Google DeepMind CEO takes a dig at Meta's poaching spree: ‘Some things are more important than money…'
Notably, Meta had started its Superintelligence Labs earlier this year, headed by former Scale AI CEO Alexander Wang and ex-GitHub CEO Nat Friedman. The new initiative was set up after a dull reception to its Llama model launches in April.
Reports suggest that Zuckerberg was personally involved in the hiring for this team, wooing top talent with packages going as high as $200 million a year. What followed were reports of several AI researchers from OpenAI, Google, and even Apple quitting their respective companies, as the war for AI talent
Reacting to Meta's hiring push, Hassabis said, 'There's a strategy that Meta is taking right now… I think the people that are real believers in the mission of AGI and what it can do—and understand the consequences, both good and bad—are mostly doing it to be at the frontier, so they can help influence how that plays out and steward the technology safely into the world.'
He added, 'Meta right now are not at the frontier. Maybe they'll manage to get back there. And it's probably rational, what they're doing from their perspective—because they're behind and they need to do something. But I think there are more important things than just money. Of course, one has to pay people market rates—and those continue to go up.'
Hassabis also reflected on how drastically the AI industry has changed since DeepMind's early days. 'We couldn't raise any money. I didn't pay myself for a couple of years. And these days, interns are being paid what we raised as our entire first seed round.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Why Is Everyone Sharing The Same Message On Facebook? Uncovering The Truth Behind The Viral Privacy Post
New Delhi: A curious trend has lately taken over Meta (formerly Facebook) feeds. Users are posting identical messages claiming to block the platform from using their photos and personal data. These posts urge friends to copy and paste the same declaration on their own timelines. The warning is that failing to do so gives Meta legal permission to use their content. This wave of viral posts has raised many questions. Does sharing such messages really protect privacy? The short answer is no. When a person creates a Meta account, he/she agrees to the platform's terms and conditions. These rules clearly explain what kind of data the site collects and how it may be used. Users can read these policies anytime in their account settings. Posting a copy-paste message does not override these agreements or prevent the platform from gathering data. Privacy control depends on the settings you choose within your account, not on viral posts. Meta collects a broad range of information. This includes basic details such as names and birthdays, group memberships and contact lists uploaded from devices. It also tracks how users interact with the platform what they watch, like or use frequently. Device information such as operating system, battery status, network type, browser and location is gathered as well. While users can limit some data collection by adjusting privacy settings, no single post or message can stop the social networking site from accessing this information. This privacy-post trend is not new. Similar messages circulated earlier as well, but now they have gone viral in Hindi across India. Unfortunately, spreading such posts often does more harm than good. Hackers and fraudsters use these viral chains to identify users who are likely to believe and share misleading information. Instead of securing privacy, this activity can expose people to scams and cyber risks. The real way to protect privacy on Meta lies in understanding and managing your account settings. Users should regularly review who can see their posts, photos and personal details. Disabling 'Off-Facebook Activity' reduces data collected from other websites and apps. Removing untrusted third-party apps strengthens security. Adjusting ad preferences can limit personalised advertising. Above all, avoid sharing sensitive information or location details publicly. No app or setting can guarantee full privacy in today's connected world. For those who want absolute control, deleting social media accounts might be the only option. Even then, some data might remain stored by the company. Staying alert, using privacy controls wisely and thinking twice before posting remain the best defense for online privacy today.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Sharing generic user preferences not breach of privacy: WhatsApp
Bengaluru Social media platform WhatsApp told the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Tuesday that sharing basic account details and generic user preferences with Meta cannot be regarded as a violation of users' right to privacy. The dispute arises from a January 2021 notification issued by WhatsApp informing users about its revised terms of service and privacy policies (REUTERS) Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi, who appeared for WhatsApp, told NCLAT that the only information WhatsApp which too is owned by Meta, shares with the latter, is 'generic, non-content data' inferred from 'user interactions' with businesses on the platform, such as an 'interest in luxury cars, frequent restaurant engagement, or regular travel.' Rohatgi argued that WhatsApp merely tells Meta how many times a user goes to a restaurant but not what they eat. It tells Meta how many times a counsel argues before the Tribunal, but not the content of their actual arguments, he added. This user metadata does not include the actual content of messages and therefore cannot amount to a breach of privacy, the senior counsel argued. 