logo
Toyota crashes Indonesia's used-car party with $120m bet

Toyota crashes Indonesia's used-car party with $120m bet

Business Times8 hours ago

It's an alliance everyone saw coming.
After decades of dominating Indonesia's automotive industry, Toyota and Astra are joining forces for the country's used-car market. The Japanese automaker shelled out US$120 million for a 40% stake in Astra Digital Mobil, giving it part ownership of used-car marketplaces OLX and OLXmobbi.
The deal comes as Indonesia's economic struggles hit its new-car sales. It dropped 13.9% in 2024 compared to 2023, according to data from the Indonesian Automotive Industry Association (Gaikindo).
Overall, roughly 800,000 new cars were sold last year – less than half of the 1.8 million used vehicles sold within the same period.
These are the exact areas the likes of Carro, Carsome, and Moladin have spent years and millions of dollars on. They face entrenched incumbents with deeper pockets, broader distribution, and long-standing brand trust.
Now the question is this: Can these smaller players survive – and thrive – as the giants move in?
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Astra declined to comment for this story, while Toyota did not respond to Tech in Asia's requests for a comment.
Big brands, bigger footprint
Yannes Martinus Pasaribu, an automotive expert from the Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB), points out that used vehicles offer a more flexible, lower-cost path to expansion. But it can also be be more profitable than selling new vehicles: while gross margins for new vehicles generally range from 2% to 5%, it can reach 5% to 15% for used cars.
Toyota has also ventured into the used-car trade overseas, operating an online store for used models in Japan. In the US and Singapore, it has dealerships selling certified used Toyotas.
Astra has done something similar with another brand that it distributes in Indonesia: BMW Astra Used Car, a dealership focused on certified pre-owned BMWs in Jakarta.
The appeal is clear. Consumers, especially those who aren't savvy, can't always assess a car's true condition. Having a vehicle certified and guaranteed by the brand itself can provide peace of mind.
Currently, it's unclear whether Toyota and Astra want to build something similar. But doing so would unlock a massive market.
Luxury brands like BMW appeal mainly to affluent consumers in major urban areas. Toyota, on the other hand, has had nationwide reach for decades – thanks to cheap, readily available spare parts and deep familiarity among Indonesian mechanics.
Indeed, Toyota was the country's top-selling car brand in 2024. It sold 288,982 units and commanded a 33.4% market share, as per Gaikindo data.
The brand also has an unparalleled offline footprint: It has over 360 dealers across 143 cities in Indonesia.
ITB's Pasaribu believes it could be key to breaking into the used-car segment, particularly when it comes to building consumer trust. It's understandable as vehicles are big-ticket items, and buyers tend to consider many factors carefully before making a purchase.
'Each SKU in the used-car business represents a single unit of inventory, and the transaction is non-repetitive – especially in the retail segment,' one industry expert, who asked not to be named, tells Tech in Asia.
Unlike ecommerce platforms like Shopee, Tokopedia, Grab, or Gojek – whose users open the apps multiple times a day – used-car transactions are far less frequent.
'If a customer uses a used-car platform once every three years, that's already good,' the expert adds.
Carro and Carsome, for example, began primarily online. But now, they follow an online-to-offline model, operating showrooms and inspection points.
The two companies have seven and nine offline points, respectively.
In contrast, Astra's OLXmobbi already has more than 30 dealerships across 10 major cities in Indonesia. Adding Toyota's offline footprint would make the Toyota-Astra alliance hard to beat.
Scale isn't everything
Still, Toyota-Astra's advantages doesn't negate Carro's or Carsome's. Indonesia's used-car market is 'too fragmented,' the industry expert believes.
'The used-car market is so large that even combined, Toyota-Astra, Carsome, and Carro probably barely scratch the surface,' they say.
Indeed, independent dealerships and individual sellers also dominate the used-car space. Most transactions still happen offline and informally.
Hence, the country's used-car market is unlikely to become a winner-takes-all arena.
Jongkie Sugiarto, chairman of Gaikindo, explains that while legacy players already have strong distribution networks, they're often limited to the brands they represent.
In contrast, startups aren't tied to specific manufacturers, allowing them to buy and sell across a wider range of brands.
Carro and Carsome also certify the cars they sell based on thorough inspections and specific quality standards.
'Carsome's focus has always been on building trust through consistency – whether in how we inspect or refurbish vehicles,' says Aaron Kee, the company's chief business officer.
One of the most important components in used-car transactions is financing. In 2022, around 70% of car purchases in Indonesia were made through credit.
Riyanto, a researcher from the University of Indonesia, believes startups can offer more flexible financing integrations. Traditional players tend to have more rigid and complicated financing schemes.
Most used-car marketplace platforms in the country – including Carro, Carsome, and Moladin – have embedded financing features into their platforms.
But so does Astra, which offers car loans through Toyota Astra Finance with its Japanese partner.
BMW Astra Used Car also provides an example of what Toyota-Astra can do: It offers financing at new car interest rates. Typically, these can be as much as 50% lower than interest rates imposed on purchases of used vehicles.
The real battle: profit
While Indonesia's macroeconomic woes have made used cars more attractive than new ones, it doesn't mean used-car sellers are completely unaffected by market lulls.
'Some used-car dealers have observed a slower pace of business in recent months,' Carsome's Kee says.
Following Toyota's investment, some expect OLX to burn cash acquiring vehicles for its inventory. Carro and Carsome, however, may not have the same appetite, with both companies eyeing potential IPOs.
Both firms have also turned EBITDA positive.
Carro reported an EBITDA of around S$40 million (US$31 million) for the financial year ending March 2025, according to The Business Times. The company is aiming for one final funding round this year before pursuing a public listing.
Its rival, Carsome, posted an EBITDA of US$4.3 million for the first quarter of 2025. It achieved full-year profitability with an adjusted EBITDA of US$10.5 million in 2024.
Khailee Ng, managing partner at 500 Global, one of Carsome's investors, believes the entry of large players like Toyota can help grow the overall customer base, creating even more opportunities for startups.
'Time and time again we've seen that fast is better than big,' he says. 'Advantages come from resourcefulness, not just resources.'
On the other hand, startups innovate new products more easily. For instance, Carro has recently expanded into the B2B space by offering new vehicles to private-hire drivers.
The anonymous industry expert argues that smaller players also have advantages in unit economics. Smaller companies, according to the source, can fine-tune their cost structure without resorting to disruptive actions like mass layoffs.
'The company needs smaller numbers to hit profitability,' they explain.
Ultimately, the competition won't come down to size alone. As funding becomes harder to secure and legacy players step in, startups that focus on efficiency, adapt to market changes, and maintain customer trust may still find room to grow. TECH IN ASIA

