Employee puts up 'stop crying before returning to work' sticker in washroom, fired
A Reddit user has gone viral after sharing a story about being fired from their job - all because of a sticker they put up in the staff washroom.'Got fired because of a sticker,' read the title of the Reddit post in which the employee explained that they had placed a sticker above a mirror in the washroom that read: 'Employees must stop crying before returning to work.'advertisementIn fact, the employee said it was meant as a 'harmless' April Fools' joke and that Human Resources (HR) even knew about it and told them where to put it.
'I went into work the next day and noticed all my things weren't where I left them so I knew immediately I was getting suspended for it. I had full intentions of admitting it and speaking with him about it so that's what I continued to do that morning. I didn't want anyone getting blamed,' the employee said.Soon after, the employee went to speak to their boss to take responsibility and apologise. 'He then told me we have to let you go. Not sure why he said we, HR was not there,' the employee said.The employee, who had worked at the company for 10 months with no previous write-ups or suspensions, said the boss also brought up a past disagreement about the use of toonies (two-dollar coins) as part of the decision.advertisementThe employee, thus, was rather upset over how things ended, especially since they felt they had worked hard to support their coworkers and be a good leader.'My heart is broken because a lot of the staff believed in me as a leader. My ex-boss cried too after everything was said. Which I thought was weird. It's like he expected a fight from me. Or to beg for my job. But that's not my character,' the employee said.
In the comments section of the post, several users sympathised with the employee and questioned the fairness of the firing. Some suggested they contact a labour board, while others warned that without written proof of HR's involvement, it might be hard to take action.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
‘Treated Like Criminal': Pakistani Man Alleges Georgia Denied Him Entry Despite Valid UAE Residency
Last Updated: Georgia permits visa-free entry to UAE citizens and allows UAE residency holders to stay for up to 90 days. A Pakistani national with valid UAE residency alleged he was denied entry into Georgia without explanation, despite carrying all necessary documents. In a viral Reddit post, the traveller recounted being detained for over 12 hours in what he described as a 'prison-like" room at Kutaisi Airport, where he claims he was humiliated and mistreated by immigration officials. Georgia permits visa-free entry to UAE citizens and allows UAE residency holders to stay for up to 90 days. The man, who had planned a short vacation to the country with a friend, shared his experience, saying, 'We flew in from Abu Dhabi to Kutaisi on Wizz Air. We had our hotel bookings, return tickets, travel insurance — everything in order. But as soon as we said we were Pakistani nationals, the officers pulled us aside." According to the post, immigration officers took their passports and photographed them in front of other passengers. The two travellers were then taken to a separate room and denied basic information. 'When we asked why we were being held, one officer just said: 'We cannot tell you,'" the man claimed, adding, 'No reason, no documentation, no violation — just a vague statement and dismissive attitude." He said they were detained for over 12 hours in a locked room with no access to proper food, clean water, or a sanitary bathroom. 'It was like a prison," he wrote, adding that efforts to contact the UAE or Pakistani embassies were met with hostility. 'They tried to snatch our phones when they saw me trying to call the embassy." The man also shared that he holds a senior position in Abu Dhabi, has no criminal record, and possesses a strong travel history. 'We were not misbehaving. Our paperwork was complete. Still, we were treated like criminals," he wrote. 'The loss isn't just financial," he continued, referring to expenses on flights, accommodation, insurance, and rental cars, adding, 'It's the psychological toll — the humiliation, the anxiety, and the sheer helplessness." He concluded his post by calling out the officers' behaviour as 'rude, racist, and unjust," saying, 'We feel dehumanised. We will never forget this." About the Author Mallika Soni Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : Georgia First Published: June 06, 2025, 21:59 IST
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
US Visa: Student's F-1 visa denied after unexpected technical queries at Hyderabad Consulate
