
National Grid boss urges Miliband to reject regional energy shake-up
The boss of National Grid has urged Ed Miliband to reject proposals to charge regions different prices for electricity.
John Pettigrew says so-called zonal pricing, which could soon be rolled out by the Energy Secretary as part of his net zero overhaul, would cause huge disruption across Britain.
While some argue it would make the grid more efficient, Mr Pettigrew has claimed it would pile pressure on a power system already under strain.
In particular, he said it would serve as an unnecessary distraction as policymakers seek to stave off the threat of blackouts while trying to decarbonise the grid by 2030.
He said: 'You have to look at zonal pricing in the context of everything else that's going on with retail reform, connections reform, the massive increase in infrastructure investments, the rollout of smart meters.
'And I think to add anything else to all that change, there needs to be a high bar. So there may well be a time when zonal pricing is right for the UK, but I don't think it's now.'
Mr Pettigrew gives the example of surging demand from data centres, which he predicts will consume nearly a third of the UK's generating capacity within a decade.
He said: 'The electricity network in the 2030s will look very different to what it is today. And I think we should only look at zonal pricing once we got through all this significant network change and market reform.'
Mr Pettigrew also warned that the huge investments needed to help the grid hit net zero would inevitably mean bills rise over the next decade, with cash set to be used to help the grid connect with offshore and Scottish wind farms.
However, this will also generate savings in the long run, he said, as it will prevent the UK from having to pay wind farms to switch off by increasing capacity.
Mr Pettigrew was speaking as the National Grid published its full-year results, which revealed that its pre-tax profits rose by 20pc to hit £3.7bn in 2024-25.
His intervention on zonal pricing comes at a crucial time.
The Energy Secretary is leading a long-term review of the UK's electricity markets, which he hopes will reduce the country's dependence on gas and boost energy security.
Zonal pricing is a key proposal within the review, which is set to be concluded next month.
If approved, Britain's current single national power market would be abolished, and the country would instead be split into a dozen or so regions.
Each would have different charges based on supply and demand.
Meanwhile, the National Grid chief's comments come as he continues to battle the fallout from Heathrow's power outage in March, which was caused by a fire at a nearby substation.
Mr Pettigrew admitted that more must be done to boost resilience to ensure a similar shutdown doesn't happen again.
A full report into the incident is set to be published in July, which is expected to highlight the Grid's failings.
Mr Pettigrew said: 'I do think it's an important question that when the investigation is done, we stand back and look at resilience, because with electricity being more important to society, it's really important.'
However, he highlighted how the Grid is already planning to invest £60bn over the next five years, which will be paid partly through levies on consumer bills.
He said: 'When I look at the overall asset health of our network in the UK, then we have committed to invest £60bn over the next five years,' he said. 'It's a huge amount of investment going into the networks.'
Mr Pettigrew also confirmed that he will step down later this year to be replaced by Zoë Yujnovich, a former director at Shell.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Public sector struggling to define what a woman is, trans report finds
Public sector workers and trade unions are widely refusing to accept the Supreme Court's judgment on what a woman is, a think tank has warned. A new study by Policy Exchange shows that dozens of organisations across the public, private and charitable sectors have continued to question the legal meaning of 'a woman', despite the ruling. In April, the court ruled that the term 'woman' refers to a biological female in the Equality Act 2010. The decision means trans women, who were born male, should use men's toilets, changing rooms and other single-sex spaces, contradicting the previous stance of a string of public sector organisations. Policy Exchange's report, the fifth edition of its 'Biology Matters Compendium', compiles examples of organisations refusing to acknowledge the legal force of the court's judgment. These include universities, professional bodies and several trade unions, along with other public bodies. Rosie Duffield, the gender-critical MP who left the Labour Party last year, hailed the report and said it showed that 'radical positions on gender identity have become deeply embedded and it will be the work of years to rectify it'. Ms Duffield wrote in the foreword: 'There should be no illusions that this is over: there will be many more battles to fight before women's sex-based rights are secure.' Lara Brown, the author of the report, said that 'despite progress, our latest edition of the Biology Matters Compendium reveals there is still a great deal of ideological capture in the policy and practice of many public institutions'. 'The defence of sex-based rights does not end with a court ruling. It requires persistent scrutiny, open debate, and the courage to challenge ideological orthodoxy – wherever it may reside. This compendium finds that in this domain, there is still much more to be done.' The report notes that at least seven major trade unions have appeared to question the ruling in recent months. Unison, one of the UK's largest unions, and the University and Colleges Union, which represents academic and support staff in further and higher education institutions, have warned of the judgment's 'harmful implications'. The Fire Brigades' Union has said in response to the ruling that 'the law is not always on the right side of history'. The Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (Aslef) released a statement on social media saying that it 'recognises the distress and uncertainty that the Supreme Court's ruling about the definition of sex in the Equality Act 2010 has caused to trans and non-binary communities.' The union declared: 'We have a proud history of championing the rights of our trans and non-binary members and we continue to stand in solidarity with them.' A collection of unions, including Unite, the civil service union PCS, the RMT and the BFAWU, a food industry union, have staged marches against the Supreme Court's decision, with one leading figure declaring that 'the trade union movement will protect and stand with trans people, whether the law cares or not.' Policy Exchange's report also draws attention to professional bodies such as the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy continuing to describe gender self-identification as 'valid'. After the Supreme Court judgment, a number of public bodies announced plans to change their policies on gender recognition. Within days, the British Transport Police announced that trans women could in future only be strip-searched by male officers. The NHS was also told by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the equalities watchdog, to change guidelines that did not fit the newly clarified legal settlement. The Football Association announced that athletes would have to compete in their biological sex categories, going forward. But other bodies were more reluctant to accept the ruling. The British Medical Association, the doctors' union, branded the Supreme Court's decision 'scientifically illiterate'. Meanwhile, the National Police Chiefs' Council said it would 'not rush' to change rules on strip-searching in order to fall in with the court's decision.


