Man fined after burning Qur'an outside Turkish consulate in London
Hamit Coskun, 50, who was found guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence on Monday, called his prosecution 'an assault on free speech'.
In February, Coskun travelled from his home in the Midlands to Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge, where he set fire to a copy of the Islamic holy book and shouted 'f*** Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and 'Qur'an is burning'.
Coskun, who was born in Turkey and is half Kurdish and half Armenian, argued in court that he had protested peacefully and burning the Qur'an amounted to freedom of expression.
The district judge, John McGarva, found that Coskun's actions were 'highly provocative' and said he was 'motivated at least in part by a hatred of Muslims'. Coskun had argued his criticism was of Islam in general rather than its followers but Judge McGarva said he could not accept this.
Coskun's legal fees are being paid by the National Secular Society (NSS) and the Free Speech Union (FSU), both of which criticised the ruling and said they intend to appeal 'and keep on appealing it until it's overturned'.
The advocacy group Muslim Engagement and Development (Mend) quoted the judge's sentencing remarks on X, commenting on the ruling with the hashtag #hatespeechisnotfreespeech.
The ruling has also prompted comment from figures in Westminster. The prime minister's official spokesperson, who was asked about the case, declined to comment but said there are no blasphemy laws in England nor are there any plans to introduce any.
Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservative party, said on X that the case 'should go to appeal'. 'Freedom of belief, and freedom not to believe, are inalienable rights in Britain,' she said. 'I'll defend those rights to my dying day.'
McGarva, who issued a fine of £240, rejected the idea that the prosecution was 'an attempt to bring back and expand blasphemy law'.
In his ruling, he said burning a religious book and making criticism of Islam or the Qur'an are 'not necessarily disorderly', but added: 'What made his conduct disorderly was the timing and location of the conduct and that all this was accompanied by abusive language.'
The judge said Coskun, who is an atheist, has a 'deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers' based on his experiences in Turkey and the experiences of his family, and that it was 'not possible to separate his views about the religion from his views about its followers'.
The judge said: 'A criminal conviction is a proportionate response to the defendant's conduct.
'I am sure that the defendant acted in a disorderly way by burning the Qur'an very obviously in front of the Turkish consulate where there were people who were likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress and accompanying his provocative act with bad language.
'I am sure that he was motivated at least in part by a hatred of Muslims. I therefore find the defendant guilty.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
Map shows the top 20 UK crime hotspots – do you live in the most dangerous area?
THE MOST dangerous towns and cities in the UK have been revealed - and the number one spot may surprise you. New data from the Home Office reveals that more than 5.3 million non-fraud related crimes were recorded in the year ending March 2025 by the 43 domestic police forces in England and Wales. 1 This is down 2% from the previous year, when around 92,000 more crimes were recorded. At the top of the list is Westminster, in London, home to iconic landmarks such as Buckingham Palace and the Houses of Parliament. A total of 423 crimes per every 1000 residents took place last year, which may seem surprising given the wealth of the area. However, huge numbers of tourists visiting the city are targeted by pickpockets and criminals every year, meaning the location is consistently at the top of the list. Camden, which is second on the list, with 195 crimes per 1000 residents, also has a huge number of tourists year round, who are targeted by phone thieves and other criminals. Outside of London, the area with the highest crime rate is Middlesbrough, which has 158.3 crimes per 1,000 people, which equates to almost one in 6 people being victim to a crime. A whopping 23,000 crimes were recorded in the North East town last year, a 5% fall from the previous year. Following Middlesbrough, Blackpool has 154.4 crimes per 1000 people, slightly higher than the posh borough of Kensington and Chelsea, which has 154.2. Below that, Manchester has 152.4 crimes per 1000, and Hartlepool has 141.5. Rounding off the top 10, Islington in London has 140.8 per 1000, Bristol has 132.3 and the London Borough of Southwark has 127.6. Maps show hotspots for crime in England and Wales' - do you live in the most dangerous area? Separate figures from the ONS reveal that a total of 9.4 million incidents of headline crime occurred in the year ending March 2025, a 7% increase from the year before. Data shows that the rise if due to a 31% increase in fraud, with 4.2 million incidents recorded. This is the highest estimated number of incidents since fraud was first collected in the report, in the year ending March 2017. The figures also show that 7.8 percent of over 16s experienced domestic abuse last year, whilst 2.9% experienced stalking. 1.9% of people experienced sexual assault, and 8.6% of people experienced stalking. There were 535 homicides recorded last year, the lowest since the year ending March 2014, when there were 533 offences. Offences involving knives or sharp instruments decreased by 1% across the UK last year to 53,047. However, police forces saw increases and some saw decreases.
