Sanjay Takale gears up for Thailand Rally Raid Championship after completing Dakar Rally
Takale, one of India's most accomplished and internationally recognised rally drivers, will compete in the T1 class--the premier category of cross-country rallying. Notably, he will be the only Indian participant in the T1 class, reaffirming his position as a trailblazer for Indian motorsport on the global stage, as per a press release.
Speaking about the transition from Dakar to Thailand, Takale shared, 'The Dakar was a true test of endurance, grit, and mechanical reliability. Thailand Rally Raid presents a unique challenge--tighter stages, unpredictable terrain, and extreme humidity. Yesterday was a good practice session; I had the chance to push the limits of the Toyota Hilux. I am excited to be back behind the wheel so soon after Dakar, and proud to carry the Indian flag into the T1 class.'
Known for his resilience and technical skill, Takale has consistently represented India at global rally events such as the Asia-Pacific Rally Championship (APRC), FIA World Rally Championship, and most recently, Dakar 2025, one of the world's toughest motorsport events.
The Thailand Rally Raid Championship is a major event in Southeast Asia's off-road calendar, drawing top drivers and teams from across the region. The two-day rally across Chachoengsao's rugged landscapes is expected to push competitors to their physical and mechanical limits.
Takale's participation not only marks his debut in the Thai off-road racing scene but also continues his mission to promote Indian talent and visibility in international motorsport. With decades of experience and multiple podiums finishes across continents, Sanjay Takale remains a fierce competitor and an ambassador for Indian motorsport excellence. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Not from IIT-NIT, not afraid of layoffs': Techie who quit Rs 65 LPA job to travel gets rehired with salary hike
A techie, who shared his unconventional career move on Reddit — quitting a high-paying job to travel for six months — has gone viral online. In his post, he revealed that he later rejoined the same company, this time with a salary hike. 'So last year I decided to quit my job where I was making 65 LPA. I didn't jump into another role, just bought a car and spent the next six months enjoying life, travelling around, doing whatever I felt like. Those months went by super fast, but honestly, I don't regret it at all,' he wrote. The techie said that after the break, he was hired back by the same company with a 15 per cent raise. 'Now I've joined back the same company (with a raise lol) and I feel way more motivated to work. I look at money differently too, there's a lot more respect for it now. The break really reset me,' he shared. Sharing details of his financial status, the techie revealed that he gets paid in US dollars and has tax benefits under Indian laws. 'I'm unmarried and have some time to play around with my career. That's why I joined the same firm again with good pay and tax benefits which Indian companies usually don't easily match when it comes to in-hand,' he wrote. 'I was planning for a master's from USA since I'm unmarried and have some time to play around with my career. That's why I joined the same firm again with good pay and tax benefits which Indian companies usually don't easily match when it comes to in-hand. (The founders already know I'm planning for a master's). I'm a full stack developer. The car I bought is a used one. I have bachelors degree from CS. I am not from IIT/NITs. just from a pretty average college,' the techie shared in the post. See the post here: Quit my 65 LPA job at 27, bought a car, chilled for 6 months, and now I'm back with a whole new mindset. AMA byu/Creative_System6833 inIndian_flex The post quickly drew attention, with a range of reactions. 'Hey man! Congratulations. In this competitive era and market conditions, taking a break may even make you feel guilty or can get you in a fomo state. But kudos to you for breaking out from all that and doing what you wanted to do,' a user wrote. 'A masters can significantly boost income if in the US. If OP can get a 65Lpa job in India, they should be able to get faang equivalent pay in the US,' another user commented.
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Let's not go below the belt': Wasim Akram warns after India avoid burning Pakistan Asia Cup question
The legendary Wasim Akram reacted on Wednesday to the ongoing backlash over the scheduled India versus Pakistan clash in the Asia Cup 2025 in the UAE, insisting that the "game must go on" regardless of whether the blockbuster encounter takes place. The two arch-rivals are slated to face each other on September 14 at the Dubai International Stadium in a Group A fixture. Wasim Akram had his say on the scheduled India vs Pakistan Asia Cup fixture Ever since the schedule was confirmed last month, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has faced significant criticism for agreeing to play against Pakistan. The controversy was heightened by the Pahalgam terror attack earlier this April, which further strained the already fragile political situation between the two countries. At one point, speculation was rife that the Asia Cup could even be cancelled if India withdrew, before the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) ended the uncertainty with an official announcement in late July. The criticism intensified after the Yuvraj Singh-led India Champions side withdrew from facing Pakistan twice in the World Championship of Legends last month, including the semifinal. More recently, at a press conference in Mumbai on Tuesday, India captain Suryakumar Yadav was asked whether his team would participate in the September 14 clash. The Indian media manager swiftly intervened, instructing reporters to restrict questions to team selection. Speaking on the Stick With Cricket podcast, Akram urged calm, stressing the importance of keeping politics away from sport. "Asia Cup schedule is out, there is backlash. But we in Pakistan are calm. We will be fine whether we play or don't play. The game must go on," he said. "Politics apart, I am not a politician. They are patriotic about their country, we are patriotic about ours. Let's not go below the belt. Talk about the triumphs of your country; the same goes for Pakistan, and the same goes for India. It is easier said than done." Akram added that while he respected the sensitivities around the rivalry, he still hoped to see India and Pakistan contest at least one bilateral Test series in his lifetime. The two neighbours have not played a bilateral series since 2012. 'I hope to see a Test series between India and Pakistan in my lifetime.'
