
Safe to Skip Postop Radioiodine in Low-Risk Thyroid Cancers?
A recent phase 3 trial found that 5-year recurrence-free survival was similar among patients who did and did not receive postoperative radioiodine, indicating the treatment can be safely avoided in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer — specifically those with pT1, pT2, and N0 or Nx tumors who have no adverse features after total thyroidectomy.
METHODOLOGY:
Although now used less often, total thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine has traditionally been the standard of care for treating differentiated thyroid cancer. Observational studies and the ESTIMABL2 trial , published in 2022, suggested that patients with low-risk disease could safely skip radioiodine, but confirmatory evidence was still needed.
The recent randomized, noninferiority, phase 3 IoN trial aimed to answer this question. The study involved patients at 33 cancer centers in the UK who underwent complete resection following total thyroidectomy and stage pT1, pT2, pT3, or pT3a disease.
Researchers randomly assigned 504 patients (77% women) to receive (n = 253) or not receive (n = 251) postoperative radioiodine. Patients underwent neck ultrasound scans annually and serum thyroglobulin measurements every 6 months. The median follow-up was 6.7 years.
The primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival, defined as the absence of locoregional recurrent or residual structural disease, distant metastases, or death from thyroid cancer. Noninferiority was assessed with a margin of 5 percentage points.
Overall, 47% of patients had pT1 tumors, 44% had pT2, and 9% had pT3 or pT3a; 91% of patients had N0 or Nx disease, and 9% had N1a disease.
TAKEAWAY:
Overall, 17 recurrences were reported — 8 in the no-radioiodine group and 9 in the radioiodine group. The 5-year recurrence-free rate was 97.9% in the no-radioiodine group vs 96.3% in the radioiodine group, with an absolute risk difference of 0.5 percentage points (P for noninferiority = .033), highlighting the noninferiority of omitting radioiodine.
Higher recurrence rates were observed in patients with pT3 or pT3a tumors than in those with pT1 or pT2 tumors (9% vs 3%) and in patients with N1a tumors than in those with N0 or Nx tumors (13% vs 2%). Additionally, baseline postsurgical thyroglobulin levels ≥ 2 ng/mL were associated with a higher risk for recurrence (hazard ratio, 12.75; P < .0001).
Adverse events were comparable between the no-radioiodine and radioiodine groups, with fatigue (25% vs 28%), lethargy (14% in both), and dry mouth (10% vs 9%) being the most common.
No treatment-related deaths or deaths from thyroid cancer were reported. But a total of eight patients died — an equal number in both groups. In the no-radioiodine group, deaths were due to two new primary cancers, one myocardial infarction, and one liver failure. In the radioiodine group, one death was due to bowel cancer and three due to vascular or unknown causes.
IN PRACTICE:
IoN and ESTIMABL2 together 'offer strong and complementary evidence showing' that postoperative radioiodine can be avoided in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer — more specifically, pT1 or pT2 tumors with N0 nodal status and no other adverse features, the study authors concluded.
Although the evidence for or against radioiodine in patients with pT3, pT3a, or N1a tumors was deemed 'insufficient,' the authors concluded that 'most patients worldwide with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer' can now safely avoid radioiodine.
SOURCE:
This study, led by Ujjal Mallick, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, was published online in The Lancet.
LIMITATIONS:
Patients had relatively few recurrences, and the findings may not be applicable to the youngest patients. Additionally, molecular data (eg, on BRAF and TERT mutations) were not routinely collected from patients.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was funded by Cancer Research UK. One author reported receiving honoraria from Esai and the British Medical Ultrasound Society for presenting treatment options for differentiated thyroid cancer. Another author reported receiving honoraria from Esai for presenting treatment options for differentiated thyroid cancer. All other authors declared having no competing interests.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Changing regulations impact medical device market entry strategies
The medical devices industry is always undergoing significant regulatory changes. In the EU and UK there have been new frameworks introduced recently, and as a result the medical device industry is consistently navigating a complex and evolving regulatory framework that has implications on medical device company market strategies. The EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) came into effect on 26 May 2021. The regulation introduced several changes to medical device regulation in Europe, including stronger market surveillance, establishing explicit responsibilities for manufacturers, improved traceability, a central database for comprehensive information on medical products, and high-risk device assessment. Additionally, in July 2025, the Competent Authorities for Medical Devices and the Head of Medicines Agency issued a statement advocating for significant medical device regulation reforms in the EU. Specifically, they are advocating for improved coordination, governance, and centralisation of regulatory activities in the EU. Similarly, in the UK, new Post-Market Surveillance regulations have taken effect in June 2025. The new regulations require device manufacturers to track the safety and performance of products to help identify safety issues early. The regulations will ensure manufacturers have a system in place to monitor devices once in use, collect safety data, report serious incidents, and take action quickly when any issues arise. These changes and expansions mean that manufacturers need to navigate complex landscapes of regulations that govern various aspects of medical