logo
Cheaper Australian childcare failing to help lower-income mothers return to work

Cheaper Australian childcare failing to help lower-income mothers return to work

The Guardian31-03-2025

Throwing more money at cheaper childcare fees won't be enough to help mothers with young children get back to work, new research shows, as lower-income families lose more in benefits and taxes than they gain from working an extra day.
The independent economic research body e61 Institute analysed childcare reforms in 2018 and found that higher subsidies for lower- and middle-income families had no measurable impact on mothers' participation in the jobs market.
Women's earnings plunge by 55% on average in the first five years of parenthood, and this 'motherhood penalty' mostly persists for a decade after giving birth, previous Treasury analysis has found.
Australian women with dependent children are less likely to be employed full-time than in comparable countries such as New Zealand, the US, the UK and Canada.
But Silvia Griselda, a research manager at e61 and co-author of the report, said the findings were a warning for policymakers that 'increasing childcare subsidies can be costly and ineffective if not carefully designed'.
Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast
Griselda said cheaper childcare did lead to more children attending centres – an important goal in itself – but that for some low-income families, an increase in childcare subsidies was not enough to offset the loss of benefits and higher taxes from moving, for example, from two to three days of work a week.
Cheaper childcare did, however, have more of an impact on labor force participation of parents in middle- to high-income families.
'If we are to truly unlock the economic benefits of childcare investment we need a comprehensive approach that considers not only the cost of childcare, but the entire tax and transfer system,' Griselda said.
Lower-income families are eligible for benefits and tax offsets such as the parenting payment, family tax benefits A and B and the low-income tax offset.
The Treasury secretary, Steven Kennedy, has also highlighted the need to tackle these high so-called 'workforce disincentive rates', which measure the share of an additional day's pay lost to taxes, reductions in benefits and childcare costs.
Anthony Albanese has committed to delivering universal childcare, although in what form remains an open question.
Since coming to power Labor has committed $3.6bn over two years to deliver a 15% boost to childcare workers' pay, and lifted the subsidy rate to 90% for families earning less than $80,000.
The government also legislated to remove the activity test – which determines parents' level of subsidies based on the number of hours they work in a fortnight – for three days of care from 2026, and has promised to establish a $1bn fund to build and expand childcare centres in areas where parents struggle to find places.
Despite the additional billions spent, parents still complain of high and rising costs of putting children in early education and care, particularly as centres increase prices by more than the additional subsidies.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Out-of-pocket childcare expenses have climbed by nearly 10% in the past year, even as inflation more broadly has slowed to under 3%. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) early last year found that higher subsidies were only having a 'limited' effect on parents' costs.
Over the longer term, the picture is better: childcare costs are 3.4% lower than two years ago, and 5.3% down since December 2021, according to the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures.
There is growing support for expanding the number of not-for-profit childcare centres, as the spotlight on the expanding for-profit sector intensifies amid recent reports of abuse and ongoing concerns about wider safety.
The government has reportedly flirted with the idea of a $10-a-day price cap on fees – a model strongly backed by advocacy groups such as the Parenthood.
But the new findings from e61 back up Productivity Commission modelling last year that showed even substantially more generous childcare subsidy rates (at an additional $5bn cost to the budget) would have a 'negligible' effect on parents' labour force participation.
Nonetheless, the PC recommended an approach that would deliver access to at least three days a week of quality early childhood education and care, and that this would require a major multi-year effort to expand the supply of centres, particularly in regional and remote areas.
Under its preferred option, care would be 'effectively free' for families earning under $80,000 – which includes around a third of families with small children.
The PC and early childhood experts said that beyond the narrow focus on workforce participation, boosting attendance in formal early childhood education was particularly beneficial for children in poorer households who were least likely to attend.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's administration reviews AUKUS submarine deal with Britain and Australia
Trump's administration reviews AUKUS submarine deal with Britain and Australia

Sky News

time22 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Trump's administration reviews AUKUS submarine deal with Britain and Australia

