logo
I was hired by NASA to protect Earth from aliens – here's what happens when they find us… & why it may spark disaster

I was hired by NASA to protect Earth from aliens – here's what happens when they find us… & why it may spark disaster

The Irish Sun26-07-2025
AN EX-NASA chief has sensationally revealed plans for intelligent alien visitors.
John Rummel was twice NASA's Planetary Protection Officer - from 1987 to 1993 and 1997 to 2006.
5
Dr John Rummel served as NASA's Planetary Protection Officer
Credit: NASA
5
5
His objective was to prevent the contamination of other planets during exploratory missions, and also to ensure alien samples didn't contaminate Earth.
But he also contemplated what he would do if intelligent aliens were to visit.
And Rummel, now retired, has even outlined what could happen if there was a full-scale alien invasion.
Rummel told The Sun: 'An alien visitor would provide mutual benefit.
More tech news
'We could imagine standard microbial sampling, such as swabs and wipes for our part.
'Conceptually, it could be like the Danish
film
, The Visit, where we have somebody who is coming here but not invading, and they're interested in finding out more.
'I would insist we sample the visitor to make sure we have no microbial hitchhikers and also that we do not introduce anything to hurt the visitor.
'As for alien invasions, you could end up with the Martians being killed off by the first pathogenic bacteria, and the other way around.
Most read in Science
'If we go to Mars, we become the Martians. We have to be careful that when we do get there we don't bring back unknowns that might otherwise be a problem.
'A lot of people go, oh well, we haven't found life on Mars so far, so it shouldn't be a problem.
'There are a lot of people with big enough egos to say 'trust me'.
'But that's not really a good idea. Ignorance is not bliss. Let's go ahead and take some data.'
He added: 'We are just getting started in looking for signs of life. I will vote for aliens finding us first.
'We are otherwise in the 'selfie' stage of understanding what to look for, and where.'
Rummel said there were no official NASA plans to prepare for an invasion, insisting his views are personal.
But in that scenario, he says the agency would be unlikely to have any jurisdiction for a response.
Rummel spoke after his successor, Catharine Conley, exclusively told The Sun she had been fired by NASA in 2013 for
Conley said her job, like Rummel's, was to protect Earth from rogue alien life entering the atmosphere.
But she believes that if there was an alien invasion, the response would be led by the US Air Force.
5
Dr Rummel outlined what could happen if there was a full-scale alien invasion
Credit: John Rummel
Mars facts
Here's what you need to know about the red planet...
Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun
It is named after the Roman god of war
The landmass of Mars is very similar to Earth, but due to the difference in gravity, you could jump three times higher there than you can here.
Mars is mountainous and hosts the tallest mountain known in the Solar System called Olympus Mons, which is three times higher than Everest
Mars is considered the second most habitable planet after Earth.
It takes the planet 687 Earth days to orbit the Sun
The planet has a diameter of 4,212 miles, and has an average distance from Earth of 140 million miles
Martian temperatures can vary wildly, reaching as high as 70F/20C or as low as -225F/-153C
She told The Sun: 'They would very much more likely be tiny little aliens.
'But if there were any intelligent ones, that would be the Air Force's problem, not NASA's, at least for the US.
'But again, we don't know what we're preparing for.'
Rummel continued to work for NASA as a senior scientist at the Astrobiology Program after leaving his PPO role before retiring.
He added: 'If somebody were to come in and land on the Earth, it's unlikely that they're going to cause a problem in my
opinion
.
'But I wouldn't trust my opinion on this because I don't have data.
'I believe that there's life out there but it wouldn't consider itself alien. Because they're out there and we're the aliens if we go out there.
'They're not the aliens themselves. I hope intelligent alien life is out there, and I certainly think it could be. We have a chance of seeing them in our lifetime.
'It changes all the time, but the search for extra terrestrial intelligence or technology has the potential to reveal if there's something else going on in the galaxy that's not us.
'At one point in time, I was the SETI program person at NASA headquarters.
"And some very smart people are dedicated to seeing what's out there.'
5
NASA says on its website it hopes to send humans to Mars as early as the 2030s to explore signs of alien life.
It was planning to return Mars samples before then as part of its Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign.
But that has been scrapped by Donald Trump's cuts, and NASA instead says it anticipates returning samples through lower-cost options.
China remains on course with its own plans to return Mars samples through its Tianwen-3 Mars mission, set for launch in 2028 and bringing samples back by 2031.
Rummel says he agrees with Catharine that NASA's current plans to bring samples back to Earth are not safe.
But he says he'll be keeping an eager eye on the Chinese.
He said: 'Mars sample return by robotic space vehicles is not currently funded by the US, so Catharine is right.
'It will be interesting to see the details of whatever the Chinese do.'
He added: 'The bottom line is that we're looking for life on Mars and if we think there's a credible possibility of finding life on Mars, then it would be
nice
to know something about whether or not that life form was benign or whether or not it somehow might affect us.'
'You don't want it to go badly.'
The Sun has approached NASA for a response to Rummel's comments.
On questions surrounding the safety of samples returned to Mars, NASA previously said: "It is anticipated that
future
missions to Mars will return samples for study on Earth.
"NASA will never compromise on safety."
How long does it take to get to Mars?
It's not that short of a trip...
There's an immense distance between Earth and Mars, which means any trip to the red planet will take a very long time
It's also made more complicated by the fact that the distance is constantly changing as the two planets rotate around the sun
The closest that the Earth and Mars would ever be is a distance of 33.9million miles – that's 9,800 times the distance between London and New York
That's really rare though: the more useful distance is the average, which is 140million miles
Scientists on Earth have already launched a whole bunch of spacecraft to (or near) Mars, so we have a rough idea of how long it takes with current technology
Historically, the trip has taken anywhere from 128 to 333 days – admittedly a huge length of time for humans to be on board a cramped spacecraft.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House orders NASA to deliberately destroy two important satellites monitoring climate change
White House orders NASA to deliberately destroy two important satellites monitoring climate change

