.JPG&w=3840&q=100)
The end for a Fort Lauderdale attorney who disappeared with at least $630,000
Specifically, a federal prison in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
On Thursday in Fort Lauderdale federal court, Judge David Leibowitz ordered John Spencer Jenkins, 55, to surrender Friday to start serving time at a federal prison in the Metroplex, where Jenkins has family. After pleading guilty to one count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering, Jenkins got two years, nine months for each charge, sentences to be served concurrently, plus $760,865 restitution.
READ MORE: What happened to a Florida attorney accused of misappropriating $1 million
Another part of Jenkins' sentence is a 500-hour residential drug and alcohol treatment program. That and a line from his lone pre-sentence letter of support — 'John completed a residential substance abuse program and continues to regularly attend AA/NA meetings' — indicates what might have driven Jenkins to desert a promising law career to disappear with a chunk of neighbor William Walters' estate.
MORE: A Fort Lauderdale lawyer stole a $643,000 inheritance and disappeared
Disappearing acts and funds
Like Jenkins, Walters lived in Wilton Manors. Walters set up his estate to go to a nephew, two nieces and the care of a younger sister. That sister is now 89, the age at which Walters died on Oct. 18 2021.
As executor of the estate, Walters' nephew, Larry Corbin, hired Jenkins, aka 'Spencer,' to handle the legal side of getting the money to whom it needed to go.
'[Jenkins] represented to [Corbin] that funds relating to [Walters'] estate should be deposited into the Jenkins Law Firm's (trust) accounts so that [Jenkins] could manage the distribution of those assets among [Walters'] designees,' Jenkins admission of facts states.
But after Walters' estate got liquidated and $543,832 got wired into Jenkins' firm's trust account. He soon moved some of that money through a couple other accounts, cash movements that prompted the money laundering charge.
Jenkins' admission says he 'caused the deposit of money from [Walters'] estate into the Jenkins Law Firm's (trust) accounts under the false pretense that he would be distributing the estate when, in truth and in fact, he embezzled the funds for his own personal use.'
Not just those. Jenkins also took $88,000 he'd been wired for another client after a commercial asset sale. Also, the Florida Bar audit said the trust account wasn't empty when Jenkins' received Walters' estate money.
None of Walters' estate money reached the Louisville, Kentucky-based family it should have. By the time Corbin filed a complaint to the Florida Bar on July 17, 2023, Stealth Supply had filed a complaint to the Florida Bar that Mullins bungled, then abandoned their case.
Also, Jenkins' client Peter Mullins claimed in a lawsuit that Jenkins abandoned his case so totally that Mullins didn't know about the judgment against him until he learned there was a lien on real estate he wanted to sell.
Corbin hadn't heard from Jenkins in a month when he filed a complaint with the Bar. Jenkins let his law firm's state registration corporate paperwork lapse in September 2023. His Fort Lauderdale office was empty. His phone numbers were disconnected.
Jenkins was found in Philadelphia on Sept. 12, 2024, and charged days after.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Altanese Phenelus handled the prosecution of the case.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell urges Supreme Court to overturn her conviction
Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein, urged the Supreme Court on Monday to take up her pending appeal and overturn her sex-trafficking conviction, claiming she was covered by an agreement Epstein made with federal authorities that shielded her from prosecution. 'This case is about what the government promised, not what Epstein did,' Maxwell's attorneys told the justices in a new brief. Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison in 2022 for carrying out a years-long scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. She has recently met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for questioning amid a political firestorm over the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files. Those talks were not mentioned in the latest Supreme Court filing. 'President Trump built his legacy in part on the power of a deal – and surely he would agree that when the United States gives its word, it must stand by it,' Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, said in a statement. 'We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the president himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's crimes, especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted.' In her appeal at the Supreme Court, filed in April, Maxwell argues she should have been covered by a non-prosecution agreement Epstein secured as part of his agreement to plead guilty. The New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Maxwell, finding that the agreement made with prosecutors in Florida did not bind the authorities in New York. Maxwell's attorney has argued that appeals courts have taken different approaches to the issue of whether a non-prosecution agreement with the United States is nationally binding. The Supreme Court will likely decide this fall whether to grant the case. 'The government's argument, across the board, is essentially an appeal to what it wishes the agreement had said, rather than what it actually says,' Maxwell told the Supreme Court. 'Of course, if wishful thinking were the standard, the whole NPA would have been thrown out long ago.' Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to state prostitution charges and was indicted on federal sex trafficking charges in July 2019 but died by suicide in prison a month later. The Trump administration has been defending the charges and conviction at the Supreme Court, even as the Justice Department has met with Maxwell amid the spiraling controversy over the handling of the Epstein documents. 'Petitioner was not a party to the relevant agreement,' the Justice Department told the Supreme Court in a brief filed on July 14. 'Only Epstein and the Florida USAO were parties.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Allianz Life discloses massive data breach linked to supply-chain attack
