
I'm the OKC mayor. Copying Indy's sports strategy brought us to the NBA Finals.
Thanks to the exploits of our basketball teams, the cities behind that success are also in the spotlight. From this exposure, we both anticipate benefits for years to come.
Students of Oklahoma City history will see it as poetic that we are facing Indianapolis at such an important moment in our city's history. I suspect you might not know why, so I felt compelled to share.
In the early 1990s, for nearly two years, our two cities competed vigorously and publicly for a United Airlines maintenance facility that was purported to bring over 7,000 new jobs. In October 1991, United chose Indianapolis, despite Oklahoma City's herculean efforts, including voter approval of a sales tax to incentivize United. It was reported that we offered $200 million cash.
The competition between cities for major economic developments is relatively common, and this opportunity ended up bringing far fewer and less stable jobs than were promised. And so this tale might have largely been forgotten had it not been the catalyst for what came next in Oklahoma City.
Our mayor at the time, Ron Norick, visited with United Airlines leadership after the failed bid. The feedback and his own conclusions delivered clarity. Our city might have offered friendly people and easy living, but our downtown was dead, we had no professional sports and, generally, living in OKC was like living in an alternate universe outside of American pop culture.
Norick was determined to learn from this defeat. So he got on a plane and flew to Indianapolis. There, he found a vibrant downtown and two major league professional sports teams.
Like OKC, Indianapolis lacked mountains or an ocean, but it had a central meeting place and reasons for people to rally there. Through its downtown and its sports teams, and all the things that come with those amenities, Indianapolis offered a quality of life appropriate to a city its size.
OKC was also a pretty large city, but after being hollowed out by urban renewal, an oil bust and a banking crisis, it felt more like a place where a lot of people just happened to live.
Indianapolis — previously our foil — was now our inspiration.
Norick decided to propose an initiative that was focused on our city's quality of life, with a particular emphasis on entertainment downtown.
His initiative would be called Metropolitan Area Projects and would entail a temporary one-cent sales tax to fund the construction of nine projects (including the arena that is hosting Games 1 and 2 of the NBA Finals). The priorities might have seemed superficial, but as it turned out, our city's lack of such amenities was proving to be an existential crisis.
In December 1993, our voters narrowly passed MAPS with 53% support. Sixteen months later, a domestic terrorist bombed our federal office building, murdering 168 of our neighbors. That was our darkest day, and it followed nearly 15 years of adversity. But, by 1998, MAPS projects were beginning to open. From that point forward, Oklahoma City has been on an uninterrupted upward trajectory that has become one of the greatest urban renaissance stories ever told.
Opinion: Jim Irsay built everything we love about downtown Indianapolis
OKC is now the 20th-largest city in the U.S., we have one of the lowest unemployment rates in the nation, we have major developments coming online every month and we now boast all the trappings of a great American city, from James Beard-winning restaurants to hip entertainment districts. And we have not stopped investing. In fact, we are now on MAPS 4. Its $1.1 billion is being deployed as we speak.
Our downtown has gone from one hotel in 1993 to nearly 30. And, like Indianapolis, we have leveraged sports. In fact, I joined our chamber of commerce and dozens of city leaders on a 2006 trip to Indianapolis, where we toured all of your sports venues, including your NBA arena. Less than two years later, our Thunder began their NBA journey. We are also the home of the Women's College World Series and seven events of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.
Thirty-four years after our United Airlines loss to Indianapolis, Oklahoma City is now in the NBA Finals, an achievement that feels like the capstone of an amazing American success story. It has been a journey inspired by you. Should another chapter be written in the weeks ahead, I regret to tell you that you'll have no one but yourselves to blame.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
17 minutes ago
- UPI
Scheffler, golf's best embrace revamped Tour Championship, $40M purse
1 of 5 | American Scottie Scheffler is a heavy favorite to win the 2025 Tour Championship. File Photo by Hugo Philpott/UPI | License Photo Aug. 21 (UPI) -- Unlike last year, Scottie Scheffler won't start the Tour Championship well under par. But the world No. 1 is still heavily favored in the revamped tournament. The season-ending tournament will air from Thursday through Sunday on Golf Channel, NBC and Peacock. Scheffler and the 30-player field will tee off Thursday morning at East Lake Golf Club in Atlanta. They will be even par as the start, instead of using the previous format, which allowed players to amass significant under-par scores entering each tournament in the FedExCup playoffs. "When it comes to this week, we all start even par, and it's time to go chase what you want," Scheffler told reporters Wednesday. Rory McIlroy, who holds a record three FedEx Cup titles, said he "didn't hate the starting strokes" format, but that wasn't the majority opinion. "It has a different feel," McIlroy told reporters Tuesday. "Any one of the 30 has a chance to win the FedExCup this year, which is obviously a lot different than it's been in previous years. "I think with that, it's a clean slate for everyone, and it's a great opportunity for one of the guys that maybe wasn't a huge part of the season to put their hand up and have a chance to win the big prize at the end of the year. "It's also a great opportunity for some of the guys who have had great years to sort of rubber-stamp the season a little bit and end on a really, really positive note. There is still a lot to play for this week." Despite Scheffler not holding the advantage before teeing off at East Lake, he is a near-historic favorite, with the second-shortest odds to win since Tiger Woods in 2009. McIlroy has the second-best odds, ahead of Tommy Fleetwood, Ludvig Aberg and Russell Henley as the Top-5 expected contenders. Justin Thomas, Patrick Cantlay, J.J. Spaun, Sam Burns, Viktor Hovland, Collin Morikawa are among other Top-10 expected contenders for the $10 million first-place prize. "It has the opportunity to be an unbelievable week in the sense of, you could have 15, 20 guys that have a chance to win on Sunday, which is pretty cool when it comes to in terms of the FedExCup," Thomas said. "It's more just playing the tournament. With the starting strokes, it was very, very dependent on where you were." The hefty prize purse will bring the second-place finisher $5 million, higher than the first-place prize for any major. Third- and fourth-place finishers will take home $3.