UK Couple Convicted Of Killing Baby Daughter After Going 'Off-Grid' In Freezing Temperatures
Constance Marten and Mark Gordon were found guilty of killing their baby daughter after they went to live "off-grid" in late 2022 in freezing temperatures in southern England.
A British couple were convicted on Monday for the manslaughter of their baby daughter for negligence, more than two years after they went on the run, sparking a nationwide manhunt.
Constance Marten, a British aristocrat whose father was once a page to the late Queen Elizabeth, and Mark Gordon went to live 'off-grid" in late 2022 when she was pregnant after their previous children were taken into care, according to prosecutors.
The couple had hoped to avoid to keep their baby girl, named Victoria, from the state's care, after their first four children were taken in a similar manner. Victoria was born in December 2022, and the couple decided to live off-grid despite Marten having access to thousands of pounds from her trust fund.
'Arrogant, Grossly Negligent'
The couple spent several weeks in freezing temperatures while living in a tent in southern England, which led to the death of the baby. Prosecutors said they spent thousands of pounds on taxis to take them almost the length of England as they sought to evade the authorities, but could not find the wherewithal to provide adequate clothing and care for their child, according to The Guardian.
'Their selfish desire to keep their baby girl led inexorably to the death of that very baby," said prosecutor Tom Little at the start of their trial at London's Old Bailey Court earlier this year. Victoria was likely to have died from hypothermia in cold conditions in the tent, or was smothered while co-sleeping, according to the prosecution.
Marten told the jury that she fell asleep in the tent with her daughter placed inside her zipped-up coat for warmth, days after going off-grid. When she awoke, she found her daughter dead and could not explain how she had died. 'I just knew she wasn't alive and I felt responsible because I was holding her so my assumption was that I had fallen asleep on her," she said.
Marten, 38, and Gordon, 51, were previously convicted of perverting the course of justice, child cruelty and concealing the birth of a child at an earlier trial, but the jury had been unable to reach a verdict at the time.
The couple will be sentenced in September, as per British media reports. Samantha Yelland, Senior Crown Prosecutor at the Crown Prosecution Service in London, said, 'Their reckless actions were driven by a selfish desire to keep their baby no matter the cost – resulting in her tragic death."
Marten and Gordon were sought by police from January 2023 after their abandoned car was found on fire with a placenta wrapped in a towel inside, near Manchester in northern England. After a nearly two-month search, they were located in Brighton on England's south coast, and the child's body was found two days later.
(with Reuters inputs)
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Will Donald Trump Pardon Ghislaine Maxwell In Epstein Case? 'Have Power To But...'
Donald Trump acknowledged he can pardon Ghislaine Maxwell but hasn't considered it. US President Donald Trump acknowledged he has the authority to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite convicted for her role in Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex trafficking ring, but said he has not considered doing so. 'I'm allowed to do it but it's something I haven't thought about," Donald Trump said when asked whether he might issue a pardon or commute Ghislaine Maxwell's sentence. The comment came as Ghislaine Maxwell held a second day of closed-door meetings with US Justice Department officials, though the purpose of those talks remains unclear. Who Is Ghislaine Maxwell? Ghislaine Maxwell, 63, is the only person currently serving a sentence in connection to Jeffrey Epstein's vast and notorious sex trafficking operation, which involved the abuse of dozens of underage girls, some as young as 14. She was convicted in 2021 on multiple federal counts, including sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy charges and is serving a 20-year sentence in a Florida federal facility. A longtime associate and confidante of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell was accused of procuring and grooming young girls for him and his network of powerful associates between 1994 and 2004. Donald Trump's comments revived scrutiny over his past remarks regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. In 2020, he said he wished her 'well" shortly after her arrest- a statement that drew backlash given the severity of the charges she faced. Ghislaine Maxwell's name has also surfaced in connection to a wider investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's ties with high-profile figures. While Donald Trump has denied wrongdoing, he has been photographed with both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at social events in the 1990s and early 2000s. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments First Published: July 25, 2025, 19:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Amid Epstein row, Ghislaine Maxwell seeks relief from US Supreme Court
