
Viral: Youngster wearing shorts denied entry inside passport office; X post sparks debate on dress codes
It all started when a youngster visited the office wearing shorts and slippers and was denied entry by a security guard. The incident came to light when Vineeth K, a consultant and founder of the startup Deals Dhamaka, shared a detailed account of what he witnessed while waiting for his turn at the office on X, formerly known as Twitter.
When confronted, the young man didn't take the refusal quietly. He pushed back, asking, 'We go to our corporate offices this way. Why don't you allow this in a government office?'
As the situation gained attention from bystanders, the young man's father stepped in. Estimated to be in his 60s, he entered the building and appealed directly to the passport officer, explaining that they had travelled a long distance for the appointment. After a brief discussion, the officer allowed the youth entry as a one-time exception.
The story could have ended there, but the security guard wasn't done. He turned to Vineeth, who had witnessed the ordeal up till now, saying, 'Some people don't give value to our work and our offices. Who comes to office in nightwear? There are women, elders inside — what if they feel uncomfortable? The entire generation is getting spoilt and their parents don't say a word.'
Vineeth's post ended with a question to his followers: Was the guard overstepping, or was he upholding a standard that deserves respect?
The responses were mixed. Some argued that rigid dress codes in government offices are outdated and classist, disproportionately affecting those who may not adhere to traditional or formal styles.
'My thoughts are that Indian admin seems to be run by a bunch of old, grumpy, boomers and we have the world's youngest population currently. Not a good sign,' an X user opined. Another argued, 'What's so offensive about shorts? We used to have the entire indian police force wearing shorts until '70s.'
Another social media user pointed out the need to dress comfortably given the rising mercury: 'In the Indian summer, it is best to let the dress code be a bit loose. We're not Norway with a pleasant 15 degree Summer.'
Others couldn't help but find humour in the situation, as an X user joked, 'I agree he should have gone in a sherwani.'
However, another section of commenters sided with the security guard, viewing the youngster's outfit as disrespectful and symptomatic of a declining regard for public institutions — due in part to the prevalence of startup culture as well as relaxed corporate atmospheres.
'These IT guys have ruined the society,' a user summed up the sentiment. Another elaborated, 'It's a govt office. That should be enough to suggest what not to wear. It's not a Gen Z corporate office where people come in sleeveless, shorts, bralettes. Everything need not be written in black and white. It's just decorum attached to a place.'
Some went as far as labelling it 'lack of civic sense'. 'Didn't it used to be that there are only two times when short pants are acceptable - on a school boy and for sports. This fellow wants to be respected, he should wear long pants,' a social media user opined, as another commented, 'This idiot won't walk into the American Embassy in shorts for a US Visa. Dress appropriately.'
Another shared his own experience of early morning school drops for his child, writing, 'I go to drop my kid to school. We don't even enter the school. Just at the outer gate. But they don't allow us to come in shorts. That's early morning and one is usually in nightwear. Highly inconvenient to change. But everyone does that.'
One user also expressed his frustration at the general disregard of norms by youngsters in our society: 'I see a lot of people defending the guy in shorts. I used to wonder why we are so bad at following traffic rules on the roads. Now I know why, we don't want follow rules, we don't want to respect others. I see a different woke culture movement happening.'
One thing is certain: the way you dress may be the key to a door opening — or remaining closed.