In a recent turn of events, a F-1 student visa applicant had an unexpected experience during his visa interview in the U.S. Consulate, Hyderabad. The incident has prompted a wave of reactions online. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The student had applied for a visa to pursue a graduate program at Indiana University Bloomington. The man recounted his experience on Reddit trying to understand what may have gone wrong. The incident As per student, the interview started in a routine manner. The questions were focused on his academic background and university selection. But in no time, the applicant noted that the tone of the conversation shifted when the officer, described as a white male in his 30s, began asking technical questions related to computer science. The topics, reportedly, included distinctions between data structures like arrays and linked lists, as well as concepts such as linear regression. Despite the applicant's responses, the officer denied the visa under Section 214(b) and advised him to reapply. Expressing his confusion in a Reddit post, the applicant wrote: 'I was surprised by the level of technical questions asked. I tried to stay calm and answer everything honestly, but I'm still not sure what went wrong—whether it was my answers, university choice, or how I explained my project. If anyone has been through this or has advice for my next attempt, I'd really appreciate it.' The story quickly went viral and sparked an online discussion. Several Reddit users started sharing similar accounts of unexpected interview experiences. One user said that his interview lasted for 15 seconds as the officer barely asked questions. Reactions: 'Wait whattt... This has kind of got me bumfuzzled. I mean, why would he ask such questions?' one user commented. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Another advised against certain phrasing, suggesting, 'If you say 'industry-oriented,' make sure to emphasize you intend to work in your home country.' The post was shared on May 30, 2025. It has sparked a conversation about the unpredictability of visa interviews and how technical queries play a role in the evaluation process. While the exact reason for the denial remains unclear, the applicant hopes to use the feedback to better prepare for a second attempt. As the upcoming student visa season approaches, experiences like this serve as a reminder to future applicants to not only prepare for standard questions but also be ready for in-depth technical discussions, even at the consulate window.
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
No work, no salary, still Rs 5 lakh due? Techie's shocking job exit story goes viral
An Indian software professional recently shared his troubling experience after stepping away from a job offer on the day he was supposed to join. Having gone through the entire hiring process—including interviews, documentation, and onboarding preparations—he chose not to proceed with the role due to unforeseen personal and professional factors. The decision was promptly communicated to the company via email on the very day of onboarding. Believing that notifying the organization early and abstaining from accepting any compensation or using internal company assets would close the matter, the employee thought it was a clean break. However, to his dismay, he received a formal communication later from the company demanding a hefty recovery sum of Rs 5,00,000. The employer claimed this amount as compensation for violating the terms of a pre-signed agreement, alleging breach of contract or failure to adhere to a commitment, often referred to as a 'bond.' The unexpected legal demand left the individual confused and anxious. Seeking clarity and assistance, he turned to Reddit, posting his story to get insights from others who might have faced similar issues. The overwhelming response from users painted a familiar picture of how companies sometimes leverage fear and misinformation to enforce questionable contract terms. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Rates Undo One user recounted facing employer intimidation during their notice period and decided to delve into the legal framework governing such employment agreements. They discovered that many organizations exploit employee ignorance about their rights under Indian labor laws . According to prevailing legal interpretations, a bond or contractual agreement demanding financial penalties is not valid unless it has been formally executed on stamped paper and includes clearly defined terms, including monetary investments made by the company on training. Another respondent emphasized that without significant training costs incurred by the company, no organization can legally demand such a recovery. Indian employment law recognizes only 'reasonable recovery' for quantifiable expenses like technical upskilling or certifications, not arbitrary penalties imposed for withdrawal or resignation. Additionally, since the employee had not officially taken charge of any responsibilities, used company infrastructure, or drawn a salary, enforcing such a bond appeared both morally and legally questionable. The consensus among Reddit users suggested that unless the company could prove a tangible financial loss directly tied to the onboarding of this individual, the demand carried no substantial legal weight. Several users even advised the employee to respond assertively to the notice, making it clear that he was aware of his rights and would not be bullied into paying an unjustified penalty. Ultimately, the community reinforced an important message: contracts that appear binding must also be fair and legally sound. The incident sparked broader conversations about unethical practices in the tech industry and the urgent need for greater awareness about employee rights.