Irish Daily Star

time18 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Star

White House orders NASA to deliberately destroy two important satellites monitoring climate change

NASA has been given orders by the White House to destroy two major satellites in space that are used by farmers, scientists, as well as oil and gas companies. NASA has been given orders by the White House to destroy two major satellites in space that are used by farmers, scientists, as well as oil and gas companies. ‌ According to NPR, the data from the satellites provides detailed information about carbon dioxide and crop health. The outlet stated that the objects are the only two federally used satellites that provide information built to specifically monitor planet-warming greenhouse gases. ‌ It is currently unclear why the Trump administration seeks to destroy the satellites, as they are state-of-the-art and were expected to last for several more years. In 2023, an official data review found that the data stored there was "of exceptionally high quality," and they recommended continuing the mission for at least three more years. It comes after a chilling map revealed the US regions where 75% of people will die in a nuclear World War 3. Both missions, known as the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, reportedly used identical measurement devices to measure carbon dioxide and plant growth around the globe. While the devices were identical, one of the satellites is actually attached to the International Space Station. Should NASA choose to comply with the directive, the standalone satellite will burn up in the Earth's atmosphere. The mission has since been dubbed Phase F, per David Crisp, a longtime NASA scientist who designed the instruments and managed the missions until he retired in 2022. ‌ "What I have heard is direct communications from people who were making those plans, who weren't allowed to tell me that that's what they were told to do," Crisp said to NPR. "But they were allowed to ask me questions." "They were asking me very sharp questions. The only thing that would have motivated those questions was [that] somebody told them to come up with a termination plan," he added. According to Crisp, it makes no sense why Trump would order the termination of the satellites. ‌ Crisp commented that it makes "no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data." According to the expert, maintaining the two observatories only costs $15 million per year, barely a dent in the agency's $25.4 billion budget. Two other NASA scientists have confirmed that the Trump administration had contacted mission leaders to make plans for the termination of other projects that would lose funding under Trump's proposed budget for the next fiscal year. ‌ Several scientists have expressed outrage at the proposal and argued that it could precipitate an end to the US's leadership in prevent this, lawmakers have attempted to draw up a counter to Trump's plan to keep NASA's budget roughly in line. "We rejected cuts that would have devastated NASA science by 47 percent and would have terminated 55 operating and planned missions," said Senator and top appropriator Chris Van Hollen, per Bloomberg. "Eliminating funds or scaling down the operations of Earth-observing satellites would be catastrophic and would severely impair our ability to forecast, manage, and respond to severe weather and climate disasters House representative and Committee on Science, Space and Technology ranking member Zoe Lofgren Article continues below "The Trump administration is forcing the proposed cuts in its FY26 budget request on already appropriated FY25 funds," she added. "This is illegal." It comes after a Trump family member revealed his body is 'rotting inside' as she delivered a terrifying update on the president's health.

