Who is Ravi Ghai? Mumbai tycoon's granddaughter engaged to Arjun Tendulkar
Who is Ravi Ghai?
Ravi Ghai is one of Mumbai's most well-known hospitality and food industry figures, heading the Graviss Group, which owns hotels and food brands recognised across India and beyond.
He is the Non-Executive Chairman of Graviss Hospitality Ltd and also holds positions in Kwality Real Estates Pvt Ltd, Perfect Livestock LLP, and other entities. He is known for bringing international hospitality and food brands to India, including Baskin-Robbins
Ravi Ghai's education
A graduate of Cornell University's School of Hotel Administration in 1966, he took over his father Iqbal Krishan Ghai's's business in 1967.
Ravi Ghai's children
Ravi Ghai, married to Gita Ghai, has four children – Gaurav Ghai, Gaurika Ghai, Ravina Ghai, and Gayatri Ghai.
Earlier this year, he accused his son Gaurav of forgery, according to a report in the Free Press Journal. Ravi accused Gaurav of forging his signature, fraudulently taking control of the company, and stopping his monthly allowance during cancer treatment.
The Graviss Group empire
The Graviss Group owns and operates the InterContinental Hotel at Marine Drive, Mumbai, which was formerly the Natraj Hotel. In the food and beverage sector, the group created the iconic Kwality Ice Cream brand and owns The Brooklyn Creamery.
It also introduced the Baskin-Robbins brand to the SAARC region. Graviss Food Solutions Pvt Ltd generated ₹624 crore in FY23–24, with a compounded annual growth rate of 20 per cent in the last year.
Roots in ice cream — The IK Ghai legacy
Ravi Ghai's father, Iqbal Krishan Ghai, nicknamed the 'Maharajah of Ice Cream,' began with a small eatery in Connaught Place, New Delhi, during World War II, serving homemade ice cream to American troops. He later expanded to create Kwality Ice Cream, a household name in India with products like chocobars, mango duets, and cassatas.
In 1967, after graduating from Cornell, Ravi took over the business and expanded it into global collaborations and high-end hospitality ventures.
Ravi Ghai trends on Google
A screenshot from Google Trends shows how interest in Ravi Ghai rose over time
Ravi Ghai began trending on Google after a report in India Today claimed that Arjun Tendulkar, 25, is engaged to Ghai's granddaughter Saaniya Chandok.
Search interest in Ravi Ghai started around 9.30pm on August 13 and climbed steadily on August 14. Related queries on Google included 'Saaniya Chandok', 'Arjun Tendulkar' and 'Chandok', with the maximum interest coming from Delhi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
8 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Google finds workaround for lobbying that omits big bosses
AP It was the end of 2018, and Google's leaders were tired of being Number One. For the second year in a row, federal records showed the search giant had spent more than any other individual company on lobbying in Washington. Executives in Mountain View were sick of seeing that mentioned in the press, according to a former Google employee who asked not to be identified discussing private conversations. Then Google apparently found a workaround. A new analysis of federal lobbying data by the nonprofit Tech Transparency Project shows that Google and its parent company, Alphabet Inc., used an internal reorganisation to exclude the value of lobbying by its senior executives from disclosures. The move helped keep Google off the top of the lobbying charts even as it maintained a robust network of advocates pushing its interests in the capital, during federal challenges to its dominance in search and advertising and the beginnings of artificial intelligence regulation. The findings, which were confirmed by a Bloomberg analysis of lobbying records, show that the effect of the accounting change was to lower the amount that Google reported spending to influence the federal government, likely by millions of dollars. The reorganization 'has allowed the company to shield a significant portion of its lobbying expenditures from public view,' the Tech Transparency Project said in its report.A Google spokesperson, José Castañeda, disputed the report and said the company has followed all relevant disclosure laws.'These are inaccurate claims about a technical change that simply brought us in line with how many other companies report their lobbying activities,' he said. 'Our lobbying expenditures began decreasing in 2018, after we restructured our government affairs team and cut spending on consultants.' Internal reshuffle Starting in 2019, Google began cutting ties with some of its external lobbying firms, a move it acknowledged publicly as part of an overhaul of its Washington the shuffling of external lobbying firms doesn't explain the whole of the decline in Google's reported lobbying expenses, which fell from more than $22 million in 2018 to $8.9 million in the Covid-disrupted year of 2020, and have subsequently remained well below pre-pandemic levels. There's been another, quieter change: in early 2020, Google moved its in-house lobbyists into a new subsidiary, called Google Client Services LLC. It's that unit which now files spending disclosures for Google's lobbying activities. The reorganization meant that the parent companies Google and Alphabet no longer directly employed any lobbyists – defined under federal disclosure law as people spending at least 20% of their time on influencing Congress or the executive branch. Companies that file lobbying disclosure reports are supposed to also account for the time that other senior executives — those who don't meet the 20% threshold – devote to lobbying, according to legal experts and the compliance guide for the Lobbying Disclosure Act published by Congressional leaders. That generally involves prorating their annual compensation to account for the days they spend influencing the government. But since Google moved lobbyists into the Google Client Services subsidiary, the parent company no longer meets the threshold for filing disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, according to the TTP analysis. That means Google no longer reports the lobbying expenses of high-ranking managers who aren't part of the Client Services unit — like Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai and chief legal officer Kent Walker — to the public, as it once did. As a result, in 2020 Google dropped out of the top 20 in corporate lobbying expenses for the first time in nearly a decade, the TTP analysis Google's reported annual spending has since edged back up again, it hasn't come close to the No.1 slot in the company lobbying rankings that it used to occupy. For the past five years, that position has alternated between two other tech giants: Meta Platforms Inc. and Inc. Antitrust challenge There's been plenty going on in Washington over the period that was crucial for Google's business. For one thing, the company — like many peers — is betting heavily on AI, a field where decisions in the US capital will shape the commercial has also been under assault from antitrust authorities over its dominance in search and digital advertising. The company has maintained in those lawsuits that its success is down to consumer choice and superior innovation, rather than a result of its power to shape laws and regulations. Publicity around its lobbying spending has the potential to undercut such arguments and alienate executives are as highly paid as many in Silicon Valley, the prorated amounts can add up to millions — even for just a few days' worth of lobbying. Google reported total compensation for Pichai of more than $225 million in 2022, thanks to grants of stock. His total compensation was $10.7 million in 2024. Walker's total compensation was more than $30 million last year, the company say the new structure Google is employing flouts the spirit of the federal disclosure law – if not the letter itself. 'This is just too cute by half,' said William Luneburg, a professor emeritus at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, and the co-editor of the manual for lobbying compliance published by the American Bar Association. 'On the face of it, it's wrong,' he said. 'They have to report all of their expenses, which would include the time of officers and directors and other employees that spend their time engaging in lobbying activity.''We always comply with disclosure laws and any suggestion of improper reporting is false,' said Castañeda, the Google said it examined lobbying disclosures of several other companies that filed reports via a similar subsidiary model, but didn't find any that had used the structure to remove executive lobbying from their disclosures. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Tariffs, tantrums, and tech: How Trump's trade drama is keeping Indian IT on tenterhooks Good, bad, ugly: How will higher ethanol in petrol play out for you? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy Stock Radar: JSPL forms Ascending Triangle pattern on weekly charts, could hit fresh 52-week high soon Nifty and business are different species: 5 small-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 30% F&O Radar | Deploy Bear Put Spread in Nifty to play index's negative stance amid volatility Wealth creation: Look beyond the obvious in some things; 10 fertilizer sector companies worth watching
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Google finds workaround for lobbying that omits big bosses
It was the end of 2018, and Google 's leaders were tired of being Number the second year in a row, federal records showed the search giant had spent more than any other individual company on lobbying in Washington. Executives in Mountain View were sick of seeing that mentioned in the press, according to a former Google employee who asked not to be identified discussing private Google apparently found a workaround.A new analysis of federal lobbying data by the nonprofit Tech Transparency Project shows that Google and its parent company, Alphabet Inc., used an internal reorganisation to exclude the value of lobbying by its senior executives from move helped keep Google off the top of the lobbying charts even as it maintained a robust network of advocates pushing its interests in the capital, during federal challenges to its dominance in search and advertising and the beginnings of artificial intelligence findings, which were confirmed by a Bloomberg analysis of lobbying records, show that the effect of the accounting change was to lower the amount that Google reported spending to influence the federal government, likely by millions of reorganization 'has allowed the company to shield a significant portion of its lobbying expenditures from public view,' the Tech Transparency Project said in its report.A Google spokesperson, José Castañeda, disputed the report and said the company has followed all relevant disclosure laws.'These are inaccurate claims about a technical change that simply brought us in line with how many other companies report their lobbying activities,' he said. 'Our lobbying expenditures began decreasing in 2018, after we restructured our government affairs team and cut spending on consultants.'Starting in 2019, Google began cutting ties with some of its external lobbying firms, a move it acknowledged publicly as part of an overhaul of its Washington the shuffling of external lobbying firms doesn't explain the whole of the decline in Google's reported lobbying expenses, which fell from more than $22 million in 2018 to $8.9 million in the Covid-disrupted year of 2020, and have subsequently remained well below pre-pandemic been another, quieter change: in early 2020, Google moved its in-house lobbyists into a new subsidiary, called Google Client Services LLC. It's that unit which now files spending disclosures for Google's lobbying reorganization meant that the parent companies Google and Alphabet no longer directly employed any lobbyists – defined under federal disclosure law as people spending at least 20% of their time on influencing