What's your take on this debate?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
US $250 visa fee may cost economy $29 bn in lost tourism spend
You Might Also Like: Could Trump's Big Beautiful Bill drive away World Cup tourists from the US? Congress and the US tourism industry are at odds over the newly approved $250 'visa integrity fee.' While the Congressional Budget Office ( CBO ) projects it could generate about $2.7 billion annually, industry officials warn it will deter international visitors and harm the broader CBO's estimate is based only on direct fee collections from roughly 11 million annual applicants. But Tourism Economics , a division of Oxford Economics, found the fee could discourage 5.4% of visitors, translating to nearly one million fewer trips each year. That would cut visitor spending, tax revenue, and jobs in the tourism sector. A CBO spokesperson told Forbes, 'By longstanding tradition, the Congressional Budget Office does not incorporate macroeconomic feedback effects into its traditional cost estimates.'Industry representatives argue that lawmakers overlooked the impact on key markets such as India and Brazil. 'Congress made the mistake of assuming that this worldwide visa integrity fee would not have a big impact on visitors from countries like India or Brazil,' Erik Hansen, senior vice president of government relations at the US Travel Association, told Forbes. He noted India is one of the fastest-growing inbound markets, with Indian tourists spending $13.3 billion in the US in 2024. 'Applying a $250 fee to a country where travel is growing is mindboggling. It will absolutely deter travel—that's what our research has found,' Hansen refund provision attached to the fee is also drawing scrutiny. Under the Big Beautiful Bill, the State Department 'may reimburse' the fee after the visa expires, but most visitor visas are valid for 10 years. 'The idea that you're going to give the government money and then wait around 10 years and remember to ask for it back, even if you followed the rules, is just absolutely crazy,' Hansen said. The CBO itself acknowledged that few applicants would claim refunds, and the State Department would need years to create a processing fee comes as international tourism to the US faces broader headwinds. A June report from the World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) projected the US will be the only major market to see a decline in international visitor spending in 2025, with losses estimated at $29 billion. WTTC President Julia Simpson said, 'While other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the US government is putting up the 'closed' sign.'Compounding the challenge, Congress cut funding for Brand USA—the country's marketing agency—from $100 million to $20 million. Hansen called the decision 'another error,' stressing that the program is central to shaping international perceptions of the US as a travel destination.


Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
Parliament Session Highlights: Online Gaming Bill on Rajya Sabha Agenda
Today will be the last day of Monsoon Session 2025 of Parliament which has been largely characterised by Opposition disruption and demand for discussion on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar. You will be able to witness a similar drama today as well with Opposition giving a notice for demanding discussion on revision of electoral rolls. Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill India, 2025 will be taken up for consideration and passing in Rajya Sabha on day two of the Budget Session. The Lok Sabha on Monday passed a Bill to ban online games of chance that allow betting of money on the ground that they lead to addiction, fraud and money laundering. Indian parliament live Updates: Parliament Monsoon Session Demand For Discussion Led To Ruckus The Opposition had taken up a series of issues demanding discussion and debate. Opposition leaders were oral in their review of the government, and indicted it of not allowing debate on important public issues including collaborative violence in certain countries, severance, rising affectation, and contended abuse of central agencies. The Rajya Sabha, Opposition MPs took to the Well of the House on numerous occasions, demanding a detailed discussion and an explanation by the PM. The government argued that the work of the House should not be interrupted and declared the Opposition accountable for causing the noise on purpose. Passing Key Bills Amid Uproar, Parliament Omits Debate Scene after scene of uproar, sloganeering and the Opposition refusing to cooperate dominated both Houses of Parliament day after day during the gaming regulation bill, with Opposition MPs demanding their issues to be addressed before the Houses could consider important legislation. In House Amid Pandemic, Parliament Debates Sustainable Textiles Mission India's first astronaut to be on international space station and the role of space programme for 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047 will be a part of special discussion in Lok Sabha.