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Sona Comstar case: Why family firms need a governance triad
When a corporate battle spills out into public view, it rarely stems from a single cause. The dispute at Sona BLW Precision Forgings (Sona Comstar)—one of India's leading auto component manufacturers—may appear, on the surface, to be about ownership rights. Yet, beneath the headlines, it is also a cautionary tale about the interlinked nature of three distinct but inseparable governance systems in family businesses: ownership, corporate and family governance. Following the unfortunate death in June of its non-executive chairman Sunjay Kapur, Sona Comstar—partly owned by the promoter Kapur family—saw board changes that sparked an inheritance dispute. His mother, Rani Kapur, raised objections that the company rebutted before proceeding with its annual general meeting (AGM). Also Read: Sona Comstar row shows why Indian firms must let professionals lead On paper, this is a dispute over ownership governance—who holds legal title to shares and the mechanism for transferring control. But the tremors extend well beyond. The Sona Comstar conflict reflects a breakdown of such governance. If share-transfer terms, inheritance provisions or trust deeds are ambiguous—or contested—the vacuum left invites competing interpretations, often landing in court or the press. Strong ownership governance in a family firm requires binding and well-communicated agreements, documented succession plans and legal instruments that leave no scope for ambiguity. Without this, corporate stability is left hostage to family disagreements. Once a family business is publicly listed, the law recognizes all shareholders equally, whether they are related to the founder or not. The board of directors becomes the ultimate decision-making body; the promoter family is only one set of shareholders—albeit often the most influential. Corporate governance is about how the company is run in the interests of all shareholders, including board composition, decision-making processes and the insulation of management from personal disputes, thus ensuring that family politics doesn't stymie operations. Also Read: The TVS Group's nuclear family pact is path-breaking In Sona Comstar's case, its board acted within its legal mandate by appointing a chairman, inducting a director and holding the AGM. Yet, the public nature of the dispute risks reputational damage and erosion of investor trust, regardless of formal compliance. Boards must therefore not only follow the law, but also actively communicate their rationale, maintain transparency and reinforce the fact that the company is not a 'family fiefdom,' but a corporate entity governed by rules, not relationships. Family governance is the least formalized, yet often the most critical. It is about managing expectations, relationships and communication within the family, so disputes don't contaminate ownership or corporate governance. This includes: Family councils or assemblies, family charters and education and alignment. Sona Comstar's situation underscores what happens when family governance is weak or absent: personal disagreements find their way into the media, allegations fly and corporate decisions become fodder for public debate. Family governance must ensure that grievances—about inheritance, recognition or roles—are resolved before they affect the company. Also Read: Indian family businesses: Governance begins at home A failure in one layer of governance often destabilizes others. In Sona Comstar's case, weak ownership governance (disputed entitlement) triggered a public challenge to board decisions. The dispute tested corporate governance, as the board had to assert its independence while managing perceptions. The absence of robust family governance meant no private forum existed to resolve the conflict, forcing it into the open. Feuds at Finolex, Raymond and other Indian family firms show how intertwined these aspects of governance are. In each, ownership clarity, corporate professionalism and family harmony had to be addressed together. The lesson: one type of governance can't be fixed in isolation. Promoter families often underestimate the preparation and discipline needed to keep ownership, corporate and family governance in harmony. Neglect of this can prove costly. It means working on three fronts. First, clarity in ownership, with succession and inheritance plans unambiguous, legally sound and updated regularly; families must see transparency as a safeguard, not a threat. Second, respect for corporate boundaries. Promoters can play a strategic role through the board, but must not bypass it, demand special privileges or let personal claims cloud business decisions. Boards must assert independence, protect management continuity and communicate proactively with all shareholders—especially amid tension. Third, investing in family governance. This is the least regulated but often the most decisive. Regular family meetings, agreed processes for appointing family members, clear entry and exit criteria, and established conflict-resolution mechanisms can prevent disputes from escalating into corporate crises. Also Read: The Godrej split holds valuable lessons for family businesses The Sona Comstar episode is a reminder that in family businesses, ownership governance may be the spark, but family governance often determines whether a dispute explodes or is quietly defused. And in the end, it is corporate governance that must keep the ship steady. If the three governance systems are aligned and strong, succession can be smooth and shareholder value preserved. If not, the headlines may write themselves in a way the family wouldn't like. These are the author's personal views. The author is professor of economics and policy and executive director, Centre for Family Business & Entrepreneurship at Bhavan's SPJIMR.
