Hamilton council targets big and small to shave about $500K off proposed 2025 city budget
Hamilton councillors say they're still looking for ways to reduce a projected average property tax increase of about 5.6 per cent, but savings won't come from freezing the police budget or cutting the city's poet in residence.
Both were suggestions proposed by councillors Friday as part of a general issues committee meeting focused on the 2025 city budget. Throughout it, councillors moved motions targeting expenses big and small.
The cumulative result was about $500,000 in savings, Mike Zegarac, general manager of finance and corporate services, said at the end of the meeting. He said the proposed average property tax increase went from 5.66 per cent at the start of the day, to about 5.62 per cent at the end of the day.
Here's some of what councillors decided.
Council rejects motion to freeze police budget
Coun. Cameron Kroetsch (Ward 2) moved a motion that the Hamilton Police Service Board's proposed budget increase of 5.7 per cent (or about $12 million) be rejected and not increased at all. The result, he said, would have been about a 0.9 per cent reduction to the projected property tax increase.
The police budget, Kroetsch said, has historically received more consistent support from council than any other departmental budget. Despite that, he said, residents continue to tell him they're not getting what they want or need from the police.
The motion was not an effort to defund the police service, but to assert that funding can't go up until police answer community members' calls for change and more transparency, said Coun. Alex Wilson (Ward 13), who seconded the motion.
Other councillors condemned the motion, saying their constituents overwhelmingly support spending on police and want more service.
Coun. Mike Spadafora (Ward 14) called the motion "unacceptable" and said most Hamiltonians want police "in their neighbourhoods protecting their families."
"They love the police," he said.
"Don't tell me we don't need police. Don't tell me they're not doing their jobs," Coun. Brad Clark (Ward 9) said.
The motion failed 2-14.
Poetry pilot off the chopping block
A much smaller budget item also generated significant debate: the city's Poet in Place pilot, through which the city hired a poet in residence for work including performing and hosting workshops.
The program is a sore spot for many residents, several councillors said.
For some, Clark said, it's an "exemplification of city hall's waste."
Coun. Matt Francis (Ward 5) moved to end the program and reallocate the funds to infrastructure.
Staff said that due to a 60-day termination clause in the contract, the move would save the city about $8,300.
"Every dollar counts," Francis said. "I don't care if this program costs $10. People hate it and they want it gone."
Mayor Andrea Horwath was one of several on coucil who defended the program, saying coming after such a relatively small expense seemed more political than practical. She said cities need "vibrancy" programs like this one.
"I think poetry is important and we don't get enough of it," Coun. Ted McMeekin (Ward 15) said.
The motion failed on an 8-8 tie.
Councillors vote to clean up underpasses
At least one of Friday's motions proposed spending rather than saving money. Kroetsch moved to add $130,000 to the budget to improve the cleanliness and safety of underpasses in Wards 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Kroetsch said that in response to concerns about dead pigeons, bird poop and poor lighting under bridges, he consulted city staff, who then identified 14 bridge underpasses that could be cleaned more regularly.
He noted improvements that had been made under bridges, like the one near Hamilton GO Centre station on which netting to deter pigeons and brighter LED lights, make for a safer and more pleasant downtown.
Coun. Tom Jackson (Ward 6) said although he wanted to reduce spending, he would "reluctantly" support Kroetsch's motion, adding he was "just shell shocked" to learn about the lack of maintenance.
Horwath also expressed frustration, saying from her perspective, the city should be able to manage regular cleaning without councillors having to weigh in.
The motion carried 13-3.
Out-of-order motions
On the advice of city clerk Matthew Trennum, meeting chair Coun. Maureen Wilson (Ward 1) ruled a few motions out of order on Friday, saying they did not directly impact the budget process and would need to be discussed in a different forum.
One such motion was Coun. John Paul Danko's (Ward 8) to "realign City funding" to organizations proven to be "good faith community partners." He said it was disappointing he didn't learn the motion was out of order sooner.