The US has launched a formal review of the multi-billion pound AUKUS submarine deal with the UK and Australia. The defence pact, which is developing a new fleet of nuclear-powered hunter-killer submarines for the UK and Australia, was agreed under Joe Biden 's administration in 2021. The alliance, which also covers collaboration on other advanced technologies, is seen as an attempt to counter the influence of China. But Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's top policy advisor, is among vocal sceptics in Donald Trump 's administration. "We are reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda," a US official said. "Any changes to the administration's approach for AUKUS will be communicated through official channels, when appropriate." AUKUS envisages Australia acquiring up to five US Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines from 2032 before the UK and Australia design and build a new class of submarine with US assistance. Australia's defence minister Richard Marles said on Thursday he was confident the pact would still go ahead and his government would work closely with the US while Mr Trump's administration conducts a review. "This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. It comes ahead of Mr Trump's first expected meeting with Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada. Security allies will discuss a request from Washington for Australia to increase defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product (GDP). AUKUS is at the centre of the UK's planned expansion of its submarine fleet, with up to 12 attack submarines expected to be built for the Royal Navy. The deal is said to be worth more than £175bn. When it was signed, all three countries - the US, UK and Australia - had different leaders. In May, the US president's new ambassador, Warren Stephens, used his first public speech to back the partnership, highlighting how "vital the US-UK relationship is to our countries and to the world". A UK government spokesperson said: "AUKUS is a landmark security and defence partnership with two of our closest allies. "It is one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades, supporting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic, while also delivering jobs and economic growth in communities across all three nations."

Cullompton railway station to be revived
Cullompton railway station to be revived

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Cullompton railway station to be revived

A Devon town will get a new railway station after a "significant victory" in winning funding.A campaign to build a new station on the main line at Cullompton has been going on for years and campaigners say it is key to unlocking the building of 5,000 homes nearby in the Culm Garden Village town's MP, Richard Foord, said there was an "irrefutable business case" for reopening the station and also welcomed the reopening of Wellington station further up the line in Chancellor made no mention of the scheme in the Spending Review on Wednesday but HM Treasury officials confirmed the funding to MPs later in the day. The new station will be built next to the motorway services at junction 28 of the M5.

Rachel Reeves returns to her roots
Rachel Reeves returns to her roots

New Statesman​

time2 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Rachel Reeves returns to her roots

Photo byEarlier this year one No 10 aide told me that they missed the old Rachel Reeves. A Chancellor who denounced austerity in opposition had ended up defined by a cut (to winter fuel payments). Her doctrine of 'securonomics' had been marginalised in favour of a more orthodox Treasury approach. And a concern with regional inequality had given way to a focus on London and the south-east. Here is how Reeves ended up in the trough of unpopularity among party as well as country. The Chancellor needed to use yesterday's Spending Review as a reset moment – and it was. 'It's not the SR that HMT [Treasury] officials would have written, which is a very good thing,' a Starmer ally told me. The charge against Reeves was that she had become an unthinking automaton – one who selected winter fuel cuts from a routine menu of Treasury options, heedless of the political consequences. But yesterday's statement positioned her as a Chancellor making distinctively Labour choices. Reeves' advance U-turn on winter fuel already marked a return to more familiar territory. Labour MPs struggled to defend a policy that removed the benefit from almost all pensioners. Now, with it restored to three-quarters, a traditional redistributive argument can be made. Reeves' aides always felt there was something incongruous about the opprobrium that she attracted from the left. Her first Budget, after all, raised taxes by £41.5bn and increased spending by £70bn a year, taking the UK far closer to its social-democratic neighbours. But style matters as well as substance. Reeves' speech on growth earlier this year – in which she announced Heathrow expansion – cheered business though left plenty in her party cold. Yesterday's statement was replete with lines designed to show that the Chancellor has not forgotten her past. Her aim, she declared, was 'to ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their job and on their high streets' (a passage that recalled Reeves' 2018 pamphlet The Everyday Economy). As shadow chancellor, Reeves disowned New Labour's approach to globalisation, embracing a more protective and interventionist state. That position was reaffirmed yesterday – 'Put simply: where things are made, and who makes them, matters,' said Reeves, hailing the publicly-owned GB Energy and the rescue of British Steel (Nick Garland, the author of her heterodox Mais Lecture, was among those who contributed to the speech). Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe If there was anything Osbornite about the Spending Review, it was not in its fiscal policy – the former chancellor would never accept such a permanent increase in the size of the state (heading for 44.6 per cent of GDP) – but in its raw political intent. From the Treasury, Osborne shielded his party's base from austerity and sought to use economic policy to construct the Tory majorities of the future. Reeves' announcement of £15bn for transport projects outside London – across the Red Wall seats where Labour MPs must fend off Reform – mirrored this approach. Her decision to prioritise the NHS – even as some cast Britain as a health service with a country attached – was similarly emblematic of the party of Aneurin Bevan. 'People are only going to know the good news that we set out today if we campaign on it, if we deliver the leaflets, if we speak to people on the doorstep,' declared Reeves, who Labour MPs regard as a more natural politician than Starmer, at last night's Parliamentary Labour Party meeting. The road ahead is strewn with risks. I noted last month that Labour's new emphasis on an improving economy was a hostage to fortune – the news that GDP shrunk by 0.3 per cent in April has confirmed as much. But by returning to her roots, Reeves has reassured her party that it has one of its own at the Treasury. [See also: Labour is losing Wales] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store