer forward.' A spokesperson for Gatwick said the airport does not anticipate significant disruption if strikes were to go ahead. They said: 'We are working with our suppliers to avoid any impacts and we expect to operate a normal summer holiday flight schedule for our airlines and passengers on these dates. Of course, we hope ICTS and their union can reach a resolution before then.' ICTS has been contacted by The Standard for comment.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Epping Council goes to High Court in bid to remove migrants from asylum hotel
Epping Forest District Councill has applied for an interim High Court injunction in a bid to stop asylum seekers from being housed at a local hotel. Documents relating to the Bell Hotel in Epping were lodged with the High Court in London on Tuesday, the council said in a statement. A series of protests have been held outside the hotel in recent weeks, after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. Council leader Chris Whitbread said the use of the hotel as asylum accommodation risks causing 'irreparable harm to the local community'. The council had unanimously voted last month to urge the Government 'to immediately and permanently close' the hotel 'for the purposes of asylum processing'. The Essex Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner, Roger Hirst, had also reportedly called on the Home Secretary to review the use of the hotel for housing asylum seekers. In a statement, Mr Whitbread said: 'The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub, we could have closed it down long ago. 'So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel. 'There are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel. The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. 'This will only increase with the start of the new school year. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen.' He continued: 'In our view, placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a clear breach of planning permission. It is not in use as a hotel, and it doesn't function as a hotel. 'The establishment of a centre to accommodate asylum seekers in this particular location, in close proximity to five schools, a residential care home, and the shops and amenities of the market town of Epping, is not appropriate in planning terms.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch claimed women in the area have 'stopped jogging in the park because there are men lurking in bushes', because of concerns about the hotel. Following a visit to Epping on Monday, Mrs Badenoch told reporters: 'The people who I spoke to are having a lot of concerns about safety. Mothers told me that they're worried about their daughters going to school. They're getting harassed. They stopped jogging in the park because there are men lurking in bushes. 'Communities shouldn't have to be paying for this. And what I saw in Epping really, really upset me. I can see why many of those people are protesting.'
