logo
Aussiewood to Mel Gibson: Save us from Trump's movie tariffs

Aussiewood to Mel Gibson: Save us from Trump's movie tariffs

Malay Mail08-05-2025
SYDNEY, May 8 — Australia's film industry wants actor Mel Gibson to do what he does in his action-hero movies and save the day, by convincing US President Donald Trump to drop his film tariffs which could devastate its A$1 billion (RM2.74 billion) Hollywood business.
Industry leaders said the tariffs would cause a large number of job losses in the local film production sector, drive up ticket prices, and called for US-born Gibson, who launched his career in Australia, to use his role as a Trump adviser to urge the president to reconsider.
In January, Trump hired Gibson as a 'special ambassador' to Hollywood although he didn't elaborate on his role.
'Hopefully Mel Gibson, as one of Trump's advisers in this space, is telling the President that this is a dumb idea,' Kate Carnell, chair of industry body Screen Producers Australia, said in an interview.
Gibson plans to shoot a movie in Italy this year, according to industry media, which could be impacted by the US tariffs.
'For Mel Gibson to make his movie in Italy and then to have a 100 per cent tariff for it to be shown in America is just nonsensical,' said Carnell.
Trump on Sunday announced a 100 per cent tariff on movies produced outside the US, saying the American movie industry was dying a 'very fast death' due to the incentives that other countries were offering to lure filmmakers.
Trump's latest tariff announcement bewildered studio executives who for decades have overseen productions across several continents and could not understand how it would work. It also sent shockwaves through film industries abroad where Hollywood shoots movies for cheaper production costs.
Australian film industry at risk
Since the first Star Wars prequels and Matrix sequels were shot in Sydney in the early 2000s with the Australian dollar near a record-low against the US dollar, Australia's film industry has become enmeshed with Hollywood.
International spending on film and television productions in Australia was about half the industry's total A$1.7 billion expenditure in 2024, says Screen Australia, a government body, which noted the overall figure fell 29 per cent since the prior year partly due to a Hollywood writers' strike.
'One hundred percent tariffs would be devastating for the Australian film industry... we're talking about a lot of jobs (lost), hard to put a number on them,' Carnell said, adding Australia's US film business was worth around A$1 billion. 'People are saying, 'how could they do this? It's so stupid'.'
Carnell said if Hollywood studios spent more shooting all movies in the US, 'their costs would go up, and so the costs to consumers, to people who see movies, would go up as well'.
Kate Marks, CEO of Ausfilm, which connects international studios with Australia, said the US had a 'long and mutually beneficial history' of collaborating on films with Australia.
'We are closely monitoring the situation and awaiting further details and will continue to work with our industry and government partners,' she said.
In the state of Queensland, home to Village Roadshow Studios where Marvel's Thor: Ragnarok and Warner Bros' Aquaman were shot, the state's screen agency said the industry was 'globally connected' and involved collaboration with national and international partners.
'The proposed US film tariff has caused widespread global uncertainty and we're closely monitoring this evolving situation,' CEO Jacqui Feeney said.
A government spokesperson for the state of Victoria, where Docklands Studios Melbourne is based, said the state would always back local screen and production workers.
'Victoria's world-class crews, state-of-the-art studios and award-winning digital and post-production capabilities means Victoria is a destination of choice for global productions,' the spokesperson said. — Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump–Putin summit: What each side wants on Ukraine
Trump–Putin summit: What each side wants on Ukraine

Malay Mail

time26 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Trump–Putin summit: What each side wants on Ukraine

