
Hamilton council targets big and small to shave about $500K off proposed 2025 city budget
Social Sharing
Hamilton councillors say they're still looking for ways to reduce a projected average property tax increase of about 5.6 per cent, but savings won't come from freezing the police budget or cutting the city's poet in residence.
Both were suggestions proposed by councillors Friday as part of a general issues committee meeting focused on the 2025 city budget. Throughout it, councillors moved motions targeting expenses big and small.
The cumulative result was about $500,000 in savings, Mike Zegarac, general manager of finance and corporate services, said at the end of the meeting. He said the proposed average property tax increase went from 5.66 per cent at the start of the day, to about 5.62 per cent at the end of the day.
Here's some of what councillors decided.
Council rejects motion to freeze police budget
Coun. Cameron Kroetsch (Ward 2) moved a motion that the Hamilton Police Service Board's proposed budget increase of 5.7 per cent (or about $12 million) be rejected and not increased at all. The result, he said, would have been about a 0.9 per cent reduction to the projected property tax increase.
The police budget, Kroetsch said, has historically received more consistent support from council than any other departmental budget. Despite that, he said, residents continue to tell him they're not getting what they want or need from the police.
The motion was not an effort to defund the police service, but to assert that funding can't go up until police answer community members' calls for change and more transparency, said Coun. Alex Wilson (Ward 13), who seconded the motion.
Other councillors condemned the motion, saying their constituents overwhelmingly support spending on police and want more service.
Coun. Mike Spadafora (Ward 14) called the motion "unacceptable" and said most Hamiltonians want police "in their neighbourhoods protecting their families."
"They love the police," he said.
"Don't tell me we don't need police. Don't tell me they're not doing their jobs," Coun. Brad Clark (Ward 9) said.
The motion failed 2-14.
Poetry pilot off the chopping block
A much smaller budget item also generated significant debate: the city's Poet in Place pilot, through which the city hired a poet in residence for work including performing and hosting workshops.
The program is a sore spot for many residents, several councillors said.
For some, Clark said, it's an "exemplification of city hall's waste."
Coun. Matt Francis (Ward 5) moved to end the program and reallocate the funds to infrastructure.
Staff said that due to a 60-day termination clause in the contract, the move would save the city about $8,300.
"Every dollar counts," Francis said. "I don't care if this program costs $10. People hate it and they want it gone."
Mayor Andrea Horwath was one of several on coucil who defended the program, saying coming after such a relatively small expense seemed more political than practical. She said cities need "vibrancy" programs like this one.
"I think poetry is important and we don't get enough of it," Coun. Ted McMeekin (Ward 15) said.
The motion failed on an 8-8 tie.
Councillors vote to clean up underpasses
At least one of Friday's motions proposed spending rather than saving money. Kroetsch moved to add $130,000 to the budget to improve the cleanliness and safety of underpasses in Wards 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Kroetsch said that in response to concerns about dead pigeons, bird poop and poor lighting under bridges, he consulted city staff, who then identified 14 bridge underpasses that could be cleaned more regularly.
He noted improvements that had been made under bridges, like the one near Hamilton GO Centre station on which netting to deter pigeons and brighter LED lights, make for a safer and more pleasant downtown.
Coun. Tom Jackson (Ward 6) said although he wanted to reduce spending, he would "reluctantly" support Kroetsch's motion, adding he was "just shell shocked" to learn about the lack of maintenance.
Horwath also expressed frustration, saying from her perspective, the city should be able to manage regular cleaning without councillors having to weigh in.
The motion carried 13-3.
Out-of-order motions
On the advice of city clerk Matthew Trennum, meeting chair Coun. Maureen Wilson (Ward 1) ruled a few motions out of order on Friday, saying they did not directly impact the budget process and would need to be discussed in a different forum.
One such motion was Coun. John Paul Danko's (Ward 8) to "realign City funding" to organizations proven to be "good faith community partners." He said it was disappointing he didn't learn the motion was out of order sooner.