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively. Scheffler, who placed third in the FedEx St. Jude Championship and won last week's BMW Championship to start the playoffs, is not only looking to add to his 2025 prize purse of over $23.9 million, but also become the first player in history to win consecutive FedExCup crowns. "To win tournaments, you have to play good golf at the right time, and if you want to win our season-long race, you have to play really good golf at the end of the season," Scheffler said. "Going into this week, we all start even par, and if you want to win the FedExCup, you've got to go win this week." Rain is in forecast throughout the week and weekend in Atlanta, which could slow down the faster greens on the 7,490-yard, par-70 course. Longer roughs and bunker placements should trigger strategical tests for the field. Scheffler and McIlroy will tee off in the final group at 2 p.m. EDT Thursday at East Lake. Chris Gotterup and Akshay Bhatia will start the round at 11:16 a.m. in Atlanta. Tour Championship All times EDT Thursday First-round coverage from 1 to 6 p.m. on Golf Channel; Stream at 11 a.m. on ESPN+ Friday Second-round coverage from 1 to 6 p.m. on Golf Channel; Stream at 11:15 a.m. on ESPN+ Saturday Third-round coverage from 1 to 2:30 p.m. on Golf Channel and 2:30 to 7 p.m. on NBC and Peacock; Stream at noon on ESPN+ Sunday Final-round coverage from noon to 1:30 p.m. on Golf Channel and 1:30 to 6 p.m. on NBC and Peacock; Stream at 11 a.m. on ESPN+


USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Social Security is run like a Ponzi scheme. My generation has to end it.
This is why you shouldn't run government programs like Ponzi schemes. Some poor group inevitably gets the rug of benefits pulled out from under them. "A government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth,' Ronald Reagan once quipped, and nowhere is that better demonstrated than in the Social Security Administration. Social Security is in dire financial straits. The administration's expenses have already exceeded revenue for years, and the program's cash reserves are quickly depleting. The program has outlived its viability and should be reformed or dissolved. However, action remains unlikely. Our politicians have no interest in ripping benefits away from baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, at everyone else's expense. Generation Z, born between 1997 to 2012, is held hostage in a program that won't work for them because our politicians refuse to reduce benefits for America's boomers. The Social Security rug will be pulled out from Gen Z If Social Security is my money, then why can't I withdraw from it? While I obviously understand why and am asking that question with snark, the answer serves as a good reminder of why the program needs to be cut. The reality is that my Social Security benefits are not my money. There is no account with my name on it accumulating interest annually, or even just holding my contributions at a static total. Instead, my contributions to the system are only being made for the promise that one day a younger generation will pay into the system on my behalf. However, recent issues have made that structure unsustainable. Due to a collapse of the American birth rate, the program is expected to be unable to pay the full promised benefits to retirees within the decade. This will manifest in a 24% across-the-board reduction in benefits. Still, our politicians have done nothing to resolve the problems with the program out of fear that they will need to make cuts that are unpopular among older Americans. Social Security is a hostage situation in which nobody is willing to kill the program because of the political blowback. The most frustrating part is that it is America's wealthiest generation that has Gen Z in a bind over government benefits. Opinion: Trump accounts give newborns $1,000. It could transform generational wealth in US. Gen Z is held hostage by Social Security The collective thinking on Social Security is a twofold problem. One is a problem of information, and the other is a problem of sunk-cost fallacy. Social Security reform is an admittedly in-the-weeds topic, and I can't expect the majority of Americans to be particularly well-versed on the details. Many Americans don't even understand the basics, such as how Social Security is funded. Nearly 1 in 4 believe Social Security is a personal retirement savings account, in which their contributions are the same dollars they withdraw later in life. The result is that most people clutch their pearls at the suggestion that the program has run its course. Roughly 8 in 10 Americans oppose making cuts to the program. The second part of the issue, however, is that there are more people subscribing to their own sunk cost in the program than are not. As people have invested more of their paychecks into Social Security, with benefits simultaneously becoming closer by the day, their cost-benefit changes. The generational divide on this issue is staggering. Roughly 52% of baby boomers would prefer to raise taxes, compared with just 13% who would rather cut benefits. Gen Z is the opposite, with 49% preferring to cut benefits and just 20% favoring a tax increase. A third of both generations (the fiscally illiterate third) would opt to borrow money to pay for Social Security. Opinion: Gen Z has become lonely and antisocial. We have only ourselves to blame. Young people are overwhelmingly more favorable toward killing the program because the total contributions we have made are so little and our prospects of benefits are so far into the future. Boomers are met with the opposite dynamic. However, even we are likely to fall victim to the sunk cost of the program after a certain point. By the time we are in our 40s, Gen Z's eagerness to end Social Security will probably recede. This is why you shouldn't run government programs like Ponzi schemes, because some poor group inevitably gets the rug of benefits pulled out from under them, or the program has to continue on forever. Neither option is a good one, but it's the choice in front of America as we near Social Security's insolvency. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.


Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
UK Private Sector Grows at Fastest Pace in a Year, PMI Shows
The UK private sector expanded at the strongest pace in 12 months, according to a closely watched survey that suggests businesses are starting to shake off the impact of Labour's tax rises. S&P Global's purchasing managers' index increased to 53 in August, up from 51.5 the month before and well above the 51.6 economists were expecting, according to provisional estimates published Thursday. It was the fourth consecutive month above the 50 threshold indicating expansion.