WARSAW, Aug 15 — The US and Russian presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are to meet at a US air base in Alaska today for talks on the Ukraine war. Expectations are high for the first summit between sitting US and Russian presidents in more than four years, but Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart in their visions on how to end the conflict. It will be Putin's first trip to a Western country since launching his invasion in February 2022, as well as his first US visit in 10 years. Here is a look at what each side hopes to achieve from the talks: Russia For Putin, who has faced years of isolation from the West since the invasion, the summit is an opportunity to press Russia's hardline demands for ending the conflict. In a draft peace plan published in June, Russia called on Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions that Moscow claimed to annex in 2022. Ukraine has rejected the idea. Russia has also called on Ukraine to halt its military mobilisation, abandon its Nato ambitions, and for Western countries to immediately stop weapon supplies — something critics say amounts to capitulation. In addition to territory, Russia wants Ukraine to ensure the 'rights and freedoms' of the Russian-speaking population and to prohibit what it calls the 'glorification of Nazism'. It also wants Western sanctions lifted. Ukraine says Russia's allegations of Nazism are absurd and that it already guarantees rights to Russian speakers. Ukraine Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is not scheduled to take part in the summit, but has said there can be no peace deal without its involvement. He has called the meeting a 'personal victory' for Putin. Ukraine has called for an unconditional ceasefire on land, sea and sky as a prerequisite to peace talks. It wants both sides to release all prisoners of war and demanded the return of Ukrainian children it says Russia illegally kidnapped. Ukraine says Russia has forcibly transferred thousands of Ukrainian children into areas under its control since the war began, often adopting them into Russian families and assigning them Russian citizenship. Russia rejects the kidnapping allegations but acknowledges that thousands of children are on its territory. Ukraine says any deal must include security guarantees to prevent Russia from attacking again, and that there should be no restrictions on the number of troops it can deploy on its territory. It says sanctions on Russia can only be lifted gradually and that there should be a way of reimposing them if needed. United States Trump promised he would end the war within '24 hours' after taking office in January. But eight months on, and even after repeated calls with Putin and several visits to Russia by US envoy Steve Witkoff, he has failed to extract any major concessions from the Kremlin. The summit is his first opportunity to broker a deal in person. The US president, author of the book 'Trump: The Art of the Deal' said on Wednesday that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if it did not halt its offensive. The US leader initially said there would be some 'land swapping going on' at the talks, but appeared to walk back after speaking with European leaders on Wednesday. Trump has said he would 'like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly'. But the White House has played down expectations of a breakthrough, describing it as a 'listening exercise' for the former reality TV star. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump said, hinting Zelensky could take part in a subsequent summit. Europe Despite providing military support for Ukraine and hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees, European leaders have been sidelined from the peace talks that may affect the region's security architecture in the future. European representatives were neither invited to the past three meetings between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, nor to the Russia-US talks in Riyadh in February. In a statement last week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the EU Commission warned there could be no meaningful peace without Ukraine's participation. 'Territorial questions concerning Ukraine can be, and will be, negotiated only by the Ukrainian president,' French President Emmanuel Macron said after speaking with Trump on Wednesday. Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer have signalled they are willing to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine once the fighting ends, an idea Russia has vehemently rejected. — AFP

‘Ridiculous': How Washington residents view the new troops in town
‘Ridiculous': How Washington residents view the new troops in town

Malay Mail

time26 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

‘Ridiculous': How Washington residents view the new troops in town

WASHINGTON, Aug 15 — Outside the busiest train station in Washington, newly deployed National Guard troops wearing camouflage lean on a huge military Humvee. Wary residents and curious tourists stop to take photos, while inside the elegant Union Station a string trio plays What a Wonderful World. Christian Calhoun, a 26-year-old consultant who was born and raised in the US capital, told AFP that seeing the troops made him 'more than disappointed — I'm furious.' 'It's a lot of standing around,' he added. Declaring that Washington is overrun by crime and plagued by homeless people, President Donald Trump has deployed 800 National Guard troops, as well as ordering a federal takeover of the city's police department. Over more than an hour on Thursday afternoon, the most that the handful of troops at Union Station interacted with the public was to let a French tourist take a selfie with them. Larry Janezich, an 81-year-old resident, said he had not seen the troops taking part in 'any kind of meaningful action that is dedicated to the prevention of crime.' Patricia Darby, a 65-year-old retiree, said that the troops 'don't want to be here,' pointing to how some had their faces covered. Calhoun said he does 'feel bad' for them as they wore heavy combat gear as temperatures soared above 33 degrees Celsius. Homeless encampments are seen near Washington Circle in Washington August 14, 2025. — AFP pic 'Fake news' On his Truth Social platform, Trump this week described Washington as 'under siege from thugs and killers,' with higher crime rates than 'many of the most violent Third World Countries.' Residents outside Union Station rejected the apocalyptic image. 'It's ridiculous, and it really just shows how (Trump) sees the people that live here,' Calhoun said. 'It's totally false, and obviously promulgated on his media to justify an unwarranted exercise of federal power,' Janezich said. Gerry Cosgrove, a 62-year-old tourist from the Scottish city of Edinburgh only in Washington for two days, had a simple response when asked about Trump's portrayal of the city: 'To quote a phrase: fake news.' Trump has also ordered homeless people to 'move out' of Washington. 'Where are they going to go?' Darby asked, after fetching a bottle of water for a homeless person in the heat. A Department of Mental Health and Human Services sign is posted near homeless encampments in Washington Circle in Washington August 14, 2025. — AFP pic Randy Kindle, who volunteers with a protest group in a tent outside Union Station, told AFP he was afraid that homeless people could now end up in confinement or jail 'when all they need is help.' Guadalupe, a homeless man in his late 70s originally from Mexico, told AFP that the troops had asked him to move on Wednesday night. 'They have no manners,' he said in Spanish. 'I almost felt sick' during the interaction, he added. Calhoun said he had mostly seen the troops outside train stations, adding that he noticed they had 'a lot of focus on cannabis use.' Washington legalised cannabis use on private property in 2015, however it is still prohibited under federal law. Several residents also raised the cost of deploying the troops in their city. 'It's a waste of money — I think DC was safe,' Darby said. — AFP