device production. The need to comply with these regulations can lead to increased operational costs and may limit the ability to rapidly introduce new products. Changes and expansions in regulations can significantly impact market entry strategies. The evolving landscape often results in longer timelines to get necessary approvals, ultimately hindering a company's ability to enter the market with new products quickly. This can divert resources from other critical areas such as research and development or marketing, potentially impacting overall competitiveness. Due to the complexity of regulatory requirements, companies may consider forming strategic partnerships with local companies that have established regulatory pathways. This can facilitate smoother market entry and compliance with local laws. Companies should establish robust compliance programmes to monitor adherence to both domestic and international regulations. Companies that have proactively adapted their product development processes to comply with new regulations tend to perform better. For example, companies that invested in understanding the MDR and preemptively adjusted their clinical trial protocol to align with the requirements likely gained a competitive edge. The implications of medical device regulations on market entry strategies are profound. Companies should be prepared to navigate an increasingly complex regulatory environment. Successful market entry strategies involve a combination of compliance, strategic partnerships, technological innovation, and localised market research. "Changing regulations impact medical device market entry strategies" was originally created and published by Medical Device Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Billion euro deal: Sanofi buys UK biotech company to expand respiratory vaccine portfolio
In the race to develop next-generation respiratory virus vaccines, French pharmaceutical company Sanofi has agreed to buy Vicebio Ltd., a privately-held biotechnology company headquartered in London, UK. Sanofi said there will be an initial cash payment of $1.15bn (€980 million) for the deal, 'with potential milestone payments of up to $450 million based on development and regulatory achievements'. 'We are excited to join Sanofi', said Emmanuel Hanon, Chief Executive Officer at Vicebio, in a statement. 'Their global scale and deep expertise in vaccine development provide the ideal environment to fully realise the potential of our innovative technology." With the acquisition, Sanofi gets Vicebio's early-stage combination vaccine candidate for two respiratory viruses, the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV). Respiratory infections, affecting millions globally, often appear as cold-like illnesses that could, in severe cases, lead to pneumonia. In respiratory medication, Sanofi already has several vaccines in its portfolio against flu and RSV prevention; this latest acquisition adds a non-mRNA vaccine to its pipeline. mRNA technology is relatively new for vaccines. It teaches the body how to make a protein that triggers an immune response to protect against a specific virus, instead of using a weakened or inactivated germ to trigger this reaction. With the current deal, Sanofi also gets access to Vicebio's Molecular Clamp technology, which stabilises viral proteins in their native shape, triggering a more effective immune response. This technology is expected to speed up vaccine development and simplify manufacturing and distribution. Related EU pharma chief calls for European Nasdaq to boost biotech innovation Doliprane-maker Sanofi confirms exclusive talks with US firm CD&R 'This acquisition furthers Sanofi's dedication to vaccine innovation with the potential to develop next-generation combination vaccines that could provide protection to older adults against multiple respiratory viruses with a single immunisation," said Jean-François Toussaint, global head of research and development vaccines at Sanofi. The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2025, and will not have a significant impact on Sanofi's financial guidance for 2025. The pharma giant's share price was down around 0.4% before 11:00 CEST in Paris.


Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Compass Pathways to Announce Second Quarter Financial Results on July 31, 2025
LONDON & NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Compass Pathways plc (Nasdaq: CMPS), a biotechnology company dedicated to accelerating patient access to evidence-based innovation in mental health, announced today that it will release financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025, and provide an update on recent developments, on July 31, 2025. Compass management will host a conference call at 8:00 am ET (1:00 pm UK) on July 31, 2025. Share Compass management will host a conference call at 8:00 am ET (1:00 pm UK) on July 31, 2025. A live webcast of the call will be available on the Compass Pathways website at: Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results. The webcast will be archived for 30 days. About Compass Pathways Compass Pathways plc (Nasdaq: CMPS) is a biotechnology company dedicated to accelerating patient access to evidence-based innovation in mental health. We are motivated by the need to find better ways to help and empower people with serious mental health conditions who are not helped by existing treatments. We are pioneering a new paradigm for treating mental health conditions focused on rapid and durable responses through the development of our investigational COMP360 synthetic psilocybin treatment, potentially a first in class treatment. COMP360 has Breakthrough Therapy designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and has received Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (ILAP) designation in the UK for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Compass is headquartered in London, UK, with offices in New York in the US. We envision a world where mental health means not just the absence of illness but the ability to thrive.