At multiple points throughout the day, councillors expressed frustration with the budget process, which is different this year because of the Ontario government's expansion of strong mayor powers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
04-08-2025
Anti-hate coalition denounces presence of white nationalist 'active clubs' in Hamilton, calls for action
Several organizations in Hamilton are denouncing white nationalist active clubs, whose members were found by a recent investigative report by CBC News (new window) to be preparing for a "race war" in area gyms and parks. The Hamilton Anti Hate Coalition, a group formerly known as No Hate in the Hammer, said it is also calling on municipal authorities and neighbours to act immediately in light of the investigation's findings. Coalition members have also issued their own statements since the investigation's initial report was published on July 18. Hamilton Centre for Civic Inclusion (HCCI), Hamilton Anti-Racism Resource Centre (HARRC), and Hamilton Immigration Partnership Council (HIPC) have expressed their condemnation and are calling for urgent action to root out hate. HIPC said it's deeply alarmed by the report from the CBC's visual investigation unit. These groups are not benign social organizations. They are part of a transnational movement grounded in fascist ideology, white supremacy, misogyny, and violent extremism, HIPC said in a statement. HIPC unequivocally condemns the presence of these hate-fuelled organizations in our city, the statement reads. Their activities — whether covert or public — pose a serious threat to the safety of all Hamiltonians and are especially harmful to newcomers and longstanding racialized communities who already experience heightened risk of discrimination and violence. Hamilton Immigration Partnership Council's anti-racism committee chair is Kim Martin. Photo: Submitted by Sarah Wayland According to HIPC anti-racism committee chair Kim Martin, newcomers and racialized communities face disproportionate barriers and discrimination. The organized presence of hate groups training in our public spaces sends a chilling message, Martin said. This cannot be normalized. We must meet it with urgency, solidarity, and zero tolerance for hate in all its forms. A CBC visual investigation (new window) , in collaboration with The Fifth Estate, recently identified local spaces where white nationalists are getting together to train, including in Myrtle and Gage Parks. Known within white nationalist communities as active clubs, these training sessions are also part of the groups' recruitment and propaganda. Although the clubs portray themselves as promoting community, fitness and Canada's European heritage, some experts told CBC News they're a growing extremist threat. Organization launches survey to hear from residents The report prompted HCCI — a community-based organization dedicated to making Hamilton an inclusive city — to get public input on combating hate. HCCI has launched a survey saying it wants to hear from people about what is needed and what expertise already exists to determine how best to support impacted communities. "Many of you have likely seen the disturbing reports published by CBC (new window) and CBC Hamilton (new window) about so-called 'active-clubs' operating in Hamilton gyms and local public spaces," HCCI wrote in an email on July 23. The escalation of these activities in the current context is disturbing and we know that reading and seeing this happen so close to home is very concerning, HCCI said. We also know that it triggers many historical memories and feelings amongst communities for whom these threats are unfortunately not new. HCCI has put out a three-question survey to see if there are any specific needs we could help respond to and figure out if we can pool some resources to add to and amplify the knowledge and skills that we know already exist in our communities. HCCI told CBC Hamilton residents interested in filling out the survey can contact HCCI directly with their email address and name and they will send the link. WATCH | CBC tracks 'active clubs' to Hamilton area: The anti-hate coalition is also encouraging residents to report suspicious activity such as groups training in parks under questionable circumstances. For example, they could be wearing masks, appear heavily militarized and be using white supremacy slogans. There are various means to report such activity, the group said, including through the Hamilton police and (new window) , a website launched in 2023 for people in the area to report incidents of hate. It is separate from police. Police say no criminal offences reported related to groups Hamilton Police Service said it is aware of the groups mentioned in the CBC report and continue to monitor their activities, however there have been no criminal offences reported to Hamilton police related to these clubs, it said. Police also said a club training in a facility is not a criminal offence. It is up to the individual business owner to act accordingly. Each business owner has the right to choose how they respond. They advised anyone who sees members of an active club working out in a park to report it through police's non-emergency number or online. On July 24, Hamilton police released their 2024 hate crime statistics (new window) , which show that 297 hate- or bias-related crimes and incidents were reported to police over the 12-month period, a 35 per cent increase from the previous year. Hamilton police reported 106 hate crimes — criminal offences where hate or bias is a clear motivating factor — and 191 hate incidents, which include actions with hateful overtones but that don't meet the legal threshold for a crime. Hate crimes were most often in the form of graffiti, but also included arson, assault, criminal harassment, theft and uttering threats, among others, police said. Black, Jewish and 2SLGBTQIA+ communities were the most frequently targeted. 