Economic Times
27 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Centre, states stare at fiscal tensions from India's big tax cut proposal
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's surprise move to lower consumption taxes within three months is set to spark tough negotiations with states, who will have to shoulder the bulk of the revenue losses. ADVERTISEMENT Modi proposed a major rejig of the complex goods and services tax last week, a move many businesses had been pushing for since the system was rolled out in 2017. Stocks rallied as investors bet lower taxes on everyday goods would boost consumer spending and help offset the drag on economic growth from higher US tariffs. The tax proposals — which still need to be approved — are expected to squeeze government revenue, especially for state governments. Economists such as Gaura Sen Gupta at IDFC First Bank estimate the total cost to the exchequer at Rs 1.8 lakh crore ($20.7 billion) annually, with the federal government facing a net revenue hit of about 0.15% of the gross domestic product and states incurring losses of roughly 0.36% of GDP. The uneven hit is likely to sharpen fiscal tensions between New Delhi and the states, which have sparred with Modi's government over revenue-sharing in the past. Some states say they were not adequately compensated for losses when the GST was introduced, leaving them with limited ways to raise revenue on their own. Harpal Singh Cheema, the finance minister of Punjab, told reporters on Wednesday that his state has been losing 210 billion rupees annually since the introduction of the GST, and called for a new mechanism to compensate states for such losses. Wealthier opposition-ruled southern states have also long argued that much of the tax revenue they generate is diverted north, where Modi's ruling party holds greater sway. 'States fear a further loss in revenue, which in turn increases their dependence on the center in framing their budget targets,' said Shumita Deveshwar, chief economist at Lombard, adding that she still views the reforms as 'positive.' ADVERTISEMENT State reactions, so far, have been mixed, with some leaders like Thomas Isaac, the former finance minister of Kerala, calling the move 'devastating' in a post on X, while others say they need more time to weigh the impact. Thangam Thennarasu, the finance minister of Tamil Nadu — an opposition-ruled southern state often in conflict with the Modi government — said they will need to 'study the proposed GST rationalization' and consult other departments to assess the revenue hit. ADVERTISEMENT Karnataka's Revenue Minister Krishna Byre Gowda told local media that 'any major shock in GST will fundamentally affect the fiscal health of the states.'To further complicate matters for the opposition, the changes are likely to be announced by the Hindu festival of Diwali in October, which comes ahead of elections in the eastern state of Bihar, where the GST cuts could be used by Modi's government to sway voters. ADVERTISEMENT 'Any GST cut, if passed on to the consumers and customers, has a potential to create goodwill for the ruling coalition in Bihar,' said Rasheed Kidwai, a fellow at New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation. The state is run by a local party led by Nitish Kumar, one of Modi's main allies in the coalition that controls the lower house of the national government is pursuing the overhaul with urgency. Home Minister Amit Shah began planning talks with state and federal ministries in July to build consensus, the Indian Express reported. Modi also called on states to support the GST revamp days after he announced the move. ADVERTISEMENT States are heavily reliant on GST revenue, which accounts for more than 40% of their tax receipts. Before the GST's introduction, Indian states had the autonomy to levy and raise their own taxes on goods and services. The unified GST stripped states of that power, leaving them able to independently tax only a few items such as petroleum products and alcohol. States such as Punjab, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, and Kerala are facing fiscal stress due to weak revenue mobilization, elevated fiscal deficits, heavy debt burdens, and poor quality of expenditure, according to a report by a government think tank Niti in New Delhi said federal and state revenues would dip in the short-run after the changes but should be gradually offset by stronger consumption. States can also raise taxes on alcohol and petroleum to bolster their coffers, the officials told reporters, asking not to be identified to discuss private tax proposals are being discussed this week by a panel of state finance ministers from both Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party and opposition parties. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Wednesday presented the federal government's recommendations at the panel meeting. The final recommendations of the panel would then be submitted to the GST Council — which is headed by the finance minister — and comprises all state finance ministers. The council is expected to take up the issue next month or in early October. The council has the final say on tax rate changes. Most decisions so far have been passed by consensus, but proposals can be put to a vote if needed and require a three-fourths majority to pass. In such a scenario, the ruling BJP — which governs 21 of 28 states and eight union territories — would have little trouble pushing the measures through, said Kidwai. 'While they have the majority states, for a democracy to function, the government must take everyone on board,' said Neerja Chowdhury, a New Delhi-based political analyst. The 'trust deficit' between opposition-ruled states and the federal government 'needs to be addressed for the GST reforms to sail through.'