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are China's economic interests in Iran?
What are China's economic interests in Iran?

Straits Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

What are China's economic interests in Iran?

China has stayed on the sidelines of Iran's conflict with Israel, urging a diplomatic solution. PHOTO: AFP BEIJING - China, one of Iran's closest allies and the biggest buyer of its oil, has stayed on the sidelines of its conflict with Israel, urging a diplomatic solution. Following are details of its investments in Iran. Cooperation pact Beijing has long backed US-sanctioned Tehran as part of efforts to deepen its strategic and economic heft in the Middle East. In 2021, they signed a 25-year cooperation deal, though full details were never disclosed and analysts say follow-up implementation has been weak. However, Chinese investment in Iran lags behind what Beijing puts into other nations in the region. 'Chinese state-owned companies have largely stayed away, mostly out of fear of running afoul of US sanctions,' said Dr Bill Figueroa, a China-Middle East expert at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. The American Enterprise Institute estimated that total Chinese investment since 2007 at just under US$5 billion (S$6.4 billion), while Chinese commerce ministry data shows its direct investments in Iran by the end of 2023 totalled US$3.9 billion. In contrast, Beijing invested more than US$8.1 billion in the United Arab Emirates between 2013 and 2022, and almost US$15 billion in Saudi Arabia between 2007 and 2024, the think-tank said. Energy China imports around 43 million barrels of oil per month from Iran – accounting for some 90 per cent of Iran's oil exports and roughly 13.6 per cent of China's crude purchases. Around 65 per cent of total crude and condensate shipped through the Strait of Hormuz off Iran is destined for China, according to shipping data firm Vortexa. China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) in 2016 signed a US$4.8 billion deal with France's Total to develop the offshore South Pars gas field in the Gulf with an Iranian state firm. CNPC's stake of 30 per cent was worth around US$600 million. However, the state-owned petroleum giant pulled out of the project due to US pressure in 2019. CNPC also signed a deal in 2009 to develop the North Azadegan oil field, with the first phase valued at about US$2 billion. The first cargo of 2 million barrels was shipped to China in 2016. China's biggest refiner Sinopec signed a US$2 billion deal to develop the Yadavaran oil field in 2007. In 2017, Sinopec signed a contract worth about US$2.1 billion to upgrade a refinery in Abadan near the Gulf coast. It remains under construction. In 2024, China's LDK Solar reached a deal with Iran's Ghadir Investment Group for a large-scale photovoltaic power plant with investment of around €1 billion (S$1.49 billion). It was expected to generate 2 billion kilowatt-hours of solar power annually. Railways In 2018, China National Machinery Industry Corporation signed a 5.3 billion yuan (S$945 million) deal to expand and renovate a railway connecting Tehran with the cites of Hamedan and Sanandaj to improve connectivity in west Iran. Also that year, a subsidiary of China Railway Construction Corporation signed a contract worth 3.5 billion yuan for the 263 km Kermanshah-Khosravi railway project in west Iran, with a construction period of 48 months. China's Norinco International signed an agreement in 2018 to build the first tramway line in the Iranian city of Qazvin, at about US$150 million. In 2017, China Eximbank and an Iranian state bank signed a US$1.5 billion deal to upgrade and electrify a 926km railway between Tehran and the eastern city of Mashhad as part of Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative. However, the project has stalled over financing negotiations. Metals In 2017, China's Metallurgical Corporation invested around US$350 million in the Sepid Dasht steel plant and won a design contract for a pelletising project. However, local media reported that the projects were delayed by financing issues. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