'We need.. preventative approaches': HARRC City officials, including Mayor Andrea Horwath and Ward 3 Coun. Nrinder Nann, have been urging residents who discover hate in their neighbourhoods to report it. Residents in Hamilton want assurance that our local police service is working proactively to monitor, track, investigate and report the individuals involved in extremist organizing in Hamilton with Canadian intelligence agencies, Nann wrote in an email to CBC Hamilton. I encourage all residents in the city to learn more about hate symbols so they can report them accurately. Nann said she is working with both HCCI and HARRC to build skills residents can use to foster community safety in Ward 3 neighbourhoods. A CBC investigation found members of white supremacist groups have been preparing for a 'race war' in Hamilton-area gyms and parks. Police say they are aware of these groups and continue to monitor them. Photo: CBC / Bobby Hristova HARRC's executive director, Lyndon George, said collective accountability, is needed, noting that we can't keep treating racism and hate as individual experiences. To confront hate in Hamilton, we need to shift from 'they' to 'we.' This is not a problem for impacted communities to solve alone; it's a responsibility we all share. George is concerned that racism and hate are too often reduced to isolated incidents or perpetuated by bad actors instead of being recognized as systemic and experienced collectively by entire communities, often over generations, he said. We need systems of accountability that include preventive approaches to address hate, bias, and radicalization before they engage in violent extremism. With files from Aura Carreño Rosas, Justin Chandler, CBC News
Global News
31-07-2025
- Global News
Ontario city facing full $18.3M cyberattack bill after insurer denies claim
Hamilton taxpayers are looking at fronting the full cost of a devastating 2024 cyberattack after the city's insurance company denied its claim. Councillors were told at the general issues committee meeting on Wednesday that the city's claim was denied because multi-factor authentication had not been fully implemented at the time of the attack. According to the city's insurance policy, no coverage was available for any losses where the absence of multi-factor authentication was the root cause of the cyber breach. 'I understand why Hamiltonians are frustrated — this was a serious and costly breach,' Mayor Andrea Horwath said in a news release Wednesday. 'We expect our public systems to be strong, secure, and dependable. This incident highlights that the city fell short of that standard — and we're not okay with that.' Story continues below advertisement Attackers demanded $18.5M in ransom On Feb. 25, 2024, Hamilton experienced a cyberattack that disabled roughly 80 per cent of its network and impacted services like business licence processing, property tax, transit planning and finance and procurement systems for weeks. A few systems were unrecoverable, the city said, including permit applications and licensing, fire department records management and traffic signal system management. 1:14 'Too early' to assess impact of cybersecurity breach, City of Hamilton says The attackers launched a complex ransomware attack through an external internet-facing server, the city said. After covertly studying the city's systems, they encrypted systems and data to render them unusable and attempted — but failed — to destroy all the city's backups. Story continues below advertisement The attackers demanded a ransom of roughly $18.5 million in exchange for a decryption tool to unscramble the city's data. The city did not pay the ransom, adding it contained the incident within two days and managed to provide critical services throughout. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Paying the ransom would have increased the City's risk and financial exposure,' the city said in the news release, saying technical advisers added decryption tools from cybercriminals are very often unreliable. 'Even with a working tool, safe restoration would have taken significant time and money. Additionally, paying ransom funds could fuel future cybercrime and support international organized crime and terrorist organizations.' City has spent $18.3M in upgrades so far Mike Zegarac, general manager of finance and corporate services, told councillors on Wednesday the city would have to incur costs regardless of whether it had paid the ransom. Story continues below advertisement To date, the city has spent $18.3 million on immediate response, system recovery and third-party expert support. There may be additional invoices still to be received for some items that will be included in future reports, staff noted. Of the $18.3 million, $14 million has been spent on external experts who have helped the city's response, redesign and future strategies, staff added. 