At multiple points throughout the day, councillors expressed frustration with the budget process, which is different this year because of the Ontario government's expansion of strong mayor powers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
26-05-2025
- CBC
Students will soon be allowed to play on former Hamilton high school's sprawling lawn, unused for 7 years
For the first time since 2019, kids will be allowed to play and run around on the sprawling lawn at the former Sir John A. Macdonald Secondary School in the middle of downtown Hamilton. In an agreement with the Hamilton Wentworth District School Board (HWDSB), Coun. Cameron Kroetsch told city council's public works committee he will use Ward 2 reserves to pay $60,000 for a new fence around the field. It will then be safe in September for elementary students attending Hess Street school across the street to use. There's no green space in the K-8 school yard besides a small turf field. "My question routinely [to HWDSB] is, 'can't we do something with this land?'" said Kroestch. "The answer is, 'yes we can.'" His motion was approved unanimously by the committee on May 20, with council getting final say this upcoming Wednesday. The school board will extend crossing guard hours at the busy Hess Street North and Cannon Street West intersection to help groups of students safely cross as they make their way to and from the field, Kroestch said. Coun. Jeff Beattie, a former HWDSB trustee, said he's "keenly aware" of the limitations at Hess Street school. "This is a really, really creative idea, kind of like, 'duh, why didn't we do this before' moment," he said at public works. "I can't say enough good things about this and I happily, happily support it." A downtown sore spot The three-hectare property has sat unused since HWDSB closed the high school seven years ago. The board told CBC Hamilton in 2023 that it spends about $135,000 a year to maintain the Sir John A. Macdonald property. Kroestch said he's asked about it often by residents who are confused as to why such a large piece of land can sit vacant amid an affordable housing and homelessness crisis. His usual response is that the province, through the school board, has the ultimate say about what happens with the land, not the city, and there's not much he or staff can do to spur development, he said at the public works meeting. "The province refuses to move on it," Kroetsch said. Closing the high school was part of HWDSB's plan to replace it with a new elementary school and community hub, including a child care centre. But the Ministry of Education has denied the $30-million funding request four times between 2017 to 2022. The ministry did not respond to a request for comment. In a letter to HWDSB in May 2022, obtained by CBC Hamilton through a freedom of information request, Ministry of Education assistant deputy minister Didem Proulx said demand for capital funding was "significant" with 290 requests from 58 school boards that year. "After careful review of your board's submissions, the ministry does not approve funding," she wrote. No other reason was given in the letter. Kroestch said last week HWDSB is currently working on a fifth application to redevelop the site.


CBC
08-05-2025
- CBC
Forgot to declare if you're living in your Hamilton home? City extends deadline for vacant unit tax
The City of Hamilton is extending the April 30 deadline for anyone who has yet to declare if their property is vacant or not. All homeowners now have until May 30 to inform the city, as part of the new vacant unit tax (VUT) program. The new deadline was approved by council Wednesday. This the first year of the VUT, which will see the city impose a one per cent levy on a home's assessed value if no one was living there for more than half of 2024. Mike Zegarac, general manager of finance, told council that as of Wednesday, the city has received declarations for 94 per cent of Hamilton's 180,000 homes. Staff are working "with compassion and in an effort assist property owners," he said. The tax is designed to discourage investors from buying homes and letting them sit empty instead of renting them out to long-term tenants. Any revenue generated from the program will go toward increasing affordable housing supply, the city says. City setting up appeal process The city mailed letters to all homeowners informing them of the process. Some councillors have had concerns not all residents would be aware of the VUT, miss the declaration window, and be inadvertently penalized. If the city doesn't receive a response from homeowners, staff will assume the property is vacant and issue the tax. "What about the little old ladies who don't read their mail?" Coun. Brad Clark asked staff Wednesday. "Folks who were snowbirds and out of town? There could be a death in the family. There's a whole list of reasons why people might not be paying attention to their mail." Clayton Pereira, director of revenue services, said staff have worked "tirelessly" to create an appeal system to handle complaints. "Ultimately our goal here is to educate the residents and make a decision that's fair," he said. Homeowners need the roll number and access code found on the declaration notice letter from the city or their most recent property tax bill. They can make declarations online or by phone, email or in person.


