logo
Trump's DOJ blames egg prices on California in new lawsuit

Trump's DOJ blames egg prices on California in new lawsuit

President Donald Trump's administration sued California over egg prices on Wednesday, claiming the state's voter-approved law protecting hens and pigs from being kept in small cages has driven costs skyward and violates U.S. farming laws and regulations. The suit did not mention that the California law, Proposition 12, has been upheld by the Supreme Court.
'California has contributed to the historic rise in egg prices by imposing unnecessary red tape on the production of eggs,' lawyers for Trump's Justice Department said in the lawsuit, filed in federal court in Los Angeles. Under federal law since 1970, they contended, no state can impose its own standards on the 'quality, condition, weight, quantity or grade' of eggs or their production that differ from nationwide standards.
Prop 12, approved by more than 62% of California's voters in 2018, requires producers of breeding pigs to house them in cages that give them room to turn around, and requires cage-free settings for egg-laying hens. It does not directly regulate out-of-state farmers but banned the sale in California of meats produced from animals in other states that violate the California standards.
It was challenged in court by the National Pork Producers Council and allied groups, who argued that Prop 12 would place unconstitutional burdens on interstate commerce while driving up prices nationwide.
But the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling in May 2023, said the state had authority to protect California from practices it considers inhumane.
'In a functioning democracy, policy choices like these usually belong to the people and their elected representatives,' Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, wrote in the lead opinion. He said many state laws have economic effects in other states, but they violate the Constitution only if they were intended to interfere with commerce in those states.
Prop 12 was put on hold during the court case and did not take effect until January 2024. The National Pork Producers Council and other agricultural groups have continued to campaign against it, seeking federal legislation that would preempt the California law.
Trump, meanwhile, has blamed former President Joe Biden for the increase in egg prices during the last two years of Biden's administration. Biden 'let the prices of eggs get out of control,' Trump told Congress in March, and 'we're working hard to get it down.'
Economists, however, have blamed soaring egg prices on an outbreak of bird flu that began in 2022. The prices continued to rise in the first months of Trump's current administration before declining to near their former levels as conditions improved.
Wednesday's lawsuit by the Trump administration contended Prop 12 was legally defective without any reference to the previous case or the Supreme Court ruling. The 'cage standards' set by the California ballot measure 'do not advance consumer welfare' and must give way to federal regulation, the Justice Department's lawyers said.
They also blamed an earlier California ballot measure, Prop 2 of 2008, which prohibited farmers in the state from keeping egg-laying hens and other animals in confines that 'prevent them from 'laying down, standing up, and fully extending his or her limbs, and turning around freely.'
Federal law sets standards to ensure that 'eggs and egg products are wholesome and properly labeled and packaged to protect the health and welfare of consumers,' the administration's lawyers said, and states cannot impose stricter standards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

San Francisco Chronicle​

time9 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he is considering 'taking away' the U.S. citizenship of a longtime rival, actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland 'if they want her.' The two have criticized each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive GOP-backed tax breaks and spending cuts plan. It's just the latest threat by Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk. But O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Musk, who was born in South Africa. O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to U.S. citizenship. The U.S. State Department notes on its website that U.S. citizens by birth or naturalization may relinquish U.S. nationality by taking certain steps – but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the Fourteen Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. 'The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born U.S. citizen," Frost said in an email Saturday. 'In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people.' Responding to Trump Saturday, O'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and 'add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn.'

Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

Associated Press

time15 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he is considering 'taking away' the U.S. citizenship of a longtime rival, actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland 'if they want her.' The two have criticized each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive GOP-backed tax breaks and spending cuts plan. It's just the latest threat by Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk. But O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Musk, who was born in South Africa. O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to U.S. citizenship. The U.S. State Department notes on its website that U.S. citizens by birth or naturalization may relinquish U.S. nationality by taking certain steps – but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the Fourteen Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. 'The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born U.S. citizen,' Frost said in an email Saturday. 'In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people.' O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage. Responding to Trump Saturday, O'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and 'add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn.'

CJI Gavai Highlights Systemic Legal Challenges and Calls for Reform-Oriented Legal Education
CJI Gavai Highlights Systemic Legal Challenges and Calls for Reform-Oriented Legal Education

Time Business News

time23 minutes ago

  • Time Business News

CJI Gavai Highlights Systemic Legal Challenges and Calls for Reform-Oriented Legal Education

Chief Justice of India Dr. B.R. Gavai, in a series of addresses delivered at NALSAR University of Law and Osmania University in Hyderabad, underscored the pressing challenges facing the Indian legal system and called for reforms in legal education and practice. Speaking at NALSAR's convocation ceremony, Justice Gavai remarked on the prolonged delays in Indian trials, noting that legal proceedings can sometimes extend for decades, with undertrial prisoners occasionally declared innocent only after spending years in incarceration. He emphasized that India's brightest legal minds must contribute to addressing these structural inefficiencies. Quoting American federal judge Jed S. Rakoff, Justice Gavai echoed a sentiment of cautious optimism, suggesting that meaningful reform remains possible through collective engagement. In his address, Justice Gavai also urged graduating law students to exercise financial prudence when considering foreign legal education. While acknowledging the value of international exposure, he cautioned against succumbing to peer pressure or incurring substantial educational debt. He cited instances where young lawyers had taken loans between ₹50–70 lakh to pursue degrees abroad—funds that, he suggested, could alternatively serve as capital to begin independent practice or build professional infrastructure. He encouraged students to seek global education through scholarships or at a later, more stable stage in their careers. Justice Gavai further identified a growing trend of Indian law graduates pursuing education abroad as indicative of deeper systemic concerns, particularly the perceived inadequacy of India's postgraduate legal education and research infrastructure. Upon returning to India, he observed, many scholars face institutional resistance, lack of structured research pathways, limited funding, and non-transparent hiring practices. He advocated for the creation of merit-based, nurturing academic environments that offer dignity and support to legal researchers and educators. Addressing the emotional and psychological pressures within the legal profession, Justice Gavai acknowledged the demanding nature of legal practice, characterized by long working hours and high expectations. He urged young professionals not to suppress their struggles and to seek support when needed, emphasizing the importance of mental well-being in sustaining a healthy legal ecosystem. Later, delivering a lecture at Osmania University on the role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in the framing of the Indian Constitution, the Chief Justice highlighted the constitutional balance between federalism and centralism. Referring to critiques that the Constitution was either too federal or too central, Justice Gavai reiterated Ambedkar's stance that the Indian Constitution was designed to maintain national unity in both peace and conflict. He commended the Constitution's resilience in the face of internal disturbances and external threats over the past 75 years and called upon citizens and legal professionals alike to uphold the vision of achieving economic, social, and political justice. Justice Gavai also expressed personal gratitude for visiting Osmania University, which had conferred an honorary upon Dr. Ambedkar in 1953. The events were also attended by Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy, Supreme Court judge Justice P.S. Narasimha, and Acting Chief Justice of the Telangana High Court, Justice Sujoy Paul. News Source TIME BUSINESS NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store