Flippant ‘Alligator Alcatraz' name obscures the unjust, dehumanizing truth
An open letter to the editors and producers of our nation's newsrooms:
I am writing today out of deep concern over the language being used by many media outlets to describe the immigrant detention center in Florida currently known as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' As an English teacher of nearly 20 years, I understand that language matters. While it may seem like a harmless nickname or a clever turn of phrase, referring to this facility by such a flippant term has dangerous consequences for public understanding and moral clarity.
Let's call this place what it is: a government-run detention camp, where human beings — including children — are being held in conditions that have been widely criticized by humanitarian organizations. Hundreds held there are facing no criminal charges. A catchy nickname, especially one coined by the administration responsible for its operation, serves to sanitize and trivialize the very real suffering taking place there. It diminishes public outrage and makes it easier for these facilities to continue existing in the shadows of normalized cruelty.
The words we choose shape public perception and, ultimately, public policy. Both history and current events offer chilling reminders of how euphemisms can be weaponized to obscure injustice.
During World War II, The United States referred to the unconstitutional incarceration of Japanese Americans as 'relocation,' and the German Nazi government used the term 'Sonderbehandlung' (which translates to 'special treatment') in the context of the Holocaust.
More recently the first Trump administration's Zero Tolerance Policy on immigration, led to the creation of detention centers for migrant children who were taken from their parents. They were branded 'tender-age shelters.'
Right now, as our government publicly condemns China for rounding up Uyghur people and sending them to 'reeducation camps,' it is sending people snatched from their jobs and immigration hearings to a camp that sounds like a Disney attraction.
The mass media has no control over what an administration that has no shame will do. However, it does have a responsibility, not to repeat the government's talking points, but to speak truth to power. Going along with that name minimizes the gravity of a human rights crisis. The fact that this nickname has been circulated by officials, or gained social media traction, does not mean it should be perpetuated by responsible journalists.
I urge you, as people with power to shape public conversation, to reconsider how your organization refers to this facility. Call it what it is: a detention center, an immigrant holding facility, or — if you have the courage to name the moral reality — a modern-day concentration camp. The stakes are too high for us to play along with euphemisms. People's lives and dignity hang in the balance.
Sincerely,
Nikki Kincaid
Nikki Kincaid is a proud lifelong Missourian, a veteran teacher and a believer in plainspoken truth.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Catherine Rampell Becomes Latest Washington Post Writer to Exit Paper
The new MSNBC host says she accepted a buyout, adding to the growing list of staffers who have left following owner Jeff Bezos' revamp of the opinion section Another day, another Washington Post writer exiting the paper. This time it is columnist Catherine Rampell, who said on Wednesday she had accepted a buyout offer from the paper she has worked at for the last 11 years. Rampell has covered a number of topics for WaPo, including politics, economics and public policy. More from TheWrap Catherine Rampell Becomes Latest Washington Post Writer to Exit Paper Trump Appeared 'Multiple Times' in Epstein Documents, New WSJ Report Says Candace Owens Sued for Defamation by French First Lady Brigitte Macron Over 'Knowingly False' Claims She's Transgender 'Daily Show' Jokes Trump's Election Theft Claim Against Obama Is 'So Old Jeffrey Epstein Wouldn't Date It' | Video The 40-year-old writer has also been a frequent critic of President Trump, ripping the president on a number of topics, from his 'Liberation Day' tariff plan, which she called 'tariffmageddon,' to his 'Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship' executive order in January. She called the EO the 'start of an Orwellian effort to root out wrongthink from government ranks and the private sector.' Rampell's exit comes just a few months after she joined MSNBC as a co-host of 'The Weekend: Primetime,' and also follows WaPo owner Jeff Bezos' revamping of the paper's opinion section to focus on 'two key pillars': personal liberties and free markets. A number of prominent WaPo staffers left soon after, including opinion editor David Shipley, who resigned immediately. Columnist Ruth Marcus, who had been at the paper for 40 years, quit weeks later, after she said a column 'expressing concern' over Bezos' new direction for the opinion section was 'spiked.' More WaPo staffers have left recently, including columnist Jonathan Capehart, who accepted a buyout on Monday, as well as Dave Jorgenson, WaPo's 'TikTok Guy.' A person familiar with the newsroom told TheWrap on Monday it would not be surprising to see more people leave the paper this week, as it is offering buyouts to those who do not 'feel aligned' with the paper's 'reinvention' through the end of July. The post Catherine Rampell Becomes Latest Washington Post Writer to Exit Paper appeared first on TheWrap. Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
'No One Wants to Buy Elon's Products,' Says Investor
Ross Gerber, President and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki, reacts to a rough earnings report as revenue for the EV maker misses estimates. Tesla has felt the impact of founder Elon Musk's political entanglements, leading to a sales slump. (Source: Bloomberg)
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Bondi briefed Trump that his name was in Epstein files
When Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Donald Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, she told him that his name appeared in the files, sources familiar with the discussion told CNN. The conversation, which also included Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, was characterized by two White House officials as a 'routine briefing' that covered the scope of the Justice Department's findings. Trump's name appearing in the files, they said, was not the sole focus of the discussions. Bondi also raised in the meeting that several names of high-profile figures were also mentioned, and that investigators did not find evidence of a so-called client list or evidence refuting that Epstein died by suicide, the officials said. The sources familiar with the department's review said the files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims that the Justice Department found not to be credible, including those relating to Trump. It wasn't clear in what context Trump's name appeared in the files. Like many high-powered people in 1990s New York, Trump was an associate of Epstein's, who worked to cultivate celebrities to burnish his business. The revelation that his name appears in the documents does little to advance previous knowledge about his ties to the late sex offender. 'The White House is not surprised by this – Trump's name was present in the binders that Bondi produced and handed out,' one of the White House officials said, adding that many of the materials already released by the Justice Department had included mention of the president's name. 'The White House does not view this as groundbreaking or new or surprising at all,' the official said, adding that there is no evidence that Trump was involved in any wrongdoing. 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement to CNN, referring to Epstein. 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media, just like the Obama Russiagate scandal, which President Trump was right about.' The Wall Street Journal first reported that Bondi informed Trump in May about his name appearing in the documents. The revelations about the meeting contradict Trump's more recent denials that he was told he was in the files. Pressed last week on whether Bondi had told him he was named in the documents, he said, 'No, no. She's given us just a very quick briefing.' Trump has struggled to tamp down weeks of backlash over the administration's decision not to release more documents related to the Epstein investigation — a move that infuriated a vocal segment of the MAGA base and put the president at odds with some of his most ardent supporters. Inside the White House, officials were outraged that Bondi did not redact Trump's name from publicly available materials contained in Epstein binders distributed to influencers in February, sources said. Her failure to protect the president during the episode has been a longstanding point of contention between the DOJ and the White House. 'The DOJ and FBI reviewed the Epstein Files and reached the conclusion set out in the July 6 memo,' Bondi and Blanche said in a statement. 'Nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts. As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings.' The White House has dismissed the ongoing focus on the Epstein files, arguing that it's distracting from the administration's accomplishments and aiding Democrats' efforts to damage the president. But a growing and bipartisan chorus of lawmakers have since called for a full release of the documents, forcing Republican leaders on Capitol Hill to cut short their legislative session to avoid taking a series of votes on the matter. A Wall Street Journal report last week – about a letter bearing Trump's name and the outline of a naked woman that was included in an album given to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2023 – has also ratcheted up the pressure on Trump. Trump denied writing the letter and has since sued the Wall Street Journal over its publication of that article.