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Facial recognition technology not about ‘total surveillance society'
Rolling out more facial recognition vans is not intended to create a 'total surveillance society', the policing minister has said. Dame Diana Johnson said she believes the public would back the police's use of live facial recognition cameras, if they are used 'in a very measured, proportionate way to go after' suspects who officers are looking for. But Labour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti alleged that the technology had been 'developed pretty much completely outside the law', and voiced fears that the Government's plan is 'yet another move towards a total surveillance society'. Dame Diana denied Lady Chakrabarti's claim. Asked whether the rollout was the 'thin end of the wedge', the Home Office minister told BBC Breakfast: 'With the greatest of respect, that's not what this is about. 'This is about giving the tools to our police officers to enable them to keep us safe. 'And the live facial recognition results in London, where it's been used, in the past 12 months, over 580 arrests were made, and these included people who were wanted for rape, for GBH (grievous bodily harm), for robbery, for domestic abuse, and also for sex offenders who were breaching their conditions of being out in the community. 'So I think this is a really powerful tool for policing. 'And it's actually a tool, it's not an automated decision maker. 'So, the police officer has to look at what's being put up on the screen and decide what to do next, so there's that human involvement, but it is a really powerful tool, which I think the public would actually be supportive of being used in a very measured, proportionate way to go after those individuals that the police are looking for for these serious offences.' Dame Diana said she had seen the technology in action in Croydon, London, where the Metropolitan Police had put together a watchlist of wanted individuals, and the list was deleted after the exercise. 'So it was very tailored,' Dame Diana said. She added: 'There are laws about how this has to be done in terms of human rights, equalities law, data protection laws. 'I think one of the concerns people, perhaps rightly, have is the need to consolidate that into one piece of legislation or one law, and that's something we're going to consult on later in the year, about how live facial recognition technology should be used and the oversight of it to make it as transparent as possible for the public to really feel this is something that the police are using properly.' Dame Diana had earlier told Times Radio: 'There is quite a lot of misinformation out there about what this actually does and how it's used.' She said: 'And I know in the past, there've been concerns about bias, particularly around certain ethnic groups or genders or age. 'And the way that this is now structured, the algorithms that are being used have been independently tested, so I'm confident that the live facial recognition that we're rolling out today actually is within the law and does not have the bias that has happened previously.' According to the Home Office, the technology will be used to track down high-harm offenders. Seven English forces will have access to 10 vans equipped with cameras, across Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire, following on from recent deployments by London's Met Police and South Wales Police. Chief Superintendent Tim Morgan of South Wales Police said the technology had 'never resulted in a wrongful arrest in South Wales, and there have been no false alerts for several years as the technology and our understanding has evolved'. But human rights campaigners have 'concerns' about 'this incredibly intrusive technology', Lady Chakrabarti, a former director of the civil liberties advocacy group Liberty, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. The former shadow attorney general said: 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society – challenges to privacy, challenges to freedom of assembly and association, and problems with race and sex discrimination because of the higher likelihood of false matches in the context of certain groups.' She said that 'the public generally understand that police powers are governed by statute, so there's a public conversation, there are parliamentary debates and votes', but warned there was no law specifically covering live facial recognition to gather evidence. 'It's particularly odd that this has all been developed pretty much completely outside the law,' she said. Lady Chakrabarti said she 'welcomed' plans to consult ahead of possible new legislation, but warned that to date, 'it's been a bit of a Wild West – the police procuring technology from whichever companies they see fit, the police drawing up watchlists of who they're looking for and what level, what severity of crime should be sufficient for deployment, and pretty much marking their own homework'.
Reuters
38 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil falls as IEA raises supply forecast, investors await US-Russia meeting
LONDON, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Oil prices fell on Wednesday after the IEA noted supply overtaking demand this year, while investors awaited Friday's meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Brent crude futures fell 45 cents, or 0.7%, to $65.67 a barrel at 0831 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures edged down 53 cents, or 0.8% at $62.64. Both contracts settled lower on Tuesday. Trump and Putin are due to meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending Russia's war in Ukraine, which has shaken oil markets since February 2022. "Oil prices drifted lower on expectations that Friday's summit would not result in additional sanctions on Russia, ensuring the country's oil continues to flow predominantly to the south and east," said PVM Oil analyst Tamas Varga in a note. The International Energy Agency on Wednesday raised its forecast for oil supply growth this year following OPEC+'s decision but lowered its demand forecast due to lacklustre demand across the major economies. Long-term support, however, came from OPEC's updated monthly report on global supply and demand, Varga said, which raised its global oil demand forecast for next year and trimmed its estimate for growth in supply from the United States and other producers outside the wider OPEC+ group, pointing to a tighter market. Investors also awaited further cues after an industry report showed U.S. crude stockpiles climbed last week. Crude inventories in the United States, the world's biggest oil consumer, rose by 1.52 million barrels last week, market sources said, citing American Petroleum Institute figures on Tuesday. Gasoline inventories dropped while distillate inventories gained slightly. Analysts polled by Reuters expect today's Energy Information Administration report to show crude inventories fell by about 300,000 barrels last week. The EIA on Tuesday in its Short Term Energy Outlook (STEO) forecast Brent prices to average less than $60 per barrel in the fourth quarter, which would be the first quarter with average prices that low since 2020, stating that growth in the global oil supply would surpass growth in demand for petroleum products.