Even as an uproar over files relating to Jeffrey Epstein engulfs President Donald Trump and Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court is due to wade into the controversy and decide whether to hear a bid by an associate of the late financier and convicted sex offender to overturn her criminal conviction. The justices, now on their summer recess, are expected in late September to consider whether to take up an appeal by British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.(AFP) The justices, now on their summer recess, are expected in late September to consider whether to take up an appeal by British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year prison sentence after being found guilty in 2021 by a jury in New York of helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. Maxwell's lawyers have told the Supreme Court that her conviction was invalid because a non-prosecution and plea agreement that federal prosecutors had made with Epstein in Florida in 2007 also shielded his associates and should have barred her criminal prosecution in New York. Her lawyers have a Monday deadline for filing their final written brief in their appeal to the court. Some legal experts see merit in Maxwell's claim, noting that it touches on an unsettled matter of U.S. law that has divided some of the nation's regional federal appeals courts, known as circuit courts. Mitchell Epner, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice, said there is a chance that the Supreme Court takes up the case, and noted the disagreement among appeals courts. Such a split among circuit courts can be a factor when the nation's top judicial body considers whether or not to hear a case. "The question of whether a plea agreement from one U.S. Attorney's Office binds other federal prosecution as a whole is a serious issue that has split the circuits," Epner said. While uncommon, "there have been several cases presenting the issue over the years," Epner added. Trump's Justice Department appeared to acknowledge the circuit split in a brief filed to the justices this month, but urged them to reject the appeal. Any disparity among lower court rulings "is of limited importance," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the brief, "because the scope of a plea or similar agreement is under the control of the parties to the agreement." If the Supreme Court opts to grant Maxwell's appeal, it would hear arguments during its new term that begins in October, with a ruling then expected by the end of next June. Mounting Pressure Trump and his administration have been facing mounting pressure from his supporters to release additional information about the Justice Department's investigation into Epstein, who hanged himself in 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell, an autopsy concluded, while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal lawyer to Trump, met with Maxwell in Florida on Thursday in what her lawyer called "a very productive day." The administration reversed course this month on its pledge to release more documents about Epstein, prompting fury among some of Trump's most loyal followers. The Epstein case has long been the subject of conspiracy theories, considering his rich and powerful friends and the circumstances of his death. The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term in office. Whether the court would want to take on such a case that represents a political landmine is an open question. The justices hear relatively few cases - about 70 out of more than 4,000 appeals filed at the court each year - and have broad discretion to choose which ones will be on their docket. At least four of the justices must agree in order for the court to take up a case. Epstein Deal Maxwell's appeal focuses on a deal Epstein struck in 2007 to avoid federal prosecution in part by pleading guilty to state criminal offenses in Florida of soliciting prostitution and soliciting minors to engage in prostitution. Epstein then served 13 months in a minimum-security state facility. In 2019, during Trump's first term as president, the U.S. Justice Department charged Epstein in Manhattan with sex trafficking of minors. Epstein pleaded not guilty, but committed suicide before the trial at age 66. Maxwell was arrested in 2020 and convicted the following year after being accused by federal prosecutors of recruiting and grooming girls to have sexual encounters with Epstein between 1994 and 2004. Maxwell failed to convince a trial judge and the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to throw out her conviction based on the 2007 non-prosecution agreement, which stated that "the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein." In the appeal to the Supreme Court, Maxwell's lawyer David Markus said that in its reference to co-conspirators, the Epstein agreement had no geographic limit on where the non-prosecution agreement could be enforced. "If the government can promise one thing and deliver another - and courts let it happen - that erodes the integrity of the justice system," Markus told Reuters. "This isn't just about Ghislaine Maxwell. It's about whether the government is held to its word," Markus said. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers has urged the Supreme Court to hear Maxwell's appeal given the prevalence of plea agreements in the U.S. criminal justice system and to ensure that the government keeps its promises. The group represents thousands of private lawyers, public defenders, law professors and judges nationwide. It said in a filing to the justices that the lack of a geographic limitation means "no part of the Department of Justice may institute criminal charges against any co-conspirator in any district." Columbia Law School professor Daniel Richman, an expert in criminal law, said it was unusual for the U.S. attorney in Florida to include protection for co-conspirators in the agreement to not prosecute Epstein. That peculiarity might be reason enough for the Supreme Court to avoid the matter, Richman said, as it renders the case a poor vehicle for resolving whether pleas in one court district bind actions in all other court districts. "There were many strange things about this deal," Richman said, which will cut against the Supreme Court's interest in taking up Maxwell's appeal. Richman said he hoped the political fallout would not play into the Supreme Court's decision on whether to hear Maxwell's appeal. If it does, Richman said, taking up the case could allow Maxwell to avoid cooperating with the government and dodge responsibility. "A decision that would allow Maxwell to protect herself probably would not be something they would be interested in," Richman said of the Supreme Court justices.