'Personal preferences such as who your friends are, where you go, what exactly you eat, constitute privacy. If I (WhatsApp) am only telling (Meta) that those in the age group of 50 to 70 prefer to buy a Mercedes car, that does not constitute any breach of privacy. That is not an offence,' Rohatgi said. Rohatgi made the submissions before Tribunal members Justice Ashok Bhushan and technical member Arun Baroka. NCLAT was hearing the appeals filed by WhatsApp and Meta challenging a 2024 order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) that imposed ₹213.14 crore penalty on Meta for abuse of dominance. The dispute arises from a January 2021 notification issued by WhatsApp informing users about its revised terms of service and privacy policies. The new policy stated that effective February 8 the same year, users were required to accept all terms, including an expanded scope of data collection as well as mandatory data sharing with Meta companies, to continue using WhatsApp. CCI took suo motu cognisance of the issue and concluded that the 2021 policy update constituted an imposition of 'unfair condition' under the Companies Act since it compelled users to accept the data collection and sharing terms. Last November, CCI imposed a penalty of ₹213.14 crore on Meta for abusing its dominant position, and prohibited WhatsApp from sharing user data collected on its platform with other Meta companies and Meta company products for advertising purposes for five years. In January this year, NCLAT stayed the five-year ban this January while directing Meta to deposit 50% of the penalty amount. On Tuesday, WhatsApp defended its data sharing practices by claiming that its users' personal message content remains protected by end-to-end encryption and that such content is inaccessible even to Meta itself. It said it does not share the content of private messages, calls, photos, videos, documents, or real-time locations, which remain protected by end-to-end encryption. This, Rohatgi said, means that nothing in WhatsApp's policy amounts to a 'criminal breach of a user's right to privacy.' Besides, Rohatgi argued, 'while India is a country of crores of people, not one person had come out on the streets, protesting' against WhatsApp's policy update. He said that the 2021 policy update pertained only to optional business-related functionalities, like using Meta's hosting services, and not personal chats. 'As everyone has seen the ads, even WhatsApp cannot read your messages,' he said. When the Tribunal asked how the argument of breach of privacy was then raised when probe agencies get a hold of a citizen's phone records, messages etc, Rohatgi said in such cases a probe agency, such as the 'Enforcement Directorate can read the messages' only if it gets a user to share his or her 'physical key' that enables encryption. 'That key is on a user's device and WhatsApp cannot access it so it can not read the messages or hear users' conversation,' Rohatgi said. The Tribunal will continue hearing the arguments on Wednesday.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Troubles mount! One in six NRIs on H-1B visas feel threat of US deportation; many thinking of returning to India: Poll
Representative AI image H-1B visa trouble: A growing number of Indian professionals in the US on H-1B visas are facing an unexpected and alarming threat of deportation landing on their doorsteps before the official 60-day grace period even runs out. Laid off and staring down the barrel of a possible permanent US ban, many say it feels like a ticking time bomb. According to a poll of 1,584 verified professionals conducted on the anonymous workplace app Blind between August 6 and August 8, 2025, one in six (16%) said they or someone they know has received a Notice to Appear (NTA) within the grace period after being laid off. Under normal rules, H-1B workers have 60 days to find a new employer or change visa status after job loss. But since mid-2025, reports have emerged of NTAs being issued within as little as two weeks, labelling recipients 'out of status.' 'Multiple cases where NTAs were sent in 2 weeks.' a Meta user wrote on Blind. 'Immigration lawyers now advise leaving as soon as possible after [the] job ends otherwise you risk a permanent ban from the US,' the user added. This sudden escalation is forcing many to rethink long-term plans. Between July 28 and August 8, 2025, workplace community app Blind surveyed 2,089 verified Indian professionals in the US on work visas such as H-1B and L1, revealing deep concerns about job security and the future of US immigration. In the survey of 2,089 verified Indian professionals, 45% said they would return to India if forced to leave, 26% would move to another country, and 29% were unsure. What are NRIs biggest concerns about leaving US? When asked about their biggest concerns over leaving the US, respondents cited a significant pay cut (25%), lower quality of life (24%), cultural or family adjustment (13%), and fewer job opportunities (10%). Interestingly, 28% said they would have no concerns and would be open to leaving. On whether they would still opt for a US work visa if given the chance again, only 35% said 'yes.' While 27% were unsure and 38% said 'no,' pointing to a clear shift in how Indian professionals view the long-term value of immigrating to the US. What is driving this change? Real experiences are driving this change. More than one in three respondents (35%) said they or someone close to them had been forced to leave the US after losing a job while on a work visa, often under the looming threat of deportation during the brief grace period. The findings suggest a growing openness to leaving the US, with many indicating they would return to India if it came to that. Trump's recent call sparks sharp divide US President Donald Trump's recent call for US companies to 'stop hiring in India' has sparked a sharp divide in opinion. Among US-based professionals, 63% felt the move could benefit their companies, while 69% of India-based respondents believed it would hurt their firms. When asked if they or someone close to them had ever been forced to leave the US after being laid off, 10% said it happened to them directly, 25% said it happened to someone close, and 65% said no. The growing anxieties reflect a broader shift in the perception of the H-1B pathway, once seen as a golden ticket to American opportunities, now increasingly viewed as a high-risk gamble. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
