Oil and gas firm to cut 250 jobs from Scottish workforce
Harbour Energy has announced it will cut around 250 onshore jobs in Aberdeen.
The firm said it was taking the decision because of 'the Government's ongoing punitive fiscal position and a challenging regulatory environment'.
In a statement, managing director of Harbour Energy's UK business said: 'Harbour is launching a review of its UK operations, which we expect to result in a reduction of around 250 onshore roles in our Aberdeen-based business unit.
'The review is unfortunately necessary to align staffing levels with lower levels of investment, due mainly to the Government's ongoing punitive fiscal position and a challenging regulatory environment.
'We are also reviewing the resourcing required to support our Viking carbon capture and storage project, where progress beyond front-end engineering design and the recent securing of a Development Consent Order has been hindered by repeated delays to the Government's Track 2 process. '
Harbour Energy recently announced losses after tax of $93m last year down from $45m profits the year before.
At the time it said it reflected 'a 108% effective tax rate'.
Russell Borthwick, chief executive at Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said: 'This is a devastating blow for the 250 plus families directly affected – and I fear it is just the tip of the iceberg, unless the government changes course.'
Harbour Energy announced in 2023 it was cutting around 350 onshore jobs out of its 1,200 workforce in Aberdeen because of the windfall tax.
The firm has been one of the most vocal critics of the tax, officially known as the Energy Profits Levy (EPL), since its introduction in 2022.
The EPL was brought in by the then-Chancellor Rishi Sunak on the back of the war in Ukraine and with oil and gas firms at the time making record profits.
Since then, oil prices have declined, sitting around $62 a barrel.
The EPL has been increased and extended on several occasions since 2022, the most recent was last year.
In July the UK Government announced the tax would increase to 38% and would come to an end in 2030.
The sector says it takes overall taxation on firms to around 78%.
The industry body, OEUK has previously said the windfall tax is a 'disappointing blow to the industry which risks jobs, investment and economic growth.'
The UK Government recently launched a consultation on ending the windfall tax and any taxation which could replace it.
It has also been consulting on the future of the North Sea after confirming it would not grant new oil and gas drilling licences.
At the time the energy secretary Ed Miliband said: 'Oil and gas production will continue to play an important role and, as the world embraces the drive to clean energy, the North Sea can power our Plan for Change and clean energy future in the decades ahead.'
The oil firm Apache also announced last year it would end its North Sea production by the end of 2029, blaming the windfall tax.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
28 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Pret A Manger ‘considering stake sale ahead of possible flotation'
Luxembourg-based JAB Holding – which bought Pret for £1.5 billion in 2018 – told the Financial Times that while it was not 'currently' considering a stake sale in Pret, it could look at the move with an initial public offering (IPO) in its sights. 'As we move closer to a potential IPO, we may evaluate bringing on a pre-IPO investor,' it told the FT. It is thought to mark the first time Pret has publicly confirmed IPO plans for Pret. JAB – which also owns Krispy Kreme and Keurig Dr Pepper – announced last month it had hired hospitality industry stalwart Jose Cil as chairman of Pret's board. Mr Cil was most recently chief executive of Burger King owner Restaurant Brands International, which also owns chains including Popeyes. JAB has been contacted for comment. Pret recently announced it was dropping plans for a doubling of its current £5 monthly subscription for up to five coffees a day as it looks to retain customers against a difficult consumer spending backdrop. The group had previously told subscribers that their subscription would increase to £10 a month from March 31, when a '50% off' deal ended. It followed Pret overhauling its £360-a-year subscription in July last year in favour of 50% off up to five coffees a day for £10 a month. The chain also removed a 20% discount on food for subscribers to end dual pricing – 'something we never really got comfortable with', it said at the time. Under the old deal that lasted for almost four years, Club Pret membership offered up to five barista-made drinks daily for a monthly fee of £30. Pret is headed up by chief executive Pano Christou, who was promoted to the top job in 2019. The firm opened its first shop in London in 1986, where the company remains headquartered. It now has 700 shops worldwide with around 12,500 employees across 21 markets.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ken Ofori-Atta: Interpol issues red notice for Ghana's fugitive ex-minister
Ghana's former finance minister Ken Ofori-Atta has been placed on Interpol's Red Notice list for allegedly using public office for personal comes after Ghanaian prosecutors declared him a wanted person as well as a fugitive from justice, as he was outside the country, over his alleged involvement in several corruption cases when he was in government.A Red Notice is not an arrest warrant but a request to police worldwide to detain someone pending who is said to be out of the country for medical reasons, has not commented on the allegations, but he has said he has been unlawfully treated. The 65-year-old has been accused of causing financial losses to the state. The allegations include questions over procurement procedures in the building of a controversial national cathedral, which remains a hole in the ground despite the alleged spending of $58m (£46.6m) of government lawyers had offered to represent him but the state prosecutor said they could not respond to criminal charges on behalf of their who sued MP and won $18m hopeful he will pocket the moneyIn February, Ofori-Atta appealed to the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) to remove his name from the wanted list and provided a definite return date in prosecutor Kissi Agyabeng accepted Ofori-Atta's assurance and subsequently took his name off the wanted list. But in March Ofori-Atta filed a lawsuit, claiming unlawful treatment and requesting removal of related content from the OSP's social media this month, Ofori-Atta was re-declared a wanted person and a fugitive from justice after failing to appear before an investigative panel. Agyebeng subsequently formally initiated the Red Notice request, seeking international help in tracking down the former official, local media reported. "We want him here physically, and