Fast Guns gangsters sentenced to life for killing five-year-old Valentino Grootetjie in crossfire
Image: Supplied
Two members of the Fast Guns gang have been sentenced to life imprisonment for the 2019 murder of five-year-old Valentino Grootetjie.
The little boy was murdered in Lavender Hill on December 21, 2019.
On Tuesday, Carlo Hofmeester, 34, and Chadwin Isaacs, 30, were sentenced in the Western Cape High Court.
They were awaiting trial prisoners for five years.
The duo was convicted on charges of murder, contravention of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (Poca), nine counts of attempted murder, two counts of illegal possession of firearms, and two counts of illegal possession of ammunition.
State Advocate Leon Snyman managed to prove to the court that the duo were members of the Fast Guns gang who were engaged in a drug turf war with the Mongrels gang in Lavender Hill and surrounding areas at the time.
Valentino Grootetjie, 5, was shot in the head as he shielded his younger brother from bullets.
Image: Supplied
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
On December 21, 2019, members of the Mongrels gang gathered in Drury Court in Lavender Hill at a known 'pela post' (a drug den) where users congregate, smoke, and socialise. This is Mongrel territory. The target of the shooting was a member of the Mongrels gang who was on the premises.
At number 37 Drury Court, five-year-old Valentino Grootetjie was playing in the yard when gunshots rang out. The young boy was shot in the head while shielding his two-year-old brother from the gunfire of two gangsters. He died just metres from the kitchen door.
This was after the gunmen tried to kill an alleged drug dealer who was in the yard at the time, speaking to a woman who had been visiting the family.
The court heard that when one of the victims whom the duo attempted to murder saw Hofmeester running towards him as he came from the shop, he suspected he was up to no good. When he reached the gate of the young boy's home, he warned the people inside. But, as he attempted to close the gate, Hofmeester grabbed him, and he managed to pull himself loose and run away.
Valentino's family with the investigating officer, Sergent Maphukata and State Prosecutor Advocate Leon Snyman outside the Western Cape High Court.
Image: Supplied
The witness stated he saw Hofmeester open the gate, look around, and start firing shots in the yard. Isaacs also ran towards the yard, opened the gate, and fired shots. Both shooters ran away after. Two women, also attempted murder victims identified as seen Hofmeester shooting in the yard. They swore at him and he fired a shot at them. They retreated.
The intended target of the Mongrels gang was also one of the attempted murder victims. The State handed in ballistic evidence collected at the scene that showed the court the two firearms used during the shooting.
In the six-week trial, Advocate Snyman called eight witnesses, including Valentino's parents, a previous investigator, the current investigator, a gun expert, and a ballistics expert.
A trial within a trial was held where the accused unsuccessfully challenged the admissibility of their warning statements.
Valentino Grootetjie killed in Lavender Hill
Image: file
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
High Court rules against NPA's extradition request for Richard Payne
Some of the accused in the matter. From left: Obakeng Stephen Mookeletsi, Sybil Ngcobo, Valdis Ntsieni Ramaano, Brian Hlongwa, and Reatile Kingdom Lolwane. Image: Baldwin Ndaba / Independent Newspapers The National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA's) bid to extradite fugitive businessman Richard Payne from the UK to face charges in the R1.2 billion graft case involving former Gauteng Health MEC Brian Hlongwa has hit a brick wall. Suspended director of public prosecutions, Gauteng local division Andrew Chauke, submitted an extradition request to the UK government in September 2022 to get Payne to return to South Africa to face 258 counts of contravention of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, racketeering, fraud, corruption and money laundering in the long-running R1.2bn irregular tender case between 2006 and 2010. Payne is wanted in the country in relation to the matter involving one of his companies, 3P Consulting, and various others, including Ukwakha Design, Midnight Masquerade Properties 72, and Golden Pond Trading 363. His other co-accused, besides Hlongwa, who also served as ANC chief whip in the Gauteng provincial legislature, are former Gauteng Health Department employees, directors of companies, and their business partners – Obakeng Stephen Mookeletsi, Sybil Nomhle Ngcobo, Valdis Ntsieni Ramaano, Abul Kalam Mohammed Mahmudur Rahman, and Reatile Kingdom Lolwane, according to the NPA. In a judgment handed down on August 2, Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, Acting Judge Lindsey Kilmartin reviewed and set aside Chauke's extradition request dated September 26, 2022, to the UK government. Acting Judge Kilmartin declared the extradition request inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid. She also declared that Chauke and National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi have no authority to submit an extradition request on behalf of South Africa to the UK. According to Acting Judge Kilmartin, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in May last year ruled that only the Minister of Justice in his/her capacity as a member of the national executive of South Africa has the power to make an extradition request. The SCA decision was made in South African citizen Johnathan Richard Schultz's attempt to thwart the NPA's extradition request to face charges of theft and sale of unwrought precious metals dating back to 2019. In the Schultz matter, the NPA filed its application for leave to appeal at the Constitutional Court three-and-a-half months late, and Acting Judge Kilmartin stated that this means the SCA judgment stands and is the law which must be applied. Additionally, the SCA found that international law makes it clear that the executive arm of the government is empowered to engage with foreign states in the international law community and the Minister of Justice is the functionary who signs extradition treaties on behalf of South Africa and s/he is the functionary responsible for performing all acts necessary to give effect to the treaty. The NPA was unsuccessful in its application to stay Payne's review application pending the outcome of its Schultz application for leave to appeal at the apex court. 'This is not a case where duplication of judicial resources is taking place and the stay requested by the NPA respondents (Chauke and Batohi) cannot be granted merely on the basis that the Constitutional Court 'may yet establish a new test or understanding of the relevant facts and law'," the acting judge stated. In April, the UK's King's Bench Division allowed Payne's appeal of an earlier March 2024 order sending his case to the Secretary of State for the Home Department, who made an extradition order in May last year, and found that the extradition proceedings against him were an abuse of process but there was no basis to show that the government of South Africa, as prosecutor, had manipulated the court process. Prosecutors accuse the group of committing a range of irregularities, including awarding of tenders, irregular payments, and fraudulent financial mismanagement, with 3P Consulting and its associated companies securing lucrative state contracts by exploiting personal relationships and illegal dealings within the department. Earlier this year, the NPA said the accused allegedly facilitated corruption through inflated contracts, unauthorised payments, and diversion of funds intended for public services. The alleged offences led to the department misusing its budget, with over R347 million in irregular payments, which include false claims for project management services and extra charges that were not part of the contracts.
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Supreme Court upholds 20-year sentence for former Icasa chairperson Rubben Mohlaloga
Zelda Venter | Published 3 hours ago Convicted former Independent Communications Authority of SA (Icasa) chairperson Rubben Mohlaloga will have to serve his 20-year jail sentence for his role in defrauding the Agri-Broad-Base Black Economic Empowerment Fund (AgriBBBEE), which was established to assist previously disadvantaged farmers. The Supreme Court of Appeal turned down his appeal against his conviction and sentence, and Judge Fayeeza Kathree-Setiloane, who wrote the judgment, had strong words regarding the conduct of Mohlaloga. Mohlaloga, formerly ANC Youth League deputy president, turned to the SCA after the high court rejected his appeal bid. He was earlier convicted in the regional court of fraud and contravention of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA). The regional court sentenced him to 15 years' imprisonment on each count and ordered that he serve an effective 20 years' imprisonment. Mohlaloga, a member of Parliament and Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture at the time, colluded with others to secure a R6-million grant under false pretences. The AgriBBBEE was approved by Parliament to assist previously disadvantaged farmers financially. Its objective was to facilitate broad-based black economic empowerment in the agricultural sector. The fund was managed and administered by the Land Bank on behalf of the National Department of Agriculture (DoA). It received R100 million from the National Treasury. In February 2008, R6 million was transferred from the fund to the trust account of a law firm, and this payment was disbursed largely to Mohlaloga. Within three months, the grant money was depleted, and not a cent had been spent for the purpose for which it had been originally designated by the Land Bank. Among Mohlaloga's grounds for appeal was that his 20-year sentence was shockingly harsh. He also appealed against the high court's refusal to grant him leave to appeal his conviction. He argued that the high court had misapplied legal principles regarding several aspects of his trial, including the doctrine of common purpose. In rejecting his grounds for appeal, the SCA noted that he played a vital role in committing the crimes. It was also noted that at the time, he was an elected and trusted member of Parliament. In once again turning down his appeal, Judge Kathree-Setiloane remarked that he abused that trust by perpetrating the crime of fraud against the fund, which was funded by taxpayers' money. 