logo
'Forgotten' 401(k) account fees can cost workers thousands in lost retirement savings, report finds

'Forgotten' 401(k) account fees can cost workers thousands in lost retirement savings, report finds

CNBC17 hours ago

With more Americans job hopping in the wake of the Great Resignation, the risk of "forgetting" a 401(k) plan with a previous employer has jumped, recent studies show.
As of 2023, there were 29.2 million left-behind 401(k) accounts holding roughly $1.65 trillion in assets, up 20% from two years earlier, according to the latest data by Capitalize, a fintech firm.
Nearly half of employees leave money in their old plans during work transitions, according to a 2024 report from Vanguard.
However, that can come at a cost.
More from Personal Finance:Average 401(k) balances drop 3% amid market swingsThe average 401(k) savings rate hit a record highOn-time debt payments aren't a magic fix for your credit score
For starters, 41% of workers are unaware that they are paying 401(k) fees at all, a 2021 survey by the U.S. Government Accountability Office found.
In most cases, 401(k) fees, which can include administrative service costs and fees for investment management, are relatively low, depending on the plan provider.
But there could be additional fees on 401(k) accounts left behind from previous jobs that come with an extra bite.
Former employees who don't take their 401(k) with them could be charged an additional fee to maintain those accounts, according to Romi Savova, CEO of PensionBee, an online retirement provider. "If you leave it with the employer, the employer could force the record keeping costs on to you," she said.
According to PensionBee's analysis, a $4.55 monthly nonemployee maintenance fee on top of other costs can add up to nearly $18,000 in lost retirement funds over time. Not only does the monthly fee eat into the principal, but workers also lose the compound growth that would have accumulated on the balance, the study found.
Fees on those forgotten 401(k)s can be particularly devastating for long-term savers, said Gil Baumgarten, founder and CEO of Segment Wealth Management in Houston.
That doesn't necessarily mean it pays to move your balance, he said.
"There are two sides to every story," he said. "Lost 401(k)s can be problematic, but rolling into a IRA could come with other costs."
When workers switch jobs, they may be able to move the funds to a new employer-sponsored plan or roll their old 401(k) funds into an individual retirement account, which many people do.
But IRAs typically have higher investment fees than 401(k)s and those rollovers can also cost workers thousands of dollars over decades, according to another study, by The Pew Charitable Trusts, a nonprofit research organization.
Collectively, workers who roll money into IRAs could pay $45.5 billion in extra fees over a hypothetical retirement period of 25 years, Pew estimated.
Another option is to cash out an old 401(k), which is generally considered the least desirable option because of the hefty tax penalty. Even so, Vanguard found 33% of workers do that.
While leaving your retirement savings in your former employer's plan is often the simplest option, the risk of losing track of an old plan has been growing.
Now, 25% of all 401(k) plan assets are left behind or forgotten, according to the most recent data from Capitalize, up from 20% two years prior.
However, thanks to "Secure 2.0," a slew of measures affecting retirement savers, the Department of Labor created the retirement savings lost and found database to help workers find old retirement plans.
"Ultimately, it can't really be lost," Baumgarten said. "Every one of these companies has a responsibility to provide statements." Often simply updating your contact information can help reconnect you with these records, he advised.
You can also use your Social Security number to track down funds through the National Registry of Unclaimed Retirement Benefits, a private-sector database.
In 2022, a group of large 401(k) plan administrators launched the Portability Services Network.
That consortium works with defined contributor plan rollover specialist Retirement Clearinghouse on auto portability, or the automatic transfer of small-balance 401(k)s. Depending on the plan, employees with up to $7,000 could have their savings automatically transferred into a workplace retirement account with their new employer when they change jobs.
The goal is to consolidate and maintain those retirement savings accounts, rather than cashing them out or risk losing track of them, during employment transitions, according to Mike Shamrell, vice president of thought leadership at Fidelity Investments, the nation's largest provider of 401(k) plans and a member of the Portability Services Network.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dave Ramsey warns Americans on 401(k)s, stocks
Dave Ramsey warns Americans on 401(k)s, stocks