US wants to put a nuclear reactor on the moon, Nasa chief says
US wants to put a nuclear reactor on the moon, Nasa chief says

Irish Independent

timea day ago

  • Irish Independent

US wants to put a nuclear reactor on the moon, Nasa chief says

The space agency's chief Sean Duffy has expedited the timeline to build the reactor, and wants it to have at least 100 kilowatts of power – enough to run about 80 homes – and be ready to launch by 2030. The directive, first reported by Politico, mentions China and Russia's joint-effort to place a reactor on the moon by the mid-2030s. The two US adversaries first announced their plans in March last year. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' Mr Duffy warned in the directive. Nasa is working with the US energy department and the broader space industry to design a fission power system that would provide at least 40 kilowatts of power. The space agency has already mentioned the benefits of developing fission surface power (FSP) on the moon and Mars. 'Relatively small and lightweight, fission systems are powerful and could enable robust operations on the moon and Mars,' Nasa states on its website. Nasa's Artemis campaign aims to establish the first long-term presence on the moon. During Mr Trump's inaugural address, he said the US would launch astronauts 'to plant the stars and stripes on the planet Mars'. 'It is about winning the second space race,' a Nasa senior official also told Politico. In Duffy's new timeline, a fission surface power programme executive will be designated within 30 days of the directive. The executive 'is empowered to provide reporting and updates with maximum transparency directly to the administrator,' the Nasa chief wrote. Within 60 days, Nasa will ask for industry proposals for the nuclear reactor, according to the directive. The directive mentioned Trump's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year, which includes $350m for a new programme 'that will accelerate the development of high priority technologies for Mars'. The funding would increase up to $500m starting in 2027.

Mission to MARS - Jennifer Walshe on her acclaimed space opera
Mission to MARS - Jennifer Walshe on her acclaimed space opera

RTÉ News​

timea day ago

  • RTÉ News​

Mission to MARS - Jennifer Walshe on her acclaimed space opera

Composer Jennifer Walshe introduces Irish National Opera's production of her opera MARS, composed by Jennifer with a libretto by Mark O'Connell, which runs at the Abbey Theatre this August following an acclaimed World Premiere at this year's Galway International Arts Festival. I recently read an interview with the astronaut Chris Hadfield where he noted that he has been as astronaut for over 20 years, but has spent only a precious six months in space. I'd like to think this opera has something in common with Hadfield's experience. A mere two hours long, it's nonetheless the result of years of thinking about Mars, a fascination which began for me as a child looking at photos of the red planet in a copy of Carl Sagan's Cosmos. Along the way my research led me to the sounds of NASA's Perseverance rover trundling over the regolith of Mars, recordings of whistlers, plasma waves and cosmic background radiation, sonifications of light curves of exoplanets millions of miles away. I spent weeks trying to figure out how to use musical instruments to simulate the sonic environment inside a spacesuit, how many balloons to tie to a double bass bow to simulate Martian gravity, which is 38% that of Earth's. I downloaded lists of the synth-heavy music astronauts uploaded to the International Space Station (a lot of Mike Oldfield and Vangelis), read mission transcripts from the Gemini and Apollo missions, discussed how a trumpet might degrade over time in a Martian habitat on the Space Exploration Stack Exchange. I held a Martian meteorite in my hands at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History, read countless sci-fi books, left livestreams of spacewalks playing on a screen in the corner of my studio as I worked. I considered a life where communication with loved ones back home can only ever be through text messages and voicemails. The fact that on the night of the opera's Dublin opening at the Abbey Theatre, a message leaving Earth will take 14 minutes and 54 seconds to reach Mars.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store