China helpless as Middle East war craters regional leverage: Analysts
China helpless as Middle East war craters regional leverage: Analysts

Straits Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

China helpless as Middle East war craters regional leverage: Analysts

As Israel and Iran engaged in an unprecedented exchange of attacks, Beijing has offered little beyond calls for de-escalation. PHOTO: AFP BEIJING - China has been able to do little more than stand back and watch as war between its key partner Iran and Israel harms its hard-fought leverage in the Middle East, analysts say. Beijing has sought to frame itself as a mediator in the region, facilitating a 2023 rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran and portraying itself as a more neutral actor in the Israel-Palestinian conflict than its rival the United States. And its position as the largest purchaser of Iranian oil has served as a crucial lifeline for Tehran as its economy is battered by crippling international sanctions. But as Israel and Iran engaged in an unprecedented exchange of attacks and the United States struck key targets on Iranian soil in the past week, Beijing has offered little beyond calls for de-escalation. 'Beijing has offered Tehran no real help – just rhetoric that paints China as the principled alternative while it stays safely on the sidelines,' Mr Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies think tank, told AFP. China, he said, 'sticks to rhetoric – condemnations, UN statements, talk of 'dialogue' – because over-promising and under-delivering would spotlight its power-projection limits'. 'The result is a conspicuously thin response that underscores how little real heft China brings to Iran when the shooting starts.' 'Strategic' friendship China – alongside its 'no limits' partner Russia – has long been a key backer of Iran, deepening ties in the wake of the United States' withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal in 2018. President Xi Jinping described relations as 'strategic' in a 2023 meeting with Iran's then-president Ebrahim Raisi, and backed Tehran in its fight against 'bullying'. Retired Chinese senior colonel Liu Qiang was even more explicit in an article on the academic website Aisixiang in June . 'Iran's survival is a matter of China's national security,' said the director of the Academic Committee of the Shanghai International Center for Strategic Studies. Beijing, he insisted, must take 'proactive measures' in light of the recent war to ensure that Tehran 'will not be broken by the military conflict' or 'jointly strangled by the US and Israel'. Analysts say Beijing's ties with Tehran are central to its efforts to ensure a regional counterbalance against both the United States and Israel as well as the Gulf States. 'Iran fits into Beijing's broader campaign to counterbalance US-led hegemony and to a lesser extent Nato encroachment,' Mr Tuvia Gering, non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told AFP. Those efforts have gone into overdrive following blows to other 'Axis of resistance' players since the start of the Gaza war – the collapse of Mr Bashar al-Assad's rule in Syria and the degradation of Hamas and Hezbollah in fighting with Israel. 'Beijing has sought to prevent a total unravelling of Iran's regional role,' Mr Gering said, pointing to Chinese efforts to resurrect the nuclear deal. 'Little leverage' China has condemned recent US strikes on Iran and called for parties in the region, 'especially Israel', to de-escalate. And it has called for a political solution to help a declared ceasefire hold. Fighting in May between India and Pakistan saw Beijing furnish its long-time allies in Islamabad with state-of-the-art military gear. Analysts do not expect China to extend the same courtesy to its comrades in Tehran, given the risk of direct confrontation with the United States. 'Iran needs more than statements at the UN or missile components,' Dr Andrea Ghiselli, a lecturer at the University of Exeter, told AFP. 'It needs air defences and fighter jets, which are things that China could provide but would require much time to be put into use – not to mention the likely extremely negative reaction by Israel and, especially now that is directly involved, the US,' he added. The United States has urged China to use its influence on Iran to help deter its leaders from shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for oil and gas. But Dr Ahmed Aboudouh, an associate fellow with the Chatham House Middle East and North Africa Programme, was sceptical that Beijing has the leverage. 'China's position in the Middle East after this conflict' has been badly affected, he told AFP. 'Everybody in the Middle East understands that China has little leverage, if any, to play any role in de-escalation.' AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside
Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside

[SINGAPORE] The Court of Appeal on Tuesday (Jun 24) dismissed an application by the founders of Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to set aside orders requiring them to disclose their dealings with their now-defunct cryptocurrency fund. Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, however, overturned a lower court decision that allowed liquidators to examine its co-founder Zhu Su following the collapse of 3AC in 2022. In October 2022, 3AC and its two founders, Zhu and Kyle Davies, were ordered by the court to disclose their dealings with the hedge fund – including any relevant books, papers, or records – to liquidators. However, both Zhu and Davies failed to comply with the disclosure order, prompting the liquidators to file two orders initiating contempt of court proceedings against them. Both men were subsequently sentenced to four months' jail for the offence. In 2023, Zhu and Davies applied to the court to have all three orders set aside, which was dismissed. They took their appeal against that decision to the Court of Appeal, in a hearing in April. Separately, following Zhu's arrest on Sep 29, 2023, liquidators sought an examination order from the court, believing that his incarceration will give them an opportunity to obtain more information about the affairs of the cryptocurrency fund. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Following this, the liquidators commenced proceedings against Zhu and Davies in the British Virgin Islands, in which they sought to recover US$66 million which Zhu allegedly owed to the hedge fund. Zhu then applied for the examination order, as well as further orders for him to provide additional answers and appear for further examination, to be set aside. This application was also dismissed. 'Deliberate decision' to evade liquidators In his judgement, the Chief Justice ruled that the lower court had correctly dismissed the founders' applications to set aside the disclosure order, as well as the two orders relating to the contempt of court proceedings. In the April hearing, Zhu and Davies' lawyers were under the impression that they were cooperating with the liquidators' requests for information and did not think that committal orders would be sought against them. But this is 'no answer at all', said Chief Justice Menon, who noted that the founders were aware of the disclosure order by Jan 5, 2023, but had no explanation as to why they waited 10 months before filing to have the orders set aside. Their applications were also made well after the 14-day deadline prescribed in the Rules of Court 2021. Furthermore, Zhu and Davies' argument that they thought they had been cooperating with liquidators in good faith 'said nothing about whether the setting-aside applications had been brought within time, or whether there were grounds for extending time', he added. 'We are with the inference the judge drew, which is that (Zhu and Davies) deliberately chose not to take any steps to set aside the disclosure order because they thought they could remain out of reach of its enforcement. 'In such circumstances, we see no good reason why (Zhu and Davies) should be allowed to revisit the question 10 months later of whether the disclosure order should even have been made against them in the first place.' 'A delay of this time is patently unreasonable,' he added. 'Therefore, we hold that (the founders) were out of time to bring the setting-aside applications against the disclosure order.' The Chief Justice also noted that Zhu and Davies, being the only directors of 3AC, chose to discharge the company's lawyers a few days before the hearing for the disclosure order was to be heard. '(This) suggested a deliberate decision by (Zhu and Davies) to evade the efforts of the liquidators to gather the necessary information pertaining to the company,' he wrote. As for the application relating to the examination order, Chief Justice Menon said the order is not an appropriate means for the liquidators to obtain information from the founders. This is given that the liquidators already intended to commence proceedings to sue Zhu and Davies in the British Virgin Islands shortly before making the order. Since the liquidators had already decided they wanted to sue the founders, they should be subject to the constraints imposed by the rules of civil procedure, he added. The court set aside the examination order, but made orders to resolve the outstanding issues arising from the lower court's earlier decision to grant it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store