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
Thailand wants to crush China's friend? Launches Operation 'Yuttha-Bodin' to crush Cambodia, Russia-made rockets fired by...
The fighting between Thailand and Cambodia is getting worse. Thailand's army has now launched a major military operation called 'Operation Yutha Bodin' against Cambodia. The Thai army said this is a 'war for sacred land' and claimed that the operation's goal is to 'crush those who have entered Thai territory illegally.' According to reports, Thailand has started heavy attacks, both by ground and air on Cambodian forces under this operation. As the violent clashes entered their second day, the Thai government moved over 1 lakh (100,000) people from four border provinces to safer areas to protect them. News agency Reuters reported that so far, 15 people have died, including 14 civilians. The situation on the border remains very tense. The fighting between Thailand and Cambodia started early Thursday morning when both armies clashed in a disputed border area. What began as small gunfire quickly turned into heavy fighting, with rockets and large weapons being used. Thailand's army said that Cambodian forces fired BM-21 Grad rockets and used field artillery during the attack. The Thai side also said that they are taking action as needed based on the situation. Meanwhile, Cambodia has blamed Thailand for the violence. Cambodian officials claimed that Thai soldiers entered their territory without any reason, and in response, they acted in self-defense. Both sides are accusing each other, and the conflict is getting more serious. How dangerous is Thailand's 'Yutha Bodin' operation? The word 'Yutha Bodin' comes from the Thai language. It means 'the ultimate war to protect the land.' Here, 'Yutha' stands for war, and 'Bodin' means holy or sacred land. According to Thai military officials, this operation is not just a military move, it's a strong and serious response to anyone who dares to violate Thailand's land or sovereignty. The army says the operation is about defending the country, its people, and its national pride. In their official statement, the Thai army said, 'Crush anyone who enters Thai land illegally—do it for the land, for the people, and for Thai honour.' On Friday, fighting was reported in Ubon Ratchathani and Surin provinces, near the border. The Thai army also said that Cambodia used heavy weapons, including artillery and Russian-made BM-21 rocket systems. The statement added that Cambodian forces kept firing rockets and bombs continuously, using powerful field weapons. According to reports, the clash between Thailand and Cambodia is spreading across an area of about 209 kilometers. There are at least six locations where heavy gunfire is being exchanged. This is said to be the worst fighting between the two countries in the last 13 years. The situation got worse on Wednesday, when Thailand pulled its ambassador out of Cambodia's capital, Phnom Penh, and also expelled Cambodia's ambassador from Bangkok. This diplomatic breakdown happened soon after a Thai soldier was injured by a landmine. Thailand has blamed Cambodia for planting that landmine. Thailand's acting Prime Minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, said: 'We want to resolve this peacefully, but this was a clear act of provocation. We had no choice but to protect our borders.' This shows how tense things have become between the two nations, with both sides blaming each other and preparing for serious military action.