Miami Herald

time41 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Dave Ramsey warns Americans on 401(k)s, stocks

With uncertainty surrounding stock market volatility and the possibility of a recession, many American workers are concerned about managing their everyday expenses - paying mortgages or rent, keeping up with rising grocery and fuel costs, and handling other financial obligations. While addressing these immediate financial pressures, they also prioritize long-term stability by investing in 401(k) plans and IRAs (Individual Retirement Accounts), aiming to secure their retirement and navigate the unpredictable economic landscape. Dave Ramsey, the personal finance bestselling author and radio host, warns Americans about the challenges of saving for retirement, investing in stocks and 401(k) plans, and building wealth amid market instability. Related: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security Enrolling in an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan remains a reliable method for growing retirement savings, particularly when companies offer matching contributions to enhance employees' investments. With automatic payroll deductions, this approach ensures consistent savings with minimal effort, making it both convenient and effective. In 2025, the maximum contribution limit for 401(k) plans has risen to $23,500, up from $23,000 in 2024. Employees between the ages of 60 and 63 can benefit from higher catch-up contribution limits of $11,250, while those aged 50 to 59 have a cap of $7,500. Ramsey outlines a few more vital facts about 401(k) plans and stocks that U.S. workers would be wise to consider. When people are at the beginning of the process of participating in their employer's 401(k) plan, Ramsey explains, they are often presented with options that are difficult for an investing novice to understand, such as vesting, equities, risk choices and beneficiaries. Ramsey shares a warning about the importance of being sure some basic 401(k) plan setup options are understood. "Your ability to retire someday depends on you getting it right today," Ramsey wrote. "But how can you make such major, long-term decisions when you don't even understand what the choices are?" More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Ramsey explains his view on the very first place to start: A company's plan document. This document provides essential details about a company's retirement plan, including employer matching contributions and the vesting schedule. A vesting schedule determines when the money an employer adds to an employee's 401(k) becomes fully theirs, Ramsey clarified. The funds contributed, along with any investment gains, are always the employee's property, but many employers require a certain period of service before their contributions are entirely vested. If one's 401(k) includes an employer match, that's a valuable benefit to accelerate retirement savings. Once a person is financially stable - debt-free with an emergency fund, as Ramsey describes it - one should invest enough to get the full match. Some plans allow people to select investments for matched funds, while others offer company stock. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s Mutual funds pool money from multiple investors to buy a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other securities. Experts manage these funds to help grow the money while reducing risk. Ramsey cautions against target date funds, which many company retirement plans heavily promote. These funds adjust their investment mix based on an individual's expected retirement date, starting with a balanced allocation of growth stock mutual funds. However, as retirement nears, the portfolio shifts toward more conservative investments. Ramsey advises against relying on these funds because, by the time retirement arrives, most of the 401(k) assets will be placed in bonds and money market accounts. These conservative investments may not generate the growth required to sustain retirees through three decades or more of financial needs. Instead, he encourages a strategy focused on maintaining strong investment growth, ensuring long-term financial stability throughout retirement. If a person works for a publicly traded company, it may offer employees the chance to invest in its own stock, a choice about which Ramsey advises caution. Employees may have the option to buy shares, sometimes through an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), offered either upon hiring or after a certain period of employment. These plans often allow workers to acquire company stock at a discounted price through payroll deductions. While a discount on stock might seem appealing, Ramsey warns against relying on it for retirement savings. He emphasizes that company stock and ESPPs involve single stocks, which can be risky. His approach is to avoid investing in individual stocks for long-term financial security, instead advocating for diversified investments that reduce risk and provide steadier growth over time. "Putting all your eggs in one basket when it comes to the stock market is risky, even if that basket is the shiny new company you work for," Ramsey wrote. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store