2:18 Ontario health agency ordered to inform patients of major data breach At the general issues committee meeting Wednesday, Ward 2 Coun. Cameron Kroetsch took issue with the 'looseness' of Hamilton's cyber strategy. 'There weren't protocols in place for many parts of the city, including how we connected to devices … and there was virtually no training provided whatsoever to councillors with respect to what to do here,' he said. 'This didn't happen due to councillors' negligence of any kind, or councils for that matter. But there have been several reports I've monitored outside of being an elected official where I saw recommendations being made to address this, and the investments not being made to pick up with those for whatever reason … we knew we had these problems with place … this has to be taken more seriously.' Story continues below advertisement Ward 9 Coun. Brad Clark said he found it 'very frustrating' that multi-factor authentication wasn't put in place years ago after learning from a staff member at the meeting that Hamilton's insurance company sought it in late 2022. When its claim was denied, the city obtained a third-party review of the decision and did not pursue further legal action as it learned the insurer's action was based on coverage terms. 'The city had full knowledge we were not compliant with the exclusion in 2023,' he said. 'How does council find out it wasn't done if staff doesn't share it with us? I find it immensely frustrating there has been zero accountability on this; this chamber, we'll be held accountable in a year and a bit; front bench and all the staff, no accountability for this incident. I can't explain that to my residents.' The city has since said it has enhanced its cyber controls and renewed its insurance coverage. In her statement, Horwath said Hamilton will learn from the incident. 'We acted swiftly, and we're moving forward with focus and determination. This is also a clear and indisputable reminder that timely investments in public infrastructure help prevent far more costly reactive responses down the line,' she said. 'The City of Hamilton is rebuilding with resilience and future-proofing in mind, while strengthening our systems, improving protections, and ensuring better service and safeguards for our entire community.'
CBC
18-07-2025
- CBC
No online voting in Hamilton's municipal election, says council, despite staff's recommendation
After lively discussion from Hamilton city councillors on Wednesday about the pros and cons of online voting, they decided it won't be used in upcoming elections. At a meeting Wednesday, council voted 9-5 against staff's recommendation to offer online voting as an option in the upcoming Ward 8 byelection Sept. 22, and the municipal election on Oct. 26, 2026. Nominations for the byelection close Aug. 8. A staff report said online voting could save the city some money, "by reducing the need for as many staff and polling locations on election day." In order to be able to vote online, people must register to vote, set up an account with their email address, verify the account and set up two-factor authentication, complete a registration process that includes providing two pieces of ID, and more, City clerk Matthew Trennum said. That's more checks and balances than for in-person voting, which, for example, not require a voter's card or an ID. "Are there risks to online voting? Yes. The risks to in-person voting are greater than the risks for online voting," said Coun. Cameron Kroetsch of Ward 2. '"I think our choice is pretty clear." But the majority of councillors didn't agree. 'Are we serious?' Ward 6 Coun. Tom Jackson said he was "strongly" against exploring online voting, citing safety following last year's cybersecurity incident. "Are we serious? We want to risk online voting at a time we've just been through spending [millions of] dollars of taxpayer money due to a cyber attack?" he said. Ward 9 Coun. Brad Clark said he's concerned about public trust and how that could impact voter turnout if online voting is approved. The city previously tested online voting during 2024's Ward 4 school board trustee byelection. While voter turnout was very low, with less than 500 ballots cast, the report said it wasn't due to online voting. Nearly half of those votes were done online. Other councillors, who opposed online voting, said the current system works and that they should instead discuss how to make in-person polls more accessible. But Ward 3 Coun. Nrinder Nann said online voting makes the election process more accessible. "It is unacceptable from the perspective of Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility and the reality that we have an obligation as a corporation ... to ensure that our process for democracy at the City of Hamilton accommodates those with disabilities and if the website is something that enables that, then we need to stop fear-mongering," she said. How they voted: For: Kroetsch (Ward 2), Nann (Ward 3), Tammy Hwang (Ward 4), Mark Tadeson (Ward 11), and Alex Wilson (Ward 13).