we insist on it. A suspect in a criminal investigation does not pick and choose how the investigative body conducts its investigations," Agyebeng the Red Notice released on late Thursday, Interpol said Ofori-Atta is wanted on charges of "using public office for profit".He was finance minister from January 2017 to February 2024, when the New Patriotic Party (NPP) was in NPP lost last December's elections to the National Democratic John Mahama, who was inaugurated in January, went on to establish an investigative committee known as Operation Recover All committee has received over 200 complaints of corruption, amounting to more than $20bn in recoverable has directed the attorney general and minister of justice to launch investigations into these allegations, stating that Ghana will no longer be a safe haven for some Ghanaians have criticised him for discontinuing cases against his former allies on trial. More Ghana stories from the BBC: Can Ghana's new president meet the voters' high expectations?The Maths Queen with a quantum mission to mentor girlsWhy some Ghanaians are fighting in insurgency-hit Burkina FasoGhana wants more for its cashews, but it's a tough nut to crack Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves's spending review will reveal what this government's priorities really are
On 11 June, the government will unveil its long-awaited spending review, laying out how it wants to spend more than £600bn annually on public services over the next few years. That's about a fifth of the entire British economy. The choices made over funding for the NHS, schools, courts, prisons and much more besides will shape life in the UK in the coming years. It's no exaggeration to say this could be the defining domestic policy moment of this parliament. Rachel Reeves's first budget included a big tax rise and a two-year increase in borrowing to boost spending on public services. For future years, the chancellor has repeatedly reaffirmed her 'ironclad' commitment to borrow only to invest. Such is the dismal state of the public finances that even with tax revenues that are high by historical standards, spending growth in the coming years will be relatively modest. Overall day-to-day departmental spending is set to rise by an average of just 1.2% above inflation over the next three years. This will make the spending review tough. Allocating spending across departments will inevitably mean picking winners and losers. The single most consequential decision will be how much funding to allocate to the NHS. The NHS budget is big – it accounts for 40% of day-to-day spending on public services. That's comfortably more than is spent on schools, universities, the police, prisons and defence combined. For decades, the savings from declining defence spending were effectively ploughed into the health service. Those 'peace dividend' days are gone. The government has already committed to increase defence spending to 2.5% of national income. It's unusual for health and defence spending to grow at once – and unheard of for it to happen in a period of low growth and high interest rates. If the government also chooses to prioritise the NHS budget alongside defence, other departments' budgets will see cuts. Consider this scenario: if the government increases defence spending as promised, and opts for a 3.4% annual increase in NHS funding – below the long-term average and far short of the 6% growth seen under Labour in the 2000s – it would probably be enough to hire the staff the government's workforce plan says the NHS needs and deliver improvements to NHS performance before the next election. But the wider implications would be stark: it would require cuts of 1% a year to the budget for all other departments. The government could, of course, allocate less to the NHS. That could jeopardise the promise to substantially reduce hospital waiting times by the next election and to build an 'NHS fit for the future'. But it would free up resources for its other missions to 'break down the barriers to opportunity', 'make Britain a clean energy superpower', deliver 'safer streets' and 'kickstart economic growth'. When funding is tight, more money for a shiny new initiative inevitably means less money for something else. The prime minister noted that achieving the five missions of his government will demand 'relentless focus and prioritisation'. We'll soon find out, when push comes to shove, what this government's priorities are. Some departments, and some ministers, are likely to be disappointed. Once the spending review settlements are revealed, the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, may not be the only Labour MP calling for higher taxes to reduce pressure on spending. By autumn, however, disgruntled colleagues could be the least of Reeves's concerns. At the spring statement in March, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was significantly more optimistic about growth prospects than most other forecasters. Since then, global developments have been bad news for the UK's economic outlook. If the OBR downgrades its growth forecast, that could easily wipe out the chancellor's limited wiggle room against her fiscal rules – perhaps several times over. Last November, Reeves was adamant that she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes'. But unless she gets lucky, she will have to come back with something to avoid a breach of her rules for borrowing. Assuming her fiscal rules remain 'ironclad', Reeves will have three options. She could cut departmental spending, just a few months after settling multiyear spending plans with her cabinet colleagues. She could make further cuts to the social security budget, when there is pressure – not least from some MPs – to do the exact opposite. Or she could raise taxes again to pay for the spending that has already been pledged. It's clear why speculation about potential tax rises will continue. But we should not let speculation about the budget distract us from scrutinising the spending review itself. The government's decisions on how to allocate more than £600bn of spending a year for several years will be of great consequence, whatever happens in the autumn. And, since speculation about the budget will inevitably continue, the discussion should shift from simply how taxes could be tweaked to raise more revenue to how they could be reformed to be less damaging to growth. Delivering higher growth deserves its place as the government's number one mission and should be a central focus across all areas of policy. Reeves is yet to show any interest in tax reform. She is missing an opportunity. With challenging years ahead, we need a government that seizes every opportunity to drive up economic growth. Achieving that mission would make everything else easier. Helen Miller is the incoming director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies
