
DOJ Antitrust chief is betting American tech will beat China
'It's about enforcing antitrust robustly in a way that works for all Americans … that's my starting point,' Slater, 53, told me in her first interview since taking on her role as Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division at the Department of Justice a little over 100 days ago.
Slater took over a serious docket of cases that includes suits against Google, in regards to search and ad tech; Apple, for its smartphone market dominance; Visa, in relation to debit card payment processing; and Live Nation/Ticketmaster and its live entertainment business.
4 Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division Gail Slater tells me the crux of her job is 'enforcing antitrust robustly in a way that works for all Americans.'
Bloomberg via Getty Images
While she won't comment on the status of those cases, she's been a key advisor urging Trump to stay the course on antitrust enforcement — despite tech companies' efforts to sway him.
(When I asked how frequently she discusses agenda with President Trump, she told me, 'We get a lot of signals from the White House in the form of Executive Orders.')
Slater is deeply committed and believes aggressive antitrust enforcement can benefit consumers in countless ways — even on seemingly unrelated issues.
'Speech and the censorship of speech can be downstream of [tech companies] market power,' she noted.
Not everyone on the right agrees with her. Some Republicans, like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), believe the US government should tread lightly with tech companies. They worry that too much regulation could unintentionally give China a dangerous advantage when it comes to artificial intelligence.
4 While tech titans, like Meta's Mark Zuckerberg (far left) and Google's Sundar Pichai (center in glasses) have cozied up to the Trump Administration, they aren't immune to regulation.
AP
But Slater feels antitrust efforts could actually give the US a leg-up.
'Companies competing against one another innovate. That's the free market at its finest,' she explained. 'We can win the AI race against the Chinese without becoming like China… we will win the global race to AI the American way.'
Bringing cases against massive companies can cost millions, making Slater's job — at a time when everyone in the federal government is under the gun to cut costs — especially challenging.
'The big tech cases alone are a huge, huge lift, both from a human resource standpoint, a scale standpoint when it comes to documents and experts and how we put those cases on a trial,' Slater said.
This story is part of NYNext, an indispensable insider insight into the innovations, moonshots and political chess moves that matter most to NYC's power players (and those who aspire to be).
Her efforts, she said, have to be 'low resource, high return on investment things.'
And even though she is focused on ending unfair monopolies, she's also trying to implement as many pro-business policies as she can.
On the front end, Slater is now allowing early terminations to the (previously) mandatory 30-day waiting period for mergers to close on deals the DOJ deems benign. Since taking the helm, she has granted 58 of 322 filings, worth $71 billion.
'In particular, we are taking settlements in merger cases where the previous administration took none,' she said.
4 Gail Slater is now allowing early terminations to the (previously) mandatory 30-day waiting period for mergers to close on deals the DOJ deems benign
REUTERS
At the back end of deals, she has embraced the use of consent decrees — allowing parties to resolve competitive overlaps by divesting assets to qualified buyers, a practice the prior administration largely avoided.
'We listened hard to concerns that Wall Street and others had about the policy of the prior administration on deal flow,' she told me of efforts to simplify rules where she can. 'We inherited a historic docket and we want to be responsible stewards of that, But we're also setting [the agenda] by fixing the merger review process to make it more transparent, to make work better for deal makers.'
Slater, who is soft-spoken, jokes 'this is me raising my voice' when talking about the efforts they've already made to cut over-regulation.
She has also teamed up with the Federal Trade Commission to eradicate what she describes as 'useless' regulations.
'We opened up a docket and we said to anybody interested with expertise in the area, tell us the regulations that you're aware that are hindering competition — and the ways in which that could be fixed. Because we want to support free market competition,' Slater said. 'That's the goal here.'
4 In a Truth Social post, Donald Trump made it clear that fighting Big Tech is a key priority for Slater.
Donald J. Trump / Truth Social
Another tool is using amicus briefs to strategically influence federal court cases, like they have done in Texas v. BlackRock — a high-profile antitrust lawsuit where states allege major investors like BlackRock colluded to reduce coal production, raising energy prices.
She said it is a way of supporting American companies and administration policies with relatively inexpensive but high-impact interventions.
Slater, who was born in Dublin and studied at Oxford, moved to the US in 2003 and worked as a trial attorney at the FTC for a decade. She held positions at the Internet Association, Fox Corporation, Roku and, during the first Trump administration, the National Economic Council, before advising JD Vance on antitrust issues while he was an Ohio senator.
She's excited moving beyond the cases left to her by her predecessor.
'A priority for me is health care,' she told me. 'We're looking to set a positive agenda around drug pricing and health care more broadly.
Send NYNext a tip: nynextlydia@nypost.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Trump Stepped Up His Attacks on the Fed
President Trump said today that Lisa Cook, a Federal Reserve governor who has repeatedly voted not to cut interest rates despite his public pressure, should 'resign, now!!!' It was the president's latest push to remake the central bank. Trump cited allegations that Cook had engaged in mortgage fraud by claiming two primary residences in her mortgage applications. That information came from Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, who said that his office had investigated Cook and referred the matter to the Justice Department, encouraging a criminal investigation. Pulte, who leveled similar allegations against Adam Schiff, the Democratic senator, and Letitia James, the New York State attorney general, is the same official who drafted a letter for the president to fire the Fed chair, Jerome Powell. Both Pulte and Trump have repeatedly criticized the Fed for holding interest rates steady. Just last night, Trump called Powell 'a disaster' for not cutting rates. Officials at the central bank have described the decision as an attempt to prevent inflation from spinning out of control. Trump's attacks against the Fed fit a broader pattern wherein the administration uses the instruments of government to target perceived political rivals: At least two large law firms have committed themselves to doing free legal work for the Trump administration in order to avoid punitive executive orders. The president has personally stipulated that universities pay hefty penalties in order to regain their federal funding. The N.S.A.'s chief data scientist, who analyzed Russian election meddling in 2016, was stripped of his security clearance despite an effort by the agency's leader to block the move. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


The Verge
a few seconds ago
- The Verge
The Made by Google event felt like being sucked into an episode of Wandavision
For the past twenty years or so, I've had a clear image of what a product launch keynote is supposed to be like. A charismatic executive walks across the stage, points to some animations and pre-taped clips, a live demo or two happens, and the crowd goes wild. Clips proliferate on social media and cue the online discourse. You can trace it back to Steve Jobs dressed in a black turtleneck, with a glint in his eye, walking across a stage, asking if a hyped-up audience is ready for one more thing. So iconic was that format, it's been the blueprint for nearly every tech keynote since. Today's Made by Google event was decidedly not that. It was a lot more like a live taping of The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon. Partly because Fallon was the one hosting it, but also because 10 minutes before the show, I was sitting in the studio audience, watching a warm-up comic try and pump up the crowd as an applause sign blazed in the rafters. A small crew of cameramen weaved in and out of four separate sets, one wheeling a teleprompter (because yes, much of the repartee was scripted). Rick Osterloh, Google's senior vice president of devices and services, did not stride across the stage to tell us all about the new Pixel 10 phones, Pixel Watch 4, and Pixel Buds 2A. He instead sat on a comfy chair while Fallon 'interviewed' him as if he were a Tonight Show guest. Pre-recorded clips were rolled. Once Osterloh's segment was done, Fallon and another Googler moved onto a different set, proceeding to walk through each new gadget like we were all watching the QVC home shopping network. Surprise guests and a parade of influencers were brought out to showcase new Gemini features, including Alex Cooper and the Subway Takes guy. A wild Jonas brother appeared because he had a 'Shot on Pixel 10 Pro' music video to premiere. Perhaps it was the cognitive dissonance of figures I've only ever seen through a screen yap about AI features I'm not 100 percent convinced they fully understood. (I don't buy that Fallon is that excited about Tensor chips or even knows what dust and waterproofing 'IP numbers!' are.) But I found myself feeling like I'd been sucked into an episode of Wandavision, a Marvel show where the Scarlet Witch is trapped in a make-believe world of studio sets and TV tropes. A show where the unnatural cringe and heightened emotions are what cue the protagonist into realizing what she's seeing is made of smoke and mirrors. Some of that is just movie magic, baby. Everything on stage feels unnaturally cringe until its intensity is diluted by being filtered through your screen. But the real unsettling thing was understanding