Why Putin is talking nukes before Trump summit on Ukraine
Why Putin is talking nukes before Trump summit on Ukraine

Malay Mail

time26 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Why Putin is talking nukes before Trump summit on Ukraine

LONDON, Aug 15 — Russian President Vladimir Putin said on the eve of a summit with US President Donald Trump that their countries might strike a new deal on nuclear weapons as part of a wider effort to strengthen peace. The summit is about Ukraine, so why talk about nukes? Putin has been under pressure from Trump to agree to end the three-and-a-half-year-old war in Ukraine, something Moscow says is part of a complex of security issues that have raised East-West tensions to their most dangerous level since the Cold War. With Russian forces gradually advancing in Ukraine, Putin has rebuffed Kyiv's calls for a full and immediate ceasefire. But if the summit makes progress towards a new arms control treaty, Putin could argue he is engaging on wider peace issues. That could help him persuade Trump that now is not the right time to impose new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its oil and other key exports, as the US leader has threatened. It could also be part of a broader drive to improve relations with Washington, including on trade and economic issues, where the Kremlin says there is huge untapped potential. Why has Putin repeatedly talked up Russia's nuclear arsenal? Throughout the war, Putin has delivered veiled threats about using nuclear missiles and warned that entering a direct confrontation with Russia could lead to World War Three. They have included verbal statements, war games, and lowering Russia's threshold for using nuclear weapons. The fact that Russia has more nuclear weapons than any other country gives it a stature in this domain that far exceeds its conventional military or economic power, allowing Putin to face Trump as an equal on the world stage when it comes to security. How many nuclear weapons do Russia and the US have? According to the Federation of American Scientists, Russia and the United States have estimated military stockpiles of 4,309 and 3,700 nuclear warheads, respectively. China trails with an estimated 600. What does the existing US-Russia nuclear treaty say? Signed by then-US President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev in 2010, the New START treaty caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the United States and Russia can deploy. Each is limited to no more than 1,550, and a maximum of 700 long-range missiles and bombers. Strategic weapons are those designed by each side to hit the enemy's centres of military, economic, and political power. The treaty came into force in 2011 and was extended in 2021 for five more years after US President Joe Biden took office. In 2023, Putin suspended Russia's participation, but Moscow said it would continue to observe the warhead limits. The treaty expires on February 5. Security analysts expect both sides to breach the limits if it is not extended or replaced. Trump said for the first time last month he would like to maintain the limits set in the treaty. 'That's not an agreement you want expiring. We're starting to work on that,' he said on July 25. 'When you take off nuclear restrictions, that's a big problem.' What are the other nuclear points of contention? In a symptom of the underlying tensions, Trump this month said he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia because of what he called threatening comments by Medvedev about the possibility of war with the US. The Kremlin played down the move but said 'everyone should be very, very careful' with nuclear rhetoric. Separately, an arms race looms over shorter- and intermediate-range missiles, which can also carry nuclear warheads. During Trump's first presidency, in 2019, he pulled the US out of a treaty that had abolished all ground-based weapons in this category. Moscow denied his accusations that it was cheating. The United States plans to start deploying weapons, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles, previously placed mainly on ships, as well as new hypersonic missiles, in Germany from 2026. Russia said this month it no longer observes any restrictions on where it might deploy intermediate-range missiles. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store