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Thousands join anti-austerity march in London to protest against Labour's cuts
Thousands of people marched through central London on Saturday calling for an end to public service and welfare cuts, in the first big anti-austerity march under Keir Starmer's Labour government. The campaign group People's Assembly, which organised the demonstration, called on the government to 'tax the rich and their hidden wealth to fund public services'. The People's Assembly said it was bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No More Austerity 2.0. Writer Kate Hardie, 57, was among those marching to Whitehall. She had voted for Labour in every election since she was 18, including last year, but said she will no longer support the party under Starmer. 'I worry about the fact that this government is making cuts that are unnecessary. People are really suffering because of it,' she said. She has friends who are disabled, who were 'devastated' when cuts to personal independence payments (Pip) were announced. 'It isn't just about my friends, because if we only vote for the people that we know, we're in trouble,' she added. Hardie was also dismayed over the prime minister's widely criticised 'island of strangers' speech, which was likened to the rhetoric of Enoch Powell. 'There's the problem of cuts and a problem with rising hate in this country and around the world,' she said. 'It's not just financial, it's also ideological and about how we treat each other.' She thinks the government's current approach will bear little fruit electorally. 'Why would you go and see a tribute band if you can get the real thing? It's not gonna work, it's ridiculous.' Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, said: 'People are very disappointed in this government. Whether it has been cuts to winter fuel, the two-child benefit cap still being in place, we haven't seen enough investment. 'We appreciate that the government have a tight fiscal window to operate in, but we think they need to tax the wealthy more and start investing in communities.' He said the 'commitment to roll out free school meals to all families in receipt of universal credit' was welcome but called on the government to 'go much further much faster because the only person who is benefiting from cuts to communities is Nigel Farage'. Holding a sign calling for landlords to be taxed – including herself, Corinne Richeux, 57, who runs an NGO based in China, said: 'I'm really worried about the state of the country and I don't think British people can take austerity any more. We need a real radical change of direction and we need to tax the rich to make it happen. 'I think that many rich people would support more taxation. I think it's cowardly of the Labour government to pander to the rich when the people are really struggling.' She said she 'was shocked when the first thing they did was to start slashing benefits'. 'I kind of hoped that he was keeping his cards close his chest and that he was planning on taxing the rich when he got into office. I wasn't expecting it to be quite so bad.' Labour-run councils were also a target of criticism. Helen Davies, 59, a social worker, chanted in support of bin workers in Birmingham, who have been striking since January. On central government, she said: 'It's not what we expect from a Labour government. The social inequalities are being driven harder, there has to be a positive alternative to that.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Zia Yusuf returns to Reform UK just 48 hours after quitting
Zia Yusuf is returning to Reform UK as leader of the Elon Musk-inspired Doge unit, just 48 hours after resigning as chairman. Yusuf attributed his initial decision to quit to exhaustion and abuse following criticism of his remarks about new Runcorn MP Sarah Pochin. He said he was motivated to return after receiving supportive messages from Reform members and speaking with Nigel Farage. Yusuf clarified that his resignation was not due to strong views on the burqa, despite feeling blindsided by Pochin's question about banning it at PMQs. Farage said Yusuf had "snapped" after receiving racist abuse on social media, blaming the "very hard extreme right" for the abuse.