This story was originally published on Cybersecurity Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Cybersecurity Dive newsletter. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America on Friday disclosed a massive data breach affecting most of the firm's 1.4 million U.S. customers, professionals and select employees. In a statement, the Minneapolis-based insurance provider said a hacker used social engineering to breach one of its cloud vendors on July 16 and steal most of its customers' personally identifiable information. The company said it discovered the intrusion the next day. The breach was the result of a social engineering attack, according to the company's filing with the Maine Attorney General's office. Allianz said it responded immediately after discovering the hack and notified the FBI. The disclosure follows a months-long international attack spree linked to the cybercrime collective Scattered Spider, which has used voice phishing techniques to target a range of industries, including insurance providers. Last week, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance disclosed a massive breach. And in June, Aflac and Erie Insurance disclosed that they had fallen victim to cyberattacks. Allianz Life, a subsidiary of the German firm Allianz SE, said it had no evidence that the hacker had accessed the company's own computer networks, including its policy administration system. The company's filing with the Maine AG's office includes a placeholder copy of its breach notice, with the company promising to share a full copy of the letter once it identifies all of the affected customers
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Investigation finds RI Public School District offered student loan forgiveness to only non-White teachers
Print Close By Rachel del Guidice Published July 28, 2025 FIRST ON FOX: An investigation conducted by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission found there was reasonable cause to believe that the Providence Public School District was unlawfully discriminating against White teachers by only offering student loan forgiveness to non-White educators. "The evidence obtained during the investigation establishes reasonable cause to believe that Respondent engaged in unlawful discrimination against a class of White applicants and employees who applied and were hired by Respondent in a teaching position for five academic years starting with the 2021-2022 school year based on their race, color and national origin," the EEOC's final determination letter stated on Thursday. In 2022, the Legal Insurrection Foundation , a Rhode Island-based nonprofit investigative and research group, filed a civil rights complaint with the U.S. Department of Education against the Providence Public School District. CORNELL UNIVERSITY HIT WITH FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT OVER ALLEGED DISCRIMINATORY DEI PRACTICES The group alleged that the Providence Public School District offered a program giving student loan forgiveness to new teachers available only to non-White educators. The complaint maintained that the Providence Public School District "engaged in a continuing violation and an ongoing pattern or practice of discrimination" with a student loan forgiveness program for newly and recently hired educators that is only accessible to non-White applicants, which was called the "Educator of Color Loan Forgiveness Program." The Providence Public School District reportedly said that recipients can have up to $25,000 of college loans forgiven once the teacher completes three consecutive years of teaching in the district. Eligibility requirements indicate recipients must "identify as Asian, Black, Indigenous, Latino, biracial, or multi-racial." The EEOC final determination letter states that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, mandates that if violations are found, the Providence Public School District must work to bring a resolution. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATING UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OVER ALLEGED DEI-BASED HIRING It directs the Providence Public School District to contact the EEOC "within ten days upon your receipt of this letter to indicate your willingness to participate in EEOC's conciliation program to address the violation noted in this letter of determination." In a statement to Fox News Digital, William Jacobson, Cornell law professor and founder of the Equal Protection Project, said, "After almost three years of effort, EPP is seeing the legal pieces fall into place to stop this racist program and to hold those responsible accountable." "The U.S. Department of Justice has opened a formal investigation and now the EEOC has issued a finding of 'reasonable cause' to believe the civil rights laws were violated," Jacobson said. "We are gratified by the findings of the EEOC, and look forward to the EEOC taking further legal action to vindicate the rights of hundreds, if not thousands, of White teachers who were subject to unlawful discriminatory treatment." Fox News Digital reached out to the Providence Public School District for comment, but did not immediately receive a response. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Fox News' Brian Flood contributed to this report. Print Close URL