'It is inconceivable that Mr Mohlaloga did not know what the purpose of the grant was, and that it was directed at empowering previously disadvantaged people. Despite being given an opportunity to repay the money by the regional court, Mr Mohlaloga failed to do so,' the judge added. The judge stated that corruption and white-collar crime in state-owned entities lead to economic decline, job losses, more poverty, and reduced public trust. 'Unless those convicted of such crimes receive appropriate sentences, public confidence and participation in government institutions would be completely eroded, leading to increased inefficiencies and possible collapse,' Kathree-Setiloane said in turning down his appeal. [email protected]
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Supreme Court upholds sentence for former ANC MP in R6m fraud
Instead of protecting the fund, the former ANC MP 'colluded with other public officers to defraud the fund for self-benefit'. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) recently rejected former ANC MP Manyaba Rubben Mohlaloga's bid to overturn his 20-year imprisonment for stealing R6 million from a government agricultural empowerment fund. The court dismissed his appeal of his sentence and struck his application for reconsideration of his conviction from the roll. Mohlaloga, who chaired parliament's portfolio committee on agriculture, was found guilty of fraud and money laundering under the Prevention of Organised Crime Act for plundering the Agricultural Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (AgriB-BBEE) Fund between 2007 and 2008. ANC MP AgriB-BBEE fraud background Parliament created the AgriB-BBEE programme to provide financial assistance to previously disadvantaged farmers. 'Its objective was to facilitate broad-based black economic empowerment in the agricultural sector,' the court noted. According to the court, the initiative aimed 'to include black South Africans at all levels of agricultural activity and enterprises along the entire agricultural value chain.' The National Department of Agriculture and Land Bank established the fund with R100 million from National Treasury. Applications require assessment according to the AgriB-BBEE Operational Manual, with the National Advisory Panel responsible for approvals or rejections. Crucially, the manual's paragraph 5.5.1 'explicitly provided that politicians, while holding public office and government employees do not qualify and will not be eligible for grants from the Fund.' ALSO READ: Masemola in firing line over multimillion-rand buildings acquisition [VIDEO] Conspiracy takes shape The court found that the fraudulent scheme began when Mohlaloga approached Tjia, head of the Limpopo Youth Commission, proposing that they seek project funding. Mohlaloga later met Tjia and attorney Nkhwashu at his Polokwane residence to discuss 'embarking on a broad-based youth empowerment project to empower, educate and employ the youth'. When acting Land Bank CEO Mohlahlane informed them they qualified for a R3 million grant, the court found their plans immediately shifted. 'Mr Mohlaloga and Mr Tjia immediately changed plans and the idea of a broad-based empowerment programme was abandoned,' Justice Kathree-Setiloane wrote. 'They decided to buy a farm on receipt of the grant.' The transformation was telling. 'It was apparent, from that point on, that they intended to make a profit from the project, and it ceased to be a broad-based empowerment programme,' the judgment states. Circumventing legal barriers When Mohlahlane informed the group about the manual's politician prohibition, Mohlaloga devised a workaround. 'On being informed of this, Mr Mohlaloga instructed Mr Tjia to make the application,' the court found. The deception deepened when Mohlahlane submitted a typed application with a forged signature instead of Tjia's handwritten version. He told fund manager Mosoma 'that the minister was extremely frustrated because there was no progress with the empowerment programme and instructed him to prepare the payment documents'. ALSO READ: Man sentenced for defrauding Amtola Water Board in tender scam Bypassing due diligence The payment authorisation violated every procedural safeguard. 'There was no formal application, no business plan or due diligence performed on the project,' the court found. 'The application was also never considered or approved by the NAP [National Advisory Panel].' When auditors later investigated, officials scrambled to create documentation. 'A paper trail was created, and various documents were falsified in an attempt to mislead the auditors,' Jude of appeal, Fayeeza Kathree-Setiloane noted. 'But for the audit, the transaction would never have been discovered.' Rapid depletion of funds On 1 February 2008, R6 million flowed from the fund to Nkhwashu's law firm trust account. The money disappeared with stunning speed. 