that I — and other gadget nerds and media — were not the target audience for this show. The point of a keynote is to be both informative and impressive, telling the most interested audiences about the ins and outs of the new products and attempting to wow them with live demos and technological feats. Today's Pixel event was less concerned with product minutiae and more concerned with making it all entertaining. I'm not entirely sure who the target was, though. Was it supposed to be the so-called mainstream Luddite who feels comforted by Fallon learning what RCS means? Perhaps. Or was it disaffected Gen Z youths, drawn in by the Subway Takes guy shilling for wireless buds even as he used a wired mic for his recorded segment? Or was it the faceless masses who are perhaps fed up with their iPhones? In teaching Fallon about RCS, the onstage Googler declared that Google is 'done with that conversation' about green bubbles and wink-wink, the Pixel team isn't afraid to say the 'A-word.' I'm not sure even Google knows who it's targeting, aside from 'someone new.' While trapped in my seat — we were told that once taping began, we could not leave, even if we had to pee — it occurred to me that perhaps this has been a long time coming. It's as my colleague Mia Sato brought up in her recent Vergecast episode: with TV on the decline, celebrities have to resort to an array of different online outlets to promote their work. Perhaps Google is doing the same. Back in the day, Jobs needed media to get the word out and build buzz. In this new age, companies can go straight to the source through influencers, YouTube (which Google also owns), and livestreams. It's why you see an increasing number of influencers invited to launch events — and featuring in them. There were plenty in attendance today. It's not that journalists are getting left out. It's more that the keynote as we know it isn't the only way to get attention anymore. All I know is today felt like the end of an era. That's not necessarily a bad thing. I'll confess that traditional keynotes have felt stale as of late. As cringe as it was, this was at least something from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Victoria Song Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gadgets Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Pixel Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Report Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech


UPI
a few seconds ago
- UPI
More than half of U.S. thinks racism is widespread, according to Gallup
A protestor stands in the street in front of Akron City Justice Center in Akron, Ohio, in July 2022 after Akron police fatally shot Jayland Walker, 25, after a short chase amid public unrest with law enforcement. Washington-based Gallup polling results suggest 64% of Americans believe racism is widespread in the United States. File Photo by Aaron Josefczyk/UPI | License Photo Aug. 20 (UPI) -- New data released Wednesday by Gallup suggests more than half the country believes that racism against Black people is not only alive and well but widespread in the United States. Gallup's newly-released results of 64% nearly tied with its last reading in its 2021 periodic measurements as its highest recorded by the Washington-based firm since 2008, the year Barack Obama was elected to the White House as the nation's first Black president. It's suggesting that 83% of Black adults and 61% of White adults say that racism is widespread. The question was first posed by Gallup experts in 2008, in which results said at the time that only 56% of U.S. adults thought racism was a widespread issues. It saw a reported dip to 51% by the following year. By 2015, its 60% reading came at a time of several high-profile killings of Black civilians at the hands of law enforcement officers and has since remained in that range. According to Gallup, police interactions stood out as the "top" area of unfair treatment toward Black people, with a perceptions of bias in healthcare, shopping, restaurants and workplaces at or near record high returns. Gallup said that non-Hispanic Black adults continue to be "most likely" to say such racism is prevalent in the country, with 83% expressing that view. Results found that smaller majorities of Hispanic respondents at 64% and 61% of non-Hispanic White adults agreed. The findings come from Gallup's survey from June 2-26 and included an oversample to allow for better estimates. "Conversely, Americans' (29%) belief that racism against White people is widespread is the lowest of five readings since 2008," according to Gallup. It added that 68% in its poll say U.S. adults think civil rights "have improved" in their lifetime. "The overall sample was weighted so all racial/ethnic groups are represented in their proper proportions of the U.S. population," according to Gallup officials. But the survey noted how in six of its interactions that dealing with police was seen largely as racially "inequitable." Gallup's results suggests a trend of at least 57% of Americans who believe Black people are treated less fairly than White people in various situations, particularly during traffic incidents that in recent years have been known to turn deadly in multiple states.