Congress or the executive that file lobbying disclosure reports are supposed to also account for the time that other senior executives — those who don't meet the 20% threshold – devote to lobbying, according to legal experts and the compliance guide for the Lobbying Disclosure Act published by Congressional leaders. That generally involves prorating their annual compensation to account for the days they spend influencing the since Google moved lobbyists into the Google Client Services subsidiary, the parent company no longer meets the threshold for filing disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, according to the TTP analysis. That means Google no longer reports the lobbying expenses of high-ranking managers who aren't part of the Client Services unit — like Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai and chief legal officer Kent Walker — to the public, as it once a result, in 2020 Google dropped out of the top 20 in corporate lobbying expenses for the first time in nearly a decade, the TTP analysis Google's reported annual spending has since edged back up again, it hasn't come close to the No.1 slot in the company lobbying rankings that it used to occupy. For the past five years, that position has alternated between two other tech giants: Meta Platforms Inc. and been plenty going on in Washington over the period that was crucial for Google's business. For one thing, the company — like many peers — is betting heavily on AI, a field where decisions in the US capital will shape the commercial has also been under assault from antitrust authorities over its dominance in search and digital advertising. The company has maintained in those lawsuits that its success is down to consumer choice and superior innovation, rather than a result of its power to shape laws and regulations. Publicity around its lobbying spending has the potential to undercut such arguments and alienate executives are as highly paid as many in Silicon Valley, the prorated amounts can add up to millions — even for just a few days' worth of lobbying. Google reported total compensation for Pichai of more than $225 million in 2022, thanks to grants of stock. His total compensation was $10.7 million in 2024. Walker's total compensation was more than $30 million last year, the company say the new structure Google is employing flouts the spirit of the federal disclosure law – if not the letter itself.'This is just too cute by half,' said William Luneburg, a professor emeritus at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law , and the co-editor of the manual for lobbying compliance published by the American Bar Association.'On the face of it, it's wrong,' he said. 'They have to report all of their expenses, which would include the time of officers and directors and other employees that spend their time engaging in lobbying activity.''We always comply with disclosure laws and any suggestion of improper reporting is false,' said Castañeda, the Google said it examined lobbying disclosures of several other companies that filed reports via a similar subsidiary model, but didn't find any that had used the structure to remove executive lobbying from their disclosures.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
When Sundar Pichai spoke on AI: ‘It will create more jobs than it destroys,' urges...
In a climate of rising layoffs and uncertainty, the conversation around artificial intelligence has taken on an urgent tone. Every week seems to bring news of companies downsizing, often citing automation and AI tools as part of the reason. From tech giants to smaller firms, the fear that machines will replace human workers entirely is fuelling public concern and political debate. Many experts predict that AI could wipe out entire categories of jobs in the coming years, leaving millions scrambling for relevance in a fast-changing economy. But Google CEO Sundar Pichai believes this fear, while understandable, tells only half the story. Speaking at the World Government Summit in Dubai, he argued that history consistently shows technology as both a disruptor and a creator of opportunity. Just as previous waves of innovation gave rise to entirely new professions, he believes AI, despite its disruptive nature, will ultimately generate more jobs than it eliminates, provided societies adapt and invest in the right skills. Google CEO Sundar Pichai highlights technology's job-creating track record Pichai cited research from MIT revealing that 60% of jobs created since 1940 did not exist before, highlighting the constant reinvention of the labour market. He pointed to modern examples such as YouTube content creators, a profession unimaginable before the digital age. While some current roles will inevitably disappear, he emphasised that the emergence of new industries and career paths is not only possible but highly likely in the AI era. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Woman sells ring given by ex, then jeweler tells her 'This can't be true' Daily Sport X Undo The Google chief stressed that many forms of work remain inherently human, relying on creativity, emotional intelligence, and judgment, qualities machines cannot fully replicate. He pointed to chess as an example: even though AI can outperform the best players, the game still thrives on human competition and skill, proving that technology and human expertise can coexist. Preparing for the future of work Pichai urged businesses to invest in upskilling and reskilling, ensuring workers are equipped to take advantage of AI-driven opportunities. He also acknowledged the risks of misuse, such as deepfake misinformation, and emphasized the need for ethical safeguards in AI development. Ultimately, he encouraged organizations to embrace experimentation and calculated risk-taking, highlighting that AI's true power lies not in replacing humans, but in enhancing their capabilities, fostering innovation, and driving sustainable economic growth. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