'Within a period of three months from date of payment of the R6 million into the DKD attorneys' trust account, an amount of only R22 641.44 remained,' the court found. Mohlaloga extracted substantial personal benefits. He reportedly received R80 000 directly into his personal account, while R866 150 was used to purchase two BMW vehicles registered in his name. According to court records, another R2.8 million went to his family trust in three instalments during April 2008. The court detailed additional personal spending: 'He transferred R10 000 to the account of his wife, bought art for R30 000 and a timeshare for R61 000. He also bought a stationary business for a total of R263 771.' Most tellingly, R2.29 million from his family trust purchased Schuinshoek farm, with the court noting this was done 'as a smoke screen to prevent detection and fool the auditors'. ALSO READ: Hawks arrest second suspect in R1.3m vehicle fraud case No exceptional circumstances found Mohlaloga's reconsideration application claimed 'blatant misapplication of fundamental legal principles' constituted exceptional circumstances warranting review. He argued the case would 'result in an irreparable injustice' and lead to 'a travesty of justice'. Kathree-Setiloane rejected these arguments. 'I am unable to find that exceptional circumstances exist in this case that warrant a reconsideration of the decision refusing leave to appeal,' she wrote. 'The errors which the high court is said to have made ultimately turn on the evaluation of the evidence and findings of fact and law which have been raised before.' Moreover, the court emphasised that exceptional circumstances require 'circumstances which give rise to a probability of grave individual injustice, or the administration of justice might be brought into disrepute if no reconsideration occurs.' Former ANC MP sentence appeal fails Mohlaloga argued his 20-year effective sentence was 'shockingly disproportionate to the convictions of fraud and money laundering.' The court disagreed, noting the Criminal Law Amendment Act prescribes minimum 15-year sentences for fraud exceeding R500,000. While acknowledging mitigating factors like Mohlaloga being a first offender with family responsibilities and university education, Kathree-Setiloane found aggravating circumstances far outweighed these considerations. ALSO READ: Home Affairs fires five more officials linked to fraud and sexual assault Betrayal of public trust The court highlighted Mohlaloga's position of responsibility. 'Mr Mohlaloga played a pivotal role in the commission of the offences while he was an elected member of parliament and Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture,' the judgment states. 'In electing him to parliament, the electorate put their trust in Mr Mohlaloga. He, however, abused that trust by perpetrating the crime of fraud against the Fund which was funded by taxpayers' money,' Kathree-Setiloane said. The judge emphasised the programme's noble purpose. 'AgriB-BBEE was a noble project that was intended to uplift and empower previously disadvantaged and emerging farmers in the agricultural sector to progress to commercial farming.' Instead of protecting the fund, 'he colluded with other public officers to defraud the Fund for self-benefit.' The court found the conspirators 'committed the offences out of pure greed' with 'no evidence that they needed the money to survive.' Unrepentant attitude Mohlaloga's trial demeanour particularly troubled the court. 'Despite being given an opportunity to repay the money by the regional court, Mr Mohlaloga failed to do so,' Justice Kathree-Setiloane observed. 'It is clear from his testimony during the trial that he lacked remorse.' The court quoted his defiant trial testimony: 'I do not know what you mean by Land Bank money, because once the money is approved and given to the beneficiary, it belongs to the beneficiary.' According to Justice Kathree-Setiloane, this attitude reflected his fundamental misunderstanding of the fund's purpose. 'He failed to recognise that the grant was intended to empower disadvantaged people in the agricultural sector, and that by defrauding the fund, he was denying those who most needed its financial assistance,' the court found. ALSO READ: ActionSA lays fraud charges against NW municipal manager Societal impact Kathree-Setiloane emphasised corruption's broader consequences. 'Corruption and white-collar crime in state-owned entities lead to economic decline, job losses, more poverty, and reduced public trust,' she said. 'Unless those convicted of such crimes receive appropriate sentences, public confidence and participation in government institutions would be completely eroded, leading to increased inefficiencies and possible collapse,' the court warned. Final ruling Applying established sentencing principles, considering offence gravity, offender circumstances, and public interest, the court upheld the sentence. 'I am of the view that an effective sentence of 20 years' imprisonment is not shockingly inappropriate,' Kathree-Setiloane concluded. The court noted that 'by the end of April 2008, there was no money left for the project. A total amount of R3 600 000 was paid to Mr Mohlaloga.' Except for the farm purchase funds, 'nothing has been paid back'. The Supreme Court of Appeal ultimately struck Mohlaloga's reconsideration application from the roll and dismissed his sentence appeal, confirming his two-decade imprisonment for the R6 million fraud that robbed resources from South Africa's most vulnerable farmers. READ NEXT: Eskom burns nearly R6 billion on diesel to keep lights on during winter