CBC
02-05-2025
- CBC
Hamilton's outdoor shelter costs balloon $5.1 million over budget
Hamilton's first outdoor shelter is $5.1 million over budget. Capital costs have almost tripled from what city staff first pitched and council approved last September — from $2.8 million to $7.9 million, says a report to council's general issues committee Wednesday. Staff revealed in the report there's been a number of issues with site contamination and the 40 tiny homes, which were delivered not up to code. These issues drove up costs for a project already plagued with controversial decisions and delays. "I have to say, I was shocked by everything that occurred, sincerely," Coun. Brad Clark told staff. "I could not believe this has happened in the manner it did and we had a full slate of people involved in this process." North-end resident Kelly Oucharek, who's been opposed to the outdoor shelter's location from the start, delegated to councillors wearing a shirt that said, "If I had $5.1 million" — a play off the Barenaked Ladies song, If I Had $1000000. "I along with many Hamiltonians are dismayed this project is 300 per cent over budget," said Oucharek. Gessie Stearns, a researcher on homelessness and advocate, told the committee that the city's decision to build the outdoor shelter on contaminated land for millions of dollars wasn't done in consultation with people experiencing homelessness or the cash-strapped community groups who support them. "If you gave 10 organizations in the community $500,000, it would've been unprecedented," Stearns said. "Here, $5 million has evaporated like it's nothing." Last summer, Mayor Andrea Horwath used strong mayor powers, which allow mayors to take quicker initiative on some issues, to direct staff to create some kind of "sanctioned" encampment site. She wasn't present at the meeting Wednesday due to an accident. By September, staff had proposed an 80-person temporary outdoor shelter — intended to house couples and people with pets — that would open by December in time for winter. It is a temporary site, and will only be operational for up to two years, but the "exit strategy" has yet to be announced, Grace Mater, general manager of healthy and safe communities, told councillors. 'A small subdivision in under 4 months' The city knew the land was contaminated when the project began, but soon discovered it would cost millions dollars more to deal with than budgeted, said Mater. The site needed grading, erosion control and other work to address the pollution, and the city had to hire architects, engineers and environmental experts to guide and sign off on the process, the report said. Mater defended city staff's management of the project on a tight timeline. "We've basically built a small subdivision in under four months," she said. "As with all projects of this magnitude, there were challenges along the way." There were also issues with the tiny homes ordered from MicroShelters Inc., staff said. The decision to buy them from the fledgling Brantford, Ont., company was already controversial, but then staff learned the units weren't up to code. The electrical wiring didn't meet Canadian standards and had to be completely replaced, said the report. The city also had to pay for architectural validation of MicroShelter's documents to make sure they met occupancy standards. The fire department had concerns about the layout of the overall shelter and individual tiny homes, and the city had to make design changes for safety reasons, the report said. In total, the city spent an unexpected $400,000 to make sure the tiny homes were safe for people to live in, Mater said. Coun. Craig Cassar said it was "very surprising" the "vendor did not deliver what was promised" and described the tiny homes as "defective." The city's legal team said it is assisting staff in trying to recoup some money from MicroShelters. MicroShelters did not respond to a request for comment, but director Jeff Cooper previously said in an email, "all aspects of its business are proprietary and confidential. Under advice of our lawyer we decline comment." Hamilton's auditor general is reviewing the contract between MicroShelters and the city, said Mater. Lawsuit filed against MicroShelters MicroShelters was incorporated weeks before council approved the project and used images on its website identical to those used by another tiny home company, Foldum Corporation. MicroShelters then imported the tiny homes from China through U.S. company Global Axxis. Foldum is now suing both MicroShelters and Global Axxis in California court, alleging they "conspired" to make a profit by using Foldum's proprietary information. Foldum's complaint says MicroShelters "falsely" advertised Foldum's housing and past projects as its own, "misleading Hamilton and other potential buyers" and then charging the city "a significant price." The allegations have not been proven in court. Global Axxis told CBC Hamilton, through a lawyer also named in the complaint, that it denies Foldum's allegations. Neither Foldum nor MicroShelters provided comments for this story. Before the lawsuit and budget overrun, city staff admitted they'd not done a thorough check on MicroShelters before awarding them a contract worth millions of dollars. Because of the short timeline, staff selected the company through a non-competitive process. Mater previously told CBC Hamilton she didn't know if MicroShelters had ever fulfilled any other similar contract before choosing it and wasn't aware they'd be importing the units from China. She said it was the only company the city could find to deliver foldable tiny homes big enough for two people in short order. The units ended up arriving weeks later than anticipated, in January. Manager says she could've told council sooner Several councillors, including Cameron Kroetsch, Matt Francis and Mike Spadafora, asked staff why they were not told of the ballooning costs or site challenges until now. "Staff had instructions to move forward extremely fast," Spadafora said. "But I think the disconnect is staff should've come back and said, 'It's not going to work, the site's a dump, it's going to cost millions of dollars and we're not going to be able to get people in before the snow flies.'" Kroetsch said if he had known the site would cost $5.1 million more and not be ready in time for winter, he wouldn't have supported it. Mater took responsibility for not "reporting back in a timely manner" but said the challenges and costs were "coming at us at a very rapid pace." The committee told staff to report back with a detailed breakdown of all the project costs, as approved in a motion from Francis. Mike Zegarac, general manager of finance, said staff would pull the additional $5.1 million from federal and provincial funding already secured for the project. Coun. Tammy Hwang defended the project, saying staff were given "an impossible task" to build the outdoor shelter in a matter of months. "This is the admirable and amazing way they have showed up and given their all," she said. "I'm thankful for the work done and respectful of the mistakes made. We need to figure out how